Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Hot Fuel Examination Facility”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Fission Gas Monitoring System Efficiency Calibration Summary Report

The Fission Gas Monitoring System was designed to work in conjunction with the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator Furnace and is used to measure fission gas releases during post-irradiation fuel heating tests. A high-purity helium sweep gas is swept past the heated fuel sample in the furnace and routed to a fission gas monitoring system, which cryrogenically traps the krypton (Kr) and xenon (Xe) fission gases. As the radioactive species of the trapped gas decays, high-purity germanium detectors monitor the amount of fission gas in each trap. The primary fission product present in this test is 85Kr, which has a 10.76-year half-life. The presence of 85Kr indicates particle defects and iodine release. There is also the potential for re-irradiating the fuel compacts in the Neutron Radiography Reactor in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility basement. With re-irradiation, it is possible to have xenon fission gas present, specifically 133Xe, which has a 5.243-day half-life. Re-irradiation also produces 131I, which is important for design-basis accidents and regulatory licensing.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

An Investigation of Liquefaction in Irradiated TRIGA Fuel Exposed to Relatively High Temperatures

This report presents the findings of an investigation into high temperature fuel cladding chemical interactions (FCCI) in Training, Research, Isotopes, General Atomics (TRIGA) fuel rods. A TRIGA fuel-rod core or meat is principally composed of uranium (U) particles dispersed in a zirconium hydride (Zr H) matrix. The fuel is clad in sealed 304SS or Incoloy 800 tubes. At high temperatures, the fuel will interact with the cladding, resulting in FCCI. To investigate the FCCI (in this case, liquefaction), irradiated TRIGA fuel rods were exposed to relatively high temperatures in furnace tests. The tests were performed at different temperatures using segments from an irradiated TRIGA fuel rod at the Hot Fuel Examination Facility located at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The data from this study is important for developing a better understanding of the performance of U-ZrH fuel type during transient events (e.g., a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) event) that may result in high temperatures while operating a TRIGA reactor. Furnace tests were run for 6 hours at 730, 800, 900, 950, and 1,000°C. One test was run for 12 hours at 950°C. Post-test microstructural characterization was performed on the heat-treated samples using optical metallography to look for evidence of liquefaction. Additionally, microstructural characterization was performed using scanning electron microscopy to investigate the microstructure of the as-irradiated fuel before heat treatment and the microstructural changes that occurred after heat treating for the 730 and 950°C heat treatments for 6 hours. Results of the analysis were compared to those produced during diffusion studies performed using unirradiated TRIGA fuel meat and type 304 stainless steel. A gap is typically present in as-irradiated fuel that limits any possibility for chemical interaction between the fuel and cladding. Optical metallography (OM) was used to identify areas in the specimens heat treated at 950 and 1000°C where fuel and cladding contact was satisfactory for the FCCI to transpire. The bulk of the interaction zones that form due to FCCI developed in the fuel meat and not as much in the cladding. Even in the sample tested at 1,000°C, no evidence was found that gross fuel meat or cladding melting had occurred. Only limited porosity was found in the fuel meat that possibly could have been due to melting of a particular precipitate phase or phases that had formed during FCCI. These results agreed with those reported for the unirradiated diffusion couple studies.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Gamma Irradiation of NaCl-UCl 3 Salt for the Molten Chloride Fast Reactor

This report documents the results of the gamma ray irradiation of NaCl-UCl 3 eutectic salt in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) spent fuel pool gamma tube and subsequent analysis of capsules utilizing the Gas Assay Sample and Recharge (GASR) system. NaCl-UCl 3 salt capsules at four different temperatures, 75C, 150C, 300C and 600C, were irradiated shortly after the core internal changeout (CIC) of the ATR, beginning April 28 th of 2021, and ending on August 18 th of 2021. Re-positioning of the fuel elements in the spent fuel pool to move more fresh fuel elements around the gamma tube occurred on May 11 th of 2021, resulting in an approximate 20% increase in the dose rate and consequently the total absorbed dose. In total, the salt-filled capsules underwent 2638 hours of gamma irradiation from the adjacent freshly discharged ATR spent fuel. Capsule internal pressure measurements were taken via the Gas Assay Sample and Recharge (GASR) system in the INL Hot Fuels Examination Facility (HFEF) following completion of the irradiation. Based on the GASR analysis results, the primary conclusion from this experiment to-date is that radiolytic generation of chlorine gas is insignificant for the dose rates and total absorbed dose that these samples experienced. To elucidate more detailed effects of radiolysis on NaCl-UCl 3 eutectic salts and reach a more definitive conclusion, further advanced analyses such as electron microscopy, simultaneous thermal analysis, and electron paramagnetic resonance are recommended to analyze the capsule wall and salt samples.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Specification of EBR-II Gamma Scan Data from the Precision Gamma Scanner

The gamma scan data stored in the FIPD was originally measured using the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS) at the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This system was originally manufactured in 1971 (when the facilities, now at INL, were operated by Argonne National Laboratory) and was upgraded on several occasions. It consists of a germanium gamma ray detector (the exact nature of which changed over time as technology improved), a variable-slit collimator that blocks the view of gamma emissions from all but the selected area of the target, and a computer-controlled system for translating a sample past the slit and logging the data.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2023

Specifications of FIPD Fission Gas Release Data

All fission gas release data stored in the Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD) was originally measured using the Gas Assay, Sample and Recharge (GASR) System in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF). It is therefore called GASR data in FIPD. During the measurement of a sample, such as an irradiated EBR-II fuel element/capsule, a pinhole-sized region near the top of the element plenum was melted by a laser. Plenum gas then expanded into a calibrated volume (note: in this document, “sample” and “capsule/element” are used interchangeably consistent with GASR documents in FIPD). The pressure rise in the volume was recorded. Helium backfilling and expansion was then performed to determine the sample (e.g., fuel element plenum) volume using Boyle’s Law and assuming ideal gas behavior at constant temperature. With the plenum volume and the recorded pressure rise, the sample (e.g., fuel element plenum) pressure was derived with assumption of ideal gas law behavior. The plenum volume and pressure as well as the cladding temperature during the measurement were collected (GASR data in FIPD). Other records associated with the fission gas release data include: raw GASR data records including volumes and post-puncture pressures of seal head/sealing head and manifold, calibration data, backfilling gas pressure data, and the data analysis records. A sample(s) of the fission gas released from the plenum was collected by the GASR system into sample bottles. The chemical and isotopic composition of the gas sample was analyzed separately from GASR data, and will be discussed in a separate specification. The plenum volume, pressure, and cladding temperature during the measurement are typically utilized to determine the number of moles of gas in the plenum. This quantity is often compared to the number of moles of gas generated by fission events. However, calculating these values and their associated uncertainty is beyond the scope of this document, as it necessitates additional assumptions. The most important document to understand the FIPD fission gas data is the GASR operational manual (title: Gas Assay, Sample and Recharge System (GASR) operation and maintenance manual, HFEF/N OMM 4381, DOC. NO. W0018-0032-ES-00). This manual provides: (1) description of the GASR and the functions of each component (laser drilling, welding, seal head/sealing head, manifold, vacuum system, sample system, purge and gas tag system, etc.); (2) step-by-step guidance on calibrations, operations, and measurements; and (3) maintenance procedures and other details relating to the structure and operation of the GASR. Note that the original GASR operated until 2020. A new GASR with the same design and measurement methodology was installed in 2021. The specifications of the GASR presented on the HFEF website at this time are consistent with the ones given in the operational manual. The methods to calculate the plenum volume and pressures were not included in the operational manual, but were recorded in the legacy data analysis files. Details of the methods are given in Chapter 3.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Specification of FIPD Fission Gas Chemistry Data

The current FIPD library contains two main sets of fission gas chemistry data. The first set is data collected during the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) program from 1984 to 1994, using a gas mass spectrometry system located in the Analytical Laboratory (AL) at Argonne National Laboratory-West (Argonne-West). Throughout this period, numerous fission gas release and chemistry datasets were gathered from a variety of metallic fuel pins. The fission gas was sampled by the Gas Assay, Sample and Recharge (GASR) System in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) and transferred to the AL to perform gas composition and isotopic abundance analysis. The second set is data collected after the IFR program. The fission gas samples were also collected by the GASR system at the HFEF, but analyzed using a similar gas mass spectrometer located in Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Many fuel pins irradiated in Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) were measured, including the fuel pins for the MFF series of experiments, designed to qualify metal fuel for use as driver fuel in the FFTF and X496 experiment. For either set of data, fission gas was sampled with the gas sampling line in GASR using sample bottles after the capsule/element volume has been determined and the system is still full of radioactive gas. The sample bottles were then transferred to the sample packaging cylinder or an approved storage location pending transfer to the AL or prepared for shipment to another laboratory (such as PNNL) for analysis of the collected gas as directed on the GASR data form, other approved form. The receiving laboratories (AL or PNNL) required their Analytical Service Request form to be completed prior to sample transfer. Typical sample transfer processes were initiated at HFEF by the principal or process engineer. The laboratories performing the analyses (AL or PNNL) use the sample bottle numbers as well as a sample number produced by the respective laboratory. HFEF and the responsible experimenter tracked the sample using the analysis number, the gas bottle number, and the fuel pin number.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗
DOE OSTI2024

Application of Partial Least Squares Approaches to Pyroprocessing ER Data

Multivariate approaches show promise for application to process monitoring for safeguards of pyroprocessing. Past MPACT work explored the application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to detect off-normal conditions in pyroprocessing electrorefiner (ER) data from in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) known as the Scalable Pyrochemical Recycling testbed (SPyRe) ER. PCA, however, does not consider the output variables. In FY24, multivariate analysis was extended from PCA to Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis. PLS maximizes the variance between both the input signals and output variables. In the case of this work, PLS was applied in two different manners: Predictive PLS and Discriminant PLS. Predictive PLS maximizes the covariance between the process variables of the ER and the measured U concentration from in-situ voltammetry. Discriminant PLS maximizes the covariance between the process variables and a set of training process “states” such as known off-normal conditions. By projecting into the latent variable space in PLS, the process variables can be regressed onto the outputs and predictions can be made for new data sets. In this work, by applying predictive PLS, a penalized non-linear PLS approach was able to make predictions of concentration based on test and training data and detect when operations were off-normal. However, the predictive PLS does not classify the signals to which off-normal operations are attributable. Discriminant PLS can be used to classify off-normal operations but is inadequate to properly classify specific off-normal classes like power supply faults when the Discriminant PLS model is only specifically trained to detect that off-normal class. When all faults are trained against the observation data, all three operational classes are accurately classified and distinguished. Thus, future application of latent variable techniques should not select any given method, but should use a mixture of PCA, Predictive PLS, and Discriminant PLS.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Study of Electrorefiner Sediment Re-Chlorination Options

A study was performed to investigate re-chlorination options for electrorefiner sediment, fulfilling a DOE Level 4 milestone within the Material Recovery and Waste Form Development campaign. The study stems from the recent identification of sediment that had accumulated in a kg-scale uranium electrorefiner at Idaho National Laboratory’s Hot Fuel Examination Facility. The study involved surveying, evaluating, and recommending options for re-chlorinating, or otherwise recovering, actinides from the sediment. Several options were investigated, including chemical and electrochemical techniques on the sediment within the electrorefiner (in situ approaches) or after its removal from the electrorefiner (ex situ approaches). A baseline approach was identified, involving electrolytic reduction of the removed sediment and subsequent electrorefining. Some options were dismissed for various deficiencies, while other options were recommended for further investigation.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Imaging and Analysis of Insoluble Electrorefiner Material

Throughout pyroprocessing efforts at the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), insoluble material has accumulated in the Electrorefiner (ER) vessel. The objective of this effort was to analyze the accumulated material to determine its origin. Material was removed from the ER salt bath and distilled to remove excess salt prior to performing analysis. Three samples were sent for chemical and isotopic analysis and underwent an ethyl acetate-bromine dissolution to segregate the oxide fraction from the metal fraction. Actinide concentrations were determined using a quadrupole–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometer (Q-ICP-MS). Three additional samples were sent for morphologic and elemental analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis at the Irradiated Materials Characterization Laboratory (IMCL). Analyses suggest that the material is primarily composed of UO2. with a small fraction of metal. This study draws no single conclusion as to the origin of the insoluble material in the ER. The particle sizes and morphologies observed in SEM micrographs indicate that the larger particles observed may be a result of introducing material to the ER that has not been completely reduced in Oxide Reduction (OR) operations, which precede electrorefining. Smaller particles may be due to reactions with oxygen and moisture present in HFEF. This research suggests that microscopic analysis of fuel particles before and after OR operations (including after distillation) as well as the uranium product collected on the cathode in the ER would increase understanding about particle morphology within the pyrochemical process.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Assembly and Initial Testing of the Gamma-Ray Emission Tomography Assessment Prototype for Irradiated Fuel

The following report documents the final development, assembly, and initial testing of the gamma-ray emission tomography assessment system (GRETA-1) for post-irradiation examination of irradiated fuel. It includes descriptions of the system components, including the high-purity germanium gamma-ray detector, the surrounding shield and collimator, the sample scanning hardware, and the control and collection software package. A series of MCNP6 simulations were performed that modeled a fuel rod scan to test image reconstruction algorithms with a complex and understood source distribution. A bench-top scan of isotopic check sources was also performed and analyzed using standard image reconstruction algorithms. The system is currently awaiting deployment at Idaho National Laboratory’s Hot Fuel Examination Facility.

46 - INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AN↗
DOE OSTI2020

Remote Fiber Based Velocimeter For Interface Strength Measurements

The understanding of the performance of nuclear reactor plate fuels is essential when developing new fuel systems. The condition of pre and post irradiated plate fuels must be characterized effectively and efficiently prior to irradiation and then post irradiation within a high rad environment. The post characterization work must be performed remotely and in an environment hostile to instrumentation. Laser based characterization methods provide the capability to be remote and robust within a hot-cell environment. Laser based characterization can provide high spatial resolution appropriate for scanning and imaging large areas. The INL is currently developing a laser shock system for Post Irradiation Examination (PIE) station for use in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF) at the INL. The laser shock system is designed to characterize fuel to cladding and cladding to cladding interface strength. The laser shock-technique induces large amplitude shock waves to mechanically characterize interfaces such as the fuel-clad interface. The shock wave propagates as a compressional wave through the fuel plate to the free (unconfined) backside surface and is reflected back through the test plate as a rarefaction (tensile) wave. This rarefaction wave is the physical mechanism that produces internal delamination failure. The focus or this paper is on the accurate measurement of surface velocity to quantify the amount of energy traveling through the interfaces to the back surface of the fuel plate. The original fiber based velocimeter design was biased by parasitic back reflections. This paper will discuss the discovery of the back-reflection issue and the design changes to resolve the issue. Supporting data will be presented.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Poster for intern poster presentation

Inside the hot cells of HFEF (Hot Fuel Examination Facility) and FCF (Fuel Conditioning Facility) reside several large, purpose built 6500-pound cranes. Each crane holds several DC motors that must all be actuated without error for years on end. However, when a component becomes inoperable inside one of these crane carriages, it must be taken out of cell, fixed, and reevaluated. In order to test these cranes and EMMs, two test boxes were built. However, the test cabinets were designed with few engineering controls, zero released documentation, and they were both at some level of disrepair. This poster goes over some of the particulars that go into a control box redesign, mostly focusing on the drawing and DCR process.

42 - ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2025

Installation and Demonstration of CNC Machining for Mechanical Test Specimens in the IFEL Hot Cell

This report documents the installation and demonstration of computer numerical control (CNC) machining capabilities in the Irradiated Fuels Examination Laboratory hot cell facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). A modified Tormach PCNC 440 mill was integrated into the hot cell with custom fixturing, fines management, and manipulator-compatible interfaces to enable the fabrication of axial tension test (ATT) and ring tension test (RTT) specimens from irradiated cladding. The first irradiated specimens machined included ATT and RTT geometries harvested from the high-burnup 6XV fuel rod. Dimensional inspections confirmed that machined specimens met the ±0.025 mm tolerance envelope established in prior development; deviations were consistent with expected measurement scatter and inherent specimen variability, such as wall thickness gradients and eccentricity. Comparisons with out-of-cell metrology confirmed that in-cell machining performance aligns with baseline scatter observed under ideal conditions. This work establishes reproducible, end-to-end specimen preparation at ORNL, directly supporting the US Department of Energy’s Accident-Tolerant Fuel program by enabling reliable, traceable mechanical testing of irradiated cladding.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

ROADRUNNER MiniFuel Experiment: Irradiation Target Design and Sample Characterization

High-density uranium nitride (UN) is a fuel candidate for several advanced nuclear reactor designs currently under development. Because there are limited UN performance data relative to fuel fabrication impurity and density variation, an irradiation campaign has been developed as part of a collaborative effort among the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), Westinghouse Electric Company, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) under the Nuclear Science User Facilities program. This project, entitled ROADRUNNER, or Research On ADvancing the peRformance of UraNium Nitrides in Extreme enviRonments, aimsto support UN fuel qualification for advanced reactors by investigating the impact of density and impurity variations on UN performance as a function of irradiation temperature and burnup. The MiniFuel experiment vehicle developed by ORNL, which leverages the High Flux Isotope Reactor, was selected to perform this accelerated separate-effects irradiation testing. The experiment test matrix consists of six MiniFuel targets containing miniature UN fuel disks, and targets three distinct burnup levels (37.5, 60, and 75 MWd/kg U) and three distinct temperatures (600, 900, and 1200°C). Neutronics and thermal analyses were performed to determine the experimental parameters needed to meet the desired irradiation conditions and to predict the experiment components temperatures. UN pellets were fabricated at LANL with tightly controlled parameters to produce specimens with three distinct densities and three levels of carbon content. The pellets were then thinned down by UTSA to the experiment-required thickness. The pre-characterization of the specimens includes density measurements, carbon and oxygen contents, microstructure analysis, and x-ray computed tomography. The selected specimens will be assembled into the MiniFuel experiment, and the first ROADRUNNER MiniFuel targets are intended for HFIR insertion during the Fall of 2024. After irradiation, the targets will be shipped to ORNL’s hot cell facility for disassembly. The post-irradiation examination on the fuel specimens includes fission gas release measurements, visual inspection, fuel swelling measurements, gamma spectroscopy, and microstructure analysis. The data collected post-irradiation will be used to develop fuel performance models.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Safety Testing of AGR-5/6/7 Compacts 2-2-2 and 2-2-4

Compacts 2-2-2 and 2-2-4 from the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program’s final irradiation campaign (AGR-5/6/7) were each separately subjected to a thermal soak at 1600°C for 300 h under flowing helium to simulated conditions experienced during a postulated high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) depressurization conduction cooldown event. The safety testing of the fuel compacts’ performance under accident conditions was conducted in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Core Conduction Cooldown Test Facility (CCCTF), which utilizes a stand-alone hot cell at the Irradiated Fuels Examination Laboratory (IFEL). The CCCTF heats fuel to temperatures up to 1900°C in a non-oxidizing environment while continuously monitoring the sweep gas for radioactive 85 Kr to detect release levels associated with hermetic failure of the tristructural-isotropic (TRISO) coating surrounding each fuel kernel. In addition, certain metallic radionuclides that escape the fuel compact are collected on deposition cups that are periodically exchanged with a new cup to obtain information on the overall retention behavior of the TRISO coating layers. Because cesium can diffuse through intact pyrocarbon layers, abnormal degradation of the silicon carbide (SiC) layer in the absence of holistic TRISO coating failure is indicated by release of 134 Cs at levels equivalent to an individual particle inventory in the absence of significant 85 Kr release (Hunn et al. 2014). Additional description of the CCCTF system is provided in Appendix A.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Candidacy Renewal Report for ICERR Designation

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has established a designation for an International Centre based on Research Reactors (ICERR). The intention of this designation is to provide a vehicle for IAEA member states to access international research-reactor and ancillary nuclear research and development infrastructure. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has made a commitment to world leadership in the development of advanced nuclear energy, science, and technology. To this end, DOE has established programs and initiatives to enhance this leadership role. ICERR designation constitutes an important step in achieving the DOE vision. DOE, represented by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), is submitting this application for re-designation as an IAEA ICERR. Both INL and ORNL have a decades-long and storied history that supports nuclear research, development, and deployment both nationally and internationally. Both have a history of safe and efficient nuclear operations and have demonstrated a track record of international collaboration and cooperation. INL and ORNL are home to two primary and two secondary research reactors. The primary reactors are Advanced Test Reactor at INL, and High-Flux Isotope Reactor at ORNL. Secondary reactors include: Neutron Radiography Reactor at INL, Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) Facility at INL, and INL Advanced Test Reactor: Critical Facility (ATRC). ICERR designation will also include numerous ancillary facilities at both laboratories, including the following: Multiple post-irradiation examination facilities at both INL and ORNL, Radiochemistry hot-cell facilities at ORNL, INL nuclear-fuel-fabrication and materials-science facilities, and INL and ORNL radiological and nuclear analytical capabilities.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Specifications of Cladding Diameter Measurements Conducted at AGHCF

Fuel element diameter data was collected on-site at the Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility (AGHCF) before and after out-of-pile furnace transient tests of fuel elements. Available data records have been collected and preserved in the Out-of-Pile Transient Database (OPTD). This data is used to determine the transient-induced changes in fuel element diameter, or cladding strain, for the Whole Pin Furnace (WPF) tests. Fuel element diameter was measured by contact profilometry along the length of the fuel pin at specified rotational orientations and/or by a manually operated micrometer at several discrete axial locations along the pin. The Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility Operations Manual details the way the facility operated, organizational and oversight responsibilities, and procedures for examination of samples. The working version of the manual at the time of the whole pin furnace tests and the test pin examinations is Doc. No. IPS-2-00-00, dated June 1989. This specification was developed using the operations manual and recovered measurement records in consultation with subject matter experts (SMEs). The measurement methods, format of the available post-test examination (PTE) data, and recommended methods for use and interpretation of that data are summarized. Section 2 describes the available diameter measurement data for the WPF tests with guidance for interpretation and usage, and Section 3 describes the instrument measurement procedures and calibration methods.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

FY23 Status of Quality Assurance Plan for Out-of-Pile Test Data

The DOE Advanced Reactor Technology program has supported recovery and preservation of legacy metallic fuel data collected as part of the US fast reactor program, recognizing it as essential to development and licensing activities for advanced fast reactors. Databases were established as organized collections of experimental records and data generated from in-pile experiments at EBRII, FFTF, and TREAT as well as related out-of-pile examinations of irradiated fuels. The Out-of-Pile Transient Database (OPTD), includes records of over 150 out-of-pile furnace transient tests on metallic fuels conducted at Argonne’s Alpha-Gamma Hot Cell Facility to evaluate their transient performance and characterize fuel/cladding interaction. The database is accessible to registered users from US universities, laboratories, and nuclear industry. Because the data in OPTD has not been formally qualified, its applicability and ability to support licensing activities is limited. This report outlines progress and plans to quality assure data in OPTD, maximizing its impact for model validation and verification as well as qualification of fuels for safe and effective use in advanced reactor designs.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗