The inversion illusion in parabolic flight Its probable dependence on otolith function
Inversion illusion in parabolic flight related to functioning of otolith apparatus
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Inversion illusion in parabolic flight related to functioning of otolith apparatus
Visual and gravitational factors in delay in perception of oculogravic illusion
Psychophysiology of illusions of spatial position of aircraft in instrument flying
Psychophysiological testing of spatial orientation illusions in persons subjected to visual stimuli
Perception of oculogravic illusion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects related to water immersion
Oculogravic illusion as indicator of otolith function based on specific testing conditions
Cosmonauts inversion illusion in parabolic flight studied with normal and deaf subjects, noting probable dependence on otolith function
Human vestibular system and its connection with oculomotor system and their relation to motion perception, spatial disorientation, and illusions
Human angular acceleration sensitivity using rotation and oculogyral illusion perception as indicators, relating to spatial orientation and flight control task precision
Suprathreshold angular acceleration effects on oculogyral illusion, obtaining magnitude estimates during and after acceleration
Thresholds comparison for angular acceleration derived by subjective cupulometry and by staircase method, determining thresholds for rotation perception and oculogyral illusion
Rotation perception in dark and oculogyral illusion, using power law to describe subjective vestibular sensation relation to angular acceleration stimulus pulses
A blindfolded recumbent subject experiences a variety of postural illusions when rotated about his Z axis. Initially, during the acceleratory phase of rotation, turning about his Z axis is experienced; but, as rotary velocity increases, a spiraling of the body outward in the direction opposite to true rotation is experienced as well. Above 15-20 rpm, only orbital motion of the body is experienced, with the subject feeling that he is always facing in the same direction. One cycle of the apparent orbit is completed each time the subject actually rotates 360 deg. The reverse sequence of illusory motion is experienced during deceleration. The illusory motion all subjects experience during Z-axis recumbent rotation is shown to depend upon the touch and pressure stimulation of the body surface generated by contact forces of support.
The first unassociated gamma-ray source was discovered by SAS-2 in 1973 (Kniffen, et al., 1975) and later confirmed by COS-B (Bennett, et al., 1977). Followed the announcement, there were numerous attempts to find a counterpart, and many models were developed to explain the source. Now over fifteen years later this illusive source still remains as one of the major riddles of astrophysics. The question of why an object, which is able to emit such energetic photons is so well concealed at other wavelengths, still remains to be answered. The association with the Einstein source 1E 0630+178 is the most favored (Bignami, Caraveo, and Lamb, 1983), but this cannot be considered proven. The pulsar emission model of Ruderman and Cheng (1988) is appealing in its broad applicability, but awaits observational confirmation. The EGRET (Energetic Gamma-Ray Experimental Telescope) instrument on the Gamma-Ray Observatory provides a major improvement in observational capability to better define the location and spectrum of this source, and hopefully leads to a confident identification.
The barber pole illusion is a well-known example of how the perceived direction of motion of an inherently ambiguous one-dimensional pattern is influenced by the shape of the area covered by the pattern. Similar effects may be observed for a stimulus which is restricted to a narrow band of spatial frequencies: when a sinusoidal grating is drifted behind a two-dimensional Gaussian contrast window having unequal standard deviations, the direction of perceived motion is biased in the direction of the major axis of the elliptical window (Mulligan, ARVO 1991). We have extended these results to provide insight into possible mechanisms responsible for the effect.
During the 1998 Neurolab mission (STS-90), four astronauts were exposed to interaural and head vertical (dorsoventral) linear accelerations of 0.5 g and 1 g during constant velocity rotation on a centrifuge, both on Earth and during orbital space flight. Subjects were oriented either left-ear-out or right-ear-out (Gy centrifugation), or lay supine along the centrifuge arm with their head off-axis (Gz centrifugation). Pre-flight centrifugation, producing linear accelerations of 0.5 g and 1 g along the Gy (interaural) axis, induced illusions of roll-tilt of 20 degrees and 34 degrees for gravito-inertial acceleration (GIA) vector tilts of 27 degrees and 45 degrees , respectively. Pre-flight 0.5 g and 1 g Gz (head dorsoventral) centrifugation generated perceptions of backward pitch of 5 degrees and 15 degrees , respectively. In the absence of gravity during space flight, the same centrifugation generated a GIA that was equivalent to the centripetal acceleration and aligned with the Gy or Gz axes. Perception of tilt was underestimated relative to this new GIA orientation during early in-flight Gy centrifugation, but was close to the GIA after 16 days in orbit, when subjects reported that they felt as if they were 'lying on side'. During the course of the mission, inflight roll-tilt perception during Gy centrifugation increased from 45 degrees to 83 degrees at 1 g and from 42 degrees to 48 degrees at 0.5 g. Subjects felt 'upside-down' during in-flight Gz centrifugation from the first in-flight test session, which reflected the new GIA orientation along the head dorsoventral axis. The different levels of in-flight tilt perception during 0.5 g and 1 g Gy centrifugation suggests that other non-vestibular inputs, including an internal estimate of the body vertical and somatic sensation, were utilized in generating tilt perception. Interpretation of data by a weighted sum of body vertical and somatic vectors, with an estimate of the GIA from the otoliths, suggests that perception weights the sense of the body vertical more heavily early in-flight, that this weighting falls during adaptation to microgravity, and that the decreased reliance on the body vertical persists early post-flight, generating an exaggerated sense of tilt. Since graviceptors respond to linear acceleration and not to head tilt in orbit, it has been proposed that adaptation to weightlessness entails reinterpretation of otolith activity, causing tilt to be perceived as translation. Since linear acceleration during in-flight centrifugation was always perceived as tilt, not translation, the findings do not support this hypothesis.
Horizontal perception change delay of man after counter rotation - effects of pre-exposure conditions on visual discrimination recovery
Comparative observations of upright perception in normal subjects and deaf persons with bilateral labyrinthine defects