Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Li anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

The Impact of Lithium Anode Interface on Capacity Fade in Polymer Electrolyte-Based Solid-State Batteries

This study investigates the Li stripping-plating morphology and failure mechanisms in full cells consisting of a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) with two commercial Li anodes: Li chip and Li foil. The primary identified failure mechanism of the SPE cell is capacity fade, regardless of the Li manufacturer. While the cathode’s role in capacity fade is evident, the Li anode significantly influences cycling performance, with Li foil cells cycling 50% longer than Li chip cells, a statistical difference. Further, post-mortem scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results attribute the Li chip’s faster capacity fade to a loss of contact and continuous growth of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Conversely, Li foil maintains consistent contact with the solid polymer, displaying a thin and stable SEI. Additionally, failure mechanisms between a gel electrolyte in previous work and the dry SPE are compared.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interfacial Pressure Improves Calendar Aging of Lithium Metal Anodes

Lithium metal is a very attractive anode material because its theoretical specific capacity is approximately 10 times higher than conventional graphite anodes. Despite great promise, Li anodes suffer from capacity fade due to instabilities with the electrolyte as well as stranding of active Li. We have previously shown that applied interfacial pressure improves Li anode cycling because the pressure reduces the propensity for Li isolation and enables easier reconnection. Many researchers have also shown that calendar aging can lead to Li capacity loss and this has been attributed to either electrolyte decomposition with concurrent Li corrosion or to the formation of stranded Li. Our prior research focused on calendar aging during cycling suggests the mechanism for calendar aging is largely related to stranding of Li during rest and reconnection of the stranded Li upon further cycling, evidenced by similar average Coulombic efficiencies and Li loss in cells with and without rest. Because our calendar aging studies suggest Li stranding as a major cause of Coulombic efficiency drops and our Li cycling studies suggest this can be mitigated partially through applied interfacial pressure, we hypothesized that applied pressure would improve calendar aging by reducing stranded Li and enabling reconnection. We systematically varied applied pressure (0-1000 kPa) on Li metal anodes during cycling tests with and without intermittent calendar aging periods. Though the Coulombic efficiency decreases during aging periods, the lost capacity is recovered during subsequent cycles, as shown though average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity loss analysis. We find that application of pressure partially mitigates calendar aging, in accordance with our hypothesis that calendar aging is caused by Li standing and can be mitigated to some degree with interfacial pressure. This is further supported by our results showing that the average Coulombic efficiency and cumulative Li capacity losses are similar over 50 cycles for cells that were continuously cycled and cells with periodic calendar aging periods. This result indicates that the losses during aging are reversible, which is consistent with Li stranding and reconnection. We show that pressure is one mitigation technique that helps reduce Li calendar aging in this study, but our finding that calendar aging is primarily governed by the stranding and reconnection of dead Li has wider implications. This research suggests that other mitigations which have been shown to prevent dead Li formation or encourage reconnection during cycling would also likely be successful for the purpose of improving calendar aging. The authors were supported by a Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (NTESS), a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/NNSA) under contract DE-NA0003525. This written work is authored by an employee of NTESS. The employee, not NTESS, owns the right, title and interest in and to the written work and is responsible for its contents. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the written work do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Government.

applied pressure↗

Ion‐Conducting, Electron‐Blocking Layer for High‐Performance Solid Electrolytes

Lithium metal batteries bring greater promise for energy density, often relying on solid‐state electrolytes to meet critical benchmarks. However, Li dendrite formation is a prevailing problem that limits the cycle life and Coulombic efficiency of solid‐state Li metal batteries. For the first time, a thin (<100 nm) layer of electronically insulating, ionically conducting lithium phosphorus oxynitride (LiPON) is applied using atomic layer deposition between a Li anode and garnet Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO). The performance of a conformal LiPON layer as an electron barrier in symmetric Li‐LLZO cells is observed through potential step chronoamperometry, galvanostatic cycling, electron microscopy, and various spectroscopic techniques. The LiPON‐coated LLZO achieves 100 times lower electronic conductance than LLZO alone. Cycling carried out at 0.1 mA cm −2 for 100 cycles demonstrates that suppression of electron pathways into the bulk solid electrolyte improves the cycle life of a lithium metal cell. These findings suggest an electronic conductivity effect in solid‐state electrolytes. A strategy is demonstrated to design thin‐film (LiPON)‐modulated bulk solid‐state electrolytes (LLZO) capable of maintaining high ionic conductivity and electrochemical stability while reducing the effective electronic conductivity, which results in significantly decreased dendrite formation, improved cycle life, and greater interfacial integrity between the electrolyte and a Li anode.

Hitz, Emily M.↗

Battery detectives: Uncovering cathode impact on anode-free Li cell performance by operando NMR

Here, Anode-free Li-ion batteries could attain new levels of energy density, but challenges remain in controlling deposition and managing degradation. In this issue of Chem, Kwon et al. probe Li metal growth using operando NMR to unravel how cathode materials impact performance and establish criteria for the high-energy/low-cost design tradeoff.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Interfacial Issues and Modification of Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Li Metal Anode in Liquid and Solid Electrolytes

Abstract The high energy density required for the next generation of lithium batteries will likely be enabled by a shift toward lithium metal anode from the conventional intercalation‐based anode such as graphite. However, several critical challenges for Li metal originate from its highly reactive nature and the hostless reaction of deposition and stripping impede the practical use of Li metal as an anode. The role of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) is very important for the Li metal anode where the SEI must protect the dynamically changing surface of the Li metal. Since the SEI‐generating reaction mechanisms for the two different electrolyte systems, liquid and solid, are considerably different, the SEI layers formed between the Li metal and the electrolytes in the two electrolyte systems have substantially different properties, causing different interfacial issues. Inhibition of the interfacial problems requires different strategies to reinforce the SEI layer for each of the electrolyte systems. However, the differences in the two electrolyte systems have not been clearly compared in the prior literature. In this report, the interfacial issues for the two different electrolyte systems are compared and different strategies for SEI modification are provided to overcome the issues.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Improving Lithium Metal Composite Anodes with Seeding and Pillaring Effects of Silicon Nanoparticles

Metallic lithium (Li) anodes are crucial for the development of high specific energy batteries yet plagued by their poor cycling efficiency. Electrode architecture engineering is vital for maintaining a stable anode volume and suppress Li corrosion during cycling. In this paper, a reduced graphene oxide “host” framework for Li metal anodes is further optimized by embedding silicon (Si) nanoparticles between the graphene layers. They serve as Li nucleation seeds to promote Li deposition within the framework even without pre-stored Li. Meanwhile, the LixSi alloy particles serve as supporting “pillars” between the graphene layers, enabling a minimized thickness shrinkage after full stripping of metallic Li. Combined with a Li compatible electrolyte, 99.4% Coulombic efficiency over ~600 cycles is achieved, and stable cycling of a Li||NMC532 full cell for ~380 cycles with negligible capacity decay is realized.

Wang, Hansen↗

Covalent Organic Framework as an Efficient Protection Layer for a Stable Lithium‐Metal Anode

Abstract Lithium (Li) metal shows great potential for achieving high‐energy‐density rechargeable batteries. However, the practical applications of Li‐metal batteries are still challenged by the formation of Li dendrites and unstable solid‐electrolyte interphase (SEI) on metallic Li. Herein, a thin covalent organic framework layer is in situ fabricated on Li (COF‐Li) to suppress Li dendrite growth and mitigate the side reaction on the Li anode. The COF has a periodic and uniform porosity, allowing for selectively sieving Li ions and guiding a uniform Li deposition. As a result, the COF‐Li exhibits a non‐dendrite morphology during repeated Li plating/stripping and demonstrates a remarkable cycle life over 13 200 h with an extremely low overpotential of only 16 mV at a high current density of 10 mA cm −2 and a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm −2 .

He, Jiarui↗

Mechanistic Insights into the Surface Instabilities of TiNb 2 O 7, a High‐Power Li‐Ion Anode

TiNb 2 O 7 (TNO) is a promising Li-ion battery anode for high-power applications, such as implantable medical devices and heavy-duty equipment. Hailed as being safe due to its elevated operating potential near 1.6 V, TNO has long been assumed to be highly stable in the carbonate-based electrolytes used in Li-ion batteries. Herein, all mechanisms occurring at the surface of both TNO and Nd-doped TNO are identified, and both materials in fact show significant gassing. CO 2 is even released at open circuit conditions, demonstrating the poor chemical stability of the material in the electrolyte even prior to battery operation. Such extreme instability is a critical safety concern. In addition, it was found that Ti dissolves from the surface of TNO particles at low voltage (below 1.4 V vs Li), and in fact deposits on the counter electrode. Ti further inside TNO particles then diffuses to the Ti-poor surface during discharge. Partial carbon-coating as a mitigating measure has also been tested and found to exacerbate these processes. The findings identify novel reactions occurring within TNO, and clearly highlight the need to stabilize the surfaces of TNO in order to prevent such aggressive deterioration at the surface of the particles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Garnet-Type Solid-Electrolyte-Based Molten Lithium–Molybdenum–Iron(II) Chloride Battery with Advanced Reaction Mechanism

Solid-electrolyte-based molten-metal batteries have attracted considerable attention for grid-scale energy storage. Although ZEBRA batteries are considered one of the promising candidates, they still have the potential concern of metal particle growth and ion exchange with the β”-Al 2 O 3 electrolyte. Herein, a Li 6.4 La 3 Zr 1.4 Ta 0.6 O 12 solid-electrolyte-based molten lithium–molybdenum–iron(II) chloride battery (denoted as Li–Mo–FeCl 2 ) operated at temperature of 250 °C, comprising a mixture of Fe and LiCl cathode materials, a Li anode, a garnet-type Li-ion ceramic electrolyte, and Mo additive, is designed to overcome these obstacles. Different from conventional battery reaction mechanisms, this battery revolutionarily synchronizes the reversible Fe–Mo alloying–dealloying reactions with the delithiation–lithiation processes, meaning that the porous Mo framework derived from Fe–Mo alloy simultaneously suppresses the growth of pure Fe particles. By adopting a Li anode and a Li-ion ceramic electrolyte, the corrosion problem between the cathode and the solid electrolyte is overcome. With similar battery cost ($12 kWh –1 ), the theoretical energy density of Li–Mo–FeCl 2 battery surpasses that of a Na–FeCl 2 ZEBRA battery over 25%, to 576 Wh kg –1 and 2216 Wh L –1 , respectively. Experimental results further prove this cell has excellent cycling performance (472 mAh g LiCl –1 after 300 cycles, 50 mg active material) and strong tolerance against the overcharge–overdischarge (3–1.6 V) and freezing–thawing (25–250 °C) incidents.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Accurately constituting robust interfaces for high-performance high-energy lithium metal batteries

High-energy lithium metal batteries (LMBs) have received ever-increasing interest. Among them, coupling lithium metal (Li) with nickel-rich material, LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 (NMCs, x ≥ 0.6, x + y + z = 1), is promising because Li anodes enable an extremely high capacity (∼3860 mA h g −1 ) and the lowest redox potential (−3.04 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode), while NMCs can achieve a much higher capacity of ∼200 mA h g −1 and lower cost than those of LiCoO 2 . However, the resultant Li‖NMC cells have been hindered from commercialization due to a series of challenges related to the interface stability of both Li anodes and NMC cathodes. Specifically, Li anodes suffer from Li dendritic growth and the formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), while NMC cathodes suffer from the formation of cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) and other interface-related issues, including transition metal dissolution, oxygen release, cracking, and so on. To tackle these issues, recently, two sister techniques, atomic and molecular layer deposition (ALD and MLD), have emerged and exhibit tremendous capabilities to accurately constitute robust interfaces to achieve high-performance Li‖NMC LMBs. They can uniquely develop uniform and conformal films as surface coatings of LMBs in a precisely controllable mode at the atomic/molecular level, while proceeding with film deposition at low temperatures (e.g., ≤250 °C). In this Feature Article, we review the latest research progress in developing novel surface coatings via ALD and MLD for Li‖NMC LMBs and discuss outcomes for pursuing high performance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Li-Metal Anode in Dilute Electrolyte LiFSI/TMP: Electrochemical Stability Using Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics

Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations were performed for Li + conducting electrolytes based on trimethyl phosphates (TMP) and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (Li + FSI – ) salt in contact with a Li-metal electrode. We focused on the transient-state behavior at the electrolyte, interfacial electrolyte–Li-metal electrode, and lithium reference electrode–electrolyte–Li-metal electrode to study dynamics and activation energy barriers of the Li + ion, electrochemical and thermal stability of the interface electrode-electrolyte, and potential behavior of the Li-metal electrode, respectively. Our results show that in the most stable state, Li + ions are tetrahedrally coordinated to three TMPs and one FSI – . The inner solvation shell of a Li-ion is composed of three TMP and one FSI – in one contact ion-pair and four TMPs in a solvent-separated ion-pair. On the other hand, Li-ions transport through electrolyte cages takes place when they are coordinated with three or less molecules that could be a combination of TMPs and FSI – . The decomposition pathway of the LiFSI salt when in direct contact with the Li-metal anode starts with defluorination of FSI – , rapidly losing F– to the lithium surface, forming LiF species. The remaining FSO 2 NSO 2 –2 with the addition of 2e – from the Li-metal decomposes into SO 2 –2 and NFSO 2 –2 . SO 2 –2 deposits on the Li-surface and decomposes into Li 2 O and Li 2 S. The remaining NFSO 2 –2 defluorinates, losing F – ion to the lithium surface, resulting in LiF and the remaining NSO 2 –1 deposits on the lithium surface and decomposes in the following picoseconds, forming several binary compounds such as Li 3 N, Li 2 S and Li 2 O. In contrast, when the salt is solvated by the TMP molecules, avoiding a direct contact with the Li metal electrode, only one defluorination occurs, decomposing the FSI – into FSO 2 NSO 2 –2 and a F – . The two anions remain stable as they are solvated by the TMP molecules. Furthermore, we also analyzed the open circuit potential energy (OCPE) of the Li-metal electrode during the SEI formation. OCPE is calculated from the average local potential profile difference within the Li-metal electrode and a pristine Li-crystal reference electrode (LRE). When no SEI is formed, the Li-metal electrode has an average OCPE of +0.36 eV vs LRE. Due to the formation of a SEI, the Li-metal electrode has an average OCPE between -0.07 and -0.21 eV vs LRE. The OCPE of the Li-metal electrode decreases by ~0.42 eV when a SEI is formed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Metal Nanoparticles as a Scalable Current Collector Engineering Approach Enabling Lithium Metal Anodes

Dendrites and dead lithium formation over prolonged cycling have long been challenges that hinder the safe implementation of metallic Li anodes. In this study, we employ polymer-stabilized liquid metal nanoparticles (LM-P NPs) of eutectic gallium indium (EGaIn) to create uniform Li nucleation sites enabling homogeneous lithium electrodeposition. Block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(acrylic acid) (PEO-b-PAA) were grafted onto the EGaIn surface, forming stabilized, well-dispersed NPs. Using a scalable spray coating approach, LM-P NPs were fabricated on copper current collectors, providing lithiophilic PEO sites and interactive carboxyl groups to guide Li deposition. The Li-EGaIn alloying process greatly reduced the Li + diffusion barrier, enabling fast Li transport through the coating layer, resulting in decreased nucleation overpotential. Therefore, about five times lower Li nucleation overpotential was obtained on the LM-P modified Cu with an optimal composition of the polymers than the bare Cu substrates. DFT computations was used to reveal the binding properties between the LM-P layer and Li. Due to the regulated Li plating/stripping process, as-obtained 30 μm Li anodes paired with LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NCM8 11 ) with a negative/positive electrode capacity (N/P) ratio ~ 10 exhibited stable cycling performance at 0.5C for over 250 cycles, with an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.55%. Ultrathin Li (1 μm) anodes with an N/P ratio ~ 0.6 were also demonstrated in Li|LiFePO 4 cells, which examined the stabilization of Li by LM-P NPs and monitored practical loadings of Li anodes that are close to anode-free systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Suspension electrolyte with modified Li + solvation environment for lithium metal batteries

Designing a stable solid–electrolyte interphase on a Li anode is imperative to developing reliable Li metal batteries. In this work, we report a suspension electrolyte design that modifies the Li + solvation environment in liquid electrolytes and creates inorganic-rich solid–electrolyte interphases on Li. Li 2 O nanoparticles suspended in liquid electrolytes were investigated as a proof of concept. Through theoretical and empirical analyses of Li 2 O suspension electrolytes, the roles played by Li 2 O in the liquid electrolyte and solid–electrolyte interphases of the Li anode are elucidated. Also, the suspension electrolyte design is applied in conventional and state-of-the-art high-performance electrolytes to demonstrate its applicability. Based on electrochemical analyses, improved Coulombic efficiency (up to ~99.7%), reduced Li nucleation overpotential, stabilized Li interphases and prolonged cycle life of anode-free cells (~70 cycles at 80% of initial capacity) were achieved with the suspension electrolytes. We expect this design principle and our findings to be expanded into developing electrolytes and solid–electrolyte interphases for Li metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Sustainable Li-ion anode material from Fe-catalyzed graphitization of paper waste

We report a novel method for the conversion of paper towel waste to biographite anode material is developed and optimized for use in Li-ion batteries. The surge in demand for Li-ion battery anode materials coupled with the unsustainable and inefficient methods of producing battery-grade graphite necessitate alternative carbon feedstocks and graphitization technologies. Paper waste (PW) is identified as a suitable carbon feedstock for iron-catalyzed graphitization due to its sustainability, low cost, low ash content, and ample supply for the intended end use. A Box Behnken experimental design for statistical optimization is pursued for untreated and pre-carbonized PW with factors of temperature (1100-1300 °C), hold time (1-5 h), and iron catalyst loading (0.5-1.5x fixed carbon content) with biographite crystal size as the primary response variable. Temperature and iron catalyst loading are found to be significant factors, whereas hold time is found to be insignificant. Reversible capacities of the biographite anodes are found to be 340-355 mAh g-1 with 99% capacity retention over 100 cycles, indicating good electrochemical performance relative to commercial graphite anodes. The initial Coulombic efficiency of untreated and pre-carbonized biographites, however, are 77% and 75%, respectively, suggesting parasitic reactions including electrolyte decomposition.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

An anode-free Li metal cell with replenishable Li designed for long cycle life

Pit corrosion of Li during stripping is an important factor responsible for poor Li cycling efficiency, a metric that determines its cycling life. When excess Li is present, it has been observed that Li tends to strip in a non-uniform fashion, forming pits that extend well past the theoretical Li depth that inevitably lead to the formation of electronically isolated “dead” Li particles. In this work, a novel cell with replenishable Li is shown to inherently mitigate the formation of this “dead” Li, as a direct result of a design in which the intrinsically more homogenous stripping behavior of anode-free cells are combined with a replenishable limited Li reservoir. These novel cells (Li|Cu||LiFePO 4 ) exhibit 25% and 34% higher cumulative capacities than the conventional cells (Cu|Li||LiFePO 4 ) in carbonate and ether electrolytes, respectively, enabling a significant increase in cycle life without impacting energy density. This improvement strategy represents a new direction in Li metal battery improvement, in which improved cycling can be achieved regardless of electrolyte chemistry.

Long cycle life↗

Recent progress in understanding solid electrolyte interphase on lithium metal anode

Lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) are among the most promising candidates of next-generation high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on Li metal anode plays a significant role which influences the Li deposition morphology and the cycle life of LMBs. Although SEI is the most important part, a thorough understanding of SEI is inadequate. In this review, we focus on the progresses of understanding on structures, properties and influencing factors of SEI as well as efficient strategies of tailoring SEI. First, the compositions, models and recent progresses on characterizing atomic structure of SEI are summarized. Second, the properties of SEI, including electronic conduction, ionic conduction, stability and mechanical properties are elucidated. Structures and properties of SEI are greatly influenced by multiple factors such as solvent, salt, additive, solvation structure, impurity, current density, temperature, pressure and capacity utilization. Thus, interactions between these factors and SEI are comprehensively discussed. Correlations of SEI with Li deposition morphology, rate capability and cycle life are further summarized. Moreover, efficient strategies of tailoring SEI with desired properties, including in-situ SEI and ex-situ SEI are also reviewed. Despite the significant progresses that have been achieved in the researches of SEI, better understanding of SEI is still highly demand. Finally, future directions especially in-operando techniques, multi-modality approaches for characterization of SEI and artificial intelligence assisted understanding of correlation between electrolyte components and SEI properties are proposed.

Wu, Haiping↗

Interfacial pressure improves calendar aging of lithium metal anodes

Lithium (Li) metal is a promising anode because its theoretical specific capacity is approximately ten times larger than graphite. However, Li anodes suffer from long-term capacity fade due to Li stranding (becoming electronically disconnected) and electrolyte decomposition. Applied interfacial pressure has been shown to improve Li anode cycling, likely due to reincorporating stranded or “dead” Li into the anode. Calendar aging can also lead to Li capacity loss due to electrolyte decomposition/Li corrosion and the formation of stranded Li. Some research suggests that calendar aging during cycling results in reversible capacity losses due to Li stranding and reconnection. We here investigate the effect of applied interfacial pressure on Li anode calendar aging during cycling with incorporated rest steps in a localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE) to understand if pressure can mitigate stranded Li formation during rest by manipulating the Li morphology. Pouch cells exhibit more stable cycling and denser Li deposits between 10 kPa and 1,000 kPa of applied pressure compared to no applied pressure. Despite drops in CE during periodic rest cycles, the average cumulative lost capacity and average coulombic efficiency (CE) of cells over 50 cycles show that cells aged with incorporated rest steps perform similarly to cells cycled without added rests. This similar average CE suggests that dead Li is largely responsible for drops in CE during rest rather than irreversible Li corrosion and that the dead Li can be reconnected in subsequent cycling. The addition of a lithiophilic ZnO coating to the Cu working electrode increases the adhesion and coverage of Li deposits at low pressures and improves CE during the first cycle.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Covalent Organic Framework as an Efficient Protection Layer for a Stable Lithium-Metal Anode

We report Lithium (Li) metal shows great potential for achieving high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. However, the practical applications of Li-metal batteries are still challenged by the formation of Li dendrites and unstable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) on metallic Li. Herein, a thin covalent organic framework layer is in situ fabricated on Li (COF-Li) to suppress Li dendrite growth and mitigate the side reaction on the Li anode. The COF has a periodic and uniform porosity, allowing for selectively sieving Li ions and guiding a uniform Li deposition. As a result, the COF-Li exhibits a non-dendrite morphology during repeated Li plating/stripping and demonstrates a remarkable cycle life over 13 200 h with an extremely low overpotential of only 16 mV at a high current density of 10 mA cm -2 and a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm -2 .

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗