Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Localized concentrated electrolyte”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Gas Generation in Lithium Cells with High-Nickel Cathodes and Localized High-Concentration Electrolytes

High-nickel layered-oxide cathodes (LiNi x Mn y Co 1-x-y O 2 , x ≥ 0.8) exhibit high capacities, but also experience rapid capacity fade during cycling, and are susceptible to heat generation and gas release. Advanced electrolytes, such as localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCE), substantially stabilize the cathode during cycling and have lower flammability than conventional electrolytes, but gas generation with these electrolytes is yet to be assessed. We demonstrate here that gas generation from a high-nickel cathode in an LHCE is half as much as in a conventional electrolyte at 4.4 V. The gas generation in LHCE is further reduced at 4.3 V, but the LHCE generates a similar amount of gas as the conventional electrolyte at 4.6 V. Neither electrolyte can prevent gas generation after cycling; cathodes after 200 cycles generate similar amounts of gas as pristine cathodes during high-voltage hold. Finally, it is shown that in both electrolytes, oxygen from the cathode lattice plays a critical role in gas generation.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Localized High–Concentration Electrolytes with Low–Cost Diluents Compatible with Both Cobalt–Free LiNiO 2 Cathode and Lithium–Metal Anode

High-nickel layered oxide cathodes and lithium-metal anode are promising candidates for next-generation battery systems due to their high energy density. Nevertheless, the instability of the electrode–electrolyte interphase is hindering their practical application. Localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) present a promising solution for achieving uniform lithium deposition and a stable cathode–electrolyte interphase. However, the limited choice of diluents and their high cost are restricting their implementation. Four novel cost-effective diluents and their performance with highly reactive LiNiO 2 cathode and Li-metal anode are reported here. The results show that all the LHCE cells exhibit a Coulombic efficiency of >99.38% in Li | Cu cells and a capacity retention of >85% in Li | LiNiO 2 cells after 250 cycles. Advanced characterizations unveil that the stable cell operation is due to well-tuned electrode–electrolyte interphases and Li deposition morphology. In addition, online electrochemical mass spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry reveal that the gas generation and heat-release are greatly reduced with the LHCEs presented. Altogether, the study provides new insights into the role of diluents in LHCEs and offers valuable guidance for further optimization of LHCEs for high energy density lithium-metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Optimization of Localized High Concentration Electrolytes (LHCE) for Li||LiCoO 2 and Si|| LiCoO 2 Batteries used in Consumer Electronics Applications (Final Report for I3T Project 75934)

This project will optimize localized high concentration electrolyte (LHCE) for Li/LCO and Si/LCO batteries for consumer electronics applications, including select the best solvent and diluent, optimize the ratios of the solvents and the salt concentration. Results will be demonstrated not only in both coin cells, but also in pouch cells, which is required for large-scale commercial applications. This work can provide better understanding that would also benefit other LMB projects, including Li/NMC and Li/S batteries for electric vehicle applications. In the history of rechargeable batteries, all batteries have been first used in small scale consumer electronics, then eventually penetrate to large scale applications such as electrical vehicle or grid. We believe this development route will also be true for LMBs. By developing the best electrolyte for Li/LCO and Si/LCO chemistry, we will not only get the early market entry in consumer electronics, but we can also accumulate experience on the practical application of LMBs which can be used to further develop other types of LMBs for EV and other large-scale applications pursued by DOE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Thermal Runaway of Nonflammable Localized High‐Concentration Electrolytes for Practical LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 |Graphite‐SiO Pouch Cells

Abstract With continuous improvement of batteries in energy density, enhancing their safety is becoming increasingly urgent. Herein, practical high energy density LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 |graphite‐SiO pouch cell with nonflammable localized high concentration electrolyte (LHCE) is proposed that presents unique self‐discharge characteristic before thermal runaway (TR), thus effectively reducing safety hazards. Compared with the reference electrolyte, pouch cell with nonflammable LHCE can increase self‐generated heat temperature by 4.4 °C, increase TR triggering temperature by 47.3 °C, decrease the TR highest temperature by 71.8 °C, and extend the time from self‐generated heat to triggering TR by ≈8 h. In addition, the cell with nonflammable LHCE presents superior high voltage cycle stability, attributed to the formation of robust inorganic‐rich electrode–electrolyte interphase. The strategy represents a pivotal step forward for practical high energy and high safety batteries.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and Its Effects on Polysulfide Structure in Solution

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LiSB) are a promising next-generation lithium energy storage technology that offers a multifold improvement over the traditional lithium-ion battery. However, the LiSB still faces the unresolved issue of the polysulfide shuttle effect. This phenomenon arises from the dissolution of sulfur intermediate reduction products into the electrolyte, which then causes a cascade of issues throughout the battery. Many mitigation strategies have been proposed to counteract this effect including the use of novel electrolyte compositions. Recently, there has been increased focus on the use of hydrofluorinated ethers as a major constituent of an electrolyte for lithium batteries. Previous studies have reported that the presence of these species create localized high concentration electrolytes (LHCE) which can have many advantages resulting in improved battery performance. Here, we report on how the inclusion of a hydrofluorinated ether BTFE (bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) ether) modifies the general properties of a LiSB electrolyte and the structure of dissolved polysulfide species in the electrolyte. Here, we found that the inclusion of BTFE does not modify the primary solvation structure of Li + directly but actively participates in secondary solvation shells. With a high concentration of BTFE, the LHCE formation is observed by the presence of clusters of non-BTFE molecules. The structure of polysulfide species in solution was modified by the BTFE in the same way. Much of the primary solvation structure was kept, but the presence of BTFE increased polysulfide–polysulfide clustering. These results indicate that the polysulfide solubility will be limited due to the promotion of clustering.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Effects of Fluorinated Diluents in Localized High‐Concentration Electrolytes for Lithium–Oxygen Batteries

Abstract A stable electrolyte is critical for practical application of lithium–oxygen batteries (LOBs). Although the ionic conductivity and electrochemical stability of the electrolytes have been extensively investigated before, their oxygen solubility, viscosity, volatility, and the stability against singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) still need to be comprehensively investigated to provide a full picture of the electrolytes, especially for an open system such as LOBs. Herein, a systematic investigation is reported on the localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) using different fluorinated diluents in comparison with those of conventional electrolytes. The physical properties and activation energies for reactions with singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) of these electrolytes are calculated by density functional theory. The electrochemical performances of LOBs using these electrolytes are compared. This study reveals that the correlation between the stability of the electrolytes and their physical and electrochemical properties depends strongly on the diluents in LHCEs. Therefore, it shines light on the rational design of new electrolytes for LOBs.

Kwak, Won‐Jin↗

Crossover Effects in Lithium–Metal Batteries with a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and High–Nickel Cathodes

While crossover effects, such as transition–metal dissolution, are well–understood in lithium–ion batteries, there is a limited understanding of the effect of crossed–over chemical species in cells with oxide cathodes and lithium–metal anodes. In this work, the effects of cathode–to–anode and anode–to–cathode crossover are explored in cells with a high–nickel cathode, lithium–metal anode, and a localized high–concentration electrolyte (LHCE). Dramatic differences are found among cells; a lithium–metal anode paired with a high–nickel cathode has three times less solid–electrolyte interphase growth than a lithium–metal anode paired with lithium metal. Meanwhile, the cathode paired with lithium metal has 2–3 times higher capacity fade than the same cathode paired with graphite. Decomposition and crossover of the FSI salt is identified as the main source of these changes. The fluorine in the salt is first stripped off at the lithium–metal anode, and the remaining sulfur and nitrogen cross over to the cathode. Although the reduction in fluorine content harms the surface stability of the cathode, the lithium–metal anode benefits from the increased fluorine content. Furthermore, because the lithium–metal anode is typically the bottleneck for cells with thin lithium, crossover is a major factor in the enhanced performance of lithium–metal batteries with LHCE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of Disordered Rocksalt Cathodes in a Localized High‐Concentration Electrolyte

Abstract Lithium (Li)‐rich transition metal oxide cathodes with a cation disordered rock salt structure (DRX) are increasingly gaining popularity for advanced Li batteries as they offer high capacity and cost benefits over the commonly used layered Li transition metal oxide cathodes. However, the performance of DRX cathodes and their applications are limited by severe side reactions between the cathode and the state‐of‐the‐art carbonate‐based electrolytes at high voltage of 4.8 V, transition metal dissolution, and structural instability of the cathode particles. In this work, an advanced localized high‐concentration electrolyte (LHCE) is developed to form a stable cathode‐electrolyte interphase and mitigate structural instability of the Li 1.13 Mn 0.66 Ti 0.21 O 2 (LMTO) DRX during electrochemical cycling. Li||LMTO half cells with the LHCE demonstrate increased capacity, cycling stability, and superior rate capability compared with cells containing a conventional carbonate electrolyte. For instance, the Li||LMTO cells cycled in LHCE show a higher initial capacity of 205.2 mAh g −1 and a better capacity retention of 72.5% after 200 cycles at a current density of 20 mA g −1 than those with the conventional electrolyte (initial capacity of 187.7 mAh g −1 and capacity retention of 19.9%). This work paves the way to the development of practical DRX cathode‐based high‐energy Li batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Air‐Stable High‐Voltage Li‐Ion Organic Cathode Enabled by Localized High‐Concentration Electrolyte

While lithium‐ion batteries have revolutionized the field of energy storage, their reliance on critical minerals such as cobalt and nickel raises significant concerns over resource availability and supply chain uncertainty. In this study, we revisit dithiin‐fused dilithium naphthazarin (5,8‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐naphthoquinone) (DNP‐Li) as a high‐voltage Li‐ion organic cathode and evaluate its performance in conjunction with localized high‐concentration electrolyte (LHCE). DNP‐Li exhibits remarkable air and thermal stability, a high operating potential of 3.55 V vs. Li + /Li, and a specific capacity of 232 mAh g −1 , positioning it as one of the most promising candidates among Li‐ion organic cathodes. Furthermore, the electrochemical behavior of DNP‐Li is strongly influenced by the electrolyte composition, giving distinct two‐plateau or four‐plateau voltage profiles accompanied by reversible or irreversible phase transitions in carbonate‐based or LHCE electrolyte formulations, respectively. The reduced solubility of DNP‐Li‐based redox intermediates in LHCE enhances cycling stability, achieving a capacity retention of 85% after 50 cycles at 0.1C and 75% after 160 cycles at 0.5C, demonstrating a significant improvement compared to the carbonate‐based electrolyte. This work highlights the critical role of solute–electrolyte interactions in modulating the electrochemical performance of multielectron small‐molecule organic cathodes, offering new pathways for advancing sustainable and high‐efficiency energy storage technologies.

Lakraychi, Alae Eddine [Department of Electrical a↗

Extending Calendar Life of Si-Based Lithium-Ion Batteries by a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte

Silicon (Si) is one of the most promising anode materials for the next generation lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Although significant progresses have been made on the cycle life of Si-based LIBs, their calendar-life is still far less than those required for electrical vehicle applications. Here, in this work, the fundamental mechanisms behind the limited calendar life of Si-LIBs have been investigated. It is found that the unstable interphase layers formed on electrodes during the formation/cycling of batteries using conventional electrolyte with fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) additive are responsible for the rapid impedance-increase of Si-LIBs during storage at elevated temperature (55°C). By using an FEC-free localized high concentration electrolyte (lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide:ethyl propionate:ethylene carbonate:1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (1:2.8:0.2:1 by mol.) with 1 wt.% lithium difluorophosphate), stable interphase layers formed on electrodes can effectively block the crosstalk between cathode and anode, minimize the impedance increase of Si||LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 (NMC622) batteries during storage at elevated temperature (55°C), therefore largely improve their calendar life. Si||NMC622 batteries using this electrolyte also demonstrated a high-capacity retention of ~92.4% after 500 cycles at 45°C with well-preserved electrode structure. Hence, this novel electrolyte is a good candidate to extend the cycling life and calendar life of Si-LIBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Crossover Effects of Transition‐Metal Ions on Lithium‐Metal Anode in Localized High Concentration Electrolytes

Abstract The stability of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) is critical to the cycle life of lithium‐metal batteries (LMBs). While the crossover effect of transition‐metal ions from cathode to anode is extensively studied in lithium‐ion batteries with graphite anodes, its impact on LMBs remains largely unexplored. Herein, this study investigates the electrochemical and chemical properties of SEI layers formed on lithium‐metal anodes in localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) containing dissolved transition‐metal ions (Ni 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Co 2+ ). It is demonstrated that transition‐metal ions in LHCEs reduce the coulombic efficiency (CE) and significantly degrade the cycle life of LMBs. Time‐of‐flight secondary‐ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) reveals that SEI structures differ depending on the dissolved TM ion, with Mn 2+ and Co 2+ inducing severe destabilization, and Ni 2+ exhibiting a less severe impact. These findings underscore the detrimental effects of transition‐metal crossover effects in LMB systems.

Guo, Zezhou [Materials Science and Engineering Pro↗

Unravelling high-temperature stability of lithium-ion battery with lithium-rich oxide cathode in localized high-concentration electrolyte

Lithium (Li)-rich manganese (Mn)-rich oxide (LMR) cathode materials, despite of the high specific capacity up to 250 mAh g-1 suffer from instability of cathode/electrolyte interfacial layer at high working voltages, causing continuous voltage decay and capacity fading, especially at elevated temperatures. In various battery systems, localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have been widely reported as a promising candidate to form effective electrode/electrolyte interphases. Here, an optimized LHCE is studied in graphite (Gr)-based full cells being cycled at 25, 45 and 60 °C with the reference of a conventional LiPF6-based electrolyte. It is revealed that the LHCE can effectively suppress continuous electrolyte decompositions and mitigate the dissolution of Mn ions due to the formation of more protective electrode/electrolyte interphases on both anode and cathode, which, in turn, lead to significantly improved cycling stability and enhanced rate capability under the selected temperatures. The mechanistic understanding on the failure of the conventional LiPF6-containing electrolyte and the function of the LHCE in Gr||LMR cells under high temperatures provides valuable perspectives of electrolyte development for practical application of LMR cathodes in high energy density batteries over a wide temperature range.

Localized high-concentration electrolyte, Lithium-↗

Long cycle and calendar life of Si-based Li-ion batteries enabled by localized high-concentration electrolytes and their surprising water tolerance

Silicon-based anodes promise an increase in energy density for Li-ion batteries, yet they suffer from a poor calendar life. Researchers have posited that fluorinated lithium salt forms reactive side products that destroy the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), even without cycling. HF is one such reactive side product formed from trace water contamination in the electrolyte. Some electrolytes, such as localized high concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) may improve cell stability in highly reactive systems, such as Li metal and Si. In the present study, LHCEs containing 200-300 ppm of water retained up to 8% greater capacity (1200-1300 mAh/g Si) in calendar life tests over 200 days compared to dried electrolytes (< 20 ppm water). Calendar aging took place at 100% state of charge. Cells with 200-300 ppm water performed comparably to cells with 20 ppm water in cycle life tests (900-1000 mAh/g Si) . Even adding 1000 ppm water did not lead to rapid capacity fade in cells undergoing cycle life tests. Nano-FTIR spectroscopy revealed chemical and structural differences in the SEI for cells with 1000 ppm water compared to 200-300 ppm water. The SEI differences, including increased Li2O concentration, may have contributed to improved calendar life. This research reveals the capabilities of LHCEs to improve the calendar and cycle life of Si-based Li-ion batteries, despite the presence of a highly reactive contaminant.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

The Relationship between Ionic Conductivity and Solvation Structures of Localized High-Concentration Fluorinated Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Localized high concentration electrolyte (LHCE) combines a diluent with high concentration electrolyte (HCE), offering promising properties. The ions, solvent, and diluent interact to form a complex heterogenous liquid structure, where high salt concentration clusters are embedded in diluent. Optimizing LHCE for desired electrolyte properties like high ionic conductivity, low viscosity, effective solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formability, within the vast chemical and compositional design space requires deeper understanding and theoretical guidance. For this work, we investigated the structures and conductivity of LHCEs based on a fluorinated solvent with two different diluents at varying concentrations. The 2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl trifluoroacetate (TFPTFA) enters the solvation cluster due to its stronger Li-ion interactions, whereas 1,1,2,2-tetrafuoroethyl 2,2,2-trifuoroethyl ether (TFETFE) enters only at extremely high diluent concentrations. The ionic conductivity increases with decreasing diluent concentrations, with a slope change during cluster percolation. Overall, TFETFE demonstrates higher effectiveness than TFPTFA, forming higher local salt concentration clusters, and resulting in higher ionic conductivity.

cluster chemistry↗

Average hydrodynamic radius analysis reveals critical solvation thresholds in high-concentration lithium electrolytes

Understanding the solvation structures of lithium salts in carbonate- and ether-based electrolytes is central to explaining the exceptional stability of high-concentration electrolytes (HCEs) and localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs). Conventional techniques such as vibrational spectroscopy and one-dimensional NMR provide only limited information, typically restricted to coordination ratios and ion-pair distributions, without revealing the actual size and mass of solution complexes. Here, in this study, we introduce an average hydrodynamic radius (AHR) analysis based on internally referenced DOSY NMR, which enables direct estimation of the average volume and molecular weight of lithium–solvent complexes in solution. Using LiFSI–EMC and LiFSI–EMC–TTE electrolytes, we demonstrate that the onset of effective lithium metal stabilization and aluminum corrosion suppression coincides with the formation of very large complexes, whose average volume exceeds 300 times that of free EMC molecules. This finding supports a new “blocking mechanism,” wherein bulky solvated complexes impede direct solvent access to reactive surfaces. The AHR analysis thus not only clarifies the fundamental origin of HCE and LHCE effectiveness, but also provides a broadly applicable experimental framework for probing complex solvation structures and guiding rational electrolyte design.

Concentrated electrolytes↗

Tailoring Solvation Solvent in Localized High-Concentration Electrolytes for Lithium||Sulfurized Polyacrylonitrile

Sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) is a promising cathode material for lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries due to its significantly reduced polysulfide (PS) dissolution compared to the elemental S cathode. Although conventional carbonate-based electrolytes is stable with SPAN electrodes, it is less stable with Li metal anode (LMA). Recently, localized high-concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have been developed to improve the stability of LMA. Here, we report a new strategy to further improve the performance of LI||SPAN batteries by replacing the conventional solvating solvent 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME) in the LHCE with a new solvating solvent, 1,2-diethoxyethane (DEE), the new LHCEs exhibits less reactivity against Li 2 S 2 , alleviates PS dissolution, forms a better cathode-electrolyte interphase layer on the SPAN, and enhances structure reversibility even at elevated temperature (ET, 45°C). With the same salt and diluent as in other LHCEs, the LHCE with DEE leads to better performance in Li||SPAN batteries (with 82.9% capacity retention after 300 cycles at ET), preservation of SPAN cathode structure, and suppression of the volume change of LMA. The similar strategy on tailoring the solvating solvents in LHCEs can also be used in other rechargeable batteries to improve their performances.

1,2-diethoxyethane↗

Weakly solvating electrolytes: a solvation-centric paradigm for rechargeable metal batteries

Electrolyte design has long followed a solvation-first paradigm that prioritizes solvents capable of maximizing salt dissociation and ionic conductivity, while treating interfacial degradation and rheological limitations as secondary constraints. Although this approach has enabled significant progress in lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries, it inherently favors solvent-dominated solvation structures that destabilize reactive metal interfaces. Weakly solvating electrolytes (WSEs) offer a fundamentally different strategy. By using solvents with intrinsically low donor strength and minimal electrostatic affinity for cations, WSEs suppress cation–solvent coordination and promote anion-rich solvation shells without relying on salt superconcentration. This shift lowers desolvation barriers, redirects interfacial decomposition pathways, and supports the formation of inorganic-rich, stable interphases. In this review, we discuss the molecular and solvation criteria that distinguish WSEs from conventional and concentrated or locally concentrated electrolyte systems, examine their implementation across different chemistries, and identify unresolved design challenges. WSEs are presented not as a niche formulation, but as a solvation-centric framework for rethinking electrolyte function in metal battery technologies.

Karbak, Mehdi [Pacific Northwest National Laborato↗