Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lunar lander”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Lunar lander conceptual design

A conceptual design is presented of a Lunar Lander, which can be the primary vehicle to transport the equipment necessary to establish a surface lunar base, the crew that will man the base, and the raw materials which the Lunar Station will process. A Lunar Lander will be needed to operate in the regime between the lunar surface and low lunar orbit (LLO), up to 200 km. This lander is intended for the establishment and operation of a manned surface base on the moon and for the support of the Lunar Space Station. The lander will be able to fulfill the requirements of 3 basic missions: A mission dedicated to delivering maximum payload for setting up the initial lunar base; Multiple missions between LLO and lunar surface dedicated to crew rotation; and Multiple missions dedicated to cargo shipments within the regime of lunar surface and LLO. A complete set of structural specifications is given.

Lee, Joo Ahn↗

Analysis of Alternative Architectures for Cargo Lunar Landers

NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) program has been working with commercial partners to develop human-class lunar landers to return the first American woman and next American man to the lunar surface in the mid 2020’s. In an effort to expand human presence beyond low Earth orbit, NASA’s Artemis program aims to facilitate a sustainable, long-term human presence in cis-lunar space. A component of this will require significant infrastructure to be delivered to the lunar surface. Delivering this infrastructure will require a significant lander capability that has yet to be developed. A thorough understanding of cargo lunar lander architectures is required such that select alternatives can be identified that best support the Artemis program’s objective of sustainability. The goal of this study is to aid NASA and its partners in the understanding of the cargo lunar lander trades space, as well as identify potential robust alternatives. The results will support NASA as it moves forward with key activities such as requirements formulation, agency strategic planning, and potential cargo lunar lander procurements. The study builds off of recent work performed by the Human Landing System program’s Architecture and Systems Analysis group to encompass a broad trade space of cargo lunar lander architecture alternatives. The current trade space as depicted by the morphological matrix and mission graph in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, respectively, includes key alternative options that have become highly relevant due to current HLS activities and include on-orbit refueling, active cryogenic fluid management, Earth orbit aggregation, and global lunar access. The authors believe that there is also a statistically relevant impact of lander-payload configuration on the primary structure of the vehicle that could greatly impact alternative selection. Because of this, several conceptual lander-payload configurations will be evaluated to determine the level of impact. The current set of conceptual configurations are shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. To aid the conceptual evaluation of these configurations, a catalogue of notional payloads has been developed that represent a wide range of masses and volumes that are expected to be delivered in support of a sustained human lunar presence, including pressurized and unpressurized rovers, surface habitats, power systems, and other support infrastructure. In order to execute this study in a timely fashion, a similar approach to that utilized in a similar 2019 study focused on 2024 human lunar sorties will be employed [1]. The team utilized a novel architecture synthesis framework currently being developed by NASA/MSFC to evaluate over 600,000 lunar lander architectures over a two month time frame [2]. From this large data set, varying ground rules and assumptions were applied as filters to explore the trade space to identify alternatives which exhibited robustness, as measured by launch vehicle payload margin, to absorb the natural growth that occurs during design maturation. The set of Earth-Moon system Delta-Vs assumed from the 2019 study, shown in Fig. 5, will be repurposed to accelerate model formulation for this effort. Additionally, current efforts in collaboration with the Georgia Institute of Technology’s Aerospace System Design Lab will be integrated to provide probabilistic modeling of the cargo lunar lander architectures to aid in identifying robust design alternatives [3]. The approach will help minimize potential impacts due to large levels of uncertainty inherent to pre phase-A conceptual design. By leveraging these past and present studies and partnerships, a highly detailed set of data can be generated in a short time period to aid NASA in the coming years to support the goal of a sustained human lunar presence.

Architectures↗

COMPASS Final Report: Low Cost Robotic Lunar Lander

The COllaborative Modeling for the Parametric Assessment of Space Systems (COMPASS) team designed a robotic lunar Lander to deliver an unspecified payload (greater than zero) to the lunar surface for the lowest cost in this 2006 design study. The purpose of the low cost lunar lander design was to investigate how much payload can an inexpensive chemical or Electric Propulsion (EP) system deliver to the Moon s surface. The spacecraft designed as the baseline out of this study was a solar powered robotic lander, launched on a Minotaur V launch vehicle on a direct injection trajectory to the lunar surface. A Star 27 solid rocket motor does lunar capture and performs 88 percent of the descent burn. The Robotic Lunar Lander soft-lands using a hydrazine propulsion system to perform the last 10% of the landing maneuver, leaving the descent at a near zero, but not exactly zero, terminal velocity. This low-cost robotic lander delivers 10 kg of science payload instruments to the lunar surface.

McGuire, Melissa L.↗

Robotic Lunar Landers for Science and Exploration

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) have been conducting mission studies and performing risk reduction activities for NASA s robotic lunar lander flight projects. This paper describes some of the lunar lander concepts derived from these studies conducted by the MSFC/APL Robotic Lunar Lander Development Project team. In addition, the results to date of the lunar lander development risk reduction efforts including high pressure propulsion system testing, structure and mechanism development and testing, long cycle time battery testing and combined GN&C and avionics testing will be addressed. The most visible elements of the risk reduction program are two autonomous lander flight test vehicles: a compressed air system with limited flight durations and a second version using hydrogen peroxide propellant to achieve significantly longer flight times and the ability to more fully exercise flight sensors and algorithms.

Chavers, D. G.↗

Robotic Lunar Landers for Science and Exploration

NASA Marshall Space Flight Center and The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory has been conducting mission studies and performing risk reduction activities for NASA s robotic lunar lander flight projects. In 2005, the Robotic Lunar Exploration Program Mission #2 (RLEP-2) was selected as a Exploration Systems Mission Directorate precursor robotic lunar lander mission to demonstrate precision landing and definitively determine if there was water ice at the lunar poles; however, this project was canceled. Since 2008, the team has been supporting NASA s Science Mission Directorate designing small lunar robotic landers for diverse science missions. The primary emphasis has been to establish anchor nodes of the International Lunar Network (ILN), a network of lunar science stations envisioned to be emplaced by multiple nations. This network would consist of multiple landers carrying instruments to address the geophysical characteristics and evolution of the moon. Additional mission studies have been conducted to support other objectives of the lunar science community and extensive risk reduction design and testing has been performed to advance the design of the lander system and reduce development risk for flight projects. This paper describes the current status of the robotic lunar mission studies that have been conducted by the MSFC/APL Robotic Lunar Lander Development team, including the ILN Anchor Nodes mission. In addition, the results to date of the lunar lander development risk reduction efforts including high pressure propulsion system testing, structure and mechanism development and testing, long cycle time battery testing and combined GN&C and avionics testing will be addressed. The most visible elements of the risk reduction program are two autonomous lander test articles: a compressed air system with limited flight durations and a second version using hydrogen peroxide propellant to achieve significantly longer flight times and the ability to more fully exercise flight sensors and algorithms. Robotic Lunar Lander design and development will have significant feed-forward to other missions to the Moon and, indeed, to other airless bodies such as Mercury, asteroids, and Europa, to which similar science and exploration objectives are applicable.

Cohen, B. A.↗

Demonstration of Navigation Doppler Lidar Capabilities Onboard the First Commercial Lunar Lander

Landing on the Moon safely, softly, and precisely is still an extremely difficult task to achieve. Navigation Doppler Lidar (NDL) was designed to provide a solution to spaceflight landing vehicles in achieving this task. NDL is a high-performance, compact, and cost-effective velocity and altitude measurement instrument that has been developed, tested and improved over many years. Testing has now culminated with NDL’s successful operation on two spaceflight vehicles this year: Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander and Intuitive Machines’ Odysseus lunar lander. Odysseus became the first U.S. vehicle to land successfully on the Moon since Apollo 17. The performance data obtained by NDL during the Intuitive Machines mission is exceptional, and this mission fully demonstrated NDL’s ability to produce critical velocity and altitude data for future robotic and human exploration missions to the Moon and other planetary bodies. This paper will give an overview of NDL briefly describing its history, architecture, and theory of operation. NDL’s system checkout on Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander is then discussed followed by NDL’s performance during the Intuitive Machines Odysseus lunar lander mission. A description of how the data acquired by NDL is then used to perform trajectory reconstruction and animation is then provided. Finally, this paper concludes with potential uses of NDL’s acquired mission data to future applications.

Lunar Landing↗

Demonstration of Navigation Doppler Lidar Capabilities Onboard the First Commercial Lunar Lander

Landing on the Moon safely, softly, and precisely is still an extremely difficult task to achieve. Navigation Doppler Lidar (NDL) was designed to provide a solution to spaceflight landing vehicles in achieving this task. NDL is a high-performance, compact, and cost-effective velocity and altitude measurement instrument that has been developed, tested and improved over many years. Testing has now culminated with NDL’s successful operation on two spaceflight vehicles this year: Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander and Intuitive Machines’ Odysseus lunar lander. Odysseus became the first U.S. vehicle to land successfully on the Moon since Apollo 17. The performance data obtained by NDL during the Intuitive Machines mission is exceptional, and this mission fully demonstrated NDL’s ability to produce critical velocity and altitude data for future robotic and human exploration missions to the Moon and other planetary bodies. This paper will give an overview of NDL briefly describing its history, architecture, and theory of operation. NDL’s system checkout on Astrobotic’s Peregrine lunar lander is then discussed followed by NDL’s performance during the Intuitive Machines Odysseus lunar lander mission. A description of how the data acquired by NDL is then used to perform trajectory reconstruction and animation is then provided. Finally, this paper concludes with potential uses of NDL’s acquired mission data to future applications.

Lunar Landing↗

Common Lunar Lander (CLL) trajectory analysis

Common Lunar Lander trajectory analysis is presented in viewgraph format. Trajectory requirements, trajectory characteristics, trajectory timeline, and alternate trajectory advantages and disadvantages are given.

Wagner, Lynn A., Jr.↗

Altair Lunar Lander Consumables Management

The Altair lunar lander is scheduled to return humans to the moon in the year 2020. Keeping the crew of 4 and the vehicle functioning at their best while minimizing lander mass requires careful budgeting and management of consumables and cooperation with other constellation elements. Consumables discussed here include fluids, gasses, and energy. This paper presents the lander's missions and constraints as they relate to consumables and the design solutions that have been employed in recent Altair conceptual designs.

Polsgrove, Tara↗

Linear Covariance Analysis for a Lunar Lander

A next-generation lunar lander Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) system, which includes a state-of-the-art optical sensor suite, is proposed in a concept design cycle. The design goal is to allow the lander to softly land within the prescribed landing precision. The achievement of this precision landing requirement depends on proper selection of the sensor suite. In this paper, a robust sensor selection procedure is demonstrated using a Linear Covariance (LinCov) analysis tool developed by Draper.

Jang, Jiann-Woei↗

An Altair Overview: Designing a Lunar Lander for 21st Century Human Space Exploration

Altair, the lunar lander element of NASA's Constellation program, was conducted in a different design environment than many other NASA projects of similar scope. Because of this relatively unique approach, there are a number of significant success stories that should be considered during the development of any future lunar landers or human spacecraft. This paper is divided into two separate themes; the first is the approach used during the conceptual design studies, including the systematic analysis cycles and the decision making process associated with each: and the second is a summary of the resulting lessons learned that were compiled after looking back at the lifetime of the Project. Altair was terminated before entering Phase B of its design, and was often criticized for being a very heavy and very large vehicle. While there was specific rationale for all of the decisions that led up to that configuration, future design cycles were specifically planned to re-address the mass challenge. Had the project continued, the deliberate, stepwise design process would have converged on an optimized lander design that balanced mass, risk, cost and capabilities. Some of the specific items that will be addressed in this paper include project development strategy, organizational approach and team dynamics, risk-informed design process, mission architecture constraints, mission key driving requirements, model-based systems engineering process, configuration studies, contingency considerations, subsystem overviews and key trade studies. The paper will conclude with a summary of the lessons identified during the Altair project and make suggestions for application to future studies.

Brown, Kendall K.↗

Robotic Lunar Lander Development Project Status

This slide presentation reviews the status of the development of a robotic lunar lander. The goal of the project is to perform engineering tests and risk reduction activities to support the development of a small lunar lander for lunar surface science. This includes: (1) risk reduction for the flight of the robotic lander, (i.e., testing and analyzing various phase of the project); (2) the incremental development for the design of the robotic lander, which is to demonstrate autonomous, controlled descent and landing on airless bodies, and design of thruster configuration for 1/6th of the gravity of earth; (3) cold gas test article in flight demonstration testing; (4) warm gas testing of the robotic lander design; (5) develop and test landing algorithms; (6) validate the algorithms through analysis and test; and (7) tests of the flight propulsion system.

Hammond, Monica↗

Challenges of Designing a Passive Thermal Control System for the Astrobotic Peregrine Lunar Lander

The Astrobotic Peregrine is a lunar lander currently undergoing design by Astrobotic Technology with help from NASA through the Lunar Cargo Transportation and Landing by Soft Touchdown (Lunar CATALYST) program. This paper will discuss the challenges of designing a passive thermal control system for the lander, and how the design has evolved from the initial passive concept. These challenges include drastically varying worst hot and worst cold case thermal environments, narrow temperature limits of critical components, limited available locations for spacecraft component mounting, and unexpected changes causing significant thermal impacts. The initial thermal control strategy was to cold bias the spacecraft by thermally coupling all spacecraft components to one mounting deck, which also doubled as a radiator, and using heaters to maintain each component’s temperature above its lower temperature limit when in the cold environments. As the design evolved, this strategy alone became inadequate. As heat dissipations increased and became more varying with the addition of components, the thermal design was changed and additional thermal control technologies added. Thermal control strategies incorporated into the design include dictating the lander orientation in demanding environments, defining locations for critical spacecraft components, limiting component operation when possible, and using technology to create variable thermal contacts. Additional design changes will occur as the design continues to evolve to optimize the most effective thermal control system. The thermal design of Peregrine is still in progress, with Critical Design Review (CDR) scheduled for December 2019.

Mauro, Stephanie↗

A lingering local exopshere created by a gas plume of a lunar lander

We model the expected local exosphere created by outgassing from a lunar lander plume water deposit located adjacent to a lunar lander. We assume the landing is near dawn within Lacus Mortis at 45oN. We consider a set of water desorption scenarios especially focusing on the water-surface desorption activation energy that can possess a distribution of energy states. Our initial simulation starts with a deposition surface having 1020 water molecules per square meter in a 2 km × 2 km region where 90% of the water is retained by weak water-water sorption interactions and 10% are bound by water-regolith sorption interactions. We find that the loosely bound water molecules in water-water interactions quickly desorb within hours after landing. However, water molecules bound to surface sites having a desorption activation greater than 0.7 eV were found to be retained until the source region rotated to later local times (i.e., surface temperature becomes relatively high). We found such time-delayed desorption leads to a tenuous but lingering exosphere emitted from the lander plume deposit region for many 10's of hours after landing. We also adjusted the initial condition by considering different landing local times and considered a case where 100% of the water is bound by water-regolith interactions (mimicking a porous regolith).

W.M. Farrell↗

Life Support Systems for Lunar Landers

Engineers designing life support systems for NASA s next Lunar Landers face unique challenges. As with any vehicle that enables human spaceflight, the needs of the crew drive most of the lander requirements. The lander is also a key element of the architecture NASA will implement in the Constellation program. Many requirements, constraints, or optimization goals will be driven by interfaces with other projects, like the Crew Exploration Vehicle, the Lunar Surface Systems, and the Extravehicular Activity project. Other challenges in the life support system will be driven by the unique location of the vehicle in the environments encountered throughout the mission. This paper examines several topics that may be major design drivers for the lunar lander life support system. There are several functional requirements for the lander that may be different from previous vehicles or programs and recent experience. Some of the requirements or design drivers will change depending on the overall Lander configuration. While the configuration for a lander design is not fixed, designers can examine how these issues would impact their design and be prepared for the quick design iterations required to optimize a spacecraft.

Anderson, Molly↗

Analysis of Base-Heating Environment During Ground Testing of a Lunar Lander Demonstrator

A three-dimensional, unstructured-grid, pressure-based, reacting flow, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and heat transfer methodology was employed to study the base-heating environment of a lunar lander demonstrator, during terrestrial ground testing. Two base-heating environments were investigated: lunar lander demonstrator sitting on pad, and lunar lander demonstrator hovering at a distance above ground. Two unique and quite different base-flow physics are found for these two cases. In the case of demonstrator sitting on pad, the computed heat fluxes are high and the base flow is unsteady, caused by a Coanda effect precursor that makes the fountain jet oscillate about the center of the base. For the second case, due to the higher elevation of the demonstrator and the layout of the nozzles, the Coanda effect forces the fountain jet to be attached to two of the nozzle plumes, resulting in much lower computed base heat fluxes.

Wang, T. S.↗

Design, Development, and Use of a Lunar Lander Simulation for NASA's Artemis Program

This paper describes the design, development, and initial use of a generalized and configurable lunar lander simulation to support NASA’s Artemis Program. This simulation is being developed for the Crew Compartment Office (CrewCo) in the Human Landing Systems (HLS) program and is called the HLS CrewCo Lander Simulation (HCLS). The HCLS provides insight into the challenges associated with returning humans to the Moon and the particular difficulties of operating at the Lunar South Pole. The simulation models a generalized integrated lunar landing spacecraft based on a government reference design but can and has been adapted to model vendor specific designs as well. The simulation architecture and tool sets provide a flexible framework that allows for quickly prototyping and evaluating various aspects of a piloted lunar landing system. This includes the modeling of all principal human controlled flight phases: rendezvous and docking with crew transfer systems; docked orbital outpost operations; undocking and lunar transfer; lunar orbital operations; lunar deorbit, descent, and landing (DDL); lunar surface operations; lunar ascent; and return to the orbital outpost. The flexibility of the simulation allows for the integrated evaluation of potential vehicle subsystems, crew displays, guidance and control modes, and trajectory designs. The purpose of the HCLS is not to design the ideal lunar lander, but rather to understand and the strengths and weaknesses of vehicle design choices. This paper describes the basic simulation architecture and discusses the tool sets used to develop the HCLS. This includes a number of open source tool sets and publicly available data sets. This paper also describes some of the early use cases and findings. The primary focus of early HCLS use has been on the manual piloting task to safely get the crew to the desired landing site in case of a failure in the automated guidance system. Several guidance modes and cues have been implemented which allow a pilot to manually fly the vehicle to the targeted landing site starting anywhere from powered descent initiation. It has been a valuable tool for understanding what is required to manually fly a lunar lander as well as giving a sense of the vehicle dynamics, which are much different than anything that is flown on Earth. A number of experienced test pilots have participated in manual piloting evaluations using the HCLS and provided valuable feedback on the piloting task which has been very beneficial to NASA and the HLS program.

James Michael Gentile↗