Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “MAGNETIC MONOPOLES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Status of the evidence for a magnetic monopole

The experimental evidence supporting the detection of a moving magnetic monopole, using a balloon-borne array of track detectors, was presented. Although the results cannot be proved to have been produced by a monopole, they do not seem to have been produced by any nucleus. The very high, roughly constant ionization rate inferred from track etch rate measurements in a stack of Lexan detectors implies passage of a minimum-ionizing particle more highly charged than any known nucleus, yet the Cerenkov film detectors indicated a velocity less than about 0.68 times the speed of light and the size of the track in the nuclear emulsion indicated a velocity approximately equal to 0.5 times the speed of light. At this velocity the ionization rate of a highly electrically charged particle would have changed dramatically with pathlength unless its mass to charge ratio were far greater than that of a nucleus.

Price, P. B.↗

Kinematic constraints on the production of magnetic monopoles

A strict lower limit is derived for the laboratory kinetic energy of a magnetic monopole produced from a target at rest. The production of a monopole-antimonopole pair via the collision of a projectile with a target at rest in the laboratory is analyzed in terms of the velocity of the zero-momentum frame, the velocity of the monopole in that frame, and the velocity of the monopole in the laboratory. The limit obtained is applied to the data of Price et al. (1975), and almost all means of producing the monopole in the atmosphere immediately above the balloon-borne detectors are ruled out. Some mechanisms for slowing a monopole following its production are briefly considered.

Wilson, L. W.↗

Magnetic monopole search by 130 m(2)sr He gas proportional counter

A search experiment for cosmic ray magnetic monopoles was performed by means of atomic induction mechanism by using He mixture gas proportional counters of the calorimeter (130 square meters sr) at the center of the Akeno air shower array. In 3,482 hours operation no monopole candidate was observed. The upper limit of the monopole flux is 1.44 x 10 to the minus 13th power cm-z, sec -1, sr-1 (90% C.L.) for the velocity faster than 7 x 0.0001 c.

Hara, T.↗

Upper limit on magnetic monopole flux from Baksan experiment

No indication of slowly moving penetrating particles in cosmic radiation underground was found during two years observation. Particle velocity and pulse shape are main criteria for search. Probability of the imitation of slow particles (Beta 0.1) by atmospheric muons is negligible. Our upper limit on superheavy magnetic monopole flux is now 1.86 x 10 to the minus 15th power cm(-2) sr(-1) s(-1) (90% c.l.) for velocity range 2 x 0.0001 beta 0.1.

Alexeyev, E. N.↗

Search for supermassive magnetic monopoles using mica crystals

The survival of the Galactic magnetic field almost certainly sets an astrophysical upper bound of approx. 10 to the minus 15th power cm(-2) sr(-1) s(-1) on the flux of monopoles. To improve significantly upon this Parker limit with direct, real time searches would require a detector area of approx. 10,000 square meters and a collection time of years. Several such searches are being contemplated. A novel alternative scheme using large mica crystals capable of recording and storing tracks of slow monopoles over a time scale of approx. 10 to the 9th power years was proposed.

Price, P. B.↗

Why does the sun sometimes look like a magnetic monopole?

For several months in early 1965 the sun appeared to have large scale magnetic field directed outwards at nearly all latitudes and longitudes. Several independent observations that lead to this puzzling situation are discussed.

Wilcox, J. M.↗

Why does the sun sometimes look like a magnetic monopole.

For three or four consecutive months in 1965 observations of the sun's magnetic field showed that it was predominantly directed out of the sun at all solar latitudes. This interval in the first part of 1965 is near the minimum of the sunspot cycle. Solar activity has been strongly associated with large-scale solar regions with field directed predominantly into the sun, while the observations noted seem to show that just near solar maximum there is almost no field observed to be directed into the sun. An attempt is made to describe and develop these interesting circumstances.

Wilcox, J. M.↗

Orion-arm magnetic monopoles and gamma rays

It is shown that galactic-disk monopoles could yield air showers which are stochastically aligned with the local Orion-arm magnetic field and which are above the energies of similarly aligned galactic heavy nuclei. In the absence of a cosmic-ray anisotropy, this method sets limits on the flux of galactic monopoles and their production cross sections. Limits based on the cosmic-ray anisotropy at 10 to the 19th power eV are presented. The possibility of stochastic alignment of inverse Compton photons from monopoles and 2.7 K black-body photons is considered. The resulting monopole-flux limits, based on the same data as those calculated by Osborne (1970), differ significantly from Osborne's limits, where the mechanisms of spiral-arm alignment and galactic containment are ignored.

Tompkins, D. R., Jr.↗

Superheavy magnetic monopoles and main-sequence stars

The interactions of superheavy monopoles with stars of mass 0.6-25 solar masses are studied. It is shown that captured monopoles cluster near the stellar center, and that their contribution to the total stellar luminosity and their effects on the structure of stars will be unobservable as long as the flux is significantly below the Parker (1970, 1971) bound. It is suggested that all but the strongly magnetic stars will retain a substantial fraction of the monopoles they capture.

Frieman, Joshua A.↗

Further measurements and reassessment of the magnetic-monopole candidate

The data on the 1975 Lexan event are reexamined in a framework that does not depend on the details of a particular track model. Instead, visual measurements of two quantities, photographic evidence, and silver-grain densities measured with an automated microscopic-image dissector are cited. It is shown that throughout the detector stack the particle had a roughly constant value of absolute Z/beta of about 109-114 based on energy deposition at radial distance less than about 0.01 micron. Its energy deposition at radial distance greater than about 20 microns was incompatible with that expected from any known cosmic ray nucleus with Z/beta in this range. A monopole is ruled out, and the three candidates compatible with the data are: (1) a slow, supermassive particle with beta about 0.4, charge about 45e, and mass above 1000-10,000 amu; (2) a fast antinucleus with Z/beta about -109 to -114 and absolute Z between 76 and 96; and (3) a very fast nucleus with Z about 110-114 and beta above about 0.99.

Price, P. B.↗

Monopole-track characteristics in plastic detectors

Total and restricted energy loss rates are calculated for magnetic monopoles of charge g = 137 e in Lexan polycarbonate. Range-energy curves are also presented. The restricted-energy-loss model is used to estimate the appearance of a monopole track in plastic detectors. The results are applied to the event observed by Price et al. and identified by them as a monopole. It is found that the observed etch rate is consistent with what one would expect for a slow magnetic monopole. These results should also be of use to other investigators for both the design and analysis of monopole experiments.

Ahlen, S. P.↗

Lunar Magnetic Field Models From Lunar Prospector and SELENE/Kaguya Along-Track Magnetic Field Gradients

We use L1-norm model regularization of |Br| component at the surface on magnetic monopoles bases and along-track magnetic field differences alone (without vector observations) to derive high quality global magnetic field models at the surface of the Moon. The practical advantages to this strategy are the following: monopoles are more stable at closer spacing in comparison to dipoles, improving spatial resolution; L1-norm model regularization leads to sparse models which may be appropriate for the Moon which has regions of localized magnetic field features; and along-track differences reduce the need for ad-hoc external field noise reduction strategies. We examine also the use of Lunar Prospector and SELENE/Kaguya magnetometer data, combined and separately, and find that the Lunar Prospector along-track vector field differences lead to surface field models that require weaker regularization and, hence, result in higher spatial resolution. Significantly higher spatial resolution (wavelengths of roughly 25–30 km) and higher amplitude surface magnetic fields can be derived over localized regions of high amplitude anomalies (due to their higher signal-to-noise ratio). These high-resolution field models are also compared with the results of Surface Vector Mapping approach of Tsunakawa et al. (2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JE004785). Finally, the monopoles- as well as dipoles-based patterns of the Serenitatis high amplitude magnetic feature have characteristic textbook patterns of Br and Bθ component fields from a nearly vertically downwardly magnetized source region and it implies that the principal source of the anomaly was formed when the region was much closer to the north magnetic pole of the Moon.

D. Ravat↗

Monopoles, cosmology, and astrophysics - Update 1985

The characteristics of the superheavy magnetic monopoles (MMs) predicted by GUTs are reviewed, and recent developments in astrophysical MM search techniques are surveyed. Theoretical models of the birth, current distribution, and motion of MMs are examined; the observational implications of MM mass, magnetic charge, and ability to catalyze nucleon decay are considered; estimates of the average and local flux limits for MMs of 10 to the 25th eV are given (less than about 3 x 10 to the -15th and less than about 3 x 10 to the -11th/sq cm sr sec, respectively); and the possibility of detecting MMs in the sun (if they can escape annihilation there) is discussed.

Turner, Michael S.↗

Kinematical constraints on the observation of slow monopoles at the top of the atmosphere

Relativistic kinematics of monopole production and propagation in earth's atmosphere and magnetic field have been examined in the light of the observation of a magnetic monopole by Price et al. It has been shown that the observed monopole cannot result from nuclear interactions in the atmosphere and that the extraterrestrial origin of this monopole is very unlikely.

Badhwar, G. D.↗