Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Moon 2024”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Biological CubeSats: What Have We Learned so Far and What Is Next?

Since Apollo 17 in 1972, NASA has sent no humans or other biological organisms outside of Earth's protective magnetosphere. Recently, NASA has set its sights on human exploration in deep space, with an ambitous plan to put astronauts back on the Moon by 2024 and to eventually land human missions on Mars. Such missions will require significant countermeasures, likely both technological and biomedical, to protect biology from chronic radiation exposure. CubeSats can inform these countermeasures by querying relevant space environments with model organisms.NASA has launched five biological CubeSat missions into low-Earth orbit (LEO). GeneSat-1 was launched in 2006 to study gene expression and increase our knowledge of how spaceflight affects microbes. Similar life-support technologies were then used in PharmaSat and O/OREOS, which launched in 2009 and 2010, respectively. PharmaSat contained optical systems to examine how yeast cells responded to an antifungal treatment. One of O/OREOS payloads, SESLO (Space Environment Survivability of Living Organisms), housed dormant microorganisms, which were rehydrated on orbit to track alterations to growth and metabolism induced by microgravity and radiation. In 2014, NASA launched SporeSat to study the mechanisms of plant cell gravity sensing using lab-on-a-chip devices. Most recently, in 2017, NASA launched EcAMSat (E. coli AntiMicrobial Satellite), which investigated the effects of microgravity on antibiotic resistance of a pathogenic bacterium. Each one of these missions increased our understanding of the biological effects of spaceflight in LEO, while refining technologies and imparting valuable lessons to the next generation of CubeSats.CubeSats housing translational biological models are therefore ideal for defining the hazards of deep space travel, as they can provide critical data over relevant durations. BioSentinel, a next-generation deep-space CubeSat, is planned to launch as a secondary payload on Artemis 1 in 2020. BioSentinel will study the DNA damage response to deep space radiation in yeast.

Santa Maria, Sergio R.↗
NASA NTRS2020

IV&V Assurance Case Design for Artemis II

As human-rated missions like those in NASA’s Artemis program continue to grow in both size and complexity, and the role of software in achieving mission objectives expands dramatically, NASA’s Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Teams face evolving challenges in assuring the safety and performance of the safety- and mission-critical embedded software that is essential to landing astronauts on the surface of the Moon by 2024. Key among these challenges is IV&V’s desire to present a cohesive, integrated assurance statement to its stakeholders that encapsulates and summarizes our assurance positions across the integrated Artemis systems and their combined role in support of a safe and successful flight. In order to meet this challenge, the IV&V Teams have begun a transition to using formal assurance case concepts and documentation in the Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) to build an argument in support of software assurance. IV&V recognizes significant benefits to the logical argumentation structure provided by assurance cases and GSN over our current practices for documenting and managing assurance claims. In order to reap these benefits, IV&V is integrating the use of assurance case concepts with our paradigm of follow-the-risk capability based assurance. Because of this, assurance cases created and used by IV&V are distinct from the sort of assurance case created by a development project or embedded software assurance organization. IV&V’s assurance cases depend much less upon standards and regulations, and more on evidence captured by IV&V regarding the environment, requirements, design, and implementation. IV&V constructs an independent network of claims based on an independent decomposition of arguments. Based upon the risk posture of these claims and their associated software and software artifacts, IV&V then develops and executes engineering analyses and testing, which provide evidence to either support or refute the claim. This emerging risk-informed assurance case methodology is being put into practice as IV&V plans for support of the Artemis II mission, the first flight of the Orion capsule and Space Launch System with astronauts on board.

Gerek Whitman↗
NASA NTRS2020

IV&V Assurance Case Design for Artemis II

As human-rated missions like those in NASA's Artemis program continue to grow in both size and complexity, and the role of software in achieving mission objectives expands dramatically, NASA's Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Teams face evolving challenges in assuring the safety and performance of the safety- and mission-critical embedded software that is essential to landing astronauts on the surface of the Moon by 2024. Key among these challenges is IV&V's desire to present a cohesive, integrated assurance statement to its stakeholders that encapsulates and summarizes our assurance positions across the integrated Artemis systems and their combined role in support of a safe and successful flight. In order to meet this challenge, the IV&V Teams have begun a transition to using formal assurance case concepts and documentation in the Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) to build an argument in support of software assurance. IV&V recognizes significant benefits to the logical argumentation structure provided by assurance cases and GSN over our current practices for documenting and managing assurance claims. In order to reap these benefits, IV&V is integrating the use of assurance case concepts with our paradigm of follow-the-risk capability based assurance. Because of this, assurance cases created and used by IV&V are distinct from the sort of assurance case created by a development project or embedded software assurance organization. IV&V's assurance cases depend much less upon standards and regulations, and more on evidence captured by IV&V regarding the environment, requirements, design, and implementation. IV&V constructs an independent network of claims based on an independent decomposition of arguments. Based upon the risk posture of these claims and their associated software and software artifacts, IV&V then develops and executes engineering analyses and testing, which provide evidence to either support or refute the claim. This emerging risk-informed assurance case methodology is being put into practice as IV&V plans for support of the Artemis II mission, the first flight of the Orion capsule and Space Launch System with astronauts on board.

Whitman, Gerek↗
NASA NTRS2020

Apollo to Artemis: Mining 50-Year Old Records to Inform Future Human Lunar Landing Systems

Under the Artemis lunar exploration program, NASA is committed to landing American astronauts on the moon by 2024. While NASA’s new Space Launch System rocket and Orion capsule will carry astronauts from Earth to the Gateway, the human lunar landing system has not yet been fully defined. As in the Apollo program, there are concerns for vehicle weight and internal volume such that seats may not be desirable, and standing during lunar descent and ascent may be a preferred engineering solution. With such a design, astronauts will experience +GZ (head-to-foot) accelerations during capsule accelerations, and it is unclear whether spaceflight deconditioned astronauts can tolerate these. Apollo astronauts stood during lunar descent and ascent, and the data contained in the early program records for those missions represent a unique resource that may provide insights to the cardiovascular stress associated with this human landing system design.

Petersen, D.↗
NASA NTRS2020

A Simulation Framework for Precision Landing and Hazard Avoidance Technology Assessments

To meet NASA’s challenge to return humans to the Moon in 2024 and establish a sustainable presence in 2028 requires advances in autonomous spacecraft navigation. The Safe and Precise Landing Integrated Capabilities Evolution (SPLICE) project, which leverages previous work at NASA to develop multi-mission precision landing and hazard avoidance technologies, is using a multi-faceted approach to achieve the advanced landing requirements. In addition to increasing the technology readiness level of key sensors and developing high performance space computing, SPLICE uses simulations to determine navigation requirements and evaluate sensor performance. The effort evaluates various precision landing concepts of operations, not only for the lunar human and robotic missions, but also for potential missions to other solar system destinations. This paper summarizes the six degree-of-freedom high fidelity simulation framework, trajectory design methodology, and sensor models being considered for a variety of precision lander missions. Initial results of the navigation sensor performance for a human Mars mission are presented. Finally, trade and sensitivity studies are outlined for future work to fully characterize sensor performance assumptions and modifications required to achieve precision landing and hazard avoidance.

Alicia Dwyer Cianciolo↗
NASA NTRS2020

A Flexible Lunar Architecture for Exploration (FLARE) Supporting NASA’s Artemis Program

The Flexible Lunar Architecture for Exploration (FLARE) is a concept to deliver four crew to the lunar surface for a minimum of seven days and then return them safely to Earth. FLARE can be implemented whenever the component vehicles are operational. FLARE was developed as an alternative to NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) reference architecture from the Design Analysis Cycle (DAC) #2 created in 2019. The DAC2 guidelines required utilization of the Gateway vehicle in a Near- Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). Instead, FLARE chooses a Low Lunar Frozen Polar Orbit (LLFPO) for lunar rendezvous of components, and an optional Gateway vehicle. The LLFPO provides a stable orbit that overflies the south pole every 2 h, ensuring easy access to the lunar surface for surface aborts with a much lower propellant requirement than NRHO. The minimum FLARE concept uses one Space Launch System (SLS) launch, one Orion, one European Service Module (ESM), and one human lander (launched on commercial vehicle(s)). FLARE adds the SpaceTug, based upon the mature and successful ULA “Common” Centaur Upper Stage vehicle, with modifications to create an Earth-Moon transfer vehicle. In the FLARE baseline mission, the SpaceTug provides propulsion needed to return the Orion + ESM from LLFPO to Earth. The SpaceTug also provides propulsion to deliver the separate human lander components – the Descent Element (DE) and the Ascent Element (AE) - from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) to LLFPO. The SLS Block 1 then launches the Orion + ESM and completes a rendezvous with the mated DE + AE components in LLFPO. FLARE offers optional phases beyond the baseline mission. The SpaceTug can deliver components of the planned Gateway, including the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) and the Habitable and Logistics Outpost (HALO), to LLFPO. FLARE provides an option to deliver precursor equipment to the lunar surface to enhance and extend the human mission. With these components, including an inflatable habitation module and airlock, individual crew mobility vehicle(s), an In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) demonstration, and science and technology experiments, the crew can explore and conduct science on the lunar surface for up to 14 days.

Moon 2024↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Centers and Universities Collaborate in Annual Smallsat Technology Partnerships

The Small Spacecraft Technology program within the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate sponsors the Smallsat Technology Partnerships (STP) initiative. The STP initiative awards cooperative agreements between NASA centers and university teams for technology development efforts that advance the capabilities of small spacecraft to achieve NASA mission objectives in unique and more affordable ways. NASA’s announcement to return humans to the Moon by 2024 raises new opportunities for Smallsats to contribute to missions in cislunar space, though technical challenges are to be overcome to establish their value in this environment. Precursor missions utilizing small spacecraft will blaze the trail for lunar exploration, establishing infrastructure such as communication and navigation networks, and performing assembly and repair services for larger structures and human habitats. To achieve these goals, certain novel Smallsat technologies will need to be developed and demonstrated. The 2020 STP solicitation sought proposals for specific technologies to enable these lunar missions. For the 2020 STP cycle, NASA selected nine university teams to mature new systems and capabilities in the laboratory, and in some cases, demonstrate in suborbital or orbital spaceflights. This paper describes the STP portfolio, past and present efforts, and the nine partnerships selected.

James J. Cockrell↗
NASA NTRS2020

Lunar Transient Accelerations White Paper

Recently, the United States announced a plan to return astronauts to the moon by 2024 [8]. Lunar landing (and subsequent Mars landing) architecture was not considered when the current NASA standards and vehicle design requirements for crew injury risk were developed. Therefore a gap exists in protecting the crew in planetary landing scenarios. One of the interesting aspects of this design reference mission (DRM)is the consideration of having the crew stand during dynamic phases of flight. Although this approach was contemplated for the Apollo Lunar Module, current NASA standards do not address design solutions that allow the crew to stand. Currently, NASA uses several tools and associated limits to mitigate crew injury because of dynamic loads. Some of these tools are the Brinkley Dynamic Response Criterion (BDRC) model and Hybrid III Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) [10]; and these have several limitations for assessing spaceflight loading environments, as well as specific underlying assumptions that may not be applicable in planetary landing vehicles. The BDRC is a simple lumped mass parameter model developed by the U.S. military, and has been used primarily to evaluate injury risk associated with aircraft ejection systems. The model evaluates seat accelerations in each axis to determine injury risk. Because the model treats the human-seat-restraint system as a single system, it is contingent on a restraint system and seat with similar characteristics of the original test data underlying the model. In particular, the model requires a rigid seat with a minimum natural frequency of 15Hz, minimal seat pan padding, side supports, and multipoint harness. The BDRC model uses undamped natural frequency and damping coefficients based on these requirements and any deviations may render the model injury predictions void. In lunar landing, one expects that a minimal or even no seat with minimal restraints will be employed. In this case, the original model parameters are likely to not be applicable. For capsule-based spacecraft returning crew to Earth, the Hybrid III ATD in various sizes also is used to supplement the BDRC. This analytical tool was added to address limitations in the BDRC related to spacecraft landings while wearing a pressure garment and helmet. Although the Hybrid III ATD has additional measurement capability; head, neck,and lumbar spine responses were the only metrics included because of the limitations imposed by the model.Lunar landing acceleration limits must assume the crew is standing during landing, an orientation for which we have limited data.Although the Apollo missions did employ a standing orientation for the crew, much of the data is lost. Therefore data from othersources havebeen examined to inform lunar landing acceleration limits.

Jeffrey T Somers↗
NASA NTRS2020

Flow Simulations for Martian and Lunar Lander Plume-Surface Interaction Prediction

Landing vehicle propulsive systems introduce several risks associated with plume/surface interactions (PSI) during the final stages of descent. For example, view obscuration during descent due to the liberation of dust driven by the rocket plume’s interaction with the lunar surface was reported on several Apollo missions. Plume-driven debris impacts on vehicle and nearby assets as well as landing instabilities due to crater formation are also potential risks associated with plume/surface interactions. The importance of studying these plume/surface interactions has been elevated due to NASA’s mission to land humans on the Moon by 2024. Existing and under-development predictive simulation tools are currently being brought to application readiness under a project awarded by the NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) Game Changing Development (GCD) program. This tool development is divided into four tasks: (1) simulating plume structure in low-pressure environments, (2) simulating crater development and ejecta, (3) regolith particle phase modeling, and (4) gas-particle interaction modeling. Recent efforts under task 1 include demonstrating existing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools for simulating plume structure in low pressure environments similar to those found on Mars. The results of these demonstrative simulations are compared to available experimental data. Emerging capability being developed under task 2 is also presented, demonstrating simulations of crater formation in Lunar conditions.

Thomas P Shurtz↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Micro-grid for Future Planetary Surface Needs

Under the current Artemis Program, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will send its next set of astronauts (first woman and next man) to the Moon by 2024 and establish a sustainable presence on the lunar surface by 2028. The challenge of creating a sustained lunar surface presence is significantly different than previous efforts. Lunar surface operations will require access to continuous and highly reliable power to support mission needs, such as to support ISRU operations. Adding to this challenge, the lunar surface operations are not going to be established over a single effort, rather the system and operations will evolve and grow over time (years). The first initial loads that arrive on the lunar surface will be integrated to their own dedicated power sources. As the lunar surface operations grow, so will the demand for power and at some point these individual loads will require more power than can be generated with any single power device. This power demand drives the need for inter-connecting the loads and power devices to share power between them, resulting in a micro-grid. One of the advantages of developing a lunar surface micro-grid is that allows lunar surface operations to resemble electrical utility operations on Earth; it allows power to be generated where it is convenient and allows power to be consumed where it is convenient, rather than negotiating between generation and consumption. The micro-grid concept also provides another benefit of affording the ability to increase overall system reliability by integrating dissimilar power generation and energy storage devices together, for example modifying the power generation strategy to include both solar arrays and nuclear. Creating a lunar surface micro-grid has its advantages, however there are significant challenges associated with an evolvable micro-grid concept. The challenges include how to efficiently transmit large amounts of power (10kW+) long distances (1kW+), how to effectively integrate dissimilar power generation and energy storage devices to maximize power consumption and minimize downtime, and how to physically connect these devices together with a connector that can survive the lunar environment (dust, extreme cold temperatures) and is capable of both astronaut and robotic operation. The basic components of the micro-grid have to be designed to ensure the system is sustainable, modular, and reconfigurable. An interface to the micro-grid has to be designed that allows for additional technologies, some of which may not yet be fully designed, to easily integrate into the micro-grid concept. This presentation discusses these lunar challenges in some more depth and offers a path forward in designing an evolvable micro-grid to meet the needs of the lunar surface operations and proposes a Universal Micro-grid Interface Converter to connect these dissimilar power sources and mission loads to the micro-grid.

Jeffrey Csank↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Power and Propulsion Element for Gateway

NASA is taking on the bold objective of returning humans to the Moon by 2024. As part of this effort, the Gateway is being constructed to serve as a command center and way-point in cis-lunar space for lunar exploration missions. The Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) is the first element of Gateway to be launched and will generate all the power and propulsion required over its 15-year service life. To achieve these goals, high-power solar arrays and solar electric propulsion will be implemented and demonstrated. The electrical power system (EPS) of Gateway, prominently featuring lightweight Roll Out Solar Arrays (ROSA) with state-of-the-art Z4J solar cells and a central hinge, will be sized for an end-of-life (EOL) power management and distribution capability of over 55 kilowatts (kW). The solar array circuits are being designed in a modular manner with scalability and extensibility to a 300 kW-class mission. NASA Glenn Research Center is managing the PPE contract on which Maxar Technologies, Inc. is responsible for fabricating and demonstrating the spacecraft. This manuscript provides a summary of the electrical power system, with additional discussion of the ROSA power generation.

Gateway↗
NASA NTRS2020

Command and Control System Automated Testing

To support the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the Orion capsule, designed to take humans back to the moon in 2024, Kennedy Space Center (KSC) has developed the Spaceport Command and Control System (SCCS) to monitor and control the launch. Within SCCS, the Launch Control System (LCS) is designed to allow console engineers to control and monitor the status of the launch and flight hardware, as well as issue commands to ground control systems and launch vehicles. The messaging software of LCS is responsible for handling the various data types that can be sent between the hardware and software components of the LCS. Since this system is interacting with numerous devices, controllers, and viewports in real time, the distribution of data across the system must be fast, but also reliable and accurate. To verify the accuracy and reliability of the system, developers on the project have created a set of tests to be performed that covers all operations allowed by the system. Given the extensive Application Programming Interface(API) provided by the messaging software, these unit tests are rather time-consuming and costly (in terms of man-hours) to perform. Therefore, an automated testing framework is used to perform supplemental tests automatically when updates are made to the code base.

Rebecca McFadden↗
NASA NTRS2020

Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA): A Segue to the Next Era of Lunar Exploration and Sample Return Activities

In the fifty years since the first lunar samples were collected on Apollo 11, significant advancements have taken place in laboratory analysis, planetary science, and astromaterials curation. These advances are now being leveraged for the Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) Program, which aims to study specially curated Apollo samples that have never been studied before. Since Apollo 17 in 1972, a great deal has been learned about the Moon, including the unique environments of the poles. Building upon Apollo and remote sensing studies since then, the Artemis Program aims to explore the cold environments near the lunar south pole while achieving the concurrent goals of landing the first woman and the next man on the Moon by 2024. Recent developments for ANGSA have significantly accelerated our readiness for Artemis sample return, particularly in the area of cold sample studies. Four science teams were selected to study cold and/or volatile-bearing samples collected during the Apollo program. These samples have special storage and handling requirements that necessitate their processing in a -20°C environment that meets the Apollo materials and cleanliness requirements. NASA has recently undertaken the development and implementation of a cold sample processing facility to support ANGSA. A similar facility will be needed to process the cold, volatile-bearing samples planned to be returned by Artemis missions; therefore, ANGSA provides excellent preparation for Artemis’ future cold sample processing efforts. We will outline the goals of the ANGSA and Artemis programs, illustrating the complementary nature of the work for both. We will describe the efforts to date in designing, testing, and implementing a cold curation facility that meets the requirements of ANGSA and Apollo curation. We will then outline future work for that facility to reach operational readiness. Finally, we will present the sample collection and curation strategies for Artemis, showing how they overlap and build on ANGSA efforts. The development of cold curation at NASA represents a significant leap in the knowledge, experience, and technologies used in astromaterials curation, opening the door for new investigations of lunar volatiles, impacts, formation processes, prebiotic chemistry, and resource utilization, among many others.

Julie Mitchell↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Ground Testing Program to Verify Lunar Dust-Tolerant Hardware for the Artemis Mission

In preparation for NASA’s Artemis Mission that will return humans to the surface of moon by 2024, an extensive test campaign will be undertaken to understand the effects of lunar dust contamination on equipment. Historically, early Apollo astronauts were affected by lunar dust that entered the cabin after their extravehicular activities, and subsequent missions had various cleaning protocols to reduce the impact of the contamination. The longest stays on the lunar surface were Apollo 15, 16, and 17 (just over three days), so equipment and suits were required to operate reliably for a relatively short duration. The ultimate goal of Artemis is a sustained human presence on the lunar surface, beginning with Artemis 3 which targets a six-and-a-half day surface deployment. This requires the design and testing of dust-tolerant infrastructure. Ground testing with aerosolized lunar dust simulants in a specialized chamber is an inexpensive way to verify the performance of equipment. Chambers equipped with various powder dispersers and analysis instrumentation can explore a variety of realistic scenarios relevant to lunar surface missions, from the interaction of dust with sensitive surfaces such as solar panels, textiles, radiators, and scientific equipment, to the effects of dust as it intrudes into habitable areas. These experiments require careful consideration of the expected mass concentrations, aerosolization methods, and transport properties of dust. Instruments that use light-scattering techniques to measure mass concentrations require calibration against lunar simulants for improved accuracy, and different simulants may have different calibration factors. Test facilities, laboratory setup and test methods for aerosolizing lunar simulant will be described along with relevant aerosol instruments and calibration efforts.

Benjamin J Sumlin↗
NASA NTRS2021

Power and Propulsion for Gateway: A NASA SBIR/STTR Success Story

NASA’s Gateway in lunar orbit will play a critical role in the Artemis program, which aims to land the first woman and the next man on the Moon by 2024. The development of the Power and Propulsion Element for Gateway is being led by Maxar Technologies, a mid-size organization, with contributions from two NASA SBIR/STTR awardees—Deployable Space Systems and Busek Company, Inc, both of which initially developed their Gateway contributions with support from the NASA SBIR/STTR program.

SBIR/STTR↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

AMO-EXPRESS-2.5: Crew Autonomy Onboard the International Space Station

NASA is committed to landing American astronauts, including the first woman and the next man, on the Moon by 2024. Currently, the crew cannot take on all functions performed by the ground today, so the future crews will need more automation to reduce the crew workload for future missions. Of significant importance for these missions is the balance between crew autonomy and vehicle automation. The Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Autonomous Systems and Operations (ASO) Project has been investigating the ability to evaluate crew self-scheduling and activity monitoring for future space missions. The ASO project designed the Autonomous Mission and Operations- EXpedite the PRocessing of Experiments to Space Station Rack-2.5 (AMO-EXPRESS-2.5) payload to evaluate crew self-scheduling and activity monitoring. The AMO-EXPRESS-2.5 builds on the previous AMO-EXPRESS and AMO-EXPRESS-2.0 demonstrations on ISS. The AMO-EXPRESS-2.5 demonstration goals are to prove crew self-scheduling by planning through diagnosing systems expertise, failure detection, procedure recommendation and situational awareness. This paper will describe the development, test and execution results of the AMO-EXPRESS-2.5 demonstration, and will also outline the future planned development and operational efforts to enable autonomy for future deep space manned missions.

Brooke C. Allen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

An Overview of the Lunar Water ISRU Measurement Study (LWIMS)

NASA announced plans for the Artemis program, which would send crewed missions to the Moon by 2024 and achieve a sustainable lunar presence by 2028 [1]. To carry out sustained crewed surface operations, In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), which would use lunar resources to produce mission consumables, will be critical. Water-bearing materials have been identified at both lunar poles and are often associated with Permanently Shadowed Regions (PSRs). These constitute a geological resource that may or may not be convertible to reserves with additional exploration. This water could provide both fuel and oxygen for refueling vehicles as well as life support consumables. However, the nature and extent of this resource is not well understood. Detection of water alone is not adequate for ISRU planning. For this reason, NASA chartered the Lunar Water ISRU Measurement Study (LWIMS). The goal of this study was to assess and define the type, amount, and fidelity of the measurements needed to select mining locations for lunar water ISRU and to define resource-related requirements for ISRU hardware development and architectures (mining operations, hardware emplacement, concept of operations).

Julie Kleinhenz↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Advanced Space Suit Pressure Garment System Status and Development Priorities 2022

This paper discusses the current focus of NASA’s Advanced Space Suit Pressure Garment Technology Development team’s efforts, the status of that work, and a summary of longer-term technology development priorities and activities. For the past two years, the team has focused on the development and detailed design of the Extra-vehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) to support two parallel missions: A 2023 deadline for delivery of the xEMU International Space Station (ISS)Demonstration configuration, and a planetary walking suit configuration to support landing on the Moon in 2024. The baselined design of the xEMU will be reviewed. The results of Design Verification Testing (DVT) will be presented and its ability to provide confidence in the hardware’s ability to meet flight requirements will be discussed. To the extent possible, an impact assessment of the Exploration Extravehicular Activity Services (xEVAS) Contract will be provided. Finally, a brief review of longer-term pressure garment challenges and technology gaps will be presented to provide an understanding of the advanced pressure garment team’s technology investment priorities and needs for future exploration missions.

xEMU↗