SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
This presentation focuses on the economic evaluation of a new NGCC plant with carbon capture operating at a 15% capacity factor (selected as a reference case example) for a Long Duration Energy Storage (LDES) application.
This poster contains preliminary results for an ongoing analysis of modeling and optimization of an NGCC plant with a solvent-based CO2 capture system with high levels of CO2 capture – up to and beyond net-zero emissions. The work was performed to understand the incremental cost of high capture in order to compare with direct-air capture and other net-negative technologies, as well as to understand optimal operation and design of the CCS unit to achieve high capture with minimal increase in cost.
This work presents NETL’s efforts to update the Baseline LCAs that utilize cross competency data from the 2022 Cost and Performance Baseline Updates. This presentation represents the updates to NGCC, SC PC, and Sub PC baseline models and the results from the LCA analysis of these updated systems.
The Texas Carbon Management Program is conducting a Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) for Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper™ (PZAS™) at a natural gas combined cycle power plant in west Texas. Here, this paper presents the design of the advanced stripper system with an emphasis on the selection of packing type, packing height, column diameter, and heat exchanger size, demonstrates the effect of ambient temperature swing on the regeneration energy requirement, and investigates two alternate process configurations that provide better energy performance than PZAS™. The design uses 2 stripper trains, and each train uses two cold cross exchangers, one hot cross exchanger, a stripper column, a CO 2 exchanger, and a condenser. Each column consists of two sections of random packing with RSR 2 packing at the top and RSR 3 packing at the bottom, with a total packed height of 7.5 m. The cold exchanger was designed with an NTU of 6, the hot exchanger with an NTU of 2, and the CO 2 exchanger with an NTU of 5. At 0.4 rich loading and 0.2 lean loading, this design resulted in a heat duty of 2.85 GJ/tonne CO 2 . The heat duty can vary up to 3.1 GJ/tonne CO 2 due to lower rich loading at higher summer temperature, but the absolute steam requirement is 8–15% lower in the summer. An alternate design, PZAS with hot rich bypass, is proposed, which can reduce the equivalent work of stripping by 1.5–3.5% compared to PZAS at low heat exchanger size, due to a reduction in stripper driving force. Using a hot rich bypass increases the vapor fraction of the total rich bypass stream from 0.3 to 1 mol% compared to using the warm rich bypass, which also contributes to a reduction in lost work in the column. PZAS with hot rich bypass outperforms PZAS in energy requirement below a packing height of 15 m, but fails to do so above 15 m of packing due to a column pinch that results in little change in LMTD of the column. PZAS with hot rich bypass has the potential to minimize capital cost in addition to reducing energy requirement as it requires less packing to strip CO 2 than PZAS and requires only one cross exchanger with 8 heat transfer units.
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
A rating model of PZAS (Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper) for a 460 MW natural gas combined cycle was developed from vendor-provided equipment performance data. Surrogate rating models were built and used to optimize variable profit of the system subject to natural gas and electricity price at a fixed value for CO 2 of $\$80$/tonne. Several process constraints were considered between ambient temperatures of 4.4 and 40.5 °C. Lower lean loading resulted in lower reboiler heat duty of about 2.2 GJ/tonne. Lean loading at 0.2 mol/equiv N was sufficient at an ambient temperature of 4.4 °C to maximize variable profit. Solvent precipitation was avoided even at low lean loading (0.18 mol/mol) in the absence of a trim cooler for the lean solvent between the absorber and the cold cross exchanger. Optimal CO 2 removal was always higher than the design case removal of 90% and achieved a peak of 93.6% for 4.4 ºC ambient temperature. Lean solvent rate was a significant driver of profitability. The maximum capacity of the compressor was a significant constraint on profitability. Increasing compressor capacity by 20–30% could increase variable profit by about 21% in the case of 0.18 lean loading at 4.4 °C ambient temperature. Furthermore, this increase in profit was lower at higher ambient temperature and higher lean loading. The breakeven gas price was $\$4.6$/MMBtu at high lean loading of 0.22 mol/mol. Below this value, profit was maximized by increasing the boiler heat rate. Above this value, profit could not be increased by burning additional natural gas, requiring a reduction in boiler heat rate and consequently, specific heat duty. At lower lean loading (0.2, 0.18 mol/mol), this transition in heat duty was not observed due to the lower heat duty. As the ambient temperature increased, a similar trend in heat duty was observed at 0.22 lean loading, but the transition to lower heat duty occurred earlier at $\$4$/MMBtu. This was because of the lower CO 2 production at higher ambient temperature, making the process unprofitable at a gas price higher than $\$3$/MMBtu unless the heat duty of the stripper and natural gas boiler is steeply decreased.
The 12-month Feasibility study in Phase I study was completed and confirmed the system is feasible and the proposed system is an improvement over alternate low carbon dispatchable power options. Our demonstration will include 54 MWh of hydrogen storage. CO 2 capture inherent to the CHG process can capture 90% of the CO 2 (with upgrades to >98%) in a commercial system (~300 MWth) for sequestration or other uses. The hydrogen will be utilized in a duct burner in a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) integrated with the existing Southern Company fossil asset. Here, the firing rate of the duct burner is varied to let the plant respond to fluctuations of electrical load. However, H 2 production is relatively constant by storing H 2 , and revenues are improved by arbitrage between use of low-cost off-peak variable electricity generation or use of stored H 2 under peak demand. The study enabled the fidelity of the concept to be improved and allowed identification of the requirements for the system. Defining the individual system and component requirements was performed via system requirements review with the whole team. These requirements were then incorporated into/iterated with our Heat & Mass Balance models and process flow diagrams were generated to reflect the overall system. This information was then used to complete the TEA and show economic feasibility. Our system generates power at 17.4% lower cost than other low carbon approaches for the H 2 generation, H 2 compression and storage, carbon sequestration, and HRSG added electricity production for a large-scale duct-fired system. Our team recommends completing the Phase II Pre-FEED study for the proposed system as the next step for the project and its tasks will achieve the overall objective and be ready to launch the FEED. The Pre-FEED tasks include updating the requirements, Concept of Operations, plant scope/process description, component modeling, system modeling, performance estimates, emission estimates, block flow diagrams, fluid/process conditions (PFD), utility usage, and facility sizing/definition. The approach will be to complete these updates in a greater level of detail for the selected site. The approach for developing the EIV is to use the updated results, including model outputs, for carbon dioxide and waste streams.
GTI Energy (GTI) and team members Southern Company Services (SCS), Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) performed a Phase II Pre-Feed Study under contract DE-FE0032008 for Hydrogen Storage for Load-Following and Clean Power. The configuration of the proposed system consists of subsystems for on-site H 2 production, on-site H 2 storage (up to 54 MWth in commercial vessels) and H 2 combustion in a duct burner in a Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) integrated with an existing fossil asset. Here, the firing rate of the duct burner is varied to let the plant respond to fluctuations of electrical load and H 2 production is relatively constant by storing H 2 . The proposed system is an improvement over alternate low carbon dispatchable power options. Technoeconomic analyses show H 2 produced with GTI’s patented Compact Hydrogen Generator (CHG) with inherent carbon capture will be lower cost (Levelized Cost of Hydrogen, LCOH) relative to hydrogen produced with a Steam Methane Reformer (SMR) with an amine system for carbon capture. This lower cost hydrogen enables our integrated system to deliver electricity (Levelized Cost of Electricity, LCOE) at 17.4% lower cost relative to a SMR sourced H 2 -fired HRSG (with an amine system for carbon capture) – Steam Turbine Generator (STG). Our analysis using EPRI’s US REGEN macroeconomic model shows our system will have significant demand in the power market and therefore require significant capacity expansion (CHG plants built to deliver hydrogen) to deliver low cost, low carbon power. In Phase II, our Team has completed a detailed system definition including the development of process models, definition of battery limits, Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs), Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (P&IDs), and a plant layout. A preliminary design for the key components of the CHG was developed including component lists & specifications. An evaluation of environmental and permitting considerations was completed and included the development of an Environmental Information Volume (EIV). The duct burners, which are flexible and can burn hydrogen and/or natural gas, were defined and initial CFD analyses were completed.
The lab sorbent testing finalized the sorbent composition and operating conditions for the integrated unit. The bench unit design included COMSOL simulation to finalize the coil design and select initial operating conditions of the power supply system. Fluidized bed testing with the induction heating verified that a heating efficiency of up to 90% can be achieved. The integrated bench unit operations provided valuable data confirming the feasibility of using induction heating for the desorption of CO2. Major challenge observed was the limited working capacity of the sorbent, requiring additional development in future projects. In addition, a large-scale reactor demonstration is required to mitigate the risk of uniform temperature distribution and heating efficiency over a large cross-sectional area when using induction heating.
This presentation will be given at the 2024 AICHE annual meeting on October 30th. This presentation focuses on modeling a rotary packed bed contactor for CO2 capture. The RPB is an alternative contactor to fixed beds and optimization is performed to minimize the energy requirement. A design of experiments case study of the RPB is also performed.
Final Technical Report for Tampa Electric Company's Front-End Engineering Design Study for the implementation of an amine-based Carbon Capture System by ION Clean Energy at the Polk Power Station, Unit 2.
Presentation of project in progress (DE-FE0032216) and Sustenol(TM) solvent
Poster for project in progress
Updated cost and performance results are presented by NETL for both F and H Class turbines, presented at the Clearwater Clean Energy Conference in August, 2022. Results are presented for cases with and without 90% CO2 Capture. Preliminary results for high capture rates presented as well.
Presented at the 2022 AIChE Annual Meeting in Phoenix, AZ.