Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “NSC”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

28 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1996

Fact Sheet: National Space Policy

For over three decades, the United States has led the world in the exploration and use of outer space. Our achievements in space have inspired a generation of Americans and people throughout the world. We will maintain this leadership role by supporting a strong, stable, and balanced national space program that serves our goals in national security, foreign policy, economic growth, environmental stewardship, and scientific and technical excellence. Access to and use of space are central for preserving peace and protecting US national security as well as civil and commercial interests. The United States will pursue greater levels of partnership and cooperation in national and international space activities and work with other nations to ensure the continued exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes. The goals of the US space program are to: (a) Enhance knowledge of the Earth, the solar system, and the universe through human and robotic exploration; (b) Strengthen and maintain the national security of the United States; (c) Enhance the economic competitiveness and scientific and technical capabilities of the United States; (d) Encourage State, local, and private sector investment in, and use of, space technologies; (e) Promote international cooperation to further US domestic, national security, and foreign policies. The United States is committed to the exploration and use of outer space by all nations for peaceful purposes and for the benefit of all humanity. "Peaceful purposes" allow defense and intelligence-related activities in pursuit of national security and other goals. The United States rejects any claims to sovereignty by any nation over outer space or celestial bodies, or any portion thereof, and rejects any limitations on the fundamental right of sovereign nations to acquire data from space. The United States considers the space systems of any nation to be national property with the right of passage through and operations in space without interference. Purposeful interference with space systems shall be viewed as an infringement on sovereign rights. The US Government will maintain and coordinate separate national security and civil space systems where differing needs dictate. All actions undertaken by agencies and departments in implementing the national space policy shall be consistent with US law, regulations, national security requirements, foreign policy, international obligations, and nonproliferation policy. The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) is the principal forum for resolving issues related to national space policy. As appropriate, the NSTC and NSC will co-chair policy process. This policy will be implemented within the overall resource and policy guidance provided by the President.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2003

Soot Nanostructure And Its Impact Upon The O2 Oxidation Rate

Studies of soot oxidation have ranged from in situ flame studies to shock tubes to flow reactors. Each of these systems possesses particular advantages and limitations related to temperature, time and chemical environments. Despite the aforementioned differences, these soot oxidation investigations share three striking features. First and foremost is the wide variation in the rates of oxidation. Reported oxidation rates vary by factors of +6 to - 20 relative to the Nagle Strickland-Constable (NSC) rate for graphite oxidation [3]. Rate variations are not surprising, as the temperatures, residence times, types of oxidants and methods of oxidation differ from study to study. Nevertheless, a valid explanation for rate differences of this magnitude has yet to be presented.

Wal, Randy L. Vander↗
NASA NTRS1996

Experiences From NASA/Langley's DMSS Project

There is a trend in institutions with high performance computing and data management requirements to explore mass storage systems with peripherals directly attached to a high speed network. The Distributed Mass Storage System (DMSS) Project at the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) has placed such a system into production use. This paper will present the experiences, both good and bad, we have had with this system since putting it into production usage. The system is comprised of: 1) National Storage Laboratory (NSL)/UniTree 2.1, 2) IBM 9570 HIPPI attached disk arrays (both RAID 3 and RAID 5), 3) IBM RS6000 server, 4) HIPPI/IPI3 third party transfers between the disk array systems and the supercomputer clients, a CRAY Y-MP and a CRAY 2, 5) a "warm spare" file server, 6) transition software to convert from CRAY's Data Migration Facility (DMF) based system to DMSS, 7) an NSC PS32 HIPPI switch, and 8) a STK 4490 robotic library accessed from the IBM RS6000 block mux interface. This paper will cover: the performance of the DMSS in the following areas: file transfer rates, migration and recall, and file manipulation (listing, deleting, etc.); the appropriateness of a workstation class of file server for NSL/UniTree with LaRC's present storage requirements in mind the role of the third party transfers between the supercomputers and the DMSS disk array systems in DMSS; a detailed comparison (both in performance and functionality) between the DMF and DMSS systems LaRC's enhancements to the NSL/UniTree system administration environment the mechanism for DMSS to provide file server redundancy the statistics on the availability of DMSS the design and experiences with the locally developed transparent transition software which allowed us to make over 1.5 million DMF files available to NSL/UniTree with minimal system outage

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2025

Hungary 908 Event - Risk Based Graded Approach to ITM

This presentation, Risk-Based, Graded Approach to Insider Threat Mitigation: Human Measures, introduces a structured framework for managing insider threat risk using internationally recognized guidance from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Nuclear Security Series No. 8-G (Rev. 1) and the Joint Statement on Mitigating Insider Threats (INFCIRC/908). The presentation emphasizes that effective insider threat mitigation (ITM) depends on both positional controls, which manage inherent risk based on access, authority, and knowledge, and human measures, which address residual risk reflected in behavior, motivation, and reliability. Using a risk-informed and graded approach, the presentation outlines methods for identifying and prioritizing high-risk positions, applying layered organizational controls, and integrating human reliability mechanisms such as the Behavior Observation Program (BOP), Fitness-for-Duty (FFD) evaluations, Employee Assistance Programs (EAP), and Nuclear Security Culture (NSC). The human-focused portion examines behavioral and organizational indicators of opportunity, vulnerability, motivation, and crisis, demonstrating how early detection, deterrence, and response can prevent insider events. The session concludes with a case review of the Millstone Nuclear Power Station incident involving engineer George Galatis. The case illustrates how weak leadership and a poor safety culture can create conditions for failure and how a comprehensive ITM framework could have altered the outcome. The objective of this presentation is to help practitioners apply a risk-based, graded philosophy to human factors and promote a culture of accountability, communication, and resilience within nuclear organizations.

99 - GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Progress and innovations in the TCV tokamak research programme

Research on the Tokamak à Configuration Variable addresses a wide range of key questions relevant to ITER and future fusion power plants. Over the past two years, highly productive experimental campaigns have led to major advances across several areas: the ITER baseline scenario; pedestal properties in low-collisionality, peeling-limited conditions; and the development of high- β N , non-inductive regimes. Alternative high-confinement scenarios have likewise received significant attention, with remarkable progress in quasi-continuous exhaust operation, X-point radiator plasmas, and negative triangularity configurations. Substantial achievements were also made in the mitigation or benign termination of runaway electron beams, in elucidating fast-ion loss mechanisms, and in improving exhaust behaviour in both conventional and alternative divertor geometries. These experimental results have been strongly supported by advances in modelling and their direct application to the experiment, ranging from gyrokinetic simulations of core and pedestal turbulence to fluid-based studies of scrape-off layer and divertor physics in diverse geometries. Plasma control has taken on an increasingly important role, with model-based and data-driven approaches now closely intertwined with physics studies. This article provides a overview of these recent activities, together with a brief outlook on forthcoming upgrades and next steps.

EPFL↗
DOE OSTI2026

Axisymmetric Eigenmodes Excited by Alpha Particle Energy Gradients in JET D-T Plasmas

Axisymmetric Alfvén eigenmodes have been observed at the plasma edge in deuterium-tritium (D-T) tokamak plasmas externally heated only by neutral beam injection in JET. The modes were detected only in D-T plasmas, not in pure D plasmas, indicating excitation by fusion-born 𝛼 particles. The presence of the axisymmetric mode suggests that the modes were driven by positive energy gradients in the 𝛼 particle distribution rather than radial gradients. The modes are driven by counter-current passing 𝛼 particles with large orbit widths, allowing core-born 𝛼 particles to interact with modes at the plasma edge. This reveals an excitation mechanism arising from positive energy gradients produced by the minimum energy required to confine particles at the edge, relevant to all burning plasmas.

Oliver, H. J. C. [United Kingdom Atomic Energy Aut↗
NASA NTRS2017

Restricted by Whom? A Historical Review of Strategies and Organization for Restricted Earth Return of Samples from NASA Planetary Missions

This presentation is a review of the timeline for Apollo's approach to Planetary Protection, then known as Planetary Quarantine. Return of samples from Apollo 11, 12 and 14 represented NASA's first attempts into conducting what is now known as Restricted Earth Return, where return of samples is undertaken by the Agency with the utmost care for the impact that the samples may have on Earth's environment due to the potential presence of microbial or other life forms that originate from the parent body (in this case, Earth's Moon).

Apollo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Restricted by A Historical Review of Strategies and Organization for Restricted Earth Return of Samples from NASA Planetary Missions

Return of samples from the Moon via the Apollo 11, 12 and 14 missions represented NASA's first attempts into conducting what is now known as Restricted Earth Return. When Apollo returned samples from the moon, there were few of the agencies, legal and organizational structures that exist now. A half a century later, the U.S system has seen changes in legal and organizational structures with the appearance of different agencies and legal requirements. During the Apollo era, U.S. legal and organizational structures, assessed threats to the Earth’s biosphere with a priority towards the risks of effects from extraterrestrial pathogens on humans, though the guiding document, the Baylor Protocol, also considered animal and plant models. This presentation focuses on a review of two main questions: Did the return of samples from the Moon happen at a “sweet spot” in time, where the number of requirements and conservatism was commensurate with the scientific knowns and unknowns? Could the emphasis of risk mitigation on human pathogens during the return of extraterrestrial samples be more about human solipsism, leaving us with a blind spot to sources of pathogens, such as fungi, which could lead to an impact to our biosphere, and we humans, via our food chains and agricultural pathways?

planetary protection↗