Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Nanobeam electron diffraction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

25 records · Page 2

Automated Crystal Orientation Mapping in py4DSTEM using Sparse Correlation Matching

Crystalline materials used in technological applications are often complex assemblies composed of multiple phases and differently oriented grains. Robust identification of the phases and orientation relationships from these samples is crucial, but the information extracted from the diffraction condition probed by an electron beam is often incomplete. We have developed an automated crystal orientation mapping (ACOM) procedure which uses a converged electron probe to collect diffraction patterns from multiple locations across a complex sample. We provide an algorithm to determine the orientation of each diffraction pattern based on a fast sparse correlation method. We demonstrate the speed and accuracy of our method by indexing diffraction patterns generated using both kinematical and dynamical simulations. We have also measured orientation maps from an experimental dataset consisting of a complex polycrystalline twisted helical AuAgPd nanowire. From these maps we identify twin planes between adjacent grains, which may be responsible for the twisted helical structure. All of our methods are made freely available as open source code, including tutorials which can be easily adapted to perform ACOM measurements on diffraction pattern datasets.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Correlated X‐Ray and Electron Microscopies of a Single Biphasic GaAs Nanowire

Engineering the properties of semiconductors by changing their crystalline phase is a technologically and economically relevant alternative to doping using foreign elements, with strong potential for photonic and electronic applications. Although major advances have been reported recently for crystal‐phase engineering of III‐V and group IV semiconductor nanowires, interfacing two mismatched crystalline phases in a nanostructure induces several deformation mechanisms, which remain largely unexplored. Here, using state‐of‐the‐art synchrotron X‐ray nanobeam diffraction and transmission electron microscopy, subtle twisting and bending is unveiled within an individual GaAs nanowire containing cubic and hexagonal segments. Their role is discussed in accommodating the inter‐reticular spacing fluctuations, and their variations are correlated to the nanoscale phase distribution and to the effect of the NW support. This study brings direct evidence of a complex combination of deformation mechanisms in biphasic nanowires, which opens a new path to tune the nanowire properties with appealing perspectives for device engineering in nanophotonics and nanomechanics.

III-V semiconductors↗

Large-Angle Rocking Beam Electron Diffraction of Large Unit Cell Crystals Using Direct Electron Detector

We report a large-angle rocking beam electron diffraction (LARBED) technique for electron diffraction analysis. Diffraction patterns are recorded in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) using a direct electron detector with large dynamical range and fast readout. We use a nanobeam for diffraction and perform the beam double rocking by synchronizing the detector with the STEM scan coils for the recording. Using this approach, large-angle convergent beam electron diffraction (LACBED) patterns of different reflections are obtained simultaneously. By using a nanobeam, instead of a focused beam, the LARBED technique can be applied to beam-sensitive crystals as well as crystals with large unit cells. Here, this paper describes the implementation of LARBED and evaluates the performance using silicon and gadolinium gallium garnet crystals as test samples. We demonstrate that our method provides an effective and robust way for recording LARBED patterns and paves the way for quantitative electron diffraction of large unit cell and beam-sensitive crystals.

4DSTEM↗

The ABCs of phase retrieval: Connecting the acronyms of scanning transmission electron microscopy

High-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (S/TEM) is an indispensable tool for characterizing the structure and properties of materials down to the atomic scale. Conventional S/TEM imaging, however, is limited by the phase problem, whereby the phase of the electron exit wave is lost upon detection. Recent advances in diffractive imaging and 4D-STEM have enabled a range of phase-retrieval techniques that computationally reconstruct the missing information encoded in the phase of the transmission function. These approaches offer improved dose efficiency and enhanced sensitivity to weakly scattering signals, extending quantitative imaging to beam-sensitive materials composed of light elements. In this work, we introduce the phase problem in electron microscopy and survey the diverse landscape of phase-retrieval techniques used in the field. Despite their many acronyms and algorithmic variations, these techniques share a common physical and mathematical foundation. We present a unified framework that connects these seemingly distinct methods, from parallax imaging and tilt-corrected bright-field (tcBF-STEM), to aberration-corrected bright-field (acBF-STEM), optimum bright-field (OBF-STEM) and single-sideband (SSB) ptychography, as well as first-moment integrated center of mass techniques (iCOM) and iterative ptychographic algorithms. Based on these insights, we discuss the opportunities and practical limitations of applying these methods across different materials systems, detector designs, and microscope configurations.Graphical abstractRepresentative electron microscopy configurations used for phase retrieval and diffractive imaging in S/TEM: (a) Zernike phase-contrast transmission electron microscopy (TEM), (b) small-convergence-angle four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D-STEM) for nanobeam-based phase reconstruction methods, and (c) large-convergence-angle 4D-STEM for ptychographic and related diffractive imaging techniques reviewed in this work.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Interrogating the Effects of Hydrogen on the Behavior of Planar Deformation Bands in Austenitic Stainless Steel

The effects of internal hydrogen on the deformation microstructures of 304L austenitic stainless steel have been characterized using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), transmission Kikuchi diffraction (TKD), high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (HRSTEM), and nanoprobe diffraction. Samples, both thermally precharged with hydrogen and without thermal precharging, were subjected to tensile deformation of 5 and 20 pct true strain followed by multiple microscopic interrogations. Internal hydrogen produced widespread stacking faults within the as-forged initially unstrained material. While planar deformation bands developed with tensile strain in both the hydrogen-precharged and non-precharged material, the character of these bands changed with the presence of internal hydrogen. As shown by nanobeam diffraction and HRSTEM observations, in the absence of internal hydrogen, the bands were predominantly composed of twins, whereas for samples deformed in the presence of internal hydrogen, ε -martensite became more pronounced and the density of deformation bands increased. For the 20 pct strain condition, α '-martensite was observed at the intersection of ε -martensite bands in hydrogen-precharged samples, whereas in non-precharged samples α '-martensite was only observed along grain boundaries. We hypothesize that the increased prevalence of α '-martensite is a secondary effect of increased ε -martensite and deformation band density due to internal hydrogen and is not a signature of internal hydrogen itself.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Comparison of Orientation Mapping in SEM and TEM

In this work, multiple experimental configurations for performing nanoscale orientation mapping are compared to determine their fidelity to the true 3D microstructure of a sample. Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction (TKD) experiments in an SEM and nanobeam diffraction (NBD) experiments in a TEM were performed on thin electrodeposited hard Au films with two different microstructures. The Au samples either have a grain size that is >50 nm or <20 nm. The same regions of the samples were measured with TKD apparatuses at 30 kV in an SEM with detectors in the horizontal and vertical configurations and in the TEM at 300 kV. Under the proper conditions, we demonstrate all three configurations can produce data of equivalent quality.Each method has strengths and challenges associated with its application and representation of the true microstructure. The conditions needed to obtain high-quality data for each acquisition method and the challenges associated with each will be discussed.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗