Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Neutron cross section”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Neutron Scattering Cross Sections: (n,n′), (n,n′γ), and (n,γ) Measurements (Final Technical Report)

This technical report discusses the outcomes from a grant to the University of Dallas in collaboration with the University of Kentucky, the United States Naval Academy and Mississippi State University to measure neutron cross sections and to provide educational opportunities in nuclear science for undergraduate and graduate students and postdoctoral scholars.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
NASA NTRS1972

A computer code for predicting gamma production cross sections by neutron inelastic scattering from light nuclei

Gamma-ray production cross section by the inelastic scattering of neutrons from light nuclei are considered. The applicability of optical model potential is discussed. Based on experimental data, a cascade approach is developed to calculate the inelastic gamma production cross sections. In the case of O-16 using computer code LINGAP in conjunction with ABACUS-2; results are compared with reported values.

George, M. C.↗
DOE OSTI2026

Measurement of the 73 As ⁢(𝑛,𝛾) cross section at thermal neutron energies

A measurement of the thermal neutron capture cross section of 73 As (t 1/2 = 80.3 d) was performed utilizing the University of Missouri Research Reactor. Two sealed quartz tubes containing 73 As were prepared and characterized before being irradiated for ≈1 week. The resulting production of 74 As was quantified with γ-ray spectroscopy. Monitor foils of Fe, Zr, and Mo were irradiated alongside the 73 As samples to assess the thermal and resonance region neutron fluxes. In conclusion, the thermal 73 As ⁢(𝑛,𝛾) cross section was determined to be 56.1 ± 8.9 b based on the average of the two 73 As samples and represents the first neutron-induced reaction cross section measured on 73 As.

and nuclear chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2024

Investigating Gadolinium-Lined Sodium-Iodide Neutron Detectors for Mobile Applications

For enhancing the effectiveness of nonproliferation efforts in neutron detection, most portable instruments rely on 6 Li scintillators, 10 B-based detectors, or gas-filled 3 He proportional counters. Additionally, gamma-ray detectors based on scintillators and semiconductors are often employed for search applications to find radioactive material in the field. These systems typically include dedicated detectors along with separate high voltage supplies and processing electronics for the gamma-ray and neutron detectors. Ideally, a portable radiation detection system should be lightweight, compact, and cost-effective. In the field, scintillators can serve a dual purpose: (1) detecting gamma-rays and (2) detecting neutrons. Gamma-ray detection with scintillators is based on the interaction of gamma-rays within the scintillating material, whereas neutron detection depends indirectly on neutron capture events. These capture events generate conversion electrons and gamma-rays, which can interact with the scintillator. For enhancing neutron capture, the scintillator can be surrounded by neutron absorber materials with a high neutron cross section. The resulting secondary electrons and gamma-rays from neutron interactions, depending on the absorber material used, can then be analyzed to detect the presence of neutron sources. Similarly, semiconductor-based detectors can be employed along with neutron absorbers as liners for neutron detection. 158 Gd has a significantly larger neutron cross section than 3 He, commonly used in gas-filled proportional counters, as shown in Figure 1. For thermal (0.025 eV) neutrons, the absorption cross section of 158 Gd is 10,000 times greater than that of 3 He (refer to Figure 1). This feature makes naturally occurring gadolinium, which consists of 24.8% 158 Gd, a promising neutron absorber material for use in combination with gamma-ray detectors–yielding a hybrid detector–for neutron detection.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗
DOE OSTI2026

Extraction of neutron-capture cross sections on 92 Zr using the charge-exchange Oslo method

The 93 Nb (𝑡, 3 He ) reaction at 115 MeV/nucleon was studied to demonstrate that nuclear level densities and 𝛾-ray strength functions can be extracted from charge-exchange reactions at intermediate energies using the Oslo technique. The matrix of excitation energy in 93 Zr, reconstructed from the (𝑡, 3 He ) reaction, versus the energy of 𝛾 rays emitted by the excited 93 Zr nuclei, was obtained in an experiment with the S800 Spectrograph operated in coincidence with the GRETINA 𝛾 -ray detector. The extracted level density and 𝛾 -ray strength function obtained by applying the Oslo method to this matrix were used to estimate the 92 Zr⁢(𝑛,𝛾) ⁢93 Zr cross section by combining the new results with other experimental data and theoretical calculations for 𝐸⁢1 and 𝑀⁢1 strength functions at higher energies. Good agreement with direct measurements of the 92 Zr⁢(𝑛,𝛾)⁢ 93 Zr cross section was found. The contribution from the upbend in the extracted 𝛾-ray strength function was important to achieve the consistency, as the neutron-capture cross section without this contribution is significantly below the direct measurements otherwise. Since charge-exchange reactions at intermediate energies have long been used for extracting Gamow-Teller strengths, the successful demonstration of the charge-exchange Oslo method enables experiments in which (𝑛,𝛾) cross sections and Gamow-Teller strengths can be measured simultaneously, which is of benefit for astrophysical studies.

90 ≤ A ≤ 149↗
NASA NTRS1982

s-process studies in the light of new experimental cross sections - Distribution of neutron fluences and r-process residuals

A best set of neutron-capture cross sections has been evaluated for the most important s-process isotopes. With this data base, s-process studies have been carried out using the traditional model which assumes a steady neutron flux and an exponential distribution of neutron irradiations. The calculated sigma-N curve is in excellent agreement with the empirical sigma-N-values of pure s-process nuclei. Simultaneously, good agreement is found between the difference of solar and s-process abundances and the abundances of pure r-process nuclei. The abundance pattern of the iron group elements where s-process results complement the abundances obtained from explosive nuclear burning is discussed. The results obtained from the traditional s-process model such as seed abundances, mean neutron irradiations, or neutron densities are compared to recent stellar model calculations which assume the He-burning shells of red giant stars as the site for the s-process.

Kaeppeler, F.↗
DOE OSTI2024

Measuring the Multi-Neutron Antineutrino Cross Section at Low Charged Hadron Energy in MINERvA

Current and future accelerator neutrino oscillation experiments need neutrino interaction models with smaller systematic uncertainties to resolve much of delta CP phase space. Final state interactions (FSI) and scattering off of correlated nuclei (2p2h) are poorly understood processes that currently contribute large uncertainties to leading models. These processes have proven difficult to study because they often produce relatively low energy nucleons. Protons up to about 100 MeV are below the detection threshold of some accelerator neutrino detectors, and neutrons are usually discounted as undetectable. This poster presents a measurement of the multi-neutron antineutrino cross section at low available energy using the MINERvA detector at Fermilab. This interaction channel is particularly sensitive to FSI and 2p2h interactions. A sideband-driven background constraint that greatly reduces uncertainties on the result will be presented. The measured cross section is compared to GENIE v3 models with different FSI treatments and the SuSA model's 2p2h predictions.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Non-Neutron Transmutation of Used Nuclear Fuel (Final Report)

The primary goal of this study is to develop a national facility concept for transmuting long-lived fission products (LLFP) to substantially reduce the disposal impact by minimizing the need for a geologic-timescale repository. As a charter for this study, the national transmutation facility was required to reduce the radiotoxicity and decay heat of LLFP isotopes by at least 90% relative to their values at discharge from a commercial LWR, while consuming less than 10% of the reactor's energy. The identified LLFP isotopes are Se-79, Zr-93, Tc-99, I-129, Sn-126, and Cs-135, whose radiotoxicity is about 99% of the total radiotoxicity of all fission products at 1,000 years. Approximately ~72 kg of LLFPs is discharged every year from a 1,000 MWe commercial or advanced nuclear reactor. First, LLFP transmutation options with non-neutron beams (photons and protons) were explored. The study concluded that LLFP transmutation is feasible with high-energy, high-intensity photons or protons, but impractical on an engineering scale due to low transmutation rates and the high energy requirements to produce the desired photon or proton beams. As alternatives, LLFP transmutation options with neutrons from fission, fusion, and spallation reactions were additionally explored. The transmutation options using advanced critical reactors are attractive only for selective LLFP isotopes because the production rates of several LLFP isotopes (Zr-93, Sn-126, and Cs-135) from fission reactions are larger than the transmutation rates. The transmutation options with only spallation neutrons are favorable to transmute all LLFP isotopes, but as a tradeoff, the net transmutation rates are reduced. The national transmutation facility concept was developed following an exploration of transmutation options using various incident particles. The proposed national LLFP transmutation comprises a dedicated molten-salt reactor (MSR), a proton accelerator, and a spallation neutron-based transmuter. The MSR power was set at 300 MWt and 120 MWe, with the thermal power approximately 10% of that of a commercial 1,000 MWe PWR. The electricity generated by the MSR powers the accelerator and transmuter. The accelerator produces 1 GeV, 30 mA protons, which are introduced into the spallation neutron-based transmuter. The spallation neutron-based transmuter consists of a central spallation target and LLFP target pins merged in a heavy water tank. The six LLFP isotopes are separated into two groups. Tc-99, I-129, and Se-79, having larger neutron cross sections, belong to group A, while Zr-93, Sn126, and Cs-135, having smaller neutron cross sections, belong to group B. Then, for effective transmutation, LLFPs in groups A and B are transmuted in the dedicated MSR and in a spallation neutron-based transmuter, respectively. The estimated capital cost of the national transmutation facility is approximately $\$$3.1B, and its annual O&M cost is expected to be ~$\$$182M. Radiotoxicity and decay heat of LLFPs were calculated and compared with those of the original LLFPs. It was assumed that the targets were made with elementwise LLFP rather than isotopic LLFP, owing to the potentially high cost of isotopic separation from used nuclear fuels. The decay heat of LLFPs can be reduced by more than 90% using a single national transmutation facility. However, radiotoxicity decreases by 79–84%, which does not meet the transmutation performance requirement, primarily because Cs-135 is produced rather than depleted. Thus, to meet the design requirement, Cs-135 should be separated from other Cs isotopes and irradiated in a spallation neutron-based transmuter. Then, radiotoxicity decreases by ~92%.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Deployment of neural-network-based neutron microscopic cross sections in the Griffin reactor physics application

The capability to utilize neural networks to predict macroscopic and microscopic cross section parametric spaces has been developed for the Griffin reactor physics application. The LibTorch interface enables Griffin's MOOSE-based materials to interact with LibTorch-trained models, allowing for the evaluation of complex macroscopic or microscopic cross section spaces, which are then used to evaluate the neutronic properties of the Griffin finite element model. This study benchmarks traditional ISOXML-formatted tabulation libraries against neural network-based models for 279 nuclides on 20,160 grid points for zero-dimensional and two-dimensional reactor models. Benchmark metrics include the fundamental mode eigenvalue, fission and absorption rates, and various temperature coefficients of reactivity (isothermal, fuel, and moderator). From the perspective of storage space, the complete set of LibTorch models uses 11 MB on disk, compared to the 10 GB for the ISOXML multigroup library that covers the same grid space. For the two-dimensional performance case considered in Griffin, the Torch model uses 97% less RAM than the reference ISOXML dataset while runtime increases by a factor of 3 when using the LibTorch model compared to the ISOXML dataset with multi-linear interpolation. The LibTorch model consistently yields errors within 0.01% for most analyzed quantities except for the temperature coefficients of reactivity where the maximum discrepancies are up to 0.3 $\frac{pcm}{K}$. Due to the neural network attempting to best predict quantities with no regard for a positive or negative bias for any given quantity, predictions may experience random fluctuations, resulting in both positive and negative errors. Future work will entail both depletion and coupled transient analysis to determine the predictive capabilities of Griffin with neural network-based cross sections.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS1997

New Parameterization of Neutron Absorption Cross Sections

Recent parameterization of absorption cross sections for any system of charged ion collisions, including proton-nucleus collisions, is extended for neutron-nucleus collisions valid from approx. 1 MeV to a few GeV, thus providing a comprehensive picture of absorption cross sections for any system of collision pairs (charged or uncharged). The parameters are associated with the physics of the problem. At lower energies, optical potential at the surface is important, and the Pauli operator plays an increasingly important role at intermediate energies. The agreement between the calculated and experimental data is better than earlier published results.

Tripathi, Ram K.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Production of neutrons from interactions of GCR-like particles

In order to help assess the risk to astronauts due to the long-term exposure to the natural radiation environment in space, an understanding of how the primary radiation field is changed when passing through shielding and tissue materials must be obtained. One important aspect of the change in the primary radiation field after passing through shielding materials is the production of secondary particles from the breakup of the primary. Neutrons are an important component of the secondary particle field due to their relatively high biological weighting factors, and due to their relative abundance, especially behind thick shielding scenarios. Because of the complexity of the problem, the estimation of the risk from exposure to the secondary neutron field must be handled using calculational techniques. However, those calculations will need an extensive set of neutron cross section and thicktarget neutron yield data in order to make an accurate assessment of the risk. In this paper we briefly survey the existing neutron-production data sets that are applicable to the space radiation transport problem, and we point out how neutron production from protons is different than neutron production from heavy ions. We also make comparisons of one the heavy-ion data sets with Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) calculations.

Non-NASA Center↗