Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “PARKING ORBIT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2009

Earth Parking Orbit and Translunar Injection

The objectives of this slide presentation are to (1) Describe the general characteristics of the Earth Parking Orbit (EPO) and Translunar Injection (TLI) (2) List the general activities that occurred during EPO (4) State what went into verifying a working Saturn IVB S-IVB IU and a CSM GNC (5) Differentiate between a Free-Return Trajectory vs. a Hybrid Non-Free-Return Trajectory (6) Identify the crew monitoring task during the TLI Burn and (7) Identify the abort modes in the event of severe systems problems during the TLI timeframe

Interbartolo, Michael↗
NASA NTRS1992

Arrival and departure impulsive Delta V determination for precessing Mars parking orbits

An attempt is made to develop a method for realistic estimation of the initial LEO mass. The method takes into account the actual geometry between the inbound and outbound hyperbolic asymptotes and the parking orbit, along with precession effects caused by the oblateness of Mars, in calculating the arrival and departure Delta V values. Three mission scenarios alternative to the arbitrarily assumed two tangential periapsis burns are described: a tangential periapsis arrival and an in-plane departure; an in-plane arrival and in-plane departure; and a tangential periapsis arrival and a 3D departure. Results obtained by the method under consideration compared well with a trajectory integration code, where the differences in the initial LEO orbit mass were within one percent, for all three cases. The method is considered to be an ideal tool for preliminary mission design, since it reduces the analysis computation time with minimal loss in accuracy.

Desai, Prasun N.↗
NASA NTRS2006

Interactive Visualization of Parking Orbits Around the Moon: An X3D Application for a NASA Lunar Mission Study

The NASA Integrated Modeling and Simulation (IM&S) project aims to develop a collaborative engineering system to include distributed analysis, integrated tools, and web-enabled graphics. Engineers on the IM&S team were tasked with applying IM&S capabilities to an orbital mechanics analysis for a lunar mission study. An interactive lunar globe was created to show 7 landing sites, contour lines depicting the energy required to reach a given site, and the optimal lunar orbit orientation to meet the mission constraints. Activation of the lunar globe rotation shows the change of the angle between the landing site latitude and the orbit plane. A heads-up-display was used to embed straightforward interface elements.

Murphy, Douglas G.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Mars orbit selection

Parking orbits for a manned Mars mission are examined for ease of access to the Martian moons. Delta V plots for a variety of burns versus elliptical orbit apoapsis are included. A high elliptical orbit (24 hour period, 500 km periapsis, 20 to 30 deg. inclination) minimizes delta V to the Martian moons and Mars orbit insertion (MOI) and trans-Earth injection (TEI) delta Vs.

Gus R Babb↗
NASA NTRS1990

Space Vehicle Deployment from Space Station Orbit

When launching a spacecraft from Earth parking orbit to deep space, it is highly desirable to have the hyperbolic excess velocity vector (v-infinity) contained in the parking orbit plane. Ground launches can force the parking orbit plane to contain the v-infinity vector by using launch azimuth and lift-off time as independent variables. When launching from the Space Station, a new set of variables comes into play. The Station orbit is of fixed inclination but precessing due to the Earth's oblateness. Its plane will seldom (and may never) contain the desired v-infinity vector. Consequently, the departure strategy will usually require multiple burns and include a plane change. Also, the concept of "launch period" will be somewhat different from Earth surface launches. An analysis of the deployment of interplanetary spacecraft from Space Station is described, with emphasis on the effect of the trajectory characteristics on station operations. Several planetary mission types are analyzed for manned Mars missions. In addition, high declination departures of spacecraft on unmanned missions to an asteroid are examined. The constraint of Station orbit nodal position is quantified and the operational implications for station reboost strategy are examined.

Henry, Paul K.↗
NASA NTRS1961

Effects of Some Typical Geometrical Contraints on Lunar Trajectories

A study has been made to determine the effects on lunar trajectories of some typical geometrical constraints. The constraints considered in this study are of two types, those resulting from specification of the trajectory characteristics near the earth and those associated with the specification of the approach conditions at the moon. The effects of the constraints are discussed from the standpoint of the limitations imposed by the constraints on the possible launch days during the month and also on the possible launch times during the day for three types of launch trajectories: direct-ascent, coasting-orbit, and parking-orbit launches. Application of the various constraints individually or in combination seriously restricts the allowable launch times during the month and day for the direct-ascent launch; whereas, less serious restrictions result for the coasting- and parking-orbit launches.

Tolson, Robert H.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Flight Results of the Chandra X-ray Observatory Inertial Upper Stage Space Mission

Under contract to NASA, a specially configured version of the Boeing developed Inertial Upper Stage (IUS) booster was provided by Boeing to deliver NASA's 1.5 billion dollar Chandra X-Ray Observatory satellite into a highly elliptical transfer orbit from a Shuttle provided circular park orbit. Subsequently, the final orbit of the Chandra satellite was to be achieved using the Chandra Integral Propulsion System (IPS) through a series of IPS burns. On 23 July 1999 the Shuttle Columbia (STS-93) was launched with the IUS/Chandra stack in the Shuttle payload bay. Unfortunately, the Shuttle Orbiter was unexpectantly inserted into an off-nominal park orbit due to a Shuttle propulsion anomaly occurring during ascent. Following the IUS/Chandra on-orbit deployment from the Shuttle, at seven hours from liftoff, the flight proven IUS GN&C system successfully injected Chandra into the targeted transfer orbit, in spite of the off-nominal park orbit. This paper describes the IUS GN&C system, discusses the specific IUS GN&C mission data load development, analyses and testing for the Chandra mission, and concludes with a summary of flight results for the IUS part of the Chandra mission.

Tillotson, R.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Parametric Studies of Human Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Systems

This paper will present a parametric analysis for entry, descent, and landing (EDL) concepts, enabling rapid systems assessment and tradespace exploration. The entry system uses a hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator (HIAD) technology. The baseline system includes elements for Mars aerocapture (AC) and EDL segments of the mission. The mission concept of operations (ConOps) begins at Mars arrival in a polar inclination. After performing an aerocapture (AC) maneuver into a pre-defined Mars parking orbit, the AC HIAD is jettisoned. The rest of thevehicle stays in the parking orbit for up to one year. The EDL sequence starts with a deorbit burn at the apoapsis of the parking orbit. After hypersonic entry with the EDL HIAD, the entry system uses a supersonic retropropulsion maneuver to slow the vehicle for the descent and landing segments of the mission. The vehicle will maintain a constant velocity of 2.5 m/s for 5 seconds prior to landing.The system includes a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), Mars Descent Module (MDM), and two HIADs. The MDM includes a primary structure, tanks, engines, and radiators. The primary structure is an aluminum-lithium (Al-Li)cruciform design similar to the structural design of the Apollo Lunar Module. The cruciform planform layout results in four outer bays, with adequate volume in the corners between outer bays to package four landing gears. The central bay is reserved for packaging the MAV and the recessed MAV engines. Two of the outer bays accommodate main propellant tanks, with one LOX and one CH4 tank in each bay. The two remaining outer bays each house four rocket engine systems and associated support structure. Each HIAD comprises an inflatable structure, flexible thermal protection system, gas, and gas generators. The HIAD design used in this study is a stacked-toroid concept with pairing loop straps and radial/chevron straps. The baseline system lands a 20-t payload on the Mars surface. It is assumed the vehicle arrives at 6.2 km/s relative velocity at 90° inclination and is captured to a 1-Sol parking orbit.The baseline design includes many assumptions such as margins, arrival state, ConOps options, parking orbit, physical dimensions, propellant options, and technology concepts. The impact of these parameters are quantified through systems-level sensitivity analyses, which capture the global impact—not at a component level—but at the systems level. The systems-level sensitivities expose major design drivers and importance of each assumption for a design.Through tradespace exploration, a wide range of systems parameters are examined and compared for several feasible design options. Studies have been completed for the following input parameters: payload mass, propellant options, AC/EDL ballistic coefficient, lander thrust to weight ratio (T/W) (surrogate for the maximum EDL g’s),engine specific impulse (Isp), parking orbit, and inclination.The final paper will present and discuss the parametric approach used in the study. It will also include the results of recent systems analyses, sensitivity analyses, and tradespace exploration

Jamshid Samareh↗
NASA NTRS1992

Development of a simplified gravitational model for lifetime studies of lunar satellite orbits

Future lunar missions will involve long stay times in orbit about the moon. The moon's nonspherical gravitational field is the primary perturbation on a low altitude parking orbit. The objective of this study is to determine the orbital lifetime of a nearly circular low altitude parking orbit. In the present analysis, a simplified gravitational model of the moon is introduced which will enable mission designers to easily predict long term changes in lunar parking orbits at the preliminary design level. The development of a simplified gravitational model with sufficient accuracy is necessary to investigate orbital lifetimes for the large number of orbital parameters possible. Utilization of a simplified model will significantly reduce the required computational time needed to perform this analysis. By investigating the effects of the lunar gravity model on the various parking orbits, the parameters which are important in determining lifetime predictions are identified.

Meyer, Kurt W.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Space science plans for the shuttle era.

Three separate and distinct modes of using the space shuttle system have been identified. These modes include the boost of a spacecraft plus one or more propulsion stages into earth orbit or parking orbit, the establishment and maintenance of automated observatories in space, and the support of exploratory research and instrument development. Studies show that approximately 60% of all planned NASA missions require a shuttle third stage. Illustrations are presented to show how the largest spacecraft, Viking, and its propulsion system, Centaur, and a communications satellite, with an Agena stage to place it into a geostationary orbit, would fit into the shuttle. Results of the NASA Shuttle Sortie Workshop studies are discussed together with prospects of European cooperation in future workshop experiments.

Naugle, J. E.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Operations of the Optical Communications Demonstration for the Orion EM-2 Mission

The GSFC implementation of an Optical Communication System to demonstrate an operational optical communication link for Orion EM-2. It will serve as a base for providing an operational optical communications capability for future Orion missions. GSFC plans to maintain a development path for the optical communication flight terminal to allow commercialization and implementation on future Orion missions. The Orion optical module part of the optical communications flight terminal and its control electronics have a common architecture with the ILLUMA-T optical terminal provided by GSFC for use on the ISS. The plan is to flow data from Orion through the Optical Communication Fight Terminal to the Optical Communication Ground Terminal and reverse. NASA's Orion spacecraft is an exploratory vehicle designed for longer-duration flights beyond the Moon. Following Orion's Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1), during which the spacecraft will travel beyond the Moon, enter a distant retrograde orbit around the Moon and return to Earth unmanned, Exploration Mission-2 (EM-2) will see a crewed spacecraft complete a slightly different flight path. First crewed test flight of the Orion spacecraft, currently targeting a June 30, 2022 launch. The mission involves: One revolution in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) parking orbit to verify basic Orion systems functionality and deploy solar arrays. A single 42-hour Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO) intermediate checkout orbit allows characterization of the Orion vehicle system performance prior to committing to a cis-lunar flight. Trans Lunar Injection (TLI) burn using Orion Service Module (SM) main engine, which sends Orion on a lunar flyby and free return. Skip reentry at lunar return velocities to splashdown off the coast of San Diego. Total mission duration is approximately 10 days. EM-2 is the first crewed mission of the Orion Spacecraft that crew brings more video up/downloads, file transfers, and real-time chats with family back home and high-rate communications enables live HD streaming for Crew conferences, Public Affairs Office (PAO) events, and significant mission events. Also still collecting vehicle data on numerous Orion subsystems via Development Flight Instrumentation (DFI) allows large data volume returns sooner for DFI and future science payloads, as opposed to waiting for end-of-mission. O2O is a demonstration of operational utility system tested as a Developmental Test Objective (DTO) and not required to meet mission requirements/success/ Flight Test Objectives (FTO). EM-2 architecture is as close to future mission operational architecture as possible.Orion subsystems (video, DFI, etc.) expected to generate ~250 GB of data in the first 24 hours of flight. Total data generated over the mission estimated to be more than 400 GBUsing S-Band alone, Orion limited to ~ 6GB of data downlink per day. Because of this limitation, Orion is planning to limit live video downlinks on EM-1 in order to downlink high priority fileswith 1 hour/day of Optical Communication, Orion could downlink ~6x more data per day (~ 36GB/day).The optical communication system is capable of multiple data rates up to at least 80 Mbps downlink for the transfer of Orion data to Earth while Orion is operating in the lunar vicinity.

Optical Communication↗