NEW SMALL-VOLUME TYPE B PACKAGING and LANL PACKAGING USER COURSE
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Thacker, Douglas James↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Package”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Packaged Combined Heat and Power Technology Overview and Market Profile
Combined heat and power (CHP), sometimes referred to as cogeneration, is an efficient and clean approach to generating electric power and useful thermal energy onsite from a single fuel source, offering reliable and affordable energy services to businesses and institutions. Furthermore, CHP provides a cost effective opportunity to improve the environmental footprint and resilience of industrial and commercial facilities across the United States. CHP equipment can be custom-engineered or installed as a predesigned and assembled package. A packaged CHP system is a standardized, pre-engineered system that includes all equipment, piping, wiring, and ancillary components to deliver electricity and thermal energy to a host facility with minimal onsite engineering and design time. Packaged CHP systems can be shipped as single or multiple modules with standard interconnections (e.g., fuel; electrical; thermal—hot water, steam, and/or chilled water), which simplifies installation and reduces the costs associated with the project. Most containerized or single packaged CHP system offerings range from 10 kW to 3 MW in capacity. Packaged CHP systems are extending the operating, efficiency, and emissions benefits of CHP to nontraditional markets in commercial, institutional, multifamily, light manufacturing, government, and military applications. These markets tend to be served by smaller systems (less than 5 MW) that are conducive to pre-engineered packaging and/or modularization. Many of these sectors have limited CHP experience and technical resources to adequately evaluate, install, and maintain onsite CHP systems. The introduction of packaged CHP offerings from experienced CHP Packagers and Solution Providers has accelerated CHP adoption, lowered energy costs, reduced emissions, and strengthened energy resilience in these sectors. In 2019, the US Department of Energy (DOE) launched the Packaged CHP eCatalog to promote increased acceptance of efficient, cost-effective CHP in these applications. The Packaged CHP eCatalog is a web-based, searchable platform that hosts DOE-recognized packaged CHP systems with features designed to reduce economic and performance risks for designers, developers, owners, and facility operators interested in installing CHP. DOE established the Packaged CHP Accelerator at the same time to help launch and publicize the eCatalog, and to validate project performance, cost, and installation time of CHP packages across a variety of applications. Accelerator efforts documented installed cost reductions and installation time reductions of more than 20% for packaged CHP systems over 100 kW compared with custom-engineered systems. The Packaged CHP Accelerator and eCatalog established a peer-to-peer network connecting public and private sector partners including utilities, state energy offices, and energy efficiency program administrators interested in promoting cost-effective, efficient CHP systems, Packagers, and Solution Providers. Feedback from these partners, along with input from DOE’s CHP Technical Assistance Partnerships (CHP TAPs), was critical in understanding the current market for packaged CHP technologies, stimulating investment in these technologies, and guiding future directions for packaged CHP systems and their applications. This report provides background on packaged CHP systems, an overview of their benefits, a profile of current packaged CHP installations, and a summary of future market trends; this report is intended for facility owners, project developers, engineers, policymakers, and other stakeholders looking to increase the adoption of efficient, flexible, and resilient packaged CHP systems.
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
Transporting Non-Compliant TRU Wastes in the OPTIMUS{sup TM} Packages - 20493
The OPTIMUS{sup TM} product line of packages was developed with the purpose of providing a versatile and modular packaging option for shipping problematic wastes and fissile material contents. The product line includes a high-activity design in the OPTIMUS-H and a low activity design in the OPTIMUS-L. The two variants utilize a singular containment vessel design, that is enclosed in different protective components that offer different levels of shielding along with thermal and impact protection. The thick shielding provided by the OPTIMUS-H packaging allows for higher activity contents than the OPTIMUS-L to be transported. But the lightweight design of the OPTIMUS-L packaging allows for more packages to be transported in a single shipment. The containment vessel design shared between the two packages provides leak-tight containment of all radioactive contents along with the capabilities to easily leak test and the option to inert and backfill the contents, as necessary, prior to each shipment of the package. Together the OPTIMUS package designs offer significant flexibility and are capable of handling a wide variety of waste materials and other radioactive contents. One of the primary contents covered in the initial design effort for these packages is TRU waste contents beyond the standard waste materials that are compliant with the WIPP Waste Acceptance Criteria. More specifically, the initial content of interest is TRU Waste drums containing sealed containers with potentially flammable gases. While there are multiple other packaging options available for transporting standard WIPP compliant TRU wastes, the goal of the OPTIMUS packages is to offer a superior option for transporting both standard TRU wastes as well as the more problematic non-compliant wastes, among other contents. The non-compliant TRU waste contents explicitly included for the OPTIMUS packages are standard aerosol cans and DOT 3E lecture bottles. However, the methods applied for the package containment can be easily adjusted to cover other sealed container types with potentially flammable gases. The primary challenges with including these items are both the obvious issue of potential for flammable gases (e.g. aerosol propellants) in the package, but also the uncertainty in the exact state of the contents. Because these desired contents are waste materials, the characterization of the materials present in the waste may include some uncertainties. For example, though it may be known that there are one or more aerosol cans in a TRU waste drum, it may not be known if this can is full, spent, or anywhere in between. Also there may be equal uncertainty in the contents of the aerosol can, specifically in the potentially flammable propellant remaining in the can. To include these types of non-compliant items as acceptable contents for the package, the methods utilized in the safety analyses of the OPTIMUS packages must consider all of the uncertainties in the characterization of the waste. The methods utilized cover a range of concerns with transporting contents of this nature including pressure buildup, gas generation, and gaseous combustion for demonstrating the containment of the package. The ability to transport these problematic contents in the OPTIMUS packages gives TRU waste generating sites the option to relocate these drums to an offsite location where the non-compliant items can be properly managed through removal or destruction. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
3D printing of packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composites: Environmental sustainability analysis
In this study, a comprehensive Life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted on molded packaging inserts from expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam, molded packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite, and 3D-printed packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite under the low mix / high volume (LMHV) scenario and molded and machined packaging inserts from EPS foam, molded and machined packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite, and 3D-printed packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite under the high mix / low volume (HMLV) scenario. Six environmental impact categories—climate change, acidification, eutrophication, fossil resource scarcity, land use, and water consumption—are analyzed to evaluate the environmental trade-offs associated with each type of packaging inserts. Under the LMHV scenario, molded packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite emerge as the best option due to their lower impact on climate change, acidification and water consumption compared to other types of packaging inserts. Conversely, molded packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite face challenges in land use and eutrophication, primarily due to raw material production. LCA also reveals that 3D-printed packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite are the most environmentally favorable option under the HMLV scenario, due to significantly lower contributions to climate change, eutrophication, and water consumption compared to other types of packaging inserts. Conversely, 3D-printed packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite face challenges in acidification and land use, primarily due to raw material production. As part of the LCA, sensitivity analyses show that sourcing energy from 100% renewable sources substantially lowers climate change impacts across all packaging types, while varying transportation distances results in only minor changes, indicating the dominant role of upstream material and manufacturing processes. Additional sensitivity analysis is conducted under the HMLV scenario to assess the impact of material removal during machining on the environment. The amount of material removal is varied from 10 to 70% for the sensitivity analysis and it highlights that the amount of material removed during machining has no significant impact on climate change for packaging inserts from EPS foam. However, molded and machined packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite show an increasing trend in climate change with higher amount of material removal, while 3D-printed packaging inserts from biomass-fungi composite exhibit a decreasing trend, driven by reduced raw material usage and energy consumption.
09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
OPTIMUS{sup TM} Packaging for Intermediate Level Wastes and Spent Fuel - 20129
NAC's OPTIMUS{sup TM} packaging is a family of Type B(U)F transportation packages designed for maximum flexibility and cost-efficiency to support shipment of a wide range of challenging wastes and materials. They are small, modular packaging designs meeting DOT weight limits for road transport. OPTIMUS{sup TM} contents include low level waste, mixed low-level waste, irradiated fuel waste and intermediate level waste. Contents can also include aerosol cans with compressed gas and liquefied gas propellants and standard DOT 3E lecture bottles for shipment to treatment facilities. OPTIMUS{sup TM} packaging provides a cost-effective solution for challenging and unique waste contents combined with design simplicity and operational flexibility meeting the requirements of both SSR-6 and 10 CFR 71 for Type B(U)F packaging. The modular design of the packaging components combined with the flexibility to add modified internals for enhanced packaging performance makes OPTIMUS{sup TM} the preferred solution for many radioactive material transportation needs. The OPTIMUS{sup TM} product line currently includes two packaging designs; OPTIMUS{sup TM}-L and OPTIMUS{sup TM}-H. OPTIMUS{sup TM}-L is a lightweight transportation packaging intended for low-activity wastes, whereas OPTIMUS{sup TM}-H is a larger, heavier package intended for high-activities wastes. Due to its small size and weight, six (6) to ten (10) OPTIMUS{sup TM}-L packages can be accommodated on a single legal-weight truck shipment, depending on the weight of the contents. For typical payloads, two (2) OPTIMUS{sup TM}-H packages can be accommodated on a single legal-weight truck shipment. The OPTIMUS{sup TM} packaging share the same cask containment vessel (CCV) in the OPTIMUS{sup TM}-H and OPTIMUS{sup TM}-L. The large cavity size of the CCV, which can accommodate a 416-liter (110-gallon) drum, combined with the small size, low weight and modularity of the OPTIMUS{sup TM} packaging provides unmatched flexibility. In this paper, NAC provides a technical overview of the OPTIMUS{sup TM} packaging and identifies the design features and technology advancements making the OPTIMUS{sup TM} a readily adaptable and flexible solution for packaging processing facilities, reactor and decommissioning wastes. Optimized shielding performance through the addition of internal shielding components and alternative shipping configurations are discussed. In addition, an overview of the first major deployment of the OPTIMUS{sup TM} packaging for the Whiteshell Laboratories Closure Project (WLCP) is discussed. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Textile Carbon Fiber Packaging and NCF Production
This Technical Collaboration Project focused on packaging large tow (≥ 10 grams/meter) textile carbon fibers, for which currently there is no suitable method. Prior to this project, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) used a crude packaging approach to deliver (approximately) 100-meter packages for evaluation by intermediates producers, composites fabricators and other collaborators. That packaging approach was simply a hoop wrap on a standard 75 mm (3 inch) cardboard tube, with paper interleaved between layers and little or no tension control during spooling. While this approach was very effective for initial fiber development and sample fiber and small composite sample evaluation, these packages were inadequate for larger-scale demonstrations and more extensive applications development. The paper-interleaved packages were inconsistent, wasteful, and too small for commercial utilization; they were designed as a quick and simple means to package material for delivery into prototyping operations and were never expected to satisfy industrial requirements for commercial production. This project aimed to develop a commercially relevant approach for packaging large tow textile carbon fibers for robust delivery into downstream commercial intermediates and composites production operations. The development of robust packaging equipment that delivers packages meeting industrial requirements is essential to commercial implementation. In this project, the team identified packaging requirements, created a design, and prototyped a new packaging concept at ORNL’s Carbon Fiber Technology Facility (CFTF) and resulting packages were tested in production of non-crimp fabric (NCF).
42 ENGINEERING↗
Assessment of Existing Transportation Packages for Use with HALEU
Commercial light water reactor operators and fuel vendors in the United States are pursuing changes to fuel that include increased 235 U enrichment. Economic studies generally anticipate maximum near-term fuel assembly designs with up to 8 wt.% 235 U. Many next-generation nuclear reactor designs require high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) (19.75 wt.% > 235 U > 5 wt.%) fuel. One necessary element for the commercial-scale use of HALEU is the ability to safely transport large quantities of enriched fuel material in multiple forms. However, there is uncertainty as to whether subcriticality requirements can be satisfied with existing package designs and whether existing critical benchmark experiment data are sufficient to support criticality safety code validation for HALEU transportation applications. This study assesses the potential to use currently licensed transportation packages for the transportation of increased enrichment unirradiated U fuel forms. The assessment uses selected package designs that represent the five categories of fuel form-boiling water reactor pins and assemblies, pressurized water reactor pins and assemblies, UF 6 , U-metal and tristructural isotropic (TRISO) particles, and UO 2 pellets or powder-and focuses on demonstrating subcriticality and identifying benchmark critical experiments appropriate for use in criticality computer code validation. Key quantities of interest that relate to subcriticality are limiting conditions (e.g., optimum moderation), package or package array k eff , package capacity, and package transportation array size. The SCALE TSUNAMI-3D and TSUNAMI Indices and Parameters codes are used for sensitivity and uncertainty calculations and for identification of candidate critical benchmark experiments for code validation. The primary metric for identifying candidate benchmarks is the similarity coefficient, c k . For each fuel form category, a representative package is evaluated. Results provided for each package evaluation include enrichment and packaging limits (e.g., maximum transportation array size as a function of enrichment) and benchmark critical experiment similarity coefficients. Results indicate that there are viable means for increasing enrichments into the HALEU range across the spectrum of fuel forms with differing increase amounts available for different packages. Sources of subcriticality margin to offset increased enrichment reactivity include reduced transportation array size, reduced fissile mass, burnable absorber credit, and safety analysis margin harvesting. For all packages except the DN-30, numerous critical benchmark experiment candidates for validation were identified.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Codisposal Waste Package Loading Options for DOE SNF and HLW PPT
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for managing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) that is currently in, or will in the future come into, its possession. DOE must continue to safely store that SNF, transport it to an interim storage site or a repository, and dispose of it. These fuels come from a wide range of reactor types with various cladding materials and enrichments. Many of these reactors, now decommissioned, had unique design features, such as core configuration, fuel element and assembly geometry, moderator and coolant materials, operational characteristics, and neutron spatial and spectral properties, resulting in a large diversity of reactor and fuel designs. Because of the wide variety and conditions of SNF, a robust DOE Standard Canister was proposed that would confine radionuclides and preclude moderator. The DOE Standard Canister had four variations: 3.05-meter (10-foot) or 4.57-meter (15-foot) length, and 45.7-cm (18-inch) or 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter. For ultimate disposal in the Yucca Mountain Repository, these canisters were to be grouped with 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter high level waste (HLW) canisters in a 2.13-meter (84-inch) diameter co-disposal waste package. The smaller 45.7-cm (18-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister could be placed in the middle of five HLW canisters. The larger 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister would take the place of one of the five HLW canisters on the outer ring in the co-disposal waste package. No DOE Standard Canisters have been loaded. A preliminary evaluation has estimated the number of elements of a fuel type that can fit into the different sizes of the DOE Standard Canister, but no definitive loading configuration has been selected. Changing the loading configuration could impact the number of loadable DOE Standard Canisters and the number of co-disposal waste packages needed for eventual disposition. This paper conveys the ranges of DOE Standard Canisters and HLW canisters that may be produced under certain conditions. It also examines the differences in the estimated number of co-disposal waste packages produced for eventual disposal when using different loading strategies in the DOE Standard Canister for Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), Peach Bottom, and High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) SNF. Changing the loading configurations of ATR, Peach Bottom, and HFIR SNF slightly impacted the number of co-disposal waste packages that may be needed for ultimate disposal. The change in loading configuration was more impactful when a different canister was used, as opposed to varying the number of elements that could fit inside the same size canister. In one case, a reduction of co-disposal waste packages could be achieved by allowing mixing of short HLW canisters with long DOE Standard Canisters. The main conclusion from this analysis is that the ratio between HLW canisters and DOE Standard Canisters will drive the total number of co-disposal waste packages. If too many HLW canisters (i.e., more than five times the number of 18-inch DOE standard canisters) or DOE Standard Canisters are produced, some co-disposal waste packages may not have all positions filled. A co-disposal waste package may be filled with all HLW with no DOE Standard Canister, or a co-disposal waste package could be filled with a single DOE Standard Canister. A ratio that does not closely align to optimum could allow for the design of waste packages that hold just HLW canisters or just DOE SNF canisters.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Hydrogen Transport in a Model 9979 Shipping Package with Inner Convenience Cans
Radiolytic hydrogen production and accumulation inside containment packages is a concern at any facility responsible for their packaging, storage, transportation, and/or disposal. When hydrogen gas accumulates to concentrations above the Lower Flammability Limit (LFL) which is 4% or 40,000 ppm in air, the possibility of a deflagration or explosion increases. This concern persists over the course of the package lifetime which is unlimited when disposed of by burial or in permanent repositories. Here, we report on a numerical model used to predict the concentration of hydrogen within each layer of a Model 9979 package containing a convenience can assembly. Simulations show the hydrogen concentration to always be highest in the inner convenience can containing the radioactive source. When the radioactive source is within the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) Packaging Limits, the hydrogen concentration is shown to remain well below the LFL at all times including packaging, storage, transportation, and disposal. A hydrogen transport model is presented for a Model 9979 package system containing a nested arrangement of convenience cans, which are tin oxide coated steel cans of various sizes with a slip-lid assembly. The inner convenience can contains the radioactive source material along with an unknown quantity of incidental water acquired from humid air or processing. While visible organic materials such as paper and plastics were purposely excluded from the inner can, it is not possible to claim the wastes are entirely organic free. The inner convenience can is tape sealed and placed into a plastic bag which is horsetail closed (i.e., twisted and taped). The bagged can is placed into an outer convenience can that is also tape sealed. The can assembly is then placed into the 30 gallon drum and subsequently placed inside the 55 gallon drum in the 9979 package. Here we assume hydrogen gas is produced in the inner convenience can from alpha radiolysis of water at a rate dependent on the quantity of uranium isotopes and water present. The hydrogen transport model was used to calculate hydrogen accumulations within the package’s five layers at different times and conditions. These simulations serve two purposes; (i) to build confidence in the model by comparing predicted values to measured values, and (ii) to check the steady state hydrogen concentrations that are approached at long times in the package’s lifetime. Model simulations were compared to gas samples taken from the 30 gallon drum after storage at LANL’s Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) building for around 500 days. Hydrogen concentration calculations over much longer periods (i.e., more than 270 years) included extreme storage durations, transportation at extreme cold temperatures, and disposal of packages assuming different average temperatures.
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Co-Disposal Waste Package Loading Options for DOE SNF and HLW - 20331
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for managing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) that is currently in, or will in the future come into, its possession. DOE must continue to safely store that SNF, transport it to an interim storage site or a repository, and dispose of it. These fuels come from a wide range of reactor types with various cladding materials and enrichments. Many of these reactors, now decommissioned, had unique design features, such as core configuration, fuel element and assembly geometry, moderator and coolant materials, operational characteristics, and neutron spatial and spectral properties, resulting in a large diversity of reactor and fuel designs. Because of the wide variety and conditions of SNF, a robust DOE Standard Canister was proposed that would confine radionuclides and preclude moderator. The DOE Standard Canister had four variations: 3.05-meter (10-foot) or 4.57-meter (15-foot) length, and 45.7-cm (18-inch) or 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter. For ultimate disposal in the Yucca Mountain Repository, these canisters were to be grouped with 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter high level waste (HLW) canisters in a 2.13-meter (84-inch) diameter co-disposal waste package. The smaller 45.7-cm (18-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister could be placed in the middle of five HLW canisters. The larger 61.0-cm (24-inch) diameter DOE Standard Canister would take the place of one of the five HLW canisters on the outer ring in the co-disposal waste package. No DOE Standard Canisters have been loaded. A preliminary evaluation has estimated the number of elements of a fuel type that can fit into the different sizes of the DOE Standard Canister, but no definitive loading configuration has been selected. Changing the loading configuration could impact the number of loadable DOE Standard Canisters and the number of co-disposal waste packages needed for eventual disposition. This paper conveys the ranges of DOE Standard Canisters and HLW canisters that may be produced under certain conditions. It also examines the differences in the estimated number of co-disposal waste packages produced for eventual disposal when using different loading strategies in the DOE Standard Canister for Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), Peach Bottom, and High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) SNF. Changing the loading configurations of ATR, Peach Bottom, and HFIR SNF slightly impacted the number of co-disposal waste packages that may be needed for ultimate disposal. The change in loading configuration was more impactful when a different canister was used, as opposed to varying the number of elements that could fit inside the same size canister. In one case, a reduction of co-disposal waste packages could be achieved by allowing mixing of short HLW canisters with long DOE Standard Canisters. The main conclusion from this analysis is that the ratio between HLW canisters and DOE Standard Canisters will drive the total number of co-disposal waste packages. If too many HLW canisters (i.e., more than five times the number of 18-inch DOE standard canisters) or DOE Standard Canisters are produced, some co-disposal waste packages may not have all positions filled. A co-disposal waste package may be filled with all HLW with no DOE Standard Canister, or a co-disposal waste package could be filled with a single DOE Standard Canister. A ratio that does not closely align to optimum could allow for the design of waste packages that hold just HLW canisters or just DOE SNF canisters. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Deeplynx Airflow Provider Package
The DeepLynx Airflow Provider Package is a python package used to interact with the data warehouse DeepLynx when using the workflow orchestration tool Apache Airflow. This python package is packaged together using the airflow package standard so that it can be easily installed and used in any Apache Airflow environment. This package is meant to encapsulate the DeepLynx API for use in Airflow so that any interactions with DeepLynx that a user may want to use in their Airflow workflow can be easily accomplished using this provider package. This allows us to develop, implement, and test our DeepLynx-Airflow interactions in one provider package repository, and then easily install and use this package in any airflow instance. This DeepLynx Airflow Provider Package will be used extensively by the DeepLynx DAG repository.
Cavaluzzi, JackM↗
ORNL Package Testing Program Overview
When transporting radioactive or hazardous materials, safety and security are top priorities. Packaging and transportation regulations require reliable evidence that containers have passed rigorous performance tests to ensure that the public and the environment are protected from the hazardous nature of the cargo. Because of its long history in energy and security research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has needed to ship hazardous packages for the past 65 years. Since the 1940s, ORNL has made significant contributions to transportation regulations and has been at the forefront of regulatory testing development. Today, ORNL is a leader in standards development and testing of designs of radioactive material packages. ORNL plays a critical role in ensuring the safe transportation of radioactive materials across the United States by executing rigorous testing campaigns of packages that contain radioactive materials. Early testing activities focused on supporting the development of transportation regulations established by both the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the United States. Currently, all package testing activities are performed under the Package Testing Program (PTP) at the Package Evaluation Facility (PEF) located at the National Transportation Research Center (NTRC), which is about 10 miles from the main ORNL campus. The PTP develops and evaluates testing solutions, ensuring that they are safe efficient, and in compliance with regulatory requirements. The vision for the PTP is to be a world-class leader in the evaluation and testing of radioactive and hazardous material packages. The key elements necessary to fulfill this mission are an experienced and professional staff; state-of-the-art facilities, equipment, and instrumentation; and completion of challenging programs and projects important to package transportation. Collaborations with other internal and external organizations play a significant role in building stronger teams and achieving this vision. By adhering to and advancing regulatory standards, ORNL’s PTP supports development of safe and compliant packaging, safeguarding the transportation process from potential risks associated with radioactive material logistics.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
When One Cannot Bypass the Byproducts: Plastic Packaging Waste Embedded in Production and Export
While packaging is praised for reducing waste of perishable food products, packaging waste is a growing concern. Its least recyclable type, plastics waste, is increasingly polluting the marine environment and many developing countries are now refusing to take the waste from developed countries. Before responsibility can be established, one has to identify the key producers and consumers. This paper adjusts the packaging waste satellite account in EXIOBASE 3 by combining the official waste data published by the World Bank. Based on input-output methods, we find that the world's top suppliers of plastic packaging waste are the United States, China, and Brazil. Food and beverage products constitute the bulk of the problem. Yet, 21% of these countries' plastic packaging waste is induced export. At the global level, it is 25.8%. About 76.0% of export-induced plastic packaging waste corresponds to packaging of the exported goods that will ultimately be disposed of in the destination country; while the others correspond to the packaging used in their supply-chain and wasted domestically. We conclude that international efforts need to assign shared responsibility and promote improvement in plastic packaging recyclability.
environment responsibility↗
ARM Data-Oriented Metrics and Diagnostics Package for Climate Model Evaluation
A Python-based metrics and diagnostics package is currently being developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Infrastructure Team at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) to facilitate the use of long-term, high-frequency measurements from the ARM Facility in evaluating the regional climate simulation of clouds, radiation, and precipitation. This metrics and diagnostics package computes climatological means of targeted climate model simulation and generates tables and plots for comparing the model simulation with ARM observational data. The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) model data sets are also included in the package to enable model intercomparison as demonstrated in Zhang et al. (2017). The mean of the CMIP model can serve as a reference for individual models. Basic performance metrics are computed to measure the accuracy of mean state and variability of climate models. The evaluated physical quantities include cloud fraction, temperature, relative humidity, cloud liquid water path, total column water vapor, precipitation, sensible and latent heat fluxes, and radiative fluxes, with plan to extend to more fields, such as aerosol and microphysics properties. Process-oriented diagnostics focusing on individual cloud- and precipitation-related phenomena are also being developed for the evaluation and development of specific model physical parameterizations. The version 1.0 package is designed based on data collected at ARM’s Southern Great Plains (SGP) Research Facility, with the plan to extend to other ARM sites. The metrics and diagnostics package is currently built upon standard Python libraries and additional Python packages developed by DOE (such as CDMS and CDAT). The ARM metrics and diagnostic package is available publicly with the hope that it can serve as an easy entry point for climate modelers to compare their models with ARM data. In this report, we first present the input data, which constitutes the core content of the metrics and diagnostics package in section 2, and a user's guide documenting the workflow/structure of the version 1.0 codes, and including step-by-step instruction for running the package in section 3.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
A Probabilistic Approach To Selecting Build Configurations in Package Managers
In the past decade software has grown significantly in complexity and scale. Likewise the number of dependencies for most software has increased with typical software packages depending on tens to hundreds of other packages. Such large numbers of dependencies place a significant burden on package managers to correctly maintain dependency lists and constraints between them. Due to this package managers have incorporated sophisticated tooling such as SAT solvers into their dependency management mechanisms. Despite these tools package managers still rely on many human annotated constraints for dependency and version selection. These are error-prone and require a significant amount of labor to constantly update and test. In this paper we propose a methodology to make use of historical build results in selecting the version for package dependencies. Our method utilizes the flexibility of the Spack package manager’s heavily parameterized package configurations to incorporate a machine learning model trained to predict the probability of build outcomes. This work is able to build and install packages with a 13% higher success rate than the default version selection mechanism in Spack.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
ARM data-oriented metrics and diagnostics package for climate model evaluation (ARM-DIAGS-V3) version 3
A Python-based metrics and diagnostics package is currently being developed by the ARM Infrastructure Team at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to facilitate the use of long-term high frequency measurements from the ARM program in evaluating the regional climate simulation of clouds, radiation, precipitation, and aerosols. This metrics and diagnostics package computes climatological means of targeted climate model simulation and generates tables and plots for comparing the model simulation with ARM observational data. The CMIP model data sets are also included in the package to enable model inter-comparison as demonstrated in Zhang et al. (2018) and Zhang et al. (2020). The mean of the CMIP model can be served as a reference for individual models. Basic performance metrics are computed to measure the accuracy of mean state and variability of climate models. The evaluated physical quantities include cloud fraction, temperature, relative humidity, cloud liquid water path, total column water vapor, precipitation, sensible and latent heat fluxes, aerosol optical depth, and radiative fluxes, with plan to extend to more fields, such as the evaluation of model simulated aerosol physicochemical properties and cloud microphysics properties. Process-oriented diagnostics focusing on aerosol, cloud, and precipitation-related phenomena are also being developed for the evaluation and development of specific model physical parameterizations. In addition to the Southern Great Plains (SGP), North Slope of Alaska (NSA) and Tropical Western Pacific (TWP) atmospheric observatories in the ARMDIAGS version 2.0, the version 3.0 package have extended to the data collected at the ARM Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) atmospheric observatory and the Observation and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GOAMAZON) field campaign. The metrics and diagnostics package are currently built upon standard Python libraries and additional Python packages developed by DOE (CDAT). The ARM metrics and diagnostic package is available publicly with the hope that it can serve as an easy entry point for climate modelers to compare their models with ARM data. In this report, we first provide an overview of major metrics in section 2. The input data, which constitutes the core content of the metrics and diagnostics package, is summarized in section 3. A user's guide documenting the workflow/structure of the version 3.0 codes and including step-by-step instruction for running the package is described in section 4.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
Additive Manufacturing of Frequency-Agile W-Band Packaging
Abstract —In this paper we demonstrate a fully additively manufactured packaged W-band amplifier with integrated bypass capacitors. This package was fabricated using a chip-first approach and aerosol jet printing. Package substrates (dielectrics), conductors and interconnects are printed around a bare die attached to a carrier. This package uses shaped ramp interconnects, allowing for frequency agnostic package performance of the interconnect with no impedance discontinuity, within the physical limits of the printer. High dielectric constant thin films of a polymer-matrix nanocomposite for bypass capacitors were printed using multi-material aerosol jet printing. The maximum measured packaged gain is 14.9 dB in the W-band, compared to the maximum bare die gain of 15.5 dB in the same frequency range. From 75 - 92 GHz, the average package loss is 1.1 dB including 3 mm transmission line, interconnects, and a GSG launch structure correlating to an average loss of 0.37 dB/mm.
Additive manufacturing, aerosol jet printing, hete↗
How R Developers explain their Package Choice: A Survey
Background: Contemporary software development relies heavily on reusing already implemented functionality, usually in the form of packages. Aims: We aim to shed light on developers' preferences when selecting packages in R language. Method: To do that, we create and administer a survey to over 1000 developers who have added one of two common dataframe enhancement libraries in R to their projects: data.table or tidyr. We design a questionnaire using the Social Contagion Theory (SCT) following prior work on technology adoption and ensure that key dimensions affecting developer choice are considered. Results: Of the 1085 developers we contacted, 803 completed the survey asking them to prioritize various factors known to affect developer perceptions of package quality and to provide their background. Most developers self-identified as data scientists with two to five years of work experience. We found significant differences between the preferences of developers who chose data.table and tidyr. Surprisingly, package reputation based on easy-to-see measures, such as the number of stars on GitHub, was not an important factor for either group. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the inherently social nature of package adoption. They can help design future studies on how different populations of developers make decisions on which software packages to use in their projects. Finally, package developers and maintainers can benefit by better understanding the prime concerns of the users of their packages.
Malviya Thakur, Addi↗