Process Defects Knowledge Modeling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: An Ontological Framework
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Components fabricated using the powder bed fusion laser beam metallic (PBF-LB/M)additive manufacturing process are the result of a multitude of weld passes conducted sequentially. Qualifying components for aerospace applications requires a thorough understanding of the process-structure-properties relationships. Porosity defects are known to have a strong adverse effect on the mechanical properties of a component. In particular, porosity defects created by lack of fusion have high aspect ratio morphologies leading to stress concentrations that become crack initiation sites. In the present work, the occurrence of spatter induced lack of fusion porosity was studied using synchronized in-situ process monitoring, additive manufacturing model-based process metrics, and high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. The results show that lack of fusion porosity is statistically correlated with unremoved welding spatter ejecta of the PBF-LB/M process and process metrics related to the hatching strategy.
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has developed several additive manufactured regenerative cooled combustion chambers from 2014 to present. Chambers have been constructed using the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) powder bed additive manufacturing (AM) technique. The materials used for the chambers has varied from Inconel 718, Inconel 625, GRCop-84, and C18150 metal alloys. The surface finish and build techniques used to successfully manufacture combustion chambers using the SLM AM result in as built surface finish and off nominal geometric features. This paper discusses and reviews the effects of surface roughness, flow area, and hydraulic performance of regenerative cooled combustion chambers. The thrust chambers designs tested ranged from 200 to 1,400 psia producing 1,000 to 35,000 lbf thrust. Empirical data from four test campaigns will be reviewed and related to design modeling parameters such as pressure drop, surface roughness, and actual fluid flow geometry. Correlation results with simple 2-D CFD modeling will also be presented. The goal of the work is to better understand how the finished additive manufactured component characteristics inside internal features can effect regenerative cooling chamber design. Adjustments to design methodology will be discussed and recommended based on the above results.
Precipitation-strengthened, nickel-based superalloys are widely used in the aerospace and energy industries due to their excellent environmental resistance and outstanding mechanical properties under extreme conditions. Powder-bed additive manufacturing (AM) technologies offer the potential to revolutionize the processing of superalloy turbine components by eliminating the need for extensive inventory or expensive legacy tooling. Like selective laser melting (SLM), electron beam melting (EBM) constructs three-dimensional dense components layer-by-layer by melting and solidification of atomized, pre-alloyed powder feedstock within 50-200 micron layers. While SLM has been more widely used for AM of nickel alloys like 718, EBM offers several distinct advantages, such as less retained residual stress, lower risk of contamination, and faster build rates with multiple-electron-beam configurations. These advantages are particularly attractive for turbine disks, for which excessive residual stress and contamination can shorten disk life during high-temperature operation. In this presentation, we will discuss the feasibility of fabricating disk superalloy components using EBM AM. Originally developed using powder metallurgy forging processing, disk superalloys contain a higher refractory content and precipitate volume fraction than alloy 718, thus making them more prone to thermal cracking during AM. This and other challenges to produce homogeneous builds with desired properties will be presented. In particular, the quality of lab-scale samples fabricated via a design of experiments, in which the beam current, build temperature, and beam velocity were varied, will be summarized. The relationship between processing parameters, microstructure, grain orientation, and mechanical response will be discussed.
This study will focus on the basics of generating an aluminum-tin ink that can sinter in air and exhibits properties near that of a solid aluminum-tin alloy. Sintering temperatures will also be assessed in this study. Once the optimal aluminum ink composition is determined, the optimal ink thickness for homogeneous sintering must be determined by additional experimentation. Additive manufacturing is a rapidly developing and growing manufacturing process and has proven successful in many different ways. Processes, such as extrusion three-dimensional (3D) printing and selective laser melting (SLM), have proven to work but have limitations, such as material capabilities or density issues. SLM is a revolutionary process for additive manufacturing of metals but cannot be used in outer space due to the need for metallic powder which would diffuse into the atmosphere in a zero-gravity environment. For this reason, metallic ink additive manufacturing is a potential solution. Work is being done on metallic ink additive manufacturing in a vacuum for electrical applications. This project has focused on developing an aluminum-tin metallic ink that can sinter without the need of a vacuum or inert gas-purged atmosphere in order to prevent oxidation of the aluminum by adding flux. Once a potential ink composition has been determined through sintering of small disks and thin layers of ink, the ink may be studied with a multimaterial 3D printer at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in future experiments. If successful, this aluminum-tin ink will be capable for use on the International Space Station to make replacement parts quickly. Along with its zero-gravity advantages, this ink may also have applications on Earth because it may be extruded on a substrate with precise ceramic tips in a 3D printing process. This would allow the fabrication of precise, complex shapes and may generate a much faster and more efficient printing process as compared with traditional powder bed additive manufacturing processes. The process would not be limited by a small building volume because the system would not require an enclosed chamber.
Powder-bed additive manufacturing (AM) processes are associated with the formation of multiple types of process-specific pores, including but not limited to lack-of-fusion (LoF) and keyhole pores. The performance of an AM component is dependent on the type of pores, their density and their proximity to the free surface, and other heterogeneities in the microstructure. In order to characterize the influence of porosity on the mechanical behavior of AM materials, it is imperative to quantitatively analyze the heterogeneous strain accumulation in the vicinity of porosity. Process-specific microstructure models are generated using SPPARKS, an open-source process simulation code. Spherical keyhole or irregular LoF pores are embedded into the microstructure models, which are meshed and input into a finite element code, ScIFEN, to solve for the heterogeneous strain localization in the vicinity of the pores. Given the non-smooth geometries of LoF pores, they readily promote strain accumulation in their vicinity thereby increasing the propensity of initiating fatigue cracks.
Powder bed fusion (PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) enables the creation of parts with complexity and functionality levels that were previously impossible with traditional manufacturing methods. By modifying the laser power, hatch spacing, or the numerous other processing parameters, the PBF process supports the production of a wide set of materials and geometries. However, that same process parameter design flexibility causes the process-design space of PBF to be massive and expensive to explore experimentally. Another challenge is quality variation across a build. As a part is being built, geometric variance between locations, such as at a thin-wall section vs. the bulk material, may cause the specified processing parameters to no longer be acceptable for producing defect-free printing. Furthermore, if the processing parameters deviate during the print process, it is difficult to assess if the part will still perform satisfactorily. Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) provides a way to understand and address these various challenges. This talk will present advancements in process-structure simulations of PBF at NASA Langley Research Center. The ability to simulate grain-scale PBF microstructures using the Physically Based Monte Carlo method will be demonstrated and compared to experimental measurements. Techniques for simulating three-dimensional lack-of-fusion and keyhole porosity defects based on the specific processing conditions and approaches for integrating the two porosity prediction techniques alongside the computational microstructure evolution models will be shown. Finally, the integration of simulated PBF microstructures, embedded process defects, and crystal plasticity finite element models to elucidate the interaction of porosity and microstructure on micromechanical fields will be demonstrated. These integrated techniques demonstrate an example of using ICME to relate processing to performance for PBF AM materials. With continued maturity, it is hoped that such ICME approaches will lead to next-generation computational-materials supported qualification and certification of AM parts.
Additive manufacturing (AM) has unique process attributes that facilitate the creation of optimized, complex, and unique parts for aerospace applications. However, the multi-scale and complicated building process for AM parts can cause unexpected build conditions that result in microstructural variability within the deposited material. The need for richer datasets and computational modeling capabilities to improve AM process reliability is a consequence of this microstructural variability. A computational approach, referred to as the Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure (AM3), addresses this need by leveraging the way AM processes fuse material in precise, incremental steps. During the layering sequence, each previous step contributes to the condition of the current step at the center of the heat source. The precise steps can be selected to systematically create a time-space point field with co-located machine input and in-situ sensor data. The sequential nature of the AM process, coupled with nearest neighbor calculations, allows for a fully parallel computation for part-scale build profile analysis. The AM3 concept introduced here enables part-scale assessment directly from build files and in-situ process monitoring sensors alike. The AM moment measures were calculated for build point fields and compared with co-located in-situ and ex-situ nondestructive evaluation and optical microscopy observations. These comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the quality of a laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) build. Details of the AM3technique will be discussed and compared to measured LPBF part characteristics. The AM3 results indicate a strong potential to advance the qualification process for aerospace applications.
Alloy 718 (Inconel 718) is used for aerospace applications because of its excellent corrosion resistance and mechanical properties. This alloy is particularly applicable in manufacturing components subjected to high temperatures in rocket engines, aero-engines, and gas turbines. Properties for this alloy when processing on systems from similar and different Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) machines provide subtle differences due to process parameters, feedstock, and machine configurations. A series of sixteen L-PBF AM Inconel 718 geometric feature build plates have been evaluated for microstructure using optical microscopy. This study presents the details of the microstructure analysis concerning geometry and different machine platforms. Microstructural investigations of these samples included average grain width measurement for all the X-Y and Y-Z build layers and are accompanied by process parameters and powder characterization. The present work concludes with a discussion on the importance of captured differences among builds to understand the practical limitations among AM platforms.
The use of in-situ process monitoring is of interest to lower the cost of inspection for the qualification of powder bed fusion laser beam metal (PBF-LB/M) additively manufactured (AM) parts. Precise monitoring of the PBF-LB/M AM build process constitutes a multi-scale and multi-discipline task. There are several significant challenges to the in-situ approach: the synchronization of sensor signals to process steps; the physical interpretation and classification of sensor signals; managing very large datasets; and comparing the inputs with the observed monitoring signals. At NASA Langley Research Center, a configurable architecture additive testbed has been developed to monitor the build process with synchronized sensors. The philosophy and method adopted for the synchronization of the cameras with laser power and position throughout a complex PBF-LB/M AM build will be described. The synchronized in-situ monitoring signals are compared with ex-situ nondestructive inspection, x-ray computed tomography (XCT). Such comparisons permit a better understanding of how the sequential process actions of LPBF-AM can affect build quality. The multi-scale and complex process of printing additively manufactured (AM) parts can have unexpected, but predictable, build conditions that result in material microstructure variability. This presentation will describe an additive manufacturing model-based process metric (AM-PM) computational method that is a fully parallel reduced order modeling approach developed to evaluate the evolution of AM processes. This method couples the known sequence of the AM process with a physically informed nearest neighbors’ calculation to map the conditions of a part-scale build. The result is a map of the build that is derived directly from build files or in-situ process monitoring sensors. The methodology of the approach will be described and mapped to the porosity observed from XCT for a complex PBF-LB/M build. Such comparative results develop understanding of how the sequential process actions can affect the PBF-LB/M AM build quality and microstructure variability.
Qualification of a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (LPBF-AM) process requires knowledge of the multi-scale material physics during the process, per part. As the LPBF-AM build occurs, each moment is influenced by the process history. Knowledge of the build sequence can be used to generate a discretized time-space-condition point field that when coupled with a nearest neighbors’ calculation results in a generalized and fully parallel process model computation. This GPU accelerated approach was developed for part-scale analysis of build files along with in-situ process monitoring sensor data and is termed the “Additive Manufacturing Moment Measure” (AM3). The AM3 approach will be presented and then used to evaluate an AM Bench relevant geometry with synchronized in-situ process data, ex-situ nondestructive evaluation, and optical microscopy observations. These comparisons permit a better understanding of how the process actions can affect the LPBF-AM build quality and the signals generated during in-situ process monitoring.
In this study, we apply the electromagnetic (EM) melt processing of thermoplastics on an innovative EM field-driven powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (AM) concept for high-performance functional parts: Selective Microwave Melting/Sintering (SMM/SMS). This technique leverages the EM susceptibility of carbon nanotube-coated polymer micro-pellets to achieve rapid, localized heating and powder fusion. Thus, selective microwave melting (SMM) was used to fabricate multilayer specimens made of recycled polyphenylene sulfide (rPPS) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The resulting SMM specimens exhibited very good interlayer integrity, localized fusion at pellet boundaries, and tolerable residual porosity, indicating effective fusion and acceptable consolidation. CNT-rich interphases were retained after irradiation, generating anisotropic electrically active network pathways and enabling conductivity enhancement at low filler content. At only 1.0 wt% CNT, the specimens exhibited electrical conductivity approximately three orders of magnitude higher than neat rPPS. Dynamic mechanical analysis showed improved viscoelastic response relative to neat rPPS, while tensile testing confirmed that the SMM-processed specimens retained practical mechanical integrity despite localized voids. These results demonstrate that SMM can effectively consolidate EM susceptible thermoplastic powder beds while preserving their segregated conductive networks. This may become a scalable route for producing multifunctional thermoplastic parts with low filler loadings, tunable anisotropy, and structured materials and parts. Overall, the findings suggest that EM field-based AM can help overcome key limitations of conventional thermoplastic processing by enabling scalable, energy-efficient fabrication of nanostructured composites and expanding AM to a broader range of resins, including high-performance thermoplastics with customized functional properties.
The microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured (AM) alloys can be significantly affected by variations in cooling rates, resulting from different process conditions across different additive manufacturing (AM) platforms. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the effect of manufacturing process on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AM Inconel 718. This study examines three AM processes: laser powder bed fusion, laser powder directed energy deposition, and wire arc additive manufacturing. Results show that fully heat treated laser powder bed fused (L-PBF) and wire arc additively manufactured (WAAM) Inconel 718 specimens exhibit higher strength compared to laser powder directed energy deposited (LP-DED) ones due to finer grain structure in L-PBF and retained dendritic microstructure in WAAM. The ductility in LP-DED Inconel 718 was slightly higher compared to WAAM and L-PBF due to relatively small carbide size, which causes stress concentration in a small material volume, leading to delayed fracture.
Additive manufacturing opens new paths for introducing oxide particles into superalloys, to potentially provide oxide dispersion strengthening (ODS) at high temperatures. This provides opportunities to study how such dispersions can influence failure modes for a given superalloy, after nearly identical material processing paths. The objective of this study was to compare monotonic failure modes for additively manufactured superalloys with versus without an introduced oxide dispersion. The superalloy for each case was produced by laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Specimens were subsequently given consistent thermal treatment paths and then tested in tensile and creep tests at varied temperatures. Failure modes were then compared. Additively manufactured NiCrAl without ODS had randomly oriented equiaxed grains while this alloy with 0.25 wt% Y 2 O 3 ODS additions had elongated [001] oriented grains in the build direction. Material made without ODS (“No-ODS”) was nearly completely single phase gamma, while ODS additions resulted in gamma, chromium carbide, and Y-Al-Cr oxide phases, with carbide and oxide phases contents estimated at no more than 13 and 1 vol%, respectively. Compared to No-ODS, material made with ODS had higher tensile strengths at room, 760 and 1093 °C. The elongation of ODS material was lower than No-ODS at room temperature, but higher at 760 °C. At 1093 °C ODS material had higher elongation than No-ODS when tested in the build direction, however elongation was lower for ODS material in the transverse direction at 1093 °C. Creep rupture strain, life, and area reduction at 760 and 1093 °C were all much higher for ODS material compared to No-ODS; 760 °C rupture life was nearly 100 times longer for ODS material. The presence of Y in the ODS material significantly improved oxidation resistance.
GRCop-42, a Cu-4at% Cr-2at% Nb alloy, was designed as a high temperature, high strength, high heat flux material for rocket engine combustion chamber liners by NASA Glenn Research Center. In situ alloying of GRCop-42 (ISGRCop-42) using powder bed fusion (PBF) additive manufacturing (AM) takes elemental powders of Cu, Cr, and Nb to be introduced into the PBF environment and develop the GRCop alloy while simultaneously building an AM component. Elemental powders were milled together prior to printing in an effort to facilitate the alloying process. Success of the in situ alloying process may provide lower cost, faster lead times, alloying optimization, and more design freedom in the development of regeneratively-cooled rocket propulsion systems. Evaluation of the ISGRCop-42 was conducted using a phase extraction procedure to isolate the Cr2Nb precipitates from the pure Cu matrix. The isolated precipitates were then examined using x-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS). It was found that ISGRCop-42 successfully and repeatedly formed Cr2Nb at a yield as high as 89% of potential Cr2Nb. Further, it was identified that the preparation of the powder was the most influential factor in alloying success, and the second most influential factor was the laser power.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The additive manufacturing (AM) industry has experienced rapid growth in recent decades as industrial interest in the process has grown. Because of this, there are many groups interested in simulations of the AM process. However, the influence of thermophysical property variability on the melt pool geometry during processing of various AM alloys is unclear. The goal of my work at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) was to characterize this influence on Ti-6Al-4V during AM processing alongside developing a tool to enable equivalent studies on other AM materials. To facilitate this process, a database tool was developed to contain and organize thermophysical data previously reported by primary sources. The specific thermophysical properties of interest for this study were density, specific heat capacity, and conductivity. Thermal diffusivity was calculated using the other three properties. This data was then fit with a Gaussian distribution and then randomly sampled from using Monte Carlo random value sampling. Using the Rosenthal equation, this sample data was used to simulate the temperature field during additive manufacturing and extract the melt pool geometry. Specifically, the melt pool’s length, width, and depth. This process was repeated an arbitrary number of times, with the default being 1000. Once this information was obtained, histograms were made showing the distributions of the sizes of the melt pool’s length, width, and depth. Representative statistical metrics of the distributions were calculated (mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variance). This work found that at the simulated processing values, the melt pool’s width and depth had a 5.7% variation while the length had a 3.2% variation. Additionally, a tool was constructed to graph a thermal color map representation of the melt pool for specific, arbitrary values of density, specific heat, and conductivity. This tool allowed for more efficient plotting of individual queries of the thermophysical properties. The results that were observed in the research were that values reported in literature vary and this variance can have a significant impact on the simulation. Predictions of the melt pool’s dimensions show that length has a standard deviation of approximately 6 μm, width has a standard deviation of approximately 5 μm, and depth can vary by approximately 3 μm. Considering the mean sizes of length, width, and depth are 185 μm, 88 μm, and 44 μm respectively, such a deviation is significant. This shows that depth, for example, could be more than 10% larger or smaller than expected. This demonstrates that variability in the reported thermophysical properties are not negligible and should be expected to have an influence on the results of the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process. When simulating this process in the future, measures should be taken to account for this discrepancy and the uncertainty involved