Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Pressure Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2011

Pressure Testing of a Minimum Gauge PRSEUS Panel

Advanced aircraft configurations that have been developed to increase fuel efficiency require advanced, novel structural concepts capable of handling the unique load conditions that arise. One such concept is the Pultruded Rod Stitched Efficient Unitized Structure (PRSEUS) developed by the Boeing Company. The PRSEUS concept is being investigated by NASA s Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Program for use in a hybrid-wing body (HWB) aircraft. This paper summarizes the analysis and test of a PRSEUS panel subjected to internal pressure, the first such pressure test for this structural concept. The pressure panel used minimum gauge skin, with stringer and frame configurations consistent with previous PRSEUS tests. Analysis indicated that for the minimum gauge skin panel, the stringer locations exhibit fairly linear response, but the skin bays between the stringers exhibit nonlinear response. Excellent agreement was seen between nonlinear analysis and test results in the critical portion at the center of the panel. The pristine panel was capable of withstanding the required 18.4 psi pressure load condition without exhibiting any damage. The impacted panel was capable of withstanding a pressure load in excess of 28 psi before initial failure occurred at the center stringer, and the panel was capable of sustaining increased pressure load after the initial failure. This successful PRSEUS panel pressure panel test was a critical step in the building block approach for enabling the use of this advanced structural concept on future aircraft, such as the HWB.

Lovejoy, Andrew J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Surge Pressure Testing of Flight-Like Components

This project studies the transient surge pressure effects (such as those observed during propulsion system priming) on flight components. A water flow setup was used to impart transient surge pressures on flight-like components. The project compared the point of component failure for transient surge pressures versus static proof pressures. Results showed that designing to keep surge pressures below component proof pressures is overly conservative, because the components can handle higher transient pressures. The tests performed on burst discs showed that the rupture pressure under a transient surge pressure was at least 20% above the static rupture pressure. A tested pressure transducer remained fully functional and accurate after surge pressures 60% above its specified proof pressure. A thruster valve was exposed to transient surge pressures four times its specified proof pressure and showed no indications of damage.

propulsion components↗
NASA NTRS1986

Supplementary calibration test of the tip-aerodynamics- and acoustics-test pressure transducers

A calibration test is described that was performed to supplement the normal calibration of the 188 pressure transducers used in the Tip Aerodynamics and Acoustics Test. This calibration led to the identification of 15 transducers which had a slope change of greater than 7% from the initial calibration. The calibration procedure is described and the results presented. The effect of the slope changes on the pressure distributions are described, followed by a method to compensate for these changes.

Watts, M. E.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Experimental investigation to validate use of cryogenic temperatures to achieve high Reynolds numbers in boattail pressure testing

An investigation has been conducted in the Langley 1/3 meter transonic cryogenic tunnel to validate the use of cryogenic temperatures to achieve high Reynolds numbers in nozzle boattail pressure testing. Tests were conducted at 0 degree angle of attack and at Mach numbers of 0.60, 0.85, and 0.90 on two wing-body configurations with differing boattail geometries. Test data were obtained by using two different techniques, the cryogenic method and the conventional method, to obtain the same Reynolds number. Later, the test data obtained from the two techniques on boattail pressure coefficient distributions and pressure drag coefficients were compared; results from the comparisons show excellent repeatability for all test conditions and indicate no measurable errors when using cryogenic temperatures to achieve high Reynolds numbers for nozzle boattail pressure testing.

Reubush, D. E.↗
NASA NTRS1942

Normal-Pressure Tests of Rectangular Plates

Report presents the results of normal-pressure tests made of 56 rectangular plates with clamped edges and of 5 plates with freely supported edges. Pressure was applied and the center deflection and the permanent set at the center were measured. For some of the plates, in addition, strains and contours were measured.

Ramberg, Walter↗
NASA NTRS1965

Adapter assembly prevents damage to tubing during high pressure tests

Portable adapter assembly prevents damage to tubing and injury to personnel when pressurizing a system or during high pressure tests. The assembly is capable of withstanding high pressure. It is securely attached to the tubing stub end and may be removed without brazing, cutting or cleaning the tube.

Stinett, L. L.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Flange weld pressure testing

Device allows localized high-pressure proof test. Use of tool eliminates need to block off far end of pipe; only small amount of pressurizing gas is needed; only small area needs to be cleared of personnel for proof test.

Holden, C. F.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Wind tunnel force and pressure tests

Force and surface pressure distributions were measured for a 13% medium speed (NASA MS(1)-0313) airfoil fitted with 20% aileron, 25% slotted flap and 10% slot lip spoiler. All tests were conducted in the Walter Beech Memorial Wind Tunnel at a Reynolds number of 2.2 million and a Mach number of 0.13. Results include lift, drag, pitching moments, control surface normal force and hinge moments, and surface pressure distributions. The basic airfoil exhibits low speed characteristics similar to the GA(W)-2 airfoil. Incremental aileron and spoiler performance are quite comparable to that obtained on the GA(W)-2 airfoil. Slotted flap performance on this section is reduced compared to the GA(W)-2, resulting in a highest c sub l max of 3.00 compared to 3.35 for the GA(W)-2.

Wentz, W. H., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Device for quick changeover between wind tunnel force and pressure testing

This device allows for expeditious and repeated changeovers between pressure and force testing and which uses a minimum internal volume of a wind tunnel test structure. A matrix configuration of holes is located on the outer surface of the structure. Pressure tubes lead through the internal cavity of the structure from test sites to this outer surface matrix configuration. A pressure tube connector with a corresponding matrix of holes is connected to the surface of the structure. Pressure tubes leading from remotely located transducers are joined to the connector, thus forming pressure passageways from the test sites to the transducers to allow for pressure testing. When force testing is required, the pressure tube connector is disconnected and a cover plate is connected. The cover plate seals the exposed internal pressure tubes. Also, the outer surface of the cover plate conforms to the exterior of the structure, providing the necessary smooth surface for force testing. If further pressure testing is required, the cover plate can be disconnected and the pressure tube connector reconnected.

Wood, Richard M.↗
NASA NTRS1944

Normal pressure tests on unstiffened flat plates

Flat sheet panels of aluminum alloy (all 17S-T except for two specimens of 24S-T) were tested under normal pressures with clamped edge supports in the structures laboratory of the Guggenheim Aeronautical Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. The thicknesses used ranged from 0.010 to 0.080 inch; the panel sizes ranged from 10 by 10 inches to 10 by 40 inches; and the pressure range was from 0 to 60-pounds-per-square-inch gage. Deflection patterns were measured and maximum tensile strains in the center of the panel were determined by electric strain gages. The experimental data are presented by pressure-strain, pressure-maximum-deflection, and pressure-deflection curves. The results of these tests have been compared with the corresponding strains and deflections as calculated by the simple membrane theory and by large deflection theories.

Head, Richard M↗
DOE OSTI2022

Next Generation Solvent Vapor Pressure Testing

Previous work by Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) indicated that the actual Next Generation Solvent vapor pressure would be higher than the Original Caustic Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) solvent vapor pressure, but below a bounding vapor pressure using Raoult’s Law. Since solvent vapor pressure has a significant impact on Composite Lower Flammability Limits (CLFL) and attendant accident analyses, obtaining an additional margin from the bounding NGS vapor pressure would be valuable. In order to quantify how much margin might be gained from the NGS bounding solvent, SRNL researchers were requested to perform vapor pressure testing with the Next Generation Solvent (NGS) by Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC). The vapor pressure curve for the NGS formulation set to be deployed at the Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF) has been determined by SRNL up to 55°C (131°F) using headspace Gas Chromatography (GC). It was expected that NGS would have a higher vapor pressure than the Original CSSX solvent; however, experimental results indicate a lower vapor pressure. At this time, it is uncertain if this difference is due to the 7x increase in concentration of the large calixarene in the solvent (0.007M BOBCalix in Original CSSX solvent vs. 0.05M MaxCalix in NGS) or to minor batch-to-batch variations in Isopar-L constituents. The NGS and the Original CSSX solvent vapor pressure data were fitted to the Antoine Equation. The Antoine equation gives a more accurate representation of the expected vapor pressure of the solvents outside of the temperature range tested. The Antoine equation fitting for NGS is given below: $P=10^{6.364⁻\frac{1788.4}{T+219.3}}$. Where, p is the vapor pressure (partial pressure) of NGS in mmHg and T is the temperature in °C. It is recommended that SRMC either continue using the more conservative Isopar-L vapor pressure calculations at SWPF with the equation developed for the Original CSSX solvent, or the equation presented above for the NGS solvent. Additionally, it is recommended to study the variability in Isopar-L vapor pressure between lots.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
NASA NTRS1942

Normal-pressure Tests of Circular Plates with Clamped Edges

A fixture is described for making normal-pressure tests of flat plates 5 inches in diameter in which particular care was taken to obtain rigid clamping at the edges. Results are given for 19 plates, ranging in thickness from 0.015 to 0.072 inch. The center deflections and the extreme-fiber stresses at low pressures were found to agree with theoretical values; the center deflections at high pressures were 4 to 12 percent greater than the theoretical values. Empirical curves are derived of the pressure for the beginning of permanent set as a function of the dimensions of the plate and the tensile properties of the material.

CIRCULAR↗
NASA NTRS1942

Normal-Pressure Tests of Circular Plates with Clamped Edges

A fixture is described for making normal-pressure tests of flat plates 5 inches in diameter in which particular care was taken to obtain rigid clamping at the edges. Results are given for 19 plates, ranging in thickness form 0.015 to 0.072 inch. The center deflections and the extreme-fiber stresses at low pressures were found to agree with theoretical values; the center deflections at high pressures were 4 to 12 percent greater than the theoretical values. Empirical curves are derived of the pressure for the beginning of the permanent set as a function of the dimensions of the plate and the tensile properties of the material.

Mcpherson, Albert E↗
NASA NTRS1999

Residual Strength Pressure Tests and Nonlinear Analyses of Stringer- and Frame-Stiffened Aluminum Fuselage Panels with Longitudinal Cracks

The results of residual strength pressure tests and nonlinear analyses of stringer- and frame-stiffened aluminum fuselage panels with longitudinal cracks are presented. Two types of damage are considered: a longitudinal crack located midway between stringers, and a longitudinal crack adjacent to a stringer and along a row of fasteners in a lap joint that has multiple-site damage (MSD). In both cases, the longitudinal crack is centered on a severed frame. The panels are subjected to internal pressure plus axial tension loads. The axial tension loads are equivalent to a bulkhead pressure load. Nonlinear elastic-plastic residual strength analyses of the fuselage panels are conducted using a finite element program and the crack-tip-opening-angle (CTOA) fracture criterion. Predicted crack growth and residual strength results from nonlinear analyses of the stiffened fuselage panels are compared with experimental measurements and observations. Both the test and analysis results indicate that the presence of MSD affects crack growth stability and reduces the residual strength of stiffened fuselage shells with long cracks.

Young, Richard D.↗
NASA NTRS1998

Residual Strength Pressure Tests and Nonlinear Analyses of Stringer-and Frame-Stiffened Aluminum Fuselage Panels with Longitudinal Cracks

The results of residual strength pressure tests and nonlinear analyses of stringer- and frame-stiffened aluminum fuselage panels with longitudinal cracks are presented. Two types of damage are considered: a longitudinal crack located midway between stringers, and a longitudinal crack adjacent to a stringer and along a row of fasteners in a lap joint that has multiple-site damage (MSD). In both cases, the longitudinal crack is centered on a severed frame. The panels are subjected to internal pressure plus axial tension loads. The axial tension loads are equivalent to a bulkhead pressure load. Nonlinear elastic-plastic residual strength analyses of the fuselage panels are conducted using a finite element program and the crack-tip-opening-angle (CTOA) fracture criterion. Predicted crack growth and residual strength results from nonlinear analyses of the stiffened fuselage panels are compared with experimental measurements and observations. Both the test and analysis results indicate that the presence of MSD affects crack growth stability and reduces the residual strength of stiffened fuselage shells with long cracks.

Young, Richard D.↗