Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SATELLITE DRAG”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Recent improvements in our knowledge of neutral atmosphere structure from satellite drag measurements

Observational results on the density in the thermosphere and lower exosphere (i.e., within the altitude range from about 150 to about 1000 km) are discussed in this paper. Most observational results on total gas density were obtained from orbital drag and more recently also from in-situ drag analysis. The primary parameter measured is atmospheric density, with temperature as a secondary structural parameter deduced with the help of theory and/or atmospheric models. Both the merits and shortcomings of the drag analysis method are outlined in view of a comparison of temperature deduced from total density and kinetic gas temperature measured by incoherent scatter. Recent improvements of our knowledge of the known density variations are presented.

Roemer, M.↗

Venus thermosphere and exosphere - First satellite drag measurements of an extraterrestrial atmosphere

Atmospheric drag measurements obtained from the study of the orbital decay of Pioneer Venus I indicate that atomic oxygen predominates in the Venus atmosphere above 160 kilometers. Drag measurements give evidence that conditions characteristic of a planetary thermosphere disappear near sundown, with inferred exospheric temperatures sharply dropping from approximately 300 K to less than 150 K. Observed densities are generally lower than given by theoretical models.

Keating, G. M.↗

Satellite drag prediction effects on Shuttle mission planning

Long-term factors, along with Shuttle performance limitations, are considered in order to illustrate the need for more reliable long-term drag (meaning 'solar cycle') prediction techniques. Such techniques would make it possible to confidently plan dual-objective Shuttle flights, which maximize Shuttle cargo loadings and thus reduce costs. In describing the coupled mission concept, it is pointed out that by deploying one payload while retrieving or servicing another, the Space Transportation System can maximize the usefulness of the Shuttle and reduce the cost per customer. It is shown here that the proposed mission coupling LDEF (Long Duration Exposure Facility) with ST (Space Telescope) must be rejected since the Shuttle performance limitations prohibit deployment of the ST at even 315 n mi with a subsequent LDEF retrieval. If, however, it were possible to predict solar cycles, then, depending on the prediction, a mission of this type could be feasible.

Young, K. A.↗

Trapping - A control phenomenon of spinning drag-free satellites.

A drag-free satellite contains a proof mass in an internal cavity and is controlled in translation so that it never touches the proof mass. The satellite shields the proof mass from external forces thus allowing the proof mass to follow a drag-free orbit. Spinning the satellite is desirable because it attenuates the effect of proof mass disturbing forces and simplifies the attitude control. The design of a translation controller for a spinning drag-free satellite typically includes a deadspace to eliminate chatter. This design feature and the inability to locate precisely the mass center give rise to a phenomenon called trapping that potentially could waste significant amounts of propellant. A theory is developed and experimentally verified that explains the role of these factors and provides insight into the effect of other control parameters.

Powell, J. D.↗

Minimum thrust levels for spinning drag-free satellites

A drag-free satellite, which contains an internal unsupported proof mass, is shielded from external forces such as solar pressure. Thrustors force the satellite to follow the proof mass and hence the satellite follows an almost purely gravitational orbit. The dominant internal disturbing force is the mass attraction of the satellite on the proof mass. Spinning the satellite reduces this force and it has been investigated what the size of the thrustors must be in this case. This size is much smaller than originally thought. Its impact on some other features is shown.

Olsder, G. J.↗

Drag-free satellite control

A drag-free satellite cancels the effect of external disturbances. Although the forces may be small, a satellite is disturbed by residual air drag, radiation pressure, micrometeorite impact, and other small forces that act on its surface disturbing its orbit, which is principally determined by the gravity field. In some missions, these small perturbations that make the satellite deviate from its purely gravitational orbit are limiting. An internal unsupported proof mass is shielded by the satellite from the external disturbances. The position of the shield (or the main part of the satellite) is measured with respect to the internal proof mass, and this information is used to actuate a propulsion system which moves the satellite to follow the proof mass. A drag-free control system is illustrated. Since the proof mass is shielded it follows a purely gravitational orbit - as does the satellite following it - hence the name drag-free satellite. The idea was conceived by Lange (1964) and has been applied to many mission studies since. In some cases, it is not necessary to cancel the disturbances, only to measure them so they may be taken into account. In such cases, an accelerometer may be a more suitable solution (for example, using the ONERA Cactus or the Bell Aerosystems MESA).

Debra, Daniel B.↗

Satellite Orbital Drag During Magnetic Storms

We investigate satellite orbital drag effects at lowEarth orbit associated with thermosphere heating during magnetic storms caused by coronal mass ejections. CHAllenge Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) and Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) neutral density data are used to compute orbital drag. Stormtoquiet density comparisons are performed with background densities obtained by the JacchiaBowman 2008 (JB2008) empirical model. Our storms are grouped in different categories regarding their intensities as indicated by minimum values of the SYMH index. We then perform superposed epoch analyses with storm main phase onset as zero epoch time. In general, we find that orbital drag effects are larger for CHAMP (lower altitudes) in comparison to GRACE (higher altitudes). Results show that storm time drag effects manifest first at high latitudes, but for extreme storms, particularly observed by GRACE, stronger orbital drag effects occur during early main phase at low/equatorial latitudes, probably due to heating propagation from high latitudes. We find that storm time orbital decay along the satellites' path generally increases with storm intensity, being stronger and faster for the most extreme events. For these events, orbital drag effects decrease faster probably due to elevated cooling effects caused by nitric oxide, which introduce modeled density uncertainties during storm recovery phase. Errors associated with total orbit decay introduced by JB2008 are generally the largest for the strongest storms and increase during storm times, particular during recovery phases. We discuss the implication of these uncertainties for the prediction of collision between space objects at lowEarth orbit during magnetic storms.

Oliveira, D. M.↗