Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SWEPTBACK WING”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

On the Installation of Jet Engine Nacelles on a Wing Fourth Partial Report: Pressure-Distribution Measurements on a Sweptback Wing with Jet Engine Nacelle

The present report, which deals with pressure-distribution measurements made on a sweptback wing with a jet engine nacelle, is similar to a report on pressure-distribution measurements on a rectangular wing with a jet engine nacelle (second partial report). Here, in investigations preliminary to high-speed measurements, as in the second partial report, useful arrangements and fillet designs have been discovered.

Buschner, R.↗

A Transonic Investigation of Changing Indentation Design Mach Number on the Aeodynamic Characteristics of a 45 deg Sweptback-Wing-Body Combination Designed for High Performance

The effects of changing indentation design Mach number on the aerodynamic characteristics of a 45 deg. sweptback-wing-body combination designed for high performance have been investigated at Mach numbers from 0.80 to 1.13 in the Langley 8-foot transonic tunnel and at a Mach number of 1.43 in the Langley 8-foot transonic pressure tunnel. The Reynolds number of the investigation covered the range from approximately 2.5 x 10 (exp 6) to approximately 3.0 x 10(exp 6) based on the mean aerodynamic chord of the wing. The 45 deg. sweptback wing with camber and a thickened root was tested at 0 deg. angle of incidence on an unindented body and on bodies indented for Mach numbers M of 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4. Transonic and supersonic area rules were used in the design of the indented bodies. Theoretical zero-lift wave drag was calculated for these wing-body combinations. A -2 deg. angle of incidence of the wing, and M = 1.4 revised body indentation, and fixed transition also were investigated. Experimental values of zero-lift wave drag for the indented-body combinations followed closely the area-rule concept in that the lowest zero-lift wave-drag coefficient was obtained at or near the Mach number for which the body of the combination was designed. Theoretical values of zero-lift wave drag were considered to be in good agreement with the experimental results. At a given supersonic Mach number the highest values of maximum lift-drag ratio for the various combinations also were obtained at or near the Mach number for which the body of the combination was designed. At Mach numbers of 1.0, 1.2, and 1.43, the maximum lift-drag ratios were 15.3, 13.0, and 9.2, respectively. The use of an angle of incidence of -2 deg. for the wing in combination with the M = 1.2 body increased the zero-lift wave drag and decreased the maximum lift-drag ratio. All configurations maintained stable characteristics up to the highest lift coefficient of the investigation (C(L) approx. equal to 0.5).

Loving, Donald L.↗

Longitudinal Characteristics of a Semispan Model of the Grumman Airplane Design 83 having a Sweptback Wing and of the Model with a Straight Wing as Determined from Wing-Flow Tests at Transonic Speeds, TED No. NACA DE337

An investigation has been made by the NACA wing-flow method to provide information on the relative longitudinal characteristics of a straight and sweptback wing in the transonic speed range. Tests were made of a semispan model of the Grumman airplane design 83 (XFlOF) incorporating a wing swept back 42.5deg with reference to quarter-chord line and also of the model with the swept wing replaced by a straight wing similar to that of the XF9F airplane. The airfoil sections were symmetrical 64l-series, with thickness ratios of 12 percent for the straight wing and 10 percent for the sweptback wing parallel to the stream direction. Measurements were made of normal force, chord force, and pitching moment at various angles of attack with the two wings both with and without the empennage, and with the fuselage alone. The tests covered a range of effective Mach numbers at the wing of the model from 0.65 to 1.10.

Silsby, Norman S.↗