Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Safety & Licensing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Chemical Process Safety at TRISO-Based, Metal-Based, and Salt-Based Fuel Fabrication Facilities: Technical Assessment and Guidance Assessment

As part of efforts to prepare for potential and ongoing safety reviews for licensing of advanced non-light-water reactor fuel cycles, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) tasked Pacific Northwest National Laboratory to prepare an assessment on the state of knowledge of potential chemical processes at fuel cycle facilities supporting the front end of these fuel cycles, and to assess the associated regulatory guidance. This report provides a technical assessment of chemical process safety considerations to support NRC licensing reviews of fabrication processes for tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) based, metallic-based, and salt-based fuels. The assessments involved collecting publicly available information on the fuel fabrication processes to (i) identify the operational process steps, characteristics and chemicals involved, (ii) identify the physical safety considerations and health safety considerations during licensing reviews of the various process steps, and (iii) collect information to support assessments of severity of accidents and potential mitigative measures to be implemented. The assessment provides a foundational basis on chemical process safety considerations for advanced fuel fabrication activities, although it is recognized that licensing reviews may necessitate design-specific considerations. The specific conditions under which chemical hazards emerge will require process-specific considerations, highlighting the importance of process-informed interpretation. The assessment also determined that exposure guidelines and limits to assess the consequences of acute exposures are limited for some chemicals, although alternative limits and supplementary information from databases or safety data sheets provide sufficient information to evaluate consequences of acute exposures. In addition, it was identified that metallic and salt fuel fabrication processes may involve beryllium, which is an exposure hazard. The regulatory framework for the licensing of advanced fuel cycle facilities, per 10 CFR Part 70 Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material, is deemed robust and flexible to address the chemical safety considerations in this report. A review was conducted on various regulatory guidance and technical basis documents. This included reviewing NUREG-1520, Revision 2, Standard Review Plan for Fuel Cycle Facilities License Applications – Final Report and the process descriptions in Appendix A of NUREG/CR-6410, Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facility Accident Analysis Handbook, to address advanced fuel types. As new fuels will involve process-specific chemical uses, process-specific considerations are provided in this report. Additionally, it is noted that the U.S. Department of Energy protective action criteria database includes Temporary Emergency Exposure Limits (TEELs) for process-specific chemicals. This report provides technical information to support chemical safety assessments of new advanced fuel cycle facilities and identifies technical and safety information to support licensing reviews. No regulatory barriers were identified for the licensing of advanced fuel cycle facilities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Modernization of Technical Requirements for Licensing of Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors: Safety Classification and Performance Criteria for Structures, Systems, and Components

This report, “Modernization of Technical Requirements for Licensing of Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors: Safety Classification and Performance Criteria for Structures, Systems and Components,” represents a key element in the development of a framework for the efficient licensing of advanced non-Light Water Reactors (non-LWRs). It is the result of a Licensing Modernization Project (LMP) led by Southern Company and cost-shared by the United States Department of Energy (DOE).

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Probabilistic Risk Assessment of a Light-Water Reactor Coupled with a High-Temperature Electrolysis Hydrogen Production Plant

This report details an expansion of the original two generic probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) for the addition of a heat extraction system (HES) to a light-water reactor, one for a pressurized-water reactor and one for a boiling-water reactor. The new material in this revision includes a new HES design, direct electrical coupling of the nuclear power plant to the High-Temperature Electrolysis Facility (HTEF), and a smaller 100-MWt HTEF analysis. The results investigate the applicability of the potential licensing approaches, which do not require a full United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing review. The PRAs are generic and include some assumptions. We eliminated many conservative assumptions from the preliminary pressurized-water reactor PRA report using design data for both the HES and HTEF. The PRA results indicate that the 10 CFR 50.59 licensing approach is justified due to the minimal increase in initiating event frequencies for all design basis accidents, with none exceeding 5.6%. The PRA results for core damage frequency and large early release frequency support the use of RG 1.174 as further risk information that supports a change without a full licensing amendment review. Further insights provided through hazard analyses and sensitivity studies confirm with high confidence that the safety case for licensing an HES addition and an HTEF sited 1.0 km from the nuclear power plant is strong and that the placement of a HTEF at 0.5 km is also a viable case. Site-specific information can alter these conclusions.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

First-of-a-Kind Fuel-bearing Molten Chloride Irradiation Experiment

Molten salt reactors (MSRs) have garnered increasing attention recently with several demonstration efforts on the way. A key challenge to the licensing basis for these reactors is the lack of experimental data on fueled salts. This is expected to be crucial to the safety evaluation and licensing basis of reactors of this type deployed in the future. While capability for irradiating molten salts has been reestablished in the recent decade, no enriched fuel irradiation capability has been developed and tested as of yet. A new experiment vehicle under development at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is presented here. The Molten-salt Research Temperature-controlled Irradiation (MRTI) experiment was developed to host enriched uranium bearing salt samples to be irradiated at a test reactor within the lab complex. One of the key scientific objectives is to provide irradiated salt samples for post-irradiation examination (PIE) to study the impact of fission product generation and neutron/gamma radioactivity on the salt solution and salt-facing wall material. This paper provides a detailed overview of the mechanical design of the experiment, followed by an overview of the fabrication and assembly of an initial prototype vehicle (with non-fuel-bearing salt). A summary of the key analyses conducted as a part of the performance and safety evaluation is then provided. Lastly, an overview of the test conducted in prototypic out-of-pile (non-neutron) environment are shown. These evaluations provide the foundation for a planned irradiation of an enriched uranium-bearing chloride salt sample in the near term. The upcoming irradiation will contain 13 cm3 of UCl3-NaCl salt (93% enrichment) generating around 20 W/cm3 of fission energy during irradiation and a temperature range that can be contained between bounds of 525-900°C.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Design and testing of an enriched uranium fueled molten salt irradiation vehicle

Molten salt reactors (MSRs) have garnered increasing attention recently with several demonstration efforts on the way. A key challenge to the licensing basis for these reactors is the lack of experimental data on fueled salts. This is expected to be crucial to the safety evaluation and licensing basis of reactors of this type deployed in the future. While capability for irradiating molten salts has started being reestablished in the recent decade, no enriched fuel irradiation capability has been developed and tested as of yet. A new experiment vehicle under development at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is presented here. The Molten-salt Research Temperature-controlled Irradiation (MRTI) experiment was developed to host enriched-uranium bearing salt samples to be irradiated at a test reactor within the lab complex. One of the key scientific objectives is to provide irradiated salt samples for post irradiation examination (PIE) to study the impact of fission product generation and neutron/gamma radioactivity on the salt solution and salt-facing wall material. This paper provides a detailed overview of the mechanical design of the experiment, followed by an overview of the fabrication and assembly of an initial prototype vehicle (with non-fuel bearing salt). A summary of the key analyses conducted as a part of the performance and safety evaluation is then provided. Lastly, an overview of the test conducted in prototypic out-of-pile (non-neutron) environment are shown. These evaluations provide the foundation for a planned irradiation of and enriched uranium-bearing chloride salt sample in the near term. The upcoming irradiation will contain 13cm 3 of UCl 3 -NaCl salt (93% enrichment) generating around 20 W/cm 3 of fission energy during irradiation and a temperature range that can be contained between bounds of 525-900°C.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Assessment of coated cladding impact on large-break LOCA with TRACE-DAKOTA

Since 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy has launched new research and development (R&D) programs for developing new accident tolerant fuels (ATFs). These new fuel concepts are expected to bring several advancements in terms of plant safety. However, development, licensing, as well as deployment of ATF require a substantial investment among fuel vendors, operating utilities, and regulatory authorities. For ATF to be economically feasible, credited safety benefits may be necessary to provide an economic incentive for transition of nuclear power plants from Zr/UO2-based fuel technologies to ATFs. As a result, it is essential to evaluate the economic viability of ATF by conducting a comprehensive safety benefits study informed by R&D and demonstration studies. In the present work, based on the best estimate plus uncertainty methodology, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification for key safety quantities under LB-LOCA are performed for the Peach Bottom boiling water reactor (BWR) with GE14 nuclear fuel design adopting the ATF concepts. A coupled TRACE-DAKOTA analysis framework is adopted to perform the uncertainty quantification. Based on the computational results and obtained statistics, the coping time increase, fuel performance improvement as well as the most dominating phenomena during the accident for Cr-coated cladding are investigated in detail. Overall, the results obtained are useful for subsequent plant PRA study and support a move to more modernized performance-based regulatory requirements to realize plant economic benefits.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Regulatory Treatment of Non-Core Sources of Radioactivity for Advanced Reactor Designs

The recent resurgence in advance (non-light water) reactor development has been paralleled by the development of risk-informed performance-based (RIPB) licensing pathways. Specifically, the creation of the RIPB Licensing Modernization Project (LMP) approach and subsequent endorsement by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) now provides advanced reactor vendors with a defined RIPB method to develop an affirmative safety case for licensing. In addition, the Technology Inclusive Content of Applications Project (TICAP) has published guidance on developing a license application based on the LMP approach. To support the utilization of risk information as part of advanced reactor design and licensing efforts, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/American Nuclear Society (ANS) Joint Committee on Nuclear Risk Management (JCNRM) has developed a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) standard for advanced reactors. The standard, which was formerly approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 2021 and recently endorsed by the NRC in trial use Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.247, is an integral standard, covering from initiating events to offsite consequence. A major feature of the standard is that it permits the inclusion of any source of radioactivity material at the site within the plant PRA. Therefore, non-core sources of radioactivity, such as fuel storage, fuel processing, and purification systems, can be included within a single comprehensive plant PRA. For those advanced reactor vendors utilizing a RIPB licensing approach, there is an opportunity to include the non-core sources of radioactivity within the RIPB framework for licensing decision-making, such as the categorization of events, classification of structures, systems, and components (SSCs), and evaluation of the adequacy of defense-in-depth (DID). For advanced reactor designs that contain multiple non-core sources of radioactivity, or for monolithic plant sites that include associated fuel facilities, this approach could potentially simplify licensing applications through the use of a single, uniform, and consistent decision-making framework across all radioactive sources at the site. In addition, a RIPB approach could provide additional insights regarding plant behavior, flexibility regarding licensing decision-making, and potentially allow the use of risk information as part of the plant oversight process. Risk-informing these aspects of advanced reactor licensing would also be consistent with the NRC’s risk policy statement. However, there is diverse regulation and guidance regarding the licensing of non-core sources of radioactivity and generally limited experience using RIPB approaches for the evaluation as part of licensing.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

SAM Developments for MSR Modeling (FY21)

An advanced system analysis tool, SAM, is under development for advanced non-LWR reactor safety analysis, including molten salt reactors (MSR). To support the development and utilization of the SAM code for MSR safety analysis and licensing, continuous efforts have been devoted to enhancing code capabilities and updating reference models for the MSRs. This report documents the FY21 progress in SAM code development, capability enhancements, and reference model development to support transient safety analysis of MSRs, including code enhancements in reactor kinetics and reactivity feedback modeling for liquid fuel reactors, updates of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) primary system model, developments and updates of the molten salt fast reactor (MSFR) model based on EVOL design, and implementation of a drift flux model for modeling gas transport in MSR systems.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Expansion of Hazards and Probabilistic Risk Assessments of a Light-Water Reactor Coupled with Electrolysis Hydrogen Production Plants

This report builds upon the body of work sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE) Light-Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Flexible Power Operation and Generation (FPOG) program that presented generic probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) for the addition of a heat extraction system (HES) to light-water reactors to support the co-location of a high temperature hydrogen electrolysis facility (HTEF). Probabilistic and deterministic hazards assessments and risk analyses are leveraged throughout this report. Several improvements and new analyses are included in this report. First, higher amounts of detail in the specifications of the generic HTEFs are used to produce scaled results for a 100, 500, and 1000 MW nominal hydrogen production facility. An additional hazard assessment of 1000 kg of hydrogen storage is performed. The facility hazards and footprint are assessed to determine the safe distance required for placement near the nuclear power plant (NPP). Second, specific designs for corresponding HESs for the different levels of support required by the HTEFs are analyzed in the PRA model. Third, a hazards analysis of the specified HTEFs leads not only to effects of the quantified risk assessment for the NPP, but also qualitative hazards assessment for the community. Finally, a seismic analysis and a high winds analysis have each been added to the PRA. The results investigate the applicability of the potential licensing approaches which do not require a full United States (U.S.) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing review. The PRAs are generic and include listed assumptions. The HTEF design built for this project has further eliminated many conservative assumptions from the prior PRAs in this series. The PRA results indicate that the 10 CFR 50.59 licensing approach is justified due to the minimal increase in initiating event frequencies for all design basis accidents, with none exceeding 7.7%. The PRA results for core damage frequency and large early release frequency support the use of NRC Regulation Guide 1.174 as further risk information that supports a change without a full licensing amendment review. The hazard analyses and PRA confirm the need for engineered blast barriers of storage tanks and the common production header leaving the HTEF. The hazards analyses and PRA also confirm with high confidence that using the assumptions of design in this report that the safety case for licensing an HES addition and an HTEF sited with its unprotected high-pressure stage components 187 meters from the NPP’s transmission towers (the most fragile structure, system, and component) is strong.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2020

Probabilistic Risk Assessment of a Light Water Reactor Coupled with a High Temperature Electrolysis Hydrogen Production Plant

Two generic probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) for the addition of a heat extraction system (HES) addition to a light water reactor (LWR) are performed, one for a pressurized water reactor (PWR) and one for a boiling water reactor (BWR). The results investigate the applicability of the potential licensing approaches which do not require a full U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing review. The PRAs are generic, and some assumptions are made. Many conservative assumptions from a the preliminary PWR PRA report were eliminated using design data for both the HES and the high temperature electrolysis facility (HTEF). The results of the PRA indicate that the 10 CFR 50.59 licensing approach is justified due to the minimal increase in initiating event frequencies for all DBAs, none exceeding 5.6%. The PRA results for CDF and LERF support the use of RG 1.174 as further risk information that supports a change without a full LAR. Further insights provided through hazard analysis and sensitivity studies confirm with high confidence that the safety case for licensing an HES addition and a HTEF sited at 1.0 km from the NPP is strong and that the placement of a HTEF at 0.5 km is a viable case. Site specific information can alter these conclusions.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Genetic algorithm optimization of nuclear criticality experiment for reduction of intermediate-energy 239 Pu nuclear data uncertainties

Nuclear criticality experiments are conducted to investigate specific nuclear data important for safe handling and storage of fissile materials, reactor design and operation, and the validation of radiation transport codes. Incorrect or uncertain nuclear data can prohibitively impact operational safety limits, reactor licensing, and predictive simulation capability; therefore, integral measurements from criticality experiments are necessary and should be performed frequently. To maximize the impact of the integral measurements, it is important to consider experiment geometry, material selection, and component dimensions. When taking these considerations into account, the experiment design process becomes iterative and very time intensive. This work utilizes a genetic algorithm to efficiently explore potential nuclear criticality experiment designs for the Laboratory Directed Research & Development project PARADIGM (PARallel Approach of Differential and InteGral Measurements) at Los Alamos National Laboratory. In this paper, the building blocks of the genetic algorithm are discussed in detail, the genetic algorithm methodology is verified, and the genetic algorithm is used to produce three candidate experiment models for the final PARADIGM design. The three candidate models produced by the genetic algorithm consist of copper-reflected assemblies containing 14 repeating units of alumina, graphite, boron, and plutonium plates. Furthermore, in addition to the optimization results, final design considerations are also discussed for designs with a height and/or weight very close to or slightly above assembly machine operational limits.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Development of a U-19Pu-10Zr fuel performance benchmark case based on the IFR-1 experiment

Metallic nuclear fuels are subject to research and development for use in advanced reactors. Robust, accurate metallic fuel performance models are important for the design, safety analysis, and licensing of these reactors. However, metallic fuel performance models require additional development; they are not as mature as UO 2 fuel performance models. A benchmark case based on the IFR-1 experiment was developed to better gauge the accuracy of existing models, identify models for high-priority development, and potentially quantify any future improvements made by further model development.This work collected publicly available information on the IFR-1 experiment and used it to develop the benchmark case. Fuel behavior during the IFR-1 irradiation was simulated by using the fuel performance code BISON, and the predicted results were compared with postirradiation examination data from the IFR-1 experiment. Furthermore, a sensitivity study and tuning studies were performed as a preliminary investigation into the causes of inaccurate temperature and dimensional change predictions.The benchmark predicted reasonably accurate values for the burnup and fission gas release. There was error in the predicted temperatures, which could be explained by uncertainty in the input parameters and legacy temperatures. BISON over-predicted dimensional changes in the fuel and cladding. The sensitivity study showed that the dimensional changes were most sensitive to the fuel swelling anisotropy and the cladding void swelling model. Future benchmark and model development should focus on cladding swelling behaviors to improve dimensional change predictions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

A Metallic Fuel Performance Benchmark Problem Based on the IFR-1 Experiment

Metallic nuclear fuels are an active area of research and development for use in advanced reactors. Robust and accurate metallic fuel performance models are necessary for the design, safety analysis, and licensing of such reactors. However, metallic fuel performance models are not as mature as ceramic fuel performance models and require additional development. In order to better gauge the accuracy of existing models, identify high-priority models for development, and quantify the improvements made by future model development, ORNL has developed a benchmark problem based on the IFR-1 experiment. This work gathers all relevant information on the IFR-1 experiment and uses it to develop the benchmark problem. It simulates the problem using the fuel performance code BISON and compare the results to post-irradiation examination data from the experiment. Then a sensitivity analysis is performed on the BISON model to determine the benchmark problem’s sensitivity to uncertainty in the input parameters. The results suggest that BISON’s mechanical models require additional development. Plastic deformation is under-predicted in the cladding and axial swelling is over-predicted in the fuel. These problems may be related. Additionally, there is a bias in the temperature which may be a result of uncertainty in the input parameters rather than an issue with the fuel performance models.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Development of a Reference Model for Molten-Salt-Cooled Pebble-Bed Reactor Using SAM

To support the development and utilization of the SAM code for fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature pebble-bed reactor (PB-FHR) safety analysis and licensing, an effort was devoted to developing reference models for PB-FHR primary loop and the reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS). A reference standard problem of a prototypical reactor design is foundational to NRC and industry to verify the adequacy of computer codes and evaluation models for a specific reactor type. The SAM code was enhanced for the reference PB-FHR model development, including a 1D-3D flow coupling scheme and conjugate heat transfer between porous media and solid structures. The reference FHR primary loop model was developed based on the UC Berkeley Mk1 FHR design with additional design features from the Kairos Power’s KP-FHR core. The PB-FHR core is modeled by a two-dimensional porous medium while the rest of the primary loop is represented by a SAM one-dimensional model. A SAM one-dimensional primary loop model was also developed for comparison using a single channel approach for the reactor core. Furthermore, the water-based NSTF cavity was modeled using SAM multi-dimensional flow module, to assist in evaluating SAM capabilities of modeling the emergency heat removal systems relying on RCCS concepts.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2020

SAM Enhancements and Model Developments for Molten-Salt-Fueled Reactors

To support the development and utilization of the SAM code for molten-salt-fueled reactor (MSR) safety analysis and licensing, an effort was devoted to enhancing code capabilities and developing reference models for the MSR primary loop. A reference standard problem of a prototypical reactor design is foundational to NRC to verify the adequacy of computer codes and evaluation models for a specific reactor type. A thermo-fluid model of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) has been developed. The MSRE primary loop model consists of a 2-D core region and external core components in 1-D or 0-D. Both the steady-state and a transient scenario are simulated. The porous medium model is utilized for both the molten salt fluid channels and the moderator matrix in the MSRE core. The use of the porous medium model for the MSRE core is verified with the higher-fidelity simulation results using 1-D representations of the fluid channels and 3-D modeling of core structures. To further enhance SAM multi-scale simulation capabilities for MSRs, a mass transport model is developed and implemented in SAM multi-dimension flow module for modeling of species transport such as delayed neutron precursors in MSRs.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Improvements of SAM Heat Transfer Models for Molten Salt-Cooled Pebble Bed Reactors

To support the development and utilization of the SAM code for molten salt-cooled pebble bed reactor safety analyses and licensing, selected improvements were made to the one-dimensional system-level heat transfer modeling in SAM with the goal of better capturing heat transfer phenomena specific to these designs. In consideration of molten salt as a coolant, new models were introduced to capture the enhanced radiative heat transfer that must be considered at the higher working temperatures. Radiative heat transfer is handled not only between two structural surfaces, but also in combination between the surfaces and the molten salt fluid, which has a higher opacity and absorption of radiative heat as compared to water. Several examples of analytical verification of the new radiative heat transfer methods are included in this report. Additionally, convective heat transfer correlations were selected from literature and included in SAM to account for the enhanced heat transfer expected in pebble bed geometry flows. These correlations are verified and demonstrated in the present work with a reference FHR example.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Scenario Exploration and Timeline Analysis for Advanced Reactors [Slides]

Slides created to discuss the report "Approach and Model Used to Represent a Timeline Analysis for Security Design Enhancements" (August 2022 INL/ RPT-22-68664) for an upcoming DOE security workshop. Advanced reactors will be able to use risk insights for many design aspects. We need realistic scenarios for input into the licensing basis safety-case. These scenarios must include timing and physics. We need to automate the safety-case creation as much as possible.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Coupled SAM/Griffin Model of a Reference Pebble Bed High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor for Multi-Physics Simulations

An effort has been dedicated to developing a reference model for multi-physics coupled simulation of the pebble bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (PB-HTGR) with SAM and Griffin computer codes for safety analysis and licensing purpose. The reference problem of a prototypical reactor design serves as the foundation for the U.S. NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) to verify the adequacy of computer codes and evaluation models for specific reactor types. In this work, a SAM model of the HTR-PM reactor has been developed based on publicly available design information and the multi-dimensional Pronghorn model developed by Idaho National Laboratory. The SAM HTR-PM model includes a multi-dimensional core region and 0- D/1-D fluid components. Additionally, a simplified air RCCS loop is modeled for decay heat removal. The Griffin model is based on a recent work by Idaho National Laboratory. The coupling between the models is achieved through the MOOSE MultiApp system. Both steady-state and transient scenarios were simulated to demonstrate the coupled model’s capability for multi-physics simulations.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗