University of Calgary Space Architecture & Systems Architecting
No abstract available
Kennedy, Kriss J.↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Space Architecture”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Posture Transfer Method on Pre-Scanned Full-body Geometry for Space Architecture Design
No abstract available
Vu, Linh↗
Space System Architecture Code
Space System Architecture Code (SSAC) program performs sensitivity studies on operating parameters of space missions. SSAC examines effects of variations in sizes of crews of piloted missions, chemical vs. nuclear electric propulsion, and specific impulse. Written in FORTRAN 77.
Jan, Darrell L.↗
Customer and mission influence on space station architecture
Overall Space Station architecture is presented in schematic outlines and plans. How the customer and mission needs influence this design is studied. The uses, occupants, activities, interfaces, utilities, locomotion, environments, and technological costs are all factors which influence the architecture. User and system functions are profiled, interfaces are characterized and functions are grouped. These lead to packaging of functions into modules and the design of system and user accommodations.
Runge, F. C.↗
An Assessment of Space Weather Architectures to Support Deep Space Exploration
NASA’s Engineering and Safety Center (NESC) assembled a technical assessment team to evaluate space weather architecture options for use in protecting future human and robotic space systems from the space radiation hazards due to energetic ions in solar particle events (SPE)
Joseph I Minow↗
Solid-State Power Generating Microdevices for Distributed Space System Architectures
Deep space missions have a strong need for compact, high power density, reliable and long life electrical power generation and storage under extreme temperature conditions. Conventional power generating devices become inefficient at very low temperatures (temperatures lower than 200 K encountered during Mars missions for example) and rechargeable energy storage devices cannot be operated thereby limiting mission duration. At elevated temperatures (for example for planned solar probe or Venus lander missions), thin film interdiffusion destroys electronic devices used for generating and storing power. Solar power generation strongly depends upon the light intensity, which falls rapidly in deep interplanetary missions (beyond 5 AU), and in planetary missions in the sun shadow or in dusty environments (Mars, for example). Radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs) have been successfully used for a number of deep space missions RTGs. However, their energy conversion efficiency and specific power characteristics are quite low, and this technology has been limited to relatively large systems (more than 100 W). The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) have been planning the use of much smaller spacecrafts that will incorporate a variety of microdevices and miniature vehicles such as microdetectors, microsensors, and microrovers. Except for electrochemical batteries and solar cells, there are currently no available miniaturized power sources. Novel technologies that will function reliably over a long duration mission (ten years and over), in harsh environments (temperature, pressure, and atmosphere) must be developed to enable the success of future space missions. It is also expected that such micropower sources could have a wide range of terrestrial applications, in particular when the limited lifetime and environmental limitations of batteries are key factors. Additional information is contained in the original extended abstract.
Fleurial, J.-P.↗
Space ROS: Architecture Roadmap
Space ROS is a matured version of ROS 2 using flight software engineering practices to facilitate mission- and safety-critical applications. This roadmap was developed by the team to communicate the planned future evolution of Space ROS
Austin Probe↗
Defining a Space Mission Architectural Framework: Guiding Robotic Space Mission Design and Development at NASA Goddard Spaceflight Center
Modern Systems Engineering activities for robotic science missions face increased complexity due to evolving measurement requirements, increased collaboration amongst stakeholders and increased collaboration between human and robotic systems. While NASA has employed standard process frameworks for project management and systems engineering for years, it has not yet established an architecture framework (AF) by which its mission systems are described. While an architecture framework is not a necessary component of an organization's operations, the value of a specified AF greatly enhances an organization's ability to define systems consistently and aid in communication across project and organizational boundaries. The current effort identifies an approach to establishing a Space Mission Architecture Framework (SMAF), an AF with roots in ISO 42010 (Systems and Software Engineering-Architecture Description), NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 7120.5 (NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Requirements) and 7123.1B (NASA Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements). The heart of the AF lies in its viewpoints and work products, artifacts that represent a set of information from the viewpoint of a particular stakeholder. This effort articulates the needs, goals and objectives that the SMAF addresses, as well as the approach to creating the framework and establishing the various work products. A full set of work products, sufficient to satisfy the Mission System reporting requirements of NPR 7120/7123 at Key Decision Point (KDP) A is identified in this paper.
Architecture↗
Space station needs, attributes, and architectural options: Space station program cost analysis
This report documents the principal cost results (Task 3) derived from the Space Station Needs, Attributes, and Architectural Options study conducted for NASA by the McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company. The determined costs were those of Architectural Options (Task 2) defined to satisfy Mission Requirements (Task 1) developed within the study. A major feature of this part of the study was the consideration of realistic NASA budget constraints on the recommended architecture. Thus, the space station funding requirements were adjusted by altering schedules until they were consistent with current NASA budget trends.
Cowls, R. S.↗
Space station architectural elements model study. Space station human factors research review
Presentation visuals and an extended abstract represent a study to explore and analyze the interaction of major utilities distribution, generic workstation, and spatial composition of the SPACEHAB space station module. Issues addressed include packing densities vs. circulation, efficiency of packing vs. standardization, flexibility vs. diversity, and composition of interior volume as space for living vs. residual negative volume. The result of the study is expected to be a series of observations and preliminary evaluation criteria which focus on the productive living environment for a module in orbit.
Taylor, Thomas C.↗
Summary and evaluation of the Strategic Defense Initiative Space Power Architecture Study
The Space Power Architecture Study (SPAS) identified and evaluated power subsystem options for multimegawatt electric (MMWE) space based weapons and surveillance platforms for the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) applications. Steady state requirements of less than 1 MMWE are adequately covered by the SP-100 nuclear space power program and hence were not addressed in the SPAS. Four steady state power systems less than 1 MMWE were investigated with little difference between them on a mass basis. The majority of the burst power systems utilized H(2) from the weapons and were either closed (no effluent), open (effluent release) or steady state with storage (no effluent). Closed systems used nuclear or combustion heat source with thermionic, Rankine, turboalternator, fuel cell and battery conversion devices. Open systems included nuclear or combustion heat sources using turboalternator, magnetohydrodynamic, fuel cell or battery power conversion devices. The steady state systems with storage used the SP-100 or Star-M reactors as energy sources and flywheels, fuel cells or batteries to store energy for burst applications. As with other studies the open systems are by far the lightest, most compact and simplist (most reliable) systems. However, unlike other studies the SPAS studied potential platform operational problems caused by effluents or vibration.
Edenburn, M.↗
Reference architecture for space data systems
Architectures for terrestrial data systems that are built and managed by a single organization are inherently complex. In order to understand any large-scale system architecture, and to judge its applicability for its nominal task, a description of the system must be produced that exposes a number of distinct viewpoints. Within the CCSDS Architecture Working Group we have adapted the Reference Model for Open Distributed Processing to describe large, multi-national, space data systems.
CCSDS space communication reference architecture s↗
A Principled Approach to the Specification of System Architectures for Space Missions
Modern space systems are increasing in complexity and scale at an unprecedented pace. Consequently, innovative methods, processes, and tools are needed to cope with the increasing complexity of architecting these systems. A key systems challenge in practice is the ability to scale processes, methods, and tools used to architect complex space systems. Traditionally, the process for specifying space system architectures has largely relied on capturing the system architecture in informal descriptions that are often embedded within loosely coupled design documents and domain expertise. Such informal descriptions often lead to misunderstandings between design teams, ambiguous specifications, difficulty in maintaining consistency as the architecture evolves throughout the system development life cycle, and costly design iterations. Therefore, traditional methods are becoming increasingly inefficient to cope with ever-increasing system complexity. We apply the principles of component-based design and platform-based design to the development of the system architecture for a practical space system to demonstrate feasibility of our approach using SysML. Our results show that we are able to apply a systematic design method to manage system complexity, thus enabling effective data management, semantic coherence and traceability across different levels of abstraction in the design chain. Just as important, our approach enables interoperability among heterogeneous tools in a concurrent engineering model based design environment.
platform-based design↗
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center’s Distributed Systems Missions Architecture
Space and Earth Science are being transformed by applying a distributed approach to missions, where the fusion of data from components, systems, instruments, models, and observation locations works in concert with timely responses and feedback mechanisms to multiply the knowledge obtained. Additionally, a disaggregated approach allows for a distributed cost and schedule that can be shared across multiple organizations to enable the greater mission. With the advances in reduced size, weight, and power for space-worthy components leading to the revolution in smaller spacecraft, the cost and timeliness proposition for launching multiple space assets has also greatly improved. Thus, the aerospace industry is undergoing a paradigm shift toward a proliferation of small satellites as a networked approach to meet mission objectives. This paper will describe the impetus, goal, and path to provide an openly available framework as a unifying catalyst for broad-ranging Distributed Systems Missions (DSMs) contributors.
Distributed Systems↗
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center’s Distributed Systems Missions Architecture
Space and Earth Science are being transformed by applying a distributed approach to missions, where the fusion of data from components, systems, instruments, models, and observation locations works in concert with timely responses and feedback mechanisms to multiply the knowledge obtained. Additionally, a disaggregated approach allows for a distributed cost and schedule that can be shared across multiple organizations to enable the greater mission. With the advances in reduced size, weight, and power for space-worthy components leading to the revolution in smaller spacecraft, the cost and timeliness proposition for launching multiple space assets has also greatly improved. Thus, the aerospace industry is undergoing a paradigm shift toward a proliferation of small satellites as a networked approach to meet mission objectives. This paper will describe the impetus, goal, and path to provide an openly available framework as a unifying catalyst for broad-ranging Distributed Systems Missions (DSMs) contributors.
Distributed Systems↗