Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “TWO EQUATION MODEL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1988

A diagonally inverted LU implicit multigrid scheme for the 3-D Navier-Stokes equations and a two equation model of turbulence

An LU implicit multigrid algorithm is developed to calculate 3-D compressible viscous flows. This scheme solves the full 3-D Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equation with a two-equation kappa-epsilon model of turbulence. The flow equations are integrated by an efficient, diagonally inverted, LU implicit multigrid scheme while the kappa-epsilon equations are solved, uncoupled from the flow equations, by a block LU implicit algorithm. The flow equations are solved within the framework of the multigrid method using a four-grid level W-cycle, while the kappa-epsilon equations are iterated only on the finest grid. This treatment of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations proves to be an efficient method for calculating 3-D compressible viscous flows.

Yokota, Jeffrey W.↗
NASA NTRS1989

A diagonally inverted LU implicit multigrid scheme for the 3-D Navier-Stokes equations and a two equation model of turbulence

An LU implicit multigrid algorithm is developed to calculate 3-D compressible viscous flows. This scheme solves the full 3-D Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equation with a two-equation kappa-epsilon model of turbulence. The flow equations are integrated by an efficient, diagonally inverted, LU implicit multigrid scheme while the kappa-epsilon equations are solved, uncoupled from the flow equations, by a block LU implicit algorithm. The flow equations are solved within the framework of the multigrid method using a four-grid level W-cycle, while the kappa-epsilon equations are iterated only on the finest grid. This treatment of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations proves to be an efficient method for calculating 3-D compressible viscous flows.

Yokota, Jeffrey W.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Extra compressibility terms for Favre-averaged two-equation models of inhomogeneous turbulent flows

Forms of extra-compressibility terms that result from use of Favre averaging of the turbulence transport equations for kinetic energy and dissipation are derived. These forms introduce three new modeling constants, a polytropic coefficient that defines the interrelationships of the pressure, density, and enthalpy fluctuations and two constants in the dissipation equation that account for the non-zero pressure-dilitation and mean pressure gradients.

Rubesin, Morris W.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Comment on two-equation models

Several turbulence models are studied and evaluated. All models are compared to each other and experimental values for flat plate boundary layer flow and channel flow. Among the models examined are: K-epsilon, k-omega, q-omega, and k-tau turbulence models. All results are presented in viewgraph format.

Lang, N.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Research on two equation models

The k-epsilon model is the most widely used turbulence model in engineering calculations. However, the model has several deficiencies that need to be fixed. This document presents improvements to the capabilities of the k-epsilon model in the following areas: a Galilean and tensorial invariant k-epsilon model for near wall turbulence; a new set of wall functions for attached flows; a new model equation for the dissipation rate, which has a better theoretical basis, contains the contribution of flow inhomogeneity, and captures the effect of the pressure gradient accurately; and a better model for bypass transition due to freestream turbulence.

Yang, Z.↗
NASA NTRS1991

A critical comparison of two-equation turbulence models

Several two-equation models were proposed and tested against benchmark flows by various researchers. For each study, different numerical methods or codes were used to obtain the results which were reported to be an improvement over other models. However, these comparisons may be overshadowed by the different numerical schemes used to obtain the results. With this in mind, several existing two-equation turbulence models, including k-epsilon, k-tau, k-omega, and q-omega models, are implemented into a common flow solver code for near wall turbulent flows. The quality of each model is based on several criteria, including robustness and accuracy of predicting the turbulent quantities.

Lang, N. J.↗
NASA NTRS1983

A two-equation turbulence model for two-phase flows

A two-equation turbulence model has been developed for predicting two-phase flows. The two equations describe the conservation of turbulence kinetic energy and dissipation rate of that energy for the carrier fluid in a two-phase flow. They have been derived rigorously from the momentum equations of the carrier fluid. Closure of the time-mean equations is achieved by modeling the turbulent correlations up to third order. The new model eliminates the need to simulate in an ad hoc manner the effects of the dispersed phase on turbulence structure. Preliminary testing indicates that the model is successful in predicting the main features of a round gaseous jet laden with uniform-size solid particles.

Elghobashi, S. E.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Examination of various turbulence models for application in liquid rocket thrust chambers

There is a large variety of turbulence models available. These models include direct numerical simulation, large eddy simulation, Reynolds stress/flux model, zero equation model, one equation model, two equation k-epsilon model, multiple-scale model, etc. Each turbulence model contains different physical assumptions and requirements. The natures of turbulence are randomness, irregularity, diffusivity and dissipation. The capabilities of the turbulence models, including physical strength, weakness, limitations, as well as numerical and computational considerations, are reviewed. Recommendations are made for the potential application of a turbulence model in thrust chamber and performance prediction programs. The full Reynolds stress model is recommended. In a workshop, specifically called for the assessment of turbulence models for applications in liquid rocket thrust chambers, most of the experts present were also in favor of the recommendation of the Reynolds stress model.

Hung, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Computation of relaminarization in scramjet nozzles

The sudden expansion of a turbulent, Mach 1.76 flow through a 12 degree turning angle is computed with two low-Reynolds number, compressible turbulence models - a Reynolds stress model and a two-equation model. The two models give significantly different predictions of the wall shear stress downstream of the expansion. The Reynolds stress model predicts a 35 percent decrease in the wall shear stress whereas the two-equation model predicts only a 13 percent decrease. Furthermore, the two-equation model gives less decrease in the wall shear stress for the 12 degree expansion than for a 6 degree expansion, unlike the Reynolds stress model. Although a detailed explanation of these results is not attempted in this paper, possible causes have to be found in one or more of the many differences between the two models, including the treatment of the production and diffusion terms, and the absence of the redistribution term in the two-equation model.

Kamath, Pradeep S.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Computation of turbulent high speed mixing layers using a two-equation turbulence model

A two-equation turbulence model was extended to be applicable for compressible flows. A compressibility correction based on modelling the dilational terms in the Reynolds stress equations were included in the model. The model is used in conjunction with the SPARK code for the computation of high speed mixing layers. The observed trend of decreasing growth rate with increasing convective Mach number in compressible mixing layers is well predicted by the model. The predictions agree well with the experimental data and the results from a compressible Reynolds stress model. The present model appears to be well suited for the study of compressible free shear flows. Preliminary results obtained for the reacting mixing layers are included.

Narayan, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Turbulent separated flow past a backward-facing step: A critical evaluation of two-equation turbulence models

The ability of two-equation models to accurately predict separated flows is analyzed from a combined theoretical and computational standpoint. Turbulent flow past a backward facing step is chosen as a test case in an effort to resolve the variety of conflicting results that were published during the past decade concerning the performance of two-equation models. It is found that the errors in the reported predictions of the k-epsilon model have two major origins: (1) numerical problems arising from inadequate resolution, and (2) inaccurate predictions for normal Reynolds stress differences arising from the use of an isotropic eddy viscosity. Inadequacies in near wall modelling play a substantially smaller role. Detailed calculations are presented which strongly indicate the standard k-epsilon model - when modified with an independently calibrated anisotropic eddy viscosity - can yield surprisingly good predictions for the backstep problem.

Thangam, S.↗
NASA NTRS1984

A two-equation turbulence model for two-phase jets

A recently-developed two-equation turbulence model for two-phase flows (Elghobashi and Abou-Arab, 1983) is tested for the flow of a turbulent axisymmetric gaseous jet laden with spherical solid particles of uniform size. The agreement between the predictions of experimental data is good.

Elghobashi, S.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Transitional Boundary-Layer Solutions Using a Mixing-Length and a Two-Equation Turbulence Model

Boundary-layer solutions were obtained using the conventional two-layer mixing-length turbulence model and the Wilcox-Traci two-equation model of turbulence. Both flatplate and blunt-body geometries were considered. The most significant result of the study is development of approximations for the two-equation model which permit streamwise stepsize comparable to that used in mixing-length computations. Additionally, a set of model-equation boundary conditions derived which apply equally well to both flat-plate and blunt-body geometries. Solutions obtained with the two-equations turbulence model are compared with experimental data and/or corresponding solutions obtained using the mixing-length model. Agreement is satisfactory for flat-plate boundary layers but not for blunt body boundary layers.

Anderson, E. C.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Advancements in engineering turbulence modeling

Some new developments in two-equation models and second order closure models are presented. Two-equation models (k-epsilon models) have been widely used in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for engineering problems. Most of low-Reynolds number two-equation models contain some wall-distance damping functions to account for the effect of wall on turbulence. However, this often causes the confusion and difficulties in computing flows with complex geometry and also needs an ad hoc treatment near the separation and reattachment points. A set of modified two-equation models is proposed to remove the aforementioned shortcomings. The calculations using various two-equation models are compared with direct numerical simulations of channel flow and flat boundary layers. Development of a second order closure model is also discussed with emphasis on the modeling of pressure related correlation terms and dissipation rates in the second moment equations. All the existing models poorly predict the normal stresses near the wall and fail to predict the 3-D effect of mean flow on the turbulence (e.g. decrease in the shear stress caused by the cross flow in the boundary layer). The newly developed second order near-wall turbulence model is described and is capable of capturing the near-wall behavior of turbulence as well as the effect of 3-D mean flow on the turbulence.

Shih, T.-H.↗
NASA NTRS1995

A Study of Two-Equation Turbulence Models on the Elliptic Streamline Flow

Several two-equation turbulence models are compared to data from direct numerical simulations (DNS) of the homogeneous elliptic streamline flow, which combines rotation and strain. The models considered include standard two-equation models and models with corrections for rotational effects. Most of the rotational corrections modify the dissipation rate equation to account for the reduced dissipation rate in rotating turbulent flows, however, the DNS data shows that the production term in the turbulent kinetic energy equation is not modeled correctly by these models. Nonlinear relations for the Reynolds stresses are considered as a means of modifying the production term. Implications for the modeling of turbulent vortices will be discussed.

Blaisdell, Gregory A.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Computation of Separated and Unsteady Flows with One- and Two-Equation Turbulence Models

The ability of one- and two-equation turbulence models to predict unsteady separated flows over airfoils is evaluated. An implicit, factorized, upwind-biased numerical scheme is used for the integration of the compressible, Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations. The turbulent eddy viscosity is obtained from the computed mean flowfield by integration of the turbulent field equations. The two-equation turbulence models are discretized in space with an upwind-biased, second order accurate total variation diminishing scheme. One and two-equation turbulence models are first tested for a separated airfoil flow at fixed angle of incidence. The same models are then applied to compute the unsteady flowfields about airfoils undergoing oscillatory motion at low subsonic Mach numbers. Experimental cases where the flow has been tripped at the leading edge and where natural transition was allowed to occur naturally are considered. The more recently developed field-equation turbulence models capture the physics of unsteady separated flow significantly better than the standard kappa-epsilon and kappa-omega models. However, certain differences in the hysteresis effects are obtained. For an untripped high-Reynolds-number flow, it was found necessary to take into account the leading edge transitional flow region in order to capture the correct physical mechanism that leads to dynamic stall.

Ekaterinaris, John A.↗