Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “WorldView-2”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

20 records · Page 2

Unalakleet Climate: Analyzing Permafrost Degradation and Drainage Networks in Unalakleet, Alaska

The coastal community of Unalakleet is currently the 8th most at-risk community in Alaska due to the adverse effects of climate change that include permafrost degradation, severe coastal erosion, and sea-level rise-induced flood inundation caused by increasingly frequent storm surges. In response, the community has started a managed relocation with support from the Native Village of Unalakleet (NVU) and the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL)’s Alaska campus in Fairbanks. The Unalakleet Climate NASA DEVELOP team partnered with NREL to provide remote sensing support and analysis for resilience planning in Unalakleet, supporting their ongoing relocation efforts and guiding future expansion. The team utilized Sentinel-1 C-Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), WorldView-2, and WorldView-3 datasets from 2017 – 2023 to analyze seasonal summer subsidence and utilized a 2014 Ancillary USGS 5 m Alaska DEM to conduct drainage network analyses that included watershed delineation and Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) analysis. The team also used high-resolution WorldView images to locate stable reference points that served as quality control for the team’s analyses. The team’s end products included maps containing subsidence and drainage zones information at and surrounding the relocation site. The team’s products provide NREL with valuable data that enables them to better assist Unalakleet’s managed relocation and assists Unalakleet with adapting to the catastrophic effects of climate change and build resilience in a community on the front lines of climate change.

Ian Lee↗

Assessment of Sensor Footprint Size and Comparison of Commercial Smallsat Images

Science users of commercial satellite data build their studies on the properties of the satellite data they work with, pixel size being one of the determining factors. However, pixel size and nominal image footprint size can be different, impacting the scale of features discernable in the satellite images. Here, we assess geometric properties such as nominal image footprint size for Planet Labs' SuperDove series, MAXAR's WorldView series, and potentially BlackSky. Additionally, we assess temporal change in nominal footprint size for the SuperDove series. Nominal Image footprint size is assessed over the CalVal sites in Baotou, China; Shadnagar, India; and Big Spring, TX. Edge spread functions are constructed along the black/white transitions, from which the line spread functions are constructed and modulation transfer functions of the scene are estimated. Scene full width half maximum (FWHM), which represents sensor footprint size, is estimated from the line spread function. The average nominal footprint size is 3.3 pixels for SuperDove series, 1.5 pixels for WorldView-2, and 1.3 pixels for WorldView-3. The SuperDove series nominal footprint size improves with time in orbit, from an average of 3.4 pixels soon after launch to an average of 3.2 pixels one or more years after launch.

PlanetScope↗