Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “accelerator beam diagnostics”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

An ultrafast laser pulse picker technique for high-average-current high-brightness photoinjectors

Beam diagnostics in high brightness photoinjectors requires that optical pulses from a high-power drive laser be picked up with an ultrahigh pulse contrast ratio and without temporal profile distortion. In high-average-current high-brightness photoinjectors, high-power drive lasers are routinely operated at GHz-level pulse repetition rate and it is challenging to achieve pulse picking without any pulse distortion. Here, we report on a new ultrafast pulse picker technique for beam diagnostics in high-average-current high-brightness photoinjectors. By efficiently combining an ultrafast low-power electro-optic modulator, high-power fiber laser amplifiers, a high-power Pockels Cell, and a frequency doubling module, we have successfully demonstrated optical bunch (30 pulses per bunch) pickup from a 704 MHz high-power drive laser and achieved a 10 6 :1 pulse contrast ratio and nearly zero pulse distortion. The performance of this pulse picking technique has been verified through beam characterization and electron cooling in the low energy RHIC electron cooling accelerator at Brookhaven National Laboratory.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2026

Realizing the scientific program with polarized ion beams at the future BNL Electron Ion Collider

Polarized ion beams at the Electron Ion Collider (EIC) are essential to address some of the most important open questions at the twenty-first century frontiers of understanding of the fundamental structure of matter. Here, in this work, we summarize the science case and identify polarized 2 H, 3 He, 6 Li, and 7 Li ion beams as critical technology that will enable experiments which address the most important science. Furthermore, we discuss the required ion polarimetry and spin manipulation at the EIC. The current EIC accelerator design is presented. We identify a significant research and development effort across national and international laboratories and universities that is required over about a decade to realize the polarized ion beams and estimate (based on previous experience) that it will require about 20 full-time equivalent (FTE) over 10 years (or a total of about 200 FTE-years) of personnel, including graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, technicians, and engineers. Attracting, educating, and training a new generation of physicists in experimental spin techniques will be essential for the successful realization. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are seen as having significant potential for both acceleration of research and development and amplification of discovery in the optimal realization of this unique quantum technology on a cutting-edge collider. The research and development effort is synergistic with research in atomic physics and fusion energy science.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Improved calibration of rf cavities for relativistic electron beams: Effects of secondary corrections and experimental verification

In the aspect of longitudinal beam bunching, the bunching strength can be controlled by the rf cavity phase and voltage. However, these machine parameters are different from those that interact with the beam itself. In order to gain control of the beam-cavity interaction, cavity calibration must be performed. Furthermore, it relies on fitting the beam energy gain versus cavity phase to a calibration function. Under the conventional assumption of relativistic beam conditions, the calibration function is a first harmonic sinusoidal function (a sinusoidal function with a period of 2π). However, this expression is insufficient for a high-voltage bunching cavity. Due to beam acceleration inside the cavity, an energy bias and a second harmonic function should be included to modify the conventional calibration function, even for a relativistic electron beam. In this paper, we will derive this modification and provide a comparison to both the Coherent Electron Cooling Experiment and the IMPACT T simulation, respectively.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗