Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “classification”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

Radiation Anomaly Detection and Classification with Bayes Model Selection

We present a new method for radiation anomaly detection that is based on Bayes Model Selection (BMS), together with models for gamma-radiation measurements from benign and threat sources. The method estimates the relative odds of pairs of such models, with the aim of supporting related hypotheses about the nature of the underlying source material. We also discuss partial optimization of the parameters in the models. The method allows measurements to be broadly categorized and screened for sources of interest in real time, a property that should improve the efficiency of mobile search or unattended monitoring operations.

Anomaly detection, Gamma-ray spectroscopy, Radiati↗
DOE OSTI2021

DeepLearnMOR: a deep-learning framework for fluorescence image-based classification of organelle morphology

Abstract The proper biogenesis, morphogenesis, and dynamics of subcellular organelles are essential to their metabolic functions. Conventional techniques for identifying, classifying, and quantifying abnormalities in organelle morphology are largely manual and time-consuming, and require specific expertise. Deep learning has the potential to revolutionize image-based screens by greatly improving their scope, speed, and efficiency. Here, we used transfer learning and a convolutional neural network (CNN) to analyze over 47,000 confocal microscopy images from Arabidopsis wild-type and mutant plants with abnormal division of one of three essential energy organelles: chloroplasts, mitochondria, or peroxisomes. We have built a deep-learning framework, DeepLearnMOR (Deep Learning of the Morphology of Organelles), which can rapidly classify image categories and identify abnormalities in organelle morphology with over 97% accuracy. Feature visualization analysis identified important features used by the CNN to predict morphological abnormalities, and visual clues helped to better understand the decision-making process, thereby validating the reliability and interpretability of the neural network. This framework establishes a foundation for future larger-scale research with broader scopes and greater data set diversity and heterogeneity.

Plant Sciences↗
DOE OSTI2018

Neuromorphic computing for temporal scientific data classification

In this work, we apply a spiking neural network model and an associated memristive neuromorphic implementation to an application in classifying temporal scientific data. We demonstrate that the spiking neural network model achieves comparable results to a previously reported convolutional neural network model, with significantly fewer neurons and synapses required.

Schuman, Catherine↗
DOE OSTI2019

TableCalculator: a Transparent Public Tool to Replicate US NRC LLW Classification Table Calculations - 19395

Classification of Low-Level Waste (LLW) as Class A, B, C, or Greater than Class C (GTCC) is based on tables provided in Section 61.55 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Those tables were developed from model projections of dose to an inadvertent intruder in agricultural and construction scenarios at different times after closure of a LLW land disposal site. The calculations were performed with two FORTRAN codes, which are documented in US NRC guidance documents published in the early 1980's. Although the equations and parameter values used in the codes are publicly available, no modern, user-friendly implementation of the codes is known to US NRC staff. Because Very Low-Level Waste (VLLW) and GTCC waste disposal are related to the low end and high end of the existing LLW waste classifications, respectively, recent interest in options for disposal of VLLW and GTCC waste have generated public interest in the original assumptions made during the development of the LLW classification tables. Certain stakeholder analyses have recommended alternatives to the existing LLW concentration limits by calculating a projected intruder dose under different conditions than were evaluated in the original development of 10 CFR Part 61 (e.g., using more modern dosimetry or assuming deeper disposal) and comparing the radionuclide concentrations that result in a projected annual dose of 5 milliSieverts (mSv) (500 millirem (mrem)) total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) to the concentrations in the waste classification tables. However, beginning with the 10 CFR Part 61 LLW classification limits and modifying only one or two assumptions to generate a proposed concentration limit could lead to misleading results without a thorough analysis of whether other assumptions made in the original development of the waste classification tables remain valid. In particular, the US NRC made adjustments to the 10 CFR 61.55 table values during the rulemaking process based on qualitative considerations. Those adjustments mean that many of the values in the final tables cannot simply be assumed to quantitatively represent a 5 mSv (500 mrem) projected inadvertent intruder dose without an assessment of whether the technical bases used to develop the adjustments are applicable to the new analysis. Furthermore, the waste classification limits were based on the limiting critical organ dose rather than a TEDE. Therefore, any calculation based on the assumption that the waste classification limits correspond to 5 mSv (500 mrem) TEDE could benefit from consideration of how differences in exposure pathways could affect the limiting critical organ dose differently from the TEDE. To facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the calculations used to develop the waste classification tables, the US NRC staff has developed a user-friendly tool to replicate the original calculations. Results were verified against output from the FORTRAN codes and the classification table values. The tool, TableCalculator, is expected to be made publicly available and will allow the user to trace the original calculations and to observe the effects of changes in disposal assumptions and other parameter values. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Benchmarking Current and Emerging Approaches to Infrasound Signal Classification

Low frequency sound ≤ 20 Hz, known as infrasound, is generated by a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources. Following an event, infrasonic waves travel through a dynamic atmosphere that can change on the order of minutes. This makes infrasound event classification a difficult problem as waveforms from the same source type can look drastically different. Event classification usually requires ground truth information from seismic or other methods. This is time consuming, inefficient, and does not allow for a classification if the event locates somewhere other than a known source, the location accuracy is poor, or ground truth from seismic data is lacking. Here we compare the performance of the state of the art for infrasound event classification, support vector machine (SVM), to the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN), a method that has been proven in tangential fields such as seismology. For a 1-class catalog consisting of only volcanic activity and earthquake events, the 4-fold average SVM classification accuracy is 75%, while it is 74% when using a CNN. Classification accuracies from the 4-class catalog consisting of the most common infrasound events detected at the global scale are 55% and 56% for the SVM and CNN architectures, respectively. These results demonstrate that using a CNN does not increase performance for infrasound event classification. This suggests that SVM should be the preferred classification method as it is a simpler and more trustworthy architecture and can be tied to the physical properties of the waveforms. The SVM and CNN algorithms described in this paper are not yet generalizable to other infrasound event catalogs. We anticipate this study to be a starting point for the development of large and comprehensive, systematically labeled, infrasound event catalogs as such catalogs will be necessary to provide an increase in the value of deep learning on event classification.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
DOE OSTI2022

Considerations for Optimizing the Photometric Classification of Supernovae from the Rubin Observatory

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory will increase the number of observed supernovae (SNe) by an order of magnitude; however, it is impossible to spectroscopically confirm the class for all SNe discovered. Thus, photometric classification is crucial, but its accuracy depends on the not-yet-finalized observing strategy of Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We quantitatively analyze the impact of the LSST observing strategy on SNe classification using simulated multiband light curves from the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-Series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC). First, we augment the simulated training set to be representative of the photometric redshift distribution per SNe class, the cadence of observations, and the flux uncertainty distribution of the test set. Then we build a classifier using the photometric transient classification library snmachine, based on wavelet features obtained from Gaussian process fits, yielding a similar performance to the winning PLAsTiCC entry. We study the classification performance for SNe with different properties within a single simulated observing strategy. We find that season length is important, with light curves of 150 days yielding the highest performance. Cadence also has an important impact on SNe classification; events with median inter-night gap <3.5 days yield higher classification performance. Interestingly, we find that large gaps (>10 days) in light-curve observations do not impact performance if sufficient observations are available on either side, due to the effectiveness of the Gaussian process interpolation. This analysis is the first exploration of the impact of observing strategy on photometric SN classification with LSST.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2016

MeMoVolc report on classification and dynamics of volcanic explosive eruptions

Classifications of volcanic eruptions were first introduced in the early twentieth century mostly based on qualitative observations of eruptive activity, and over time, they have gradually been developed to incorporate more quantitative descriptions of the eruptive products from both deposits and observations of active volcanoes. Progress in physical volcanology, and increased capability in monitoring, measuring and modelling of explosive eruptions, has highlighted shortcomings in the way we classify eruptions and triggered a debate around the need for eruption classification and the advantages and disadvantages of existing classification schemes. Here, we (i) review and assess existing classification schemes, focussing on subaerial eruptions; (ii) summarize the fundamental processes that drive and parameters that characterize explosive volcanism; (iii) identify and prioritize the main research that will improve the understanding, characterization and classification of volcanic eruptions and (iv) provide a roadmap for producing a rational and comprehensive classification scheme. In particular, classification schemes need to be objective-driven and simple enough to permit scientific exchange and promote transfer of knowledge beyond the scientific community. Schemes should be comprehensive and encompass a variety of products, eruptive styles and processes, including for example, lava flows, pyroclastic density currents, gas emissions and cinder cone or caldera formation. Furthermore open questions, processes and parameters that need to be addressed and better characterized in order to develop more comprehensive classification schemes and to advance our understanding of volcanic eruptions include conduit processes and dynamics, abrupt transitions in eruption regime, unsteadiness, eruption energy and energy balance.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2023

Impact of Rubin Observatory Cadence Choices on Supernovae Photometric Classification

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will discover an unprecedented number of supernovae (SNe), making spectroscopic classification for all the events infeasible. LSST will thus rely on photometric classification, whose accuracy depends on the not-yet-finalized LSST observing strategy. In this work, we analyze the impact of cadence choices on classification performance using simulated multiband light curves. First, we simulate SNe with an LSST baseline cadence, a nonrolling cadence, and a presto-color cadence, which observes each sky location three times per night instead of twice. Each simulated data set includes a spectroscopically confirmed training set, which we augment to be representative of the test set as part of the classification pipeline. Then we use the photometric transient classification library snmachine to build classifiers. We find that the active region of the rolling cadence used in the baseline observing strategy yields a 25% improvement in classification performance relative to the background region. This improvement in performance in the actively rolling region is also associated with an increase of up to a factor of 2.7 in the number of cosmologically useful Type Ia SNe relative to the background region. However, adding a third visit per night as implemented in presto-color degrades classification performance due to more irregularly sampled light curves. Overall, our results establish desiderata on the observing cadence related to classification of full SNe light curves, which in turn impacts photometric SNe cosmology with LSST.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Photometric redshift-aided classification using ensemble learning

We present SHEEP, a new machine learning approach to the classic problem of astronomical source classification, which combines the outputs from the XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost learning algorithms to create stronger classifiers. A novel step in our pipeline is that prior to performing the classification, SHEEP first estimates photometric redshifts, which are then placed into the data set as an additional feature for classification model training; this results in significant improvements in the subsequent classification performance. SHEEP contains two distinct classification methodologies: (i) Multi-class and (ii) one versus all with correction by a meta-learner. We demonstrate the performance of SHEEP for the classification of stars, galaxies, and quasars using a data set composed of SDSS and WISE photometry of 3.5 million astronomical sources. The resulting F1 -scores are as follows: 0.992 for galaxies; 0.967 for quasars; and 0.985 for stars. In terms of the F1-scores for the three classes, SHEEP is found to outperform a recent RandomForest-based classification approach using an essentially identical data set. Our methodology also facilitates model and data set explainability via feature importances; it also allows the selection of sources whose uncertain classifications may make them interesting sources for follow-up observations.

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS↗