Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “composite solid electrolyte”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Impact of Salt Chemistry and Interlayer Architecture on Solid Electrolyte Interphase Composition and Performance

Reversible lithium metal anodes require interphases that are chemically stable, mechanically robust, and compatible with scalable processing. Here, we use slot-die-coated, salt-rich PEO interlayers to design SEI nanolayers on Cu current collectors and isolate how salt anion chemistry controls interphase composition and lithium plating/stripping behavior in architectures relevant to Li plating and anode-free cells. Mesoscale modeling shows that dendrite initiation at SEI defects is governed by a tradeoff among interphase thickness, ionic conductivity, and stiffness through defect-driven current focusing, motivating controlled formation from thin precursor layers. Using UHV-transferred XPS and ToF-SIMS depth profiling after controlled Li deposition, we find that fluorinated sulfonylimide salts (LiTFSI, LiFSI) form mixed inorganic/organic interphases containing LiF and PEO-derived alkoxides, with LiFSI producing a more LiF-dominant Li-facing surface than LiTFSI under identical conditions. In contrast, LiNO 3 -containing interlayers yield a comparatively thick nitrate-derived interphase that reduces upon Li contact to an N-rich inorganic layer (Li–N/N 3− , LiN x O y ). In Cu| |Li cells, these designed interlayers reduce interfacial resistance and improve Coulombic efficiency (CE) and critical current density (CCD) relative to uncoated controls, with LiFSI- and LiNO 3 -based interlayers providing the highest CE/CCD. Overall, the results demonstrate a manufacturing-relevant approach to engineer SEI nanolayers by salt chemistry, providing pathways to improve reversible lithium metal anodes while reducing reliance on LiTFSI.

anion chemistry↗

Operando Optical Microscopy for Visualization of Dendrite Growth in an Argyrodite LPSCl–Polymer Composite Electrolyte

Herein, we demonstrate the utility of optical microscopy as an accessible technique for the in situ visualization of dendrite growth within polymer–sulfide composite solid-state electrolytes. The composite electrolyte features in situ polymerization and cross-linking of the polymer between ceramic particles, which opens up extensive opportunities for accelerated materials discovery, given the vast array of acrylate/methacrylate monomers available. Specifically, the cross-linked polymer poly(triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) (poly(TEGDMA)) was observed to effectively fill pores and inhibit dendrite growth at the lithium metal interface, attributed to its glassy state at room temperature. This work represents the first application of optical microscopy to illustrate that the incorporation of glassy, undoped polymers such as poly(TEGDMA) can serve as a viable strategy for dendrite suppression in solid-state composite electrolytes.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Consolidation of composite cathodes with NCM and sulfide solid-state electrolytes by hot pressing for all-solid-state Li metal batteries

In this study, hot pressing was evaluated as a method of cell fabrication to increase the energy density of next-generation all-solid-state batteries with NCM active material and sulfide solid-state electrolyte. Hot pressing involves consolidating glassy sulfide electrolyte by the application of pressure at a temperature above the electrolyte’s glass transition temperature. Typically, cell stacks are formed at room temperature and retain 15–30% porosity that limits cell energy density. On the other hand, the porosity of hot-pressed cell stacks is reduced to less than 10%. The electrochemical function of hot-pressed cathode composites was assessed as a function of active material and solid-state electrolyte compositions. Specifically, LiNi 0.85 Co 0.10 Mn 0.05 O 2 and LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 were studied in combination with either glassy Li 7 P 3 S 11 , glassy Li 3 PS 4 , or β-Li 3 PS 4 solid-state electrolytes. Cathode composites composed of LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 and Li 3 PS 4 maintained the best function after hot pressing at 200 °C and 370 MPa for 10 min. It was found that LiNi 0.6 Co 0.2 Mn 0.2 O 2 ’s resistance to microcracking and the inherent stability of Li 3 PS 4 ’s fully de-networked local structure are critical to maintain good electrochemical function after hot pressing. Furthermore, the results of this study show that hot pressing reduces porosity in the cathode composite and confirms the feasibility of cathode support of consolidated, reinforced glass separators.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Wet chemical synthesis and properties of argyrodite sulfide solid electrolytes for solid state lithium batteries

The commercialization of the lithium-ion battery (LIB) in 1991 was responsible for the explosion in portable electronic technologies that has been seen over the past 30 years. With the advent of electric vehicles and other high-powered technologies, there is tremendous demand for LIBs with higher energy density and high safety. To achieve this, new electrode materials must be explored. The obvious choice of anode material would be pure metal lithium, which has a theoretical specific capacity of 3860 mAh g-1 . Unfortunately, metal lithium anodes have not been widely commercialized due to their tendency to react violently with the flammable liquid electrolytes used in today’s batteries. Battery safety can best be achieved by adopting solid electrolytes in place of liquid electrolytes. Solid electrolytes are nonvolatile and nonflammable, safely allowing for the combination of high-capacity cathode materials with a Li metal anode. Argyrodite sulfide solid electrolytes such as halogen-doped Li6PS5X (X = Cl, Br, I) are noted for their high ionic conductivity. But before sulfides can be commercially adopted, they possess several disadvantages which must be addressed, including time- and energy-consuming synthesis processes, poor electrochemical stability, and intrinsically poor air stability. This dissertation seeks to address each of these challenges through materials design an synthesis strategies. In this work, we pioneer a solvent-based approach for the synthesis of argyrodite solid electrolytes Li7PS6 and Li6PS5Xinstead of a stringent solid-state synthesis. Nontoxic ethanol is employed as the solvent, enabling a rapid synthetic approach to produce argyrodite solid electrolytes with high phase purity and compositional flexibility. Compared with Li7PS6, halogen doping (i.e. X = F, Cl, Br, I) not only increases the ionic conductivity, but also enhances the electrochemical stability at the interface towards Li metal. Specifically, F-doped argyrodites produce a robust SEI layer containing LiF, contributing to enhanced interfacial stability. Finally, to address the air instability challenge, argyrodite-incorporated composite solid electrolytes (CSEs) are designed and prepared to produce stable and flexible membranes that are demonstrated in solid-state Li metal batteries. These advances push argyrodite sulfide solid electrolyte research further and pave the way for the proliferation of next generation lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Solid-state rigid-rod polymer composite electrolytes with nanocrystalline lithium ion pathways

A critical challenge for next-generation lithium-based batteries lies in development of electrolytes that enable thermal safety along with use of high-energy-density electrodes. We describe molecular ionic composite (MIC) electrolytes based on an aligned liquid crystalline polymer combined with ionic liquids and concentrated Li salt. This high strength (200 MPa) and non-flammable solid electrolyte possesses outstanding Li + conductivity (1 mS cm -1 at 25 °C) and electrochemical stability (5.6 V vs Li|Li + ) while suppressing dendrite growth and exhibiting low interfacial resistance (32 Ω cm 2 ) and overpotentials (≤ 120 mV @ 1 mA cm -2 ) during Li symmetric cell cycling. A heterogeneous salt doping process modifies a locally ordered polymer-ion assembly to incorporate an inter-grain network filled with defective LiFSI & LiBF 4 nanocrystals, strongly enhancing Li + conduction. Furthermore, this modular material fabrication platform shows promise for safe and high-energy-density energy storage and conversion applications, incorporating the fast transport of ceramic-like conductors with the superior flexibility of polymer electrolytes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Identifying Bounds of Inorganic Content in Solventless Processing of Hybrid Solid Electrolytes

Solid-state lithium batteries require safe, robust electrolytes to enable higher energy densities and improved safety over conventional cells. Hybrid polymer–ceramic electrolytes are a promising solution, combining the processability of polymers with the high ionic conductivity and mechanical strength of inorganic fillers. In this work, we demonstrate a solventless, UV-curing method to produce hybrid solid electrolytes using a poly(ethylene glycol) dimethyl ether (PEGDME)-based photocurable matrix incorporating Li 1.5 Al 0.5 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP) or Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) ceramic electrolyte. Inorganic filler loadings up to ∼55 wt.% could be successfully incorporated via this process which was the highest inorganic content at which the slurry remains processable and cured into a uniform film. The resulting UV-cured composite electrolytes remain flexible and exhibit room-temperature ionic conductivities on the order of 10 −4 S·cm −1 , along with notably improved lithium-ion transference numbers compared to conventional polymer electrolytes. Similar performance and processing limits were observed for both LAGP and LLZO, indicating that ceramic filler chemistry does not significantly affect the UV-curing process or the electrolyte's ion transport properties in this regime. Eliminating solvents from fabrication not only simplifies processing and mitigates environmental concerns but also enables higher solid contents that enhance mechanical strength and help suppress lithium dendrite formation. In conclusion, this scalable approach thus paves the way for manufacturing robust composite solid electrolytes for next-generation solid-state batteries (SSBs).

Batteries↗

Differences in the Interfacial Mechanical Properties of Thiophosphate and Argyrodite Solid Electrolytes and Their Composites

Interfacial mechanics are a significant contributor to the performance and degradation of solid-state batteries. Spatially resolved measurements of interfacial properties are extremely important to effectively model and understand the electrochemical behavior. Herein, we report the interfacial properties of thiophosphate (Li 3 PS 4 )- and argyrodite (Li 6 PS 5 Cl)-type solid electrolytes. Using atomic force microscopy, we showcase the differences in the surface morphology as well as adhesion of these materials. Additionally we investigate solvent-less processing of hybrid electrolytes using UV-assisted curing. Physical, chemical, and structural characterizations of the materials highlight the differences in the surface morphology, chemical makeup, and distribution of the inorganic phases between the argyrodite and thiophosphate solid electrolytes.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

A room temperature rechargeable Li 2 O-based lithium-air battery enabled by a solid electrolyte

Lithium-air batteries have scope to compete with gasoline in terms of energy density. However, in most systems, the reaction pathways either involve one- or two-electron transfer, leading to lithium peroxide (Li 2 O 2 ) or lithium superoxide (LiO 2 ), respectively. Kondori et al. investigated a lithium-air battery that uses a ceramic-polyethylene oxide–based composite solid electrolyte and found that it can undergo a four-electron redox reaction through lithium oxide (Li 2 O) formation and decomposition (see the Perspective by Dong and Lu). The composite electrolyte embedded with Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 nanoparticles shows high ionic conductivity and stability and high cycle stability through a four-electron transfer process.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Reaction Current Heterogeneity at the Interface between a Lithium Electrode and Polymer/Ceramic Composite Electrolytes

Although lithium metal anodes are expected to increase the energy density of next-generation batteries, dendrite growth during charge remains a major bottleneck preventing widespread implementation. Composite solid electrolytes with ceramic particles embedded in a polymer matrix have the potential to prevent dendrites owing to the higher mechanical stiffness while also possessing the flexibility to maintain contact with the electrode. However, microscopically, the different mechanical and electrochemical properties of the polymer and ceramic domains can cause inhomogeneous charge transfer at the Li/electrolyte interface, which can lead to nonuniform Li deposition and propagation of dendrites. Here, we computationally examine the coupled electrochemical, transport, and mechanical processes at the interface to determine the propensity for dendrite formation and possible approaches to mitigate this issue. Predictions of two possible microstructures at the interface, namely, (i) where both the polymer and ceramic come in contact with Li metal and (ii) when only the polymer comes in contact with Li metal, suggest that the former has a greater tendency for nonuniform plating. In addition, predictions suggest that minimizing the interfacial resistance between polymers and ceramics and incorporating interlayers between the electrode and electrolyte help mitigate current heterogeneity. In conclusion, these predictions provide guidance for experimental approaches to prevent dendrites in composite electrolytes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Chemical interaction and enhanced interfacial ion transport in a ceramic nanofiber–polymer composite electrolyte for all-solid-state lithium metal batteries

This article reports the synergy between ceramic nanofibers and a polymer, and the enhanced interfacial Li-ion transport along the nanofiber/polymer interface in a solid-state ceramic/polymer composite electrolyte, in which a three-dimensional (3D) electrospun aluminum-doped Li 0.33 La 0.557 TiO 3 (LLTO) nanofiber network is embedded in a polyvinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) matrix. Strong chemical interaction occurs between the nanofibers and the polymer matrix. Addition of the ceramic nanofibers into the polymer matrix results in the dehydrofluorination of the PVDF chains, deprotonation of the –CH 2 moiety and amorphization of the polymer matrix. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra reveal that lithium ions transport via three pathways: (i) intra-polymer transport, (ii) intra-nanofiber transport, and (iii) interfacial polymer/nanofiber transport. In addition, lithium phosphate is coated on the LLTO nanofiber surface before the nanofibers are embedded into the polymer matrix. The presence of lithium phosphate at the LLTO/polymer interface further enhances the chemical interaction between the nanofibers and the polymer, which promotes the lithium ion transport along the polymer/nanofiber interface. This in turn improves the ionic conductivity and electrochemical cycling stability of the nanofiber/polymer composite. As a result, the flexible LLTO/Li 3 PO 4 /polymer composite electrolyte membrane exhibits an ionic conductivity of 5.1 × 10 -4 S cm -1 at room temperature and an electrochemical stability window of 5.0 V vs. Li/Li + . A symmetric Li|electrolyte|Li half-cell shows a low overpotential of 50 mV at a constant current density of 0.5 mA cm -2 for more than 800 h. In addition, a full cell is constructed by sandwiching the composite electrolyte between a lithium metal anode and a LiFePO 4 -based cathode. Such an all-solid-state lithium metal battery exhibits excellent cycling performance and rate capability.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

A review of composite solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: fundamentals, key materials and advanced structures

All-solid-state lithium ion batteries (ASSLBs) are considered next-generation devices for energy storage due to their advantages in safety and potentially high energy density. As the key component in ASSLBs, solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) with non-flammability and good adaptability to lithium metal anodes have attracted extensive attention in recent years. Among the current SSEs, composite solid-state electrolytes (CSSEs) with multiple phases have greater flexibility to customize and combine the advantages of single-phase electrolytes, which have been widely investigated recently and regarded as promising candidates for commercial ASSLBs. Based on existing investigations, herein, we present a comprehensive overview of the recent developments in CSSEs. Initially, we introduce the historical development from solid-state ionic conductors to CSSEs, and then summarize the fundamentals including mechanisms of lithium ion transport, key evaluation parameters, design principles, and key materials. Finally, four main types of advanced structures for CSSEs are classified and highlighted according to the recent progress. Moreover, advanced characterization and computational simulation techniques including machine learning are reviewed for the first time, and the main challenges and perspectives of CSSEs are also provided for their future development.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

In Situ Alloying Enabled by Active Liquid Metal Filler for Self‐Healing Composite Polymer Electrolytes

Abstract Solid inorganics, known for kinetically inhibiting polymer crystallization and enhancing ionic conductivity, have attracted significant attention in solid polymer electrolytes. However, current composite polymer electrolytes (CPEs) are still facing challenges in Li metal batteries, falling short of inhibiting severe dendritic growth and resulting in very limited cycling life. This study introduces Ga 62.5 In 21.5 Sn 16 (Galinstan) liquid metal (LM) as an active liquid alternative to conventional passive solid fillers, aiming at realizing self‐healing protection against dendrite problems. Compared to solid inorganics, for example silica, LM droplets could more significantly reduce polymer crystallinity and enhance Li‐ion conductivity due to their liquid nature, especially at temperatures below the polymer melting point. More importantly, LMs are unraveled as dynamic chemical traps, which are capable of blocking and consuming lithium dendrites upon contact via in situ alloying during battery operation and further inhibiting dendritic growth due to the lower deposition energy barrier of the formed Li‐LM alloy. As a proof of concept, by strategically designing an asymmetric CPE with the active LM filling, a solid‐state Li/LiFePO 4 battery achieves promising full‐cell functionality with notable rate performance and stable cycle life. This active filler‐mediated self‐healing approach could bring new insights into the battery design in versatile solid‐state systems.

Wu, Kai↗

Polymer-ceramic composite electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries: Ionic conductivity and chemical interaction enhanced by oxygen vacancy in ceramic nanofibers

Perovskite Li 3x La 2/3-x TiO3 (LLTO) nanofibers have been heat-treated in the hydrogen-containing atmosphere and then incorporated with the poly(vinylidene fluoride)-co-hexafluoropropylene (PVDF-HFP) polymer to form a composite electrolyte. Hydrogen treatment has created oxygen vacancies in the LLTO nanofibers, which has reduced the activation energy of Li ion transport along intra-grains and inter-grains, leading to improvement in the ion conductivity of LLTO nanofibers. Hydrogen treatment of the LLTO nanofibers has also enhanced the chemical interaction between the LLTO nanofibers and the polymer matrix in the composite electrolyte, and favored the Li ion transport at the nanofiber/polymer interface, improving the ion conductivity of the composite electrolyte to 3.4×10- 4 S/cm at room temperature. As a result, the Li|composite-electrolyte|Li half-cell exhibits good stability during lithium plating/stripping cycling at room temperature, showing an overpotential of ~91 mV at a constant current density of 0.5 mA/cm 2 . Finally, the full-cell battery with the composite electrolyte, lithium metal anode and lithium iron phosphate cathode shows excellent rate capacity and cycling performance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Compositions and Formation Mechanisms of Solid-Electrolyte Interphase on Microporous Carbon/Sulfur Cathodes

We report the formation mechanism and compositions of a solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) on a microporous carbon/sulfur (MC/S) cathode in Li–S batteries using a carbonate-based electrolyte (1 M LiPF 6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate, v:v = 1:1). Through characterizations using 1D and 2D solution-phase nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, coupled with model chemical reactions and DFT calculations, we have identified two critical roles of Li + in steering the SEI formation. First, the preferential solvation of Li + by EC in the mixed carbonate electrolyte renders EC as the dominant participant in the SEI formation, and second, Li + coordination to the EC carbonyl alters activation barriers and changes the reaction pathways relative to Na + . The main organic components in the SEI are identified as lithium ethylene monocarbonate and lithium methyl carbonate, which are virtually identical to those formed on Li and graphite anodes of lithium-ion batteries but via a different pathway.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗