Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “iodine sorbent”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Iodine Capture with Copper-Electroplated Nickel Foams

This work explores the use of Ni0 foam scaffolds for Cu0 coatings for use as sorbents for iodine. The Cu0 electroplating was performed from aqueous copper(II) sulfate (CuSO4) solutions under different conditions to achieve a range of Cu0-layer thicknesses (4.89 ± 1.05 μm–57.32 ± 3.95 μm) with 900 A·m–2 current densities and coating times of 15–180 min. The thickest coatings resulted in Cu0-plated Ni0 foams with >89 mass % Cu0 in the final product. Iodine capture experiments showed very high Cu0 utilizations of 91.9–97.3 mass % at iodine loadings of 839–1774 mg·g–1 through the formation of CuI (marshite; space group F-43m). No evidence was found of iodine reactions taking place with the Ni0 scaffold, so it remained in iodine-loaded Cu-electroplated Ni foams as structural support to provide mechanical rigidity to the foams during the iodine loading process. Hot pressing of these materials can be used to create a CuI/Ni ceramic-metal composite waste form for disposal as demonstrated with spark plasma sintering.

Riley, Brian [Pacific Northwest National Laborator↗
DOE OSTI2026

Preparation of iodine-bearing waste forms for hot isostatic pressing

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has prepared a new set of iodine-bearing sorbents. The sorbent materials used for this activity were supplied by IONEX (NexSorb-99) or C&CS (AC6120-7%). Metal canisters were previously prepared by ORNL in 2022. They are 2 in. long by 1.5 in. in diameter and are made of 316 stainless steel.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2025

Feasibility of carbon foam-based sorbents for the abatement of gaseous mercury and iodine

The U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site in Washington State is in the process of commissioning the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant to process a portion of the 54 million gallons of radioactive and chemical waste from cold war weapon production. Technologies for the capture of volatile species of concern are still being assessed, and new methods and materials are developed as operational and flowsheet mission risks are identified. One such area still being assessed is the abatement efficacy of the Carbon Adsorber units to retain gaseous mercury and 129 I released during processing. It is challenging to predict the mercury chemistry due to the variability of the feed, and different methods/materials are required for the capture of gaseous Hg 0 and Hg II compounds. In this study, the feasibility of using developmental carbon foam (CF) sorbents for the capture of iodine and mercury was assessed using static and dynamic flow testing and compared against a commercially available sorbent, BATII-37. Both CF and CF functionalized with bismuth particles (CF-Bi) chemisorbed iodine, and CF-Bi had similar mercury capture performance to BATII-37 in dynamic flow tests. While species loading concentrations were measurable, limitations in achieving a mass balance prevented a full evaluation of capture efficacy. Nonetheless, the results serve as an important first step in demonstrating the potential for simultaneous iodine and mercury capture.

Hanford site↗
DOE OSTI2021

Iodine Sorption on AgZ-PAN

The Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain Program Material Recovery and Waste Form Development (MRWFD) Campaign Off-gas Sigma Team has performed research and development on iodine control and iodine waste forms for the past several years. This research and development has included iodine adsorption tests using a laboratory-scale test system containing multiple-segmented fixed beds of iodine adsorbents. Iodine capture performance has been tested using (a) non-radioactive synthetic gas mixtures blended from air, nitrogen, NO, NO 2 , water, to simulate dissolver off-gas (DOG) and vessel off-gas (VOG) streams from used nuclear fuel aqueous reprocessing, (b) inorganic and organic iodine species, and (c) different sorbents. An initial test of silver-functionalized mordenite in polyacrylonitrile matrix (AgZ-PAN) was conducted to assess if this sorbent, initially designed for selective sorption of Xe that evolves into used fuel reprocessing off-gas streams, could also be a candidate for iodine sorption. This test was conducted using the same deep-bed test system and methodologies used in many prior iodine sorption tests using other sorbents. Diatomic iodine (I2) was used as the target iodide in a gas stream containing air, NO, NO 2 , and moisture designed to simulate an aqueous reprocessing dissolver off-gas (DOG) stream.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Analysis of Organoiodide Adsorption Mechanisms

If the United States were to engage in the reprocessing of used nuclear fuel, radioactive iodine must be removed from multiple plant off-gas streams to comply with governing regulations. One of these streams is the vessel off-gas (VOG), which arises from the separations process and is expected to contain iodine in primarily organic iodine forms and at parts-per-billion concentrations. The relative lack of knowledge surrounding organic iodine removal from the VOG prompted the US Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy to initiate experimental efforts targeted at understanding organic iodide removal from prototypic VOG streams. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), this effort has focused on developing a comprehensive understanding of iodine removal from VOG streams by using silver-based sorbents. An important aspect of this testing is developing an understanding of how the sorption of methyl iodide (CH 3 I), the most studied organic iodide species to date, compares with the sorption of other volatile organic iodide species potentially present in the VOG. The work presented here reflects initial testing that will continue to be developed, and final results will be incorporated into an end-of-year report that details a multiyear testing campaign designed to understand iodine mitigation from VOG streams. The goal of these experiments was to determine whether similar reaction pathways govern both CH 3 I and iodobutane (C 4 H 9 I) sorption onto silver mordenite (AgZ), a common silver-based iodine sorbent. More specifically, the authors hypothesized that the sorption of C 4 H 9 I by AgZ will result in the formation of butanol (C 4 H9OH). Effluent monitoring of CH 3 I sorption testing has confirmed methanol production, but analogous monitoring of effluents from C 4 H 9 I sorption studies has not been performed. A series of tests was completed to test this hypothesis with the aim of detecting C 4 H 9 OH downstream of the AgZ bed. Test conditions varied the bed depth, gas stream humidity, and bed temperature post sorption. The effluent gas stream downstream of the AgZ bed was sampled by using gas-tight syringes, and these samples were analyzed by a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer. Thin bed C 4 H 9 I tests conducted at -65 and 0°C dew points did not result in C 4 H 9 OH detection in the effluent. This suggests that the sorption mechanism and subsequent reactions could be different from those observed for CH 3 I. The sorption testing continues; additional results will be included in final end-of-year report and will increase the fundamental understanding of organic iodide sorption by AgZ from VOG streams.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Prioritizing Off-Gas Metrics: A Guide for Comparable Off-Gas Capture Testing

The Material Recovery and Waste Form Development (MRWFD) off-gas team had a workshop, hosted by Idaho National Laboratory (INL), to align goals and expectations for off-gas research. The workshop included team members from four national laboratories. The workshop focused on defining distinct R&D phases with specific metrics, outlining standard test and measurement protocols for Iodine and Krypton/Xenon sorbents, brainstorming approaches to future disruptive technologies, and recognizing parameters with more inherent risk, requiring more rigorous evaluation. This report will serve as a guide for future off-gas work. Its purpose is to foster efficient collaboration across diverse research facilities and invite direct comparison of materials and results.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Densification and Immobilization of AgI-Containing Iodine Waste Forms Using Spark Plasma Sintering

Here in this study, porous Ag-xerogel (Ag-Xero), Ag-faujasite (Ag-FAU) zeolite, and Ag-mordenite (Ag-MOR) zeolite sorbents were loaded with iodine gas [I 2 (g)] under saturated conditions at 150 °C for 24 h, followed by densification and consolidation into monolithic waste forms using spark plasma sintering (SPS). For Ag-Xero materials, SPS pellets were made with as-loaded samples, while others were made with preheated (PH; 500 °C for 2 h) samples to help with densification. SPS processing was conducted at 50 MPa under different temperatures (T = 200–800 °C) for different times (t = 0.5–30 min), where eleven AgI-Xero samples, five AgI-FAU, and two AgI-MOR separate samples were produced. The primary goal was to look for the optimum processing parameters for each material to yield pellets with high iodine retentions, high densities, and low porosities while preventing AgI decomposition. The Ag-Xero showed the highest iodine loadings (qe = 470 mg g –1 ) compared to Ag-FAU (qe = 368 mg g –1 ) and Ag-MOR (qe = 108 mg g –1 ). Measured iodine concentrations were the highest in AgI-Xero pellets without PH, followed by AgI-Xero with PH, AgI-FAU, and then AgI-MOR. Silver utilization (I/Ag on a mol % basis) values were in the order of AgI-MOR ≈ AgI-Xero (no PH) > AgI-Xero (PH) > AgI-FAU. Chemical durabilities of SPS-densified AgI-Xero (PH) pellets were very favorable, with lower releases than SPS pellets made from AgI-Xero samples without PH. These results show promise for iodine waste form production.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2024

Iodine Capture Studies of Silver Mordenite and Novel Alternative Metal Sorbents

Radioiodine is one of the radionuclides of concern when considering reprocessing of used nuclear fuel (UNF). It is expected to be released primarily in the dissolver off-gas (DOG) stream. Sorbents that target I 2 removal from a UNF processing off gas must perform efficiently under elevated temperatures in the presence of water vapor and nitrogen oxide gasses (NOx). Many studies have been conducted that examine the adsorption of iodine species in the presence of NOx gases through reduced silver-exchanged mordenite (Ag 0 Z), a zeolite mineral. This study characterizes the effects of iodine, water vapor, and nitrogen dioxide on the adsorption of I 2 by Ag 0 Z at lower temperatures suitable for comparison with novel Cu- and Bi- bearing sorbents which offer a non-RCRA alternative. When exposed to ‘harsh’ conditions such as I 2 , H 2 O, and NO 2 vapors carried by air, Cu 2 S-polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is more efficient than Ag 0 Z and all other novel sorbents, providing with 11% I capture efficiency. However, under ‘ideal’ conditions in which I 2 is carried by dry air), Ag 0 Z is more efficient than Cu 2 S-PAN and other novel sorbents, providing 74% I capture efficiency. To investigate this result and the overall performance of all sorbents tested, several characterization techniques were employed, including thermal gravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy – electron dispersion X-Ray spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. These techniques are discussed within this report. This document also includes a design and test plan update from Idaho National Laboratory as the next step in testing the high performing sorbents from thin-bed tests carried out by Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Bismuth-Functionalized Silica Aerogels for Iodine Capture

The U.S. Department of Energy is looking into alternative sorbents for the removal of radioiodine from off-gas streams in a used nuclear fuel reprocessing plant. One class of sorbents considered are bismuth-functionalized silica aerogels which offer an efficient capture of iodine from off-gas streams and are environmentally friendly and lower cost when compared to silver-functionalized sorbents. Two types of bismuth-functionalized silica aerogels were successfully manufactured using a hierarchical synthesis approach:1) The Bi 3+ -aerogel with bismuth oxide nitrate hydroxide hydrate particles and 2) Bi-aerogel with bismuth metal and bismuth sulfide nanoparticles. Both sorbents exhibited high sorption capacity for iodine. However, presence of particles of different composition, size, and distribution on aerogel support resulted in different iodine loadings. The Bi 3+ -aerogel exhibited sorption capacity of 289 mg/g. In contrast, Bi-aerogel exhibited more that 20% higher sorption capacity. The heat-treatment of Bi 3+ -aerogel at 225? under hydrogen atmosphere increased iodine loading capacity to 351 mg/g.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Environmental remediation with functional aerogels and xerogels

Several different types of aerogel and/or xerogel scaffolds have been demonstrated as effective sorbents for the capture and immobilization of radionuclides in gaseous form [e.g., iodine gas or I2(g), Xe] as well as ionic form (e.g., Ce4+, Cs+, I–, IO3-, Rb+, Sr2+, 99Tc7+, and U6+). These scaffolds have unique properties, which include high specific surface areas, high pore volumes, varieties of pore sizes, and functionalities that provide methods for binding radionuclides through physisorption, chemisorption, or a combination thereof. This combination of properties and functionalities make these types of materials ideal scaffolds for use as sorbents for capturing radionuclides. The primary base materials that will be discussed in this chapter include Ag0-functionalized silica aerogels, Ag+-impregnated aluminosilicate aerogels, Ag0-functionalized aluminosilicate aerogels, metal-impregnated (non-Ag) aluminosilicate aerogels and xerogels, sulfide-based aerogels, and carbon-based aerogel composites. For the capture of I2(g), the materials reported herein show some of the highest iodine loadings ever reported for inorganic sorbents. For the capture of ionic species, these materials also show promise to be some of the next generations of materials for active radionuclide remediation. This progress report will describe how these materials are fabricated, the general properties of these materials, as well as an overview of how they have been used for different applications in environmental remediation of radionuclides.

aerogel, xerogel, iodine, radionuclide remediation↗
DOE OSTI2020

Performance Criteria for Capture and/or Immobilization Technologies (Revision 1)

The capture and subsequent immobilization of regulated volatile radionuclides from the off-gas streams of a used nuclear fuel (UNF) reprocessing facility has been a topic of substantial research interest for the US Department of Energy and its international counterparts. Removal of specific radionuclides from the plant effluent streams before discharge to the environment is required to meet regulations set forth by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Upon removal, the radionuclides, as well as associated sorbents that cannot be regenerated in a cost-effective manner, are destined for conversion to a waste form. Research in separation and capture methodologies has included a wide range of technology types, and studies of waste forms are correspondingly diverse. In considering the future development and implementation of both sorbents and waste forms, it is necessary to identify benchmark measures of performance to objectively evaluate each sorbent system or waste form. Sets of performance criteria and associated metrics have been developed for sorbent and waste form evaluation. These criteria address physical, radiological, and chemical characteristics, technical practicality, technical maturity, cost, and, for sorbents, system performance. The criteria and metrics appear to be robust and should be applicable despite the eventual waste classification (as either high- or low-level waste). They are flexible enough to address both aqueous reprocessing and electrochemical reprocessing of UNF. These criteria sets can serve as tools to evaluate performance at multiple stages within the development process, and in this revision (Revision 1) they have been used to assess technologies relating to krypton/xenon separations and iodine capture from off-gas streams arising from UNF reprocessing. Assessment of krypton/xenon separations using engineered forms of two zeolite minerals (silver mordenite and hydrogen mordenite in a polyacrylonitrile-based binder [AgZ-PAN/HZ-PAN]) found that the zeolite-based separation is relatively advanced in its development, but several key issues require resolution. First, desorption processes for both krypton and xenon require refinement to provide an understanding of the product purity that can be achieved. Second, adsorption rate data is needed in order to calculate the bed depth required for effective separation. Finally, it is strongly recommended that a technical review of krypton/xenon separation by AgZ-PAN/HZ-PAN be performed to synergize available data and assess the cost savings and operational benefits that may be realized from implementation of this technology. Assessment of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) for their use in the separation of krypton/xenon found that the ideal separation would be performed using a single-column system with a MOF selective for krypton over xenon. A robust research effort should work to identify a krypton-selective MOF designed to operate at temperatures of approximately 0°C or higher, which could be preferred over cryogenic krypton/xenon capture for used fuel reprocessing off-gas streams. In the case of the CaSDB-MOF (the most well-understood xenon sorbent to date), two issues are judged of high importance. First, xenon breakthrough capacity for the CaSDB-MOF in prototypical conditions should be determined. Preliminary research indicates that breakthrough may be near immediate, presenting a substantial obstacle in separative system design. Second, development of desorption methodology should be performed to determine regeneration time, energy requirements, and the product stream composition. Silver-based sorbents (AgZ and AgAero) for use in iodine capture from the dissolver off-gas were evaluated against the established criteria. These sorbents are significantly better understood for this application as a result of research efforts over the past decade. The potential implementation of AgAero at a large scale is hindered by its physical degradation by components of the dissolver off-gas stream. Less is known about the adsorption of iodine by these sorbents from other off-gas streams in the plant. Initial experimental efforts have been closely coordinated in an effort to understand organic iodine (such as would be found in the vessel off-gas) adsorption by AgZ and AgAero. Future work should expand this experimental program, and analysis of other reprocessing facility off-gas streams such as the vitrification off-gas stream should be conducted to better understand other potential applications for iodine sorbents. A review of iodine waste form development shows that this area is diverse and that multiple promising waste forms have been identified for the immobilization of radioactive iodine. Efforts related to the direct conversion of iodine sorbents (including AgZ and AgAero) should be continued because of the advantages of direct conversion in a waste management strategy and other sorbents should continue to be advanced as merited.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Sol–gel synthesis of iodosodalite precursors and subsequent consolidation with a glass binder made from oxides and sol–gel routes

Radioiodine accumulates in aqueous solutions and off-gas streams during nuclear fuel reprocessing due to its solubility in aqueous solutions and volatility, respectively. Additionally, radioiodine is highly mobile in geological environments and iodine-129 has been found to be one of the largest long-term contributors to chronic dose to humans in scenarios of radionuclide migration from geological repositories. Most of the radioiodine can be captured during fuel reprocessing in off-gas streams using solid sorbents and scrubbing solutions. Once iodine is captured, it must be stored in a durable form for eventual disposal. Iodosodalite has been investigated as a waste form for radioiodine, however these synthesis processes typically result in mixed products and iodine volatilization during consolidation. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel approach to synthesizing iodosodalite utilizing a sol-gel method. This method was chosen to lower processing temperatures and improve product yield. Preliminary experiments conducted to determine the viability of this synthetic method are presented. Additionally, consolidation of sol-gel derived iodosodalite with a glass-binder was explored using three different methods: 1) incorporating the glass-binder during gel preparation using alkoxide precursors; 2) separately preparing the glass binder using a sol-gel method; and 3) separately preparing the glass-binder using a melt-quench technique. Glass-bonded iodosodalite was successfully synthesized using these novel sol-gel approaches.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Hybrid Sorbents for 129 I Capture from Contaminated Groundwater

Radioiodine ( 129 I) poses a risk to the environment due to its long half-life, toxicity, and mobility. It is found at the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site due to legacy releases of nuclear wastes to the subsurface where 129 I is predominantly present as iodate (IO 3 – ). To date, a cost-effective and scalable cleanup technology for 129 I has not been identified, with hydraulic containment implemented as the remedial approach. Here, novel high-performing sorbents for 129 I remediation with the capacity to reduce 129 I concentrations to or below the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) drinking water standard and procedures to deploy them in an ex-situ pump and treat (P&T) system are introduced. Furthermore, this includes implementation of hybridized polyacrylonitrile (PAN) beads for ex-situ remediation of IO 3 – -contaminated groundwater for the first time. Iron (Fe) oxyhydroxide and bismuth (Bi) oxyhydroxide sorbents were deployed on silica substrates or encapsulated in porous PAN beads. In addition, Fe–, cerium (Ce)–, and Bi–oxyhydroxides were encapsulated with anion-exchange resins. The PAN–bismuth oxyhydroxide and PAN–ferrihydrite composites along with Fe- and Ce-based hybrid anion-exchange resins performed well in batch sorption experiments with distribution coefficients for IO 3 – of >1000 mL/g and rapid removal kinetics. Of the tested materials, the Ce-based hybrid anion-exchange resin was the most efficient for removal of IO 3 – from Hanford groundwater in a column system, with 50% breakthrough occurring at 324 pore volumes. The functional amine groups on the parent resin and amount of active sorbent in the resin can be customized to improve the iodine loading capacity. These results highlight the potential for IO 3 – remediation by hybrid sorbents and represent a benchmark for the implementation of commercially available materials to meet EPA standards for cleanup of 129 I in a large-scale P&T system.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2022

Iodine Capture with Metal-Functionalized Polyacrylonitrile Composite Beads Containing Ag 0 , Bi 0 , Cu 0 , or Sn 0 Particles

The capture of radioiodine from nuclear processes and the mitigation of environmental release are important topic areas of research. Some of the more commonly employed chemisorption-type iodine scavengers reported in the literature are based on metal-exchanged porous sorbents such as Ag-zeolites or metal-functionalized aerogels and xerogels. However, another option is to use zero-valent metals directly that have known high affinities for iodine gas [i.e., I2(g)]. In this study, fine metal particles of Ag0, Bi0, Cu0, and Sn0 were embedded in porous polyacrylonitrile (PAN) substrates at 75 mass% metal loadings within the form of ellipsoidal beads with maximum diameters of ~2–3 mm. These composite beads showed extremely high iodine loadings that are directly related to the metal particle loadings. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of Ag0, Bi0, Cu0, and Sn0 particles as well as metal-PAN composite beads reacted with iodine gas at 120 ± 1 °C showed phases of AgI, BiI3, CuI, and SnI4, respectively. For the Ag-PAN, Cu-PAN, and Sn-PAN beads, no other crystalline peaks were observed in XRD for unreacted metal or oxidized metals after 48 h in saturated I2(g) at 120 ± 1 °C, whereas unreacted metallic Bi0 was observed within the Bi-PAN composites. However, after a 72 h exposure at 120 ± 1 °C, both the Bi0 particles and the Bi-PAN composites showed full conversion from Bi0 to BiI3 with XRD. Comparisons between mass uptake data and X-ray absorption spectroscopy were used to better understand the phase distribution of the Bi phases present in the Bi-PAN+I composites. The iodine loadings (mg iodine per g sorbent, or qe) for these materials were 1120 (Ag-Particle), 1382 (Bi-Particle-72h), 1033 (Cu-Particle), 3000 (Sn-Particle), 753 (Ag-PAN), 1012 (Bi-PAN-72h), 1457 (Cu-PAN), and 1669 (Sn-PAN). It is possible that inexpensive sorbents such as these could be deployed to help limit or prevent release of radioiodine to the environment.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Solid Sorbent Cost Sensitivity Analysis: A Framework for UNF Reprocessing Sorbent Cost Comparison

Solid sorbents have been the subject of research and development across the U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory complex for many years. They are generally accepted as a safer alternative to cryogenic distillation for noble gas capture, and they present an easier pathway in development of long-term waste forms after iodine capture. As more types of sorbents have been proposed for capture of volatile radionuclides, it has become necessary to compare them based on performance and cost criteria. This report details cost and performance information for three promising sorbents and provides a cost sensitivity analysis. The goal of this analysis is to establish a framework which can be utilized to directly compare future sorbents, with differing properties, to the sorbents discussed in this report. Direct comparison is instrumental to making informed decisions to efficiently guide research and minimize laborious detours. In all cases, sorbent capacity is a major cost driver as it influences the mass of sorbent, operational footprint, and disposal cost requirements., However, sorbent price can greatly increase the cost of a capture technology. For sorbents used in krypton capture, the purity of krypton released to storage is the highest cost driver.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Crystalline Aluminosilicates for Radionuclide Remediation

Crystalline aluminosilicates have a wide range of applications such as media for the capture and/or immobilization of radionuclides. Several different types of metal-exchanged zeolites have been successfully demonstrated as effective sorbents for gaseous, aqueous, or solid-state capture and immobilization of radionuclides including iodine [e.g., I2(g), CH3I(g)], xenon, krypton, radium (e.g., 226Ra and 228Ra), selenium (e.g., 79Se6+), technetium (e.g., 99TcO4-), strontium (e.g., 90Sr2+), cesium (e.g., 135Cs+, 137Cs+), mixed alkali halide streams (i.e., iodide and chloride salts), and actinides (e.g., U6+, Th4+). These zeolites include sodalite (SOD), mordenite (MOR or Z-type), faujasite (FAU), Linde type-A (LTA), cancrinite (CAN), gismondine (GIS), and heulandite (or clinoptilolite) (HEU). The structural building blocks of these seven materials vary from cages (e.g., a-cages, ß-cages, e-cages) to channels linking various cage types and these are mostly comprised of aluminosilicates. This chapter will delve into the crystallographic differences between these framework materials and provide a brief overview of literature data where these seven crystalline aluminosilicates have been utilized for the capture and/or immobilization of radionuclides. Metal-exchanged zeolites (e.g., MOR, FAU, LTA) have often been the source of study for gaseous capture of iodine where the more promising compositions include Ag-exchanged sorbents; these types of materials can be made in a variety of robust forms including berl saddles and extrudates. Sodalite can be used as an immobilization strategy for halide waste streams (e.g., Cl, I), including those from electrochemical reprocessing of used nuclear fuel, as well as TcO4–. Cancrinite has been demonstrated to enhance sorption capacity of sediments for several problematic ionic radionuclides including Cs+, SeO42–, and TcO4–. Actinides such as U6+ and Th4+ have been successfully captured from solutions using MOR, FAU, LTA, and HEU-type aluminosilicates. Finally, mixtures of aluminosilicates have been included in a set of zeolite materials that show promise as sorbents for 226Ra and 228Ra removal from mine waters.

zeolites, aluminosilicates, radionuclide remediati↗