Lattice Confinement Fusion Fast Fission - Power System for Accessing Icy Worlds
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Theresa L Benyo↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “lattice confinement fusion”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
A New Way of Triggering Nuclear Fusion
Lattice confinement fusion eliminates massive magnets and powerful lasers.
Lattice confinement fusion↗
Lattice Confinement Fusion-Fast-Fission
Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) • Published 2020, Physical Review C 1,2 • Patented and Commercialized 2024, Astral Systems • LCF in compact neutron generator 50x increase in neutron flux, 99% from LCF • Produce medical radioisotopes • LCF Fast-Fission Hybrid Reaction • No Enriched Uranium • Demonstrated with US Navy and GEC • Modeling and Scaling under NIAC and NSF funding • Application • Deep space • Power: Icy worlds • Propulsion: Nuclear Electric Propulsion • Planetary Surface Power: Lunar and Mars • Terrestrial • DoD Operational Energy • Onsite power for Data Centers
lattice confinement fusion↗
Lattice Confinement Fusion-Fast-Fission
Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) • Published 2020, Physical Review C 1,2 • Patented and Commercialized 2024, Astral Systems • LCF in compact neutron generator 50x increase in neutron flux, 99% from LCF • Produce medical radioisotopes • LCF Fast-Fission Hybrid Reaction • No Enriched Uranium • Demonstrated with US Navy and GEC • Modeling and Scaling under NIAC and NSF funding • Application • Deep space • Power: Icy worlds • Propulsion: Nuclear Electric Propulsion • Planetary Surface Power: Lunar and Mars • Terrestrial • DoD Operational Energy • Onsite power for Data Centers
nuclear electric propulsion↗
The Trajectory of Recent Solid State Fusion Results
Both NASA and Google have explored and funded Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) aka Solid-State Fusion or Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) research. NASA has funded efforts since 1989, and Google Research began in 2014. Google, and researchers initially-funded by Google, published significant scientific papers in Nature, Nature Communications and the Journal of Applied Physics. NASA began a significant set of LENR-triggering programs in 2012 resulting in papers in Physical Review C, the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and the Journal of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. Both NASA and Google engaged researchers across fields of nuclear physics, chemistry, electrochemistry, material science and more. NASA built upon early novel gas pumping experiments then followed the patented work of the US Navy SPAWAR (US8,419,919, “System and Method to Generate Particles”) and experiments with the Naval Surface Warfare Centers. Google supported researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), the University of British Columbia (UBC), MIT and others. This resulted in patent applications and two granted patents (US10264661B2, “Target structure for enhanced electron screening” and US10566094B2 “Enhanced electron screening through plasmon oscillations”). These separate efforts, unknown to the researchers at the time, provided the impetus for the DoE ARPA-E LENR program followed by the DARPA DSO “Mechanisms for Amplification of Fusion Reaction Rates in Solids” (MARRS) program. This document briefly describes the overlapping NASA and Google Research efforts in plasma loading and electron screening emphasizing the results of the latest paper in Nature Communications. The papers and patents cited are listed.
electron screening↗
An Extremely High Isp Spacecraft Propulsion System
Specific Impulse, Isp, is a measure of a rocket engine’s efficiency. It is calculated relative to the Earth’s gravitational field, where Isp = ve/ go, with go= 9.8 m/s2 and the escape velocity of the propellant, ve, in m/s. Chemical rockets have ve < 4.4x103 m/s and Isp < 450 seconds. As an alternative, the NASA Glenn Research Center developed multiple generations of Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP), high Isp, ion engines using Xe gas as a propellant. Consequently, over 100 SEP Ion Thrusters provide geo-synchronous station keeping along with deep space probes like Deep Space One and Dawn. These have ve » 2.9 x 104 m/s with Isp = 3x103 seconds. These thrusters have continuous operating lifetimes of thousands of hours allowing continuous acceleration making up for the very low thrust. Chang-Diaz’ Variable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR) has the potential for four times the propellant escape velocity and four times the specific impulse1. Unfortunately, this comes at a tremendous electrical power cost, estimated at 200 kWe for maintaining the International Space Station in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). Although nuclear fission and fusion reactors2 have been suggested for powering nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) it only doubles the Isp over chemical rockets but with comparable thrust. Instead, we propose using Lattice Confinement Fusion (LCF) reactions.
High Isp Propulsion↗
Low and High Temperature Non-Thermonuclear Fusion Approaches to Energy Production
We are responding to the RFI points A1, A2 and A3. We appreciate the need for a high density, high power, environmentally-benign and carbon-neutral power system. Although fusion has been considered for over 70 years, the nearly intractable means of maintaining a hydrogen plasma at temperatures exceeding the center of the Sun increasingly delays not only commercialization but even the scientific breakeven point. As a recent JASON report notes, the world-wide energy grid is moving towards decentralization which is counter to the large tokamak fusion de-vices necessary given their underdense plasmas. NASA has spent several years understanding and developing Lattice Confinement Fusion as an alternative to thermonuclear fusion by exploring many means of loading and triggering fusion reactions in deuterated metal lattices. Triggering has run the gamut from bremsstrahlung-initiated photo-neutrons to the role of electron screening in assisting these reactions. Electron screening may be responsible for both nuclear effects in deuterium pumped metals as well as fast neutrons observed from electrolytically driven cathodes. Electron screened fusion rate enhancement has been observed by others, including the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. NASA’s need for deep space power drove this research with a goal of a ten-year lifetime for a multi-kWe power system. Previous NASA studies have explored the use of fusion systems for nuclear thermal propulsion for manned spaceflight to the outer planets. Despite these designated uses, small-scale terrestrial power applications as well as medical isotope production are possible once scaling is achieved. ARPA-E can contribute to the Nation’s Green Energy mandates by funding research in this field that builds on condensed matter nuclear science findings by the US Navy and NASA.
L. P. Forsley↗
Contamination, Transportation or Transmutation in LENR Material Analyses
LENR experiments using various loading and triggering mechanisms rely on a variety of elemental and isotopic assays to determine LENR effects. These assays include optical microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis (SEM/EDX), X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). All of these methods observe the surface of a material. By dissolving or vaporizing the sample, Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Element Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) can determine elemental composition (ppb) or with mass spectroscopy, isotopes (ICP/MS). One can use a focused ion beam (FIB) to cut open a sample and observe the “cut” with either SEM/EDX, or Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (TOF-SIMS). High Purity Gamma Ray Spectroscopy (HPGe) and alpha/ beta Liquid Scintillator spectroscopy can be used. We’ve employed these assay methods in our NASA GRC research under both the Advanced Energy Conversion and Lattice Confinement Fusion Projects. However, there are limitations associated with each of these methods ranging from handling contamination, instrumental limitations including sensitivity and field of view, and sample preparation.
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions↗
Electron Screened and Enhanced Nuclear Reactions
In 1954, Salpeter calculated nuclear reaction rates would increase via weak and strong electron screening in stars. Astrophysical observations and laboratory astrophysics experiments have confirmed that electron screening reduces the Coulomb Barrier between charged particles. Fermi degenerate strong screening occurs when the electron density exceeds 10e23 electrons/cm3 in the cores of gas giant planets, White Dwarf Stars, the conduction bands of metals, deuterated LENR materials and Inertial Confinement Fusion targets at maximum compression. We have modelled these quantum mechanical effects with Density Functional Theory codes.
electron screening↗
Plasma-Induced Electron Screening at the Bragg Peak
Over 36 years of laboratory astrophysics experiments employing accelerated hydrogen isotope beams have demonstrated the role of electron screened, enhanced nuclear reactions. The astrophysical role of weak and strong electron screening was first discussed by Saltpeter [1] in 1954 and later by Hagino and Balantekin [2] in 2002. Assenbaum, et al. [3], Czerski, et al. [4], and Schenkel, et al., [5] have used accelerated deuteron beams on various metal targets and observed increased fusion rates over the expected Astrophysical, S(E), and Gamow Factors for bare deuteron-deuteron fusion rates. The Pines calculated both electron screened direct and asymptotic enhancement factors, f(E) [6]. Arguably, electron screening makes LENR possible.
plasma↗
Plasma-Induced Electron Screening at the Bragg Peak
Over 36 years of laboratory astrophysics experiments employing accelerated hydrogen isotope beams have demonstrated the role of electron screened, enhanced nuclear reactions. The astrophysical role of weak and strong electron screening was first discussed by Saltpeter in 1954 and later by Hagino and Balantekin in 2002. Assenbaum, et al., Czerski, et al., and Schenkel, et al., have used accelerated deuteron beams on various metal targets and observed increased fusion rates over the expected Astrophysical, S(E), and Gamow Factors for bare deuteron-deuteron fusion rates. The Pines calculated both electron screened direct and asymptotic enhancement factors, f(E). Arguably, electron screening makes LENR possible.
plasma↗
Low Level Neutron Spectroscopy
Although the most sought-after hot plasma fusion reactions use deuterium-tritium due to its higher fusion cross-section, the deuteron-deuteron fusion reaction is also used and is suspected in Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR). Although LENR reactions are largely aneutronic, the D(d,n)3He reaction produces a 2.45 MeV kinetic energy neutron. In the course of fusion experiments at NASA, ranging from bremsstrahlung photoneutron-initiated fusion to Pd/D co-deposition, we’ve made use of liquid and solid neutron scintillator spectrometers, bubble detectors and Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors (CR-39). We have observed the unfolded neutron energy spectrum from primary fusion and boosted fusion or stripped neutrons from photoneutron induced fusion. Despite an average deuteron energy of 64 keV, the peak unfolded neutron flux was only a few neutrons/minute. The major problem was the 10e14vgamma ray/neutrons/second flux ratio.
Neutron spectroscopy↗
Condensed Matter Nuclear Reactions in Nano-Materials
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
nanomaterials↗
Plasma Loading and Nuclear Reactions in Condensed Matter
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
plasma↗
Development And Testing Of The Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Diffusion Thruster
The Inertial Electrostatic Confinement (IEC) diffusion thruster is an experiment in active development that takes advantage of physical phenomenon that occurs during operation of an IEC device. The IEC device has been proposed as a fusion reactor design that relies on traditional electrostatic ion acceleration and is typically arranged in a spherical geometry. The design incorporates two radially-symmetric spherical electrodes. Often the inner electrode utilizes a grid of wire shaped in a sphere with a radius 15 to 50 percent of the radius of the outer electrode. The inner electrode traditionally has 90 percent or more transparency to allow particles (ions) to pass to the center of the spheres and collide/recombine in the dense plasma core at r=0. When operating the IEC, an unsteady plasma leak is typically observed passing out one of the gaps in the lattice grid of the inner electrode. The IED diffusion thruster is based upon the idea that this plasma leak can be used for propulsive purposes. The IEC diffusion thruster utilizes the radial symmetry found in the IEC device. A cylindrical configuration is employed here as it will produce a dense core of plasma the length of the cylindrical grid while promoting the plasma leak to exhaust through an electromagnetic nozzle at one end of the apparatus. A proof-of-concept IEC diffusion thruster is operational and under testing using argon as propellant (Figure 1).
Becnel, Mark D.↗