Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “legacy fuel data”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Cataloging Legacy Data from the Tritium Systems Test Assembly Program

The Tritium Systems Test Assembly (TSTA) at Los Alamos National Laboratory, operational from 1984 to 2001, was critical in advancing fusion fuel cycle technologies, including tritium storage, gas separation, and pumping. TSTA’s contributions, particularly in safe tritium operations, have influenced subsequent fusion projects. This paper discusses the ongoing effort to digitize and catalog TSTA’s historical data to create a searchable resource for the fusion research community. While the long-term objective is to develop a relational database for structured data management, the project remains in the early phase, with current efforts focused on scanning and indexing physical documents. Initial plans for database implementations are also presented, outlining key considerations for structure, query indexing, and standardization. As digitization progresses, future discussions will refine these implantation details to ensure an efficient and comprehensive system. This initiative aims to preserve critical legacy data, enhance the design of tritium system facilities, and support the next generation of fusion energy research.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Status Report on Fast Flux Test Facility Mechanistic Fuel Failure Experiment Analysis with BISON for Post Irradiation Examination Support

The renewed interest in metallic U-Zr nuclear fuel alloy has led to a drive for deeper understanding of the mechanisms driving the phenomena observed under irradiation conditions. The Department of Energy Advanced Fuel Campaign has developed infrastructure to support metallic fuel development, including Post Irradiation Examination (PIE) of legacy Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) Mechanistic Fuel Failure (MFF) experiments. The PIE performed on legacy FFTF MFF experiments gives insight on metallic fuel performance and can address the lack of knowledge and scarcity of reliable data identified in several studies over recent years. Unfortunately, PIE efforts can cost significant time and resources which can impede the progress of metallic U-Zr fuel development. Metallic U-Zr fuel performance modeling can be used to inform PIE efforts on regions of interest for relevant investigations and can help understand phenomena observed in PIE. This report demonstrates the current progress of FFTF MFF fuel performance simulations using the BISON fuel performance code and discusses the support provided by simulation to PIE efforts. Progress in temperature, profilometry, fission gas release, plenum pressure, and zirconium redistribution simulation results have been demonstrated.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

The Impact of the Halden Reactor Project on the Development of the Bison Fuel Performance Code

The Bison fuel performance code has been under development at Idaho National Laboratory by various programs within the U.S. Department of Energy since 2009. As part of any fuel performance code development, validation is necessary. To this end, several Halden experiments have been used. Early on, the focus was on validating the thermal mechanical behaviour, including pellet cladding mechanical interaction and fission gas release models implemented in Bison. Support for design-basis accident capabilities began in approximately 2014. Also in 2014, the development of models for accident tolerant fuel (ATF) concepts also began. This includes dopedUO2 fuel for which Halden has some experiments with temperature and fission gas release measurements. The Bison team has been fortunate to have two senior developers be secondees to Halden for a year: the late Dr. Giovanni Pastore from May 2015 to April 2016 and the now retired Dr. Richard Williamson in 2018. The paper will provide examples of Bison validation using Halden data for standard UO2 fuel under normal operation and loss-of-coolant accident condition, and ATF concepts. A tribute to the legacy that both the late Giovanni and retired Richard left on the Bison code is provided.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

The effect of temperature and burnup on U-10Zr metallic fuel chemical interaction with HT-9: A SEM-EDS study

The fuel cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) between Uranium-Zirconium-based metallic fuel and cladding materials during in-pile service is one of the most constraining phenomena affecting the performance of this fuel system. In this study, we investigated the effect of temperature and burnup on the FCCI development in two U-10 wt.% Zr (U-10Zr) fuel samples with HT-9 cladding irradiated as part of the MFF-3 irradiation test in the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). One sample achieved a burnup of 13.1 at.% and operated with an average inner cladding temperature of 530°C, while the other achieved a burnup of 8.5 at.% and was subjected to an average inner cladding temperature of 615°C. Automated scanning electron microscopy (SEM) back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging of entire fuel cross-sections and SEM energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis on specific fuel-cladding interface regions successfully provided a comprehensive characterization of the depth and type of interaction happening under different irradiation conditions. Further, our analysis shows that FCCI development on both fuel and cladding side is strongly influenced by the inner cladding temperature and, to some extent, the formation and integrity of Zr-rich layers between the fuel and cladding, while the impact of burnup and power is negligible. Measured FCCI thicknesses were compared to BISON simulations using both an empirical model based upon legacy data from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR II) irradiations and a mechanistic model currently under development for the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, showing satisfactory agreement. Nonetheless, this comparison supports the need for additional microstructural characterization in intermediate ranges of temperature, power, and burnups in prototypic-length pins.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Effects of Internal and External Heat Sources on Cladding Microstructure and Rupture Performance

In the event of a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA), the primary supply of cooling water for a nuclear reactor is lost, leading to a significant pressure differential across the cladding wall. Without adequate cooling, the fuel rods continue to heat as a result of fission reactions. Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL’s) Severe Accident Test Station (SATS) is currently focused on evaluating fuel cladding performance using an external infrared lamp as a heat source, whereas legacy testing primarily utilized an internal heating approach. While external heating may better simulate the effect of neighboring fuel rods heating a central rod, it may not accurately represent the internal heat absorption from the fuel during accident transients. The heating dynamics depend greatly on the fuel rod's position within the bundle and the reactor. To fully understand the implications of a LOCA event and assess the influence of internal heating on cladding performance, combined internal heating and pressurization capability was developed at ORNL. Tests were conducted to compare cladding segments heated internally (representing heat from the fuel within the rod) and externally (representing heat from adjacent fuel rods). The findings indicate that both internal and external heating result in comparable rupture temperatures during 5°C/s laboratory LOCA tests and also agree with legacy test data. Axial temperature gradients and internal heat source dispersal were found to significantly impact cladding deformation and rupture geometry. Clear modifications were outlined to further improve the capability with heating rates above 5°C/s.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Specifications of FIPD Fission Gas Release Data

All fission gas release data stored in the Fuels Irradiation & Physics Database (FIPD) was originally measured using the Gas Assay, Sample and Recharge (GASR) System in the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF). It is therefore called GASR data in FIPD. During the measurement of a sample, such as an irradiated EBR-II fuel element/capsule, a pinhole-sized region near the top of the element plenum was melted by a laser. Plenum gas then expanded into a calibrated volume (note: in this document, “sample” and “capsule/element” are used interchangeably consistent with GASR documents in FIPD). The pressure rise in the volume was recorded. Helium backfilling and expansion was then performed to determine the sample (e.g., fuel element plenum) volume using Boyle’s Law and assuming ideal gas behavior at constant temperature. With the plenum volume and the recorded pressure rise, the sample (e.g., fuel element plenum) pressure was derived with assumption of ideal gas law behavior. The plenum volume and pressure as well as the cladding temperature during the measurement were collected (GASR data in FIPD). Other records associated with the fission gas release data include: raw GASR data records including volumes and post-puncture pressures of seal head/sealing head and manifold, calibration data, backfilling gas pressure data, and the data analysis records. A sample(s) of the fission gas released from the plenum was collected by the GASR system into sample bottles. The chemical and isotopic composition of the gas sample was analyzed separately from GASR data, and will be discussed in a separate specification. The plenum volume, pressure, and cladding temperature during the measurement are typically utilized to determine the number of moles of gas in the plenum. This quantity is often compared to the number of moles of gas generated by fission events. However, calculating these values and their associated uncertainty is beyond the scope of this document, as it necessitates additional assumptions. The most important document to understand the FIPD fission gas data is the GASR operational manual (title: Gas Assay, Sample and Recharge System (GASR) operation and maintenance manual, HFEF/N OMM 4381, DOC. NO. W0018-0032-ES-00). This manual provides: (1) description of the GASR and the functions of each component (laser drilling, welding, seal head/sealing head, manifold, vacuum system, sample system, purge and gas tag system, etc.); (2) step-by-step guidance on calibrations, operations, and measurements; and (3) maintenance procedures and other details relating to the structure and operation of the GASR. Note that the original GASR operated until 2020. A new GASR with the same design and measurement methodology was installed in 2021. The specifications of the GASR presented on the HFEF website at this time are consistent with the ones given in the operational manual. The methods to calculate the plenum volume and pressures were not included in the operational manual, but were recorded in the legacy data analysis files. Details of the methods are given in Chapter 3.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Multifidelity uncertainty quantification with models based on dissimilar parameters

Multifidelity uncertainty quantification (MF UQ) sampling approaches have been shown to significantly reduce the variance of statistical estimators while preserving the bias of the highest-fidelity model, provided that the low-fidelity models are well correlated. However, maintaining a high level of correlation can be challenging, especially when models depend on different input uncertain parameters, which drastically reduces the correlation. Existing MF UQ approaches do not adequately address this issue. In this work, we propose a new sampling strategy that exploits a shared space to improve the correlation among models with dissimilar parameterization. We achieve this by transforming the original coordinates onto an auxiliary manifold using the adaptive basis (AB) method (Tipireddy and Ghanem, 2014). The AB method has two main benefits: (1) it provides an effective tool to identify the low-dimensional manifold on which each model can be represented, and (2) it enables easy transformation of polynomial chaos representations from high- to low-dimensional spaces. This latter feature is used to identify a shared manifold among models without requiring additional evaluations. Here we present two algorithmic flavors of the new estimator to cover different analysis scenarios, including those with legacy and non-legacy high-fidelity (HF) data. We provide numerical results for analytical examples, a direct field acoustic test, and a finite element model of a nuclear fuel assembly. For all examples, we compare the proposed strategy against both single-fidelity and MF estimators based on the original model parameterization.

42 ENGINEERING↗

Effects of Internal and External Heat Sources on Cladding Microstructure and Rupture Performance

In the event of a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA), the primary supply of cooling water for a nuclear reactor is lost, leading to a significant pressure differential across the cladding wall. Without adequate cooling, the fuel rods continue to heat as a result of fission reactions. Research at Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL’s) Severe Accident Test Station (SATS) is currently focused on evaluating fuel cladding performance using an external infrared lamp as a heat source, whereas legacy testing primarily utilized an internal heating approach. While external heating may better simulate the effect of neighboring fuel rods heating a central rod, it may not accurately represent the internal heat absorption from the fuel during accident transients. The heating dynamics depend greatly on the fuel rod's position within the bundle and the reactor. To fully understand the implications of a LOCA event and assess the influence of internal heating on cladding performance, combined internal heating and pressurization capability was developed at ORNL. Tests were conducted to compare cladding segments heated internally (representing heat from the fuel within the rod) and externally (representing heat from adjacent fuel rods). The findings indicate that both internal and external heating result in comparable rupture temperatures during 5°C/s laboratory LOCA tests and also agree with legacy test data. Axial temperature gradients and internal heat source dispersal were found to significantly impact cladding deformation and rupture geometry. Clear modifications were outlined to further improve the capability with heating rates above 5°C/s.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Experimental Covariance Determination for Critical Integral Experiments

Integral benchmarks for criticality safety and nuclear data validation require expensive uncertainty quantification studies. In general, uncertainty quantification techniques ignore correlations between experiments and shared parts. Experiments, such as the TEX (Thermal/Epithermal eXperiments) campaigns, consist of many shared parts, such as the ‘Jemima’ HEU fuel plates, which create a strong correlation in their uncertainties. While these correlations are known to exist, they are often not estimated due to the complexity of such calculations. This paper describes an intuitive method of determining the covariance for each of the experimental components, providing a correlation for each family of parts across the multiple cases examined within a benchmark. A proof-of-principle study using the TEX-HEU experimental campaign was performed and verified that the correlations can be calculated with information commonly found in the ICSBEP (International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project) benchmarks. This study showed that the introduction of model and experimental covariances reduces the χ 2 per degree of freedom from 2.203 to 1.179, indicating that the omission causes overly pessimistic bias quantifications. This technique can be seamlessly integrated to current benchmark evaluations as well as reevaluations of legacy benchmarks.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Evaluation of Oak Ridge National Laboratory Health Physics Research Reactor Operation Data for Critical Benchmark Creation [Abstract]

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Health Physics Research Reactor (HPRR) was a research reactor designed and built at ORNL in 1961. The critical assembly was using a highly enriched uranium and molybdenum alloy as the fuel, and it could be operated in steady-state or burst modes. The reactor was used for about 25 years to produce a lot of publications related to dosimetry, radiobiology and radiation detectors testing before its decommissioning in 1987. In recent years, the idea of using legacy operation data from the to create a valuable critical accident alarm system shielding benchmark arose. Such a benchmark has been submitted to the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiment Project (ICSBEP) Technical Review Group for a potential inclusion in the 2022 version of the handbook. Another way to use the valuable data from the operation of the HPRR is to evaluate the feasibility of the creation of a subcritical or prompt supercritical benchmark for inclusion in the ICSBEP or the International Reactor Physics Experiments Evaluation Project (IRPhEP) handbooks. To initiate a burst, the HPRR had to be operated in a slightly subcritical state for a few minutes. Then, the insertion of the burst control rod would greatly increase the reactivity of the system and start the burst. No critical configuration of the HPRR critical assembly could be located. The only information available concerns stable subcritical and prompt supercritical states, found in a burst experiments’ logbook. In the recovered logbook pages, information about 8 different bursts is available. The information includes the rods positions before and during a burst, the recorded subcritical reactor period and reactivity, and the burst fission yield derived from the temperature elevation sulfur pellet irradiation analysis. By using the HPRR logbook information and the as-built drawings of the critical assembly, a highly detailed model of the HPRR was created with SCALE 6.2.4/KENO-VI. Eight KENO-VI models were created to replicate the sub-critical assembly configurations described in the eight bursts from the recovered logbook pages. KENO-VI calculates k eff and it can be linked to a reactivity value in cents by using the delayed neutron fraction B eff , also calculated by KENO-VI. KENO-VI can also be used to model the prompt super-critical configurations of the HPRR and to assess the similarity with the burst measurements by comparing the calculated k eff and the measured fission yields between each burst. Unfortunately, high uncertainty exist and the obtained discrepancies between experiments and calculation results are high, compromising the creation of a valuable critical benchmark from HPRR operation data. The reasons of the discrepancies and potential ways to solve them are explored.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Open Rotor Development

The ERA project executed a comprehensive test program for Open Rotor aerodynamic and acoustic performance. System studies used the data to estimate the fuel burn savings and acoustic margin for an aircraft system with open rotor propulsion. The acoustic measurements were used to produce an auralization that compares the legacy blades to the current generation of open rotor designs.

Open Rotors↗

Nuclear Criticality Safety Integral Experiment Covariance Determination

Integral benchmarks for criticality safety and nuclear data validation require expensive uncertainty quantification studies. Commonly, the uncertainty quantification ignores correlations between experiments that share components. Experiments such as the TEX (Thermal/Epithermal eXperiments) campaigns consist of many shared parts between experiments, such as fuel, which creates a strong correlation in their errors. While these correlations are known to exist, they are often not estimated due to the complexity of such calculations. This paper describes a software package that uses an intuitive method of determining the covariance for each of the experimental components, providing a correlation matrix for each family of parts across the multiple cases examined within a benchmark. The code uses the TEX-HEU campaign as a proof of concept, and we show that the correlations can be calculated with information commonly found in ICSBEP (International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project) benchmarks. The estimated covariances are used in χ 2 trending studies to evaluate their impact on nuclear data validation. The covariance determination code can be easily integrated into current benchmark evaluations as well as reevaluating legacy benchmark uncertainties. Uncertainty correlation calculations should become the baseline for criticality safety integral experiment benchmarks and can now be easily calculated with the described software package.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Validation of Fast Reactor Depletion Tools Using EBR-II Measured Data

The validation of simulation tools for calculating fuel depletion and evolution in fast reactors is vital for design, licensing, deployment, operations, and material accountancy. The Physics Analysis Database (PADB) and Analytical Laboratory (AL) database contain measured data collected from Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) and were used to validate the most recent versions of the Argonne Reactor Computation (ARC) tool suite and ORIGEN-S for calculating isotopic compositions in irradiated fast reactor fuel. The PADB contains important modeling and operational information about the EBR-II core design, fuel cycle, and analytical results from the legacy versions of the ARC tool suite. The AL database contains the measured isotopic compositions of irradiated samples taken from core subassemblies. A new procedure was developed for the ARC tool suite to perform the EBR-II depletion simulation, as well as to perform more detailed isotopic calculations using ORIGEN-S calculations by coupling it with the ARC suite. Both the ARC and ARC-ORIGEN results were compared with the AL measured data for all relevant samples and showed good agreement for the major actinides. Good agreement with measured data was also achieved using the ARC-ORIGEN approach for several fission products.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Development of a U-19Pu-10Zr fuel performance benchmark case based on the IFR-1 experiment

Metallic nuclear fuels are subject to research and development for use in advanced reactors. Robust, accurate metallic fuel performance models are important for the design, safety analysis, and licensing of these reactors. However, metallic fuel performance models require additional development; they are not as mature as UO 2 fuel performance models. A benchmark case based on the IFR-1 experiment was developed to better gauge the accuracy of existing models, identify models for high-priority development, and potentially quantify any future improvements made by further model development.This work collected publicly available information on the IFR-1 experiment and used it to develop the benchmark case. Fuel behavior during the IFR-1 irradiation was simulated by using the fuel performance code BISON, and the predicted results were compared with postirradiation examination data from the IFR-1 experiment. Furthermore, a sensitivity study and tuning studies were performed as a preliminary investigation into the causes of inaccurate temperature and dimensional change predictions.The benchmark predicted reasonably accurate values for the burnup and fission gas release. There was error in the predicted temperatures, which could be explained by uncertainty in the input parameters and legacy temperatures. BISON over-predicted dimensional changes in the fuel and cladding. The sensitivity study showed that the dimensional changes were most sensitive to the fuel swelling anisotropy and the cladding void swelling model. Future benchmark and model development should focus on cladding swelling behaviors to improve dimensional change predictions.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Performance Testing of Moving Bed Gasifier Using Biomass and Waste Fuels to Generate Low-Cost Clean Hydrogen

Our need for hydrogen is growing as the world transitions toward a low-carbon future. Hydrogen provides long-term energy storage for grid stability in a solar- and wind-dominated power market and can be used to decarbonize other sectors. One promising process for generating low-cost hydrogen that produces net-negative carbon is to gasify biomass with a mixture of legacy coal wastes, waste plastics, and other wastes with carbon capture. Use of waste fuels lowers costs and diverts waste from landfills. EPRI is leading a project, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, to conduct performance testing of modular, moving-bed gasification for the generation of low-cost, clean hydrogen from biomass mixed with legacy coal waste, waste plastic, and/or refuse derived fuels. The work scope includes preparation of multiple pellet feedstocks using biomass (both woody biomass and corn stover) with a mixture of legacy coal waste, plastic waste (wire insulation), and refuse-derived fuel (RDF). These pelletized feedstocks are being qualified based on performance testing of selected fuel blend compositions in updraft moving-bed gasifier located in Sardinia, Italy. Testing is being conducted to obtain relevant data to advance the modular design of the moving-bed gasification process, and successfully use these feedstocks to produce a high hydrogen content raw syngas that can be shifted to produce clean hydrogen. Testing results will be used to determine the effects of the various fuels on feedstock development, the resulting products (i.e., syngas compositions, organic condensate production, and ash characteristics), and impacts on gasifier operations.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Cybersecurity Standards for Distributed Energy Resources: Gaps and Harmonization Strategy

This report examines cybersecurity standards for Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) in light of their rapid growth and increasing integration into energy systems. It identifies critical gaps in existing frameworks, including inadequate coverage of DER-specific challenges, complexities in implementing comprehensive standards, integration issues with legacy systems, adoption hurdles for newer standards, and a lack of harmonization across regulatory landscapes. The analysis highlights vulnerabilities such as data integrity risks, unauthorized device control, and denial-of-service attacks across various DER technologies like solar PV, wind turbines, energy storage systems, and hydrogen fuel cells. The report proposes a harmonization strategy to address these deficiencies by developing unified cybersecurity requirements, certification programs, and training resources while fostering collaboration among stakeholders such as government agencies, industry groups, DER operators, manufacturers, and research institutions. A phased roadmap is outlined to refine and implement these measures through pilot testing and widespread adoption. Ultimately, the report underscores the urgent need for coordinated efforts to enhance DER cybersecurity and ensure the reliable operation of future energy systems.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Modeling Radionuclide Inventories in MSR Off-Gas Systems with Radiochemical Transport Analysis

Molten salt reactors (MSR) contain unique characteristics that may require enhancements to modeling tools to accurately predict phenomena. One characteristic that may be advantageous to leverage during normal operation is on-line processing of the circulating fuel salt, such as an off-gas system (OGS) to remove volatile fission products. Therefore, new modeling tools must be developed to integrate spatial resolution and chemistry effects into fuel depletion tools to be able to account for these non-core sources of radioactivity. Such types of radiochemical transport analysis tools were used to estimate the removal rates for 12 elements within a flow model of the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE) by optimizing against legacy experimental data of the gas-borne (GB) percentages of 12 nuclides. The removal rates were used in a depletion model to calculate the FP inventory that enters the MSRE OGS. Calculations are in good agreement with the empirical GB percentages reported for the 12 nuclides, which validates the approach and verifies each tool’s treatment of the radiochemical flow effects. The OGS inventory is discussed in terms of the largest nuclide contributors to activity, dose consequence, decay heat, and elemental composition. Finally, insights from the study allow recommendations to be made for future code development activities.

Shahbazi, Shayan↗

Update of Emission Factors of Greenhouse Gases and Criteria Air Pollutants, and Generation Efficiencies of the U.S. Electricity Generation Sector

The last decade has seen a steady evolution of the electricity generation sector. Fuels used for electricity generation have shifted from coal to cleaner energy sources such as natural gas and renewables including solar, wind, and other renewable sources. The share of U.S. electricity generated from coal decreased from 45% in 2010 to 24% in 2019, and is expected to decrease further to 13% by 2050. The conversion efficiency of electricity generation has also increased gradually for fuels such as natural gas due as less-efficient old generators are retired and more-efficient generators replace them. These changes in the electricity generation industry are likely to cause changes in the emissions from power generation units. Emission factors of greenhouse gases (GHG) including CO 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 O, and criteria air pollutants (CAPs) including CO, NO x , PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and SO x , from power plants are important parameters for estimating life-cycle emissions associated with vehicle electrification, energy systems, and the production of materials and chemicals. The electricity generation technologies and associated emission factors in the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Technologies (GREET) model need to be updated to reflect recent developments in the electricity generation sector. The most recent update of the electricity generation emission factors in GREET adopted a mixed method. The emission factors of CH 4 , N 2 O, NO x , and SOx were estimated using a “topdown” approach by dividing the total emissions by the total net electricity generation, because emission data of these pollutants are readily available in the Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID). For other CAPs such as CO, VOC, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 , emission data were not reported in eGRID. A “bottom-up” method was used to estimate the emission factors for these pollutants by considering generic uncontrolled emission factors and the pollutant removal efficiencies of emission control technologies adopted in the electricity generation sector. However, the uncontrolled emission factors and the emission removal efficiencies of various emission control technologies considered in the 2012 study came from the legacy AP-42 emission factors, and may not reflect the actual emission performances of the electricity generation sector of today. To leverage new data that recently became available, especially emission data measured from continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS), we developed a new “top-down” approach to estimate efficiencies and GHG and CAP emission factors for electricity generation from combustion of individual fuel types by individual combustion technologies on the basis of power-generation data from U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA’s) form EIA-923, and plant emission data from Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Clean Air Markets Division (CAMD) dataset and National Emissions Inventory (NEI) dataset. Detailed discussion of the method and data used in this study can be found in Section 2.1. With this topdown approach, we aim to improve the estimates of energy efficiencies and emission factors for power plants using a more consistent methodology, and to update the emission factors, generation efficiencies, and generation technologies mixes in GREET to reflect recent technology advancements in the electricity generation sector.

20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS↗