Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium metal anode stabilization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Crossover Effects of Transition‐Metal Ions on Lithium‐Metal Anode in Localized High Concentration Electrolytes

Abstract The stability of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) is critical to the cycle life of lithium‐metal batteries (LMBs). While the crossover effect of transition‐metal ions from cathode to anode is extensively studied in lithium‐ion batteries with graphite anodes, its impact on LMBs remains largely unexplored. Herein, this study investigates the electrochemical and chemical properties of SEI layers formed on lithium‐metal anodes in localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) containing dissolved transition‐metal ions (Ni 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Co 2+ ). It is demonstrated that transition‐metal ions in LHCEs reduce the coulombic efficiency (CE) and significantly degrade the cycle life of LMBs. Time‐of‐flight secondary‐ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) reveals that SEI structures differ depending on the dissolved TM ion, with Mn 2+ and Co 2+ inducing severe destabilization, and Ni 2+ exhibiting a less severe impact. These findings underscore the detrimental effects of transition‐metal crossover effects in LMB systems.

Guo, Zezhou [Materials Science and Engineering Pro↗

Polymer-Stabilized Liquid Metal Nanoparticles as a Scalable Current Collector Engineering Approach Enabling Lithium Metal Anodes

Dendrites and dead lithium formation over prolonged cycling have long been challenges that hinder the safe implementation of metallic Li anodes. In this study, we employ polymer-stabilized liquid metal nanoparticles (LM-P NPs) of eutectic gallium indium (EGaIn) to create uniform Li nucleation sites enabling homogeneous lithium electrodeposition. Block copolymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(acrylic acid) (PEO-b-PAA) were grafted onto the EGaIn surface, forming stabilized, well-dispersed NPs. Using a scalable spray coating approach, LM-P NPs were fabricated on copper current collectors, providing lithiophilic PEO sites and interactive carboxyl groups to guide Li deposition. The Li-EGaIn alloying process greatly reduced the Li + diffusion barrier, enabling fast Li transport through the coating layer, resulting in decreased nucleation overpotential. Therefore, about five times lower Li nucleation overpotential was obtained on the LM-P modified Cu with an optimal composition of the polymers than the bare Cu substrates. DFT computations was used to reveal the binding properties between the LM-P layer and Li. Due to the regulated Li plating/stripping process, as-obtained 30 μm Li anodes paired with LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 (NCM8 11 ) with a negative/positive electrode capacity (N/P) ratio ~ 10 exhibited stable cycling performance at 0.5C for over 250 cycles, with an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.55%. Ultrathin Li (1 μm) anodes with an N/P ratio ~ 0.6 were also demonstrated in Li|LiFePO 4 cells, which examined the stabilization of Li by LM-P NPs and monitored practical loadings of Li anodes that are close to anode-free systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Crossover Effects in Lithium–Metal Batteries with a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and High–Nickel Cathodes

While crossover effects, such as transition–metal dissolution, are well–understood in lithium–ion batteries, there is a limited understanding of the effect of crossed–over chemical species in cells with oxide cathodes and lithium–metal anodes. In this work, the effects of cathode–to–anode and anode–to–cathode crossover are explored in cells with a high–nickel cathode, lithium–metal anode, and a localized high–concentration electrolyte (LHCE). Dramatic differences are found among cells; a lithium–metal anode paired with a high–nickel cathode has three times less solid–electrolyte interphase growth than a lithium–metal anode paired with lithium metal. Meanwhile, the cathode paired with lithium metal has 2–3 times higher capacity fade than the same cathode paired with graphite. Decomposition and crossover of the FSI salt is identified as the main source of these changes. The fluorine in the salt is first stripped off at the lithium–metal anode, and the remaining sulfur and nitrogen cross over to the cathode. Although the reduction in fluorine content harms the surface stability of the cathode, the lithium–metal anode benefits from the increased fluorine content. Furthermore, because the lithium–metal anode is typically the bottleneck for cells with thin lithium, crossover is a major factor in the enhanced performance of lithium–metal batteries with LHCE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Terminally fluorinated glycol ether electrolyte for lithium metal batteries

Despite being an excellent candidate for lithium metal batteries due to its stability towards lithium metal, ethereal solvent suffers from relatively low anodic stability, rendering it incompatible with high voltage cathode. Although the anodic stability of ethereal solvent can be enhanced by fluorination, the lithium solvating ability of fluorinated ethers is largely reduced. As a result, common hydrofluoroethers, such as 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropylether (TTE) and bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) ether (BTFE) are not able to dissolve any lithium salt, albeit enhanced oxidation potential. Therefore, new fluorinated glycol ethers were synthesized in this research. The diglyme analog, which was terminally fluorinated, demonstrated high anodic stability and excellent capability to facilitate lithium plating/stripping. Unlike its non-fluorinated counterpart, the fluorinated diglyme analog displayed outstanding compatibility with lithium hexafluorophosphate, which is an essential salt in lithium-ion batteries. Here it was shown that the electrolyte based on fluorinated diglyme analog with fluoroethylene carbonate as co-solvent enabled highly stable cycling of Li-metal batteries pairing with layered oxide cathode.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Establishing the Stability of Cross-Linked Poly(ethylene oxide) Blended with Poly(pentyl malonate) against Lithium Metal Anodes

This work focuses on an electrolyte obtained by infusing linear poly(pentyl malonate) (PPM) chains into cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO). A lithium salt is added to enable ion transport. Obtaining this electrolyte is only possible because PPM is miscible with PEO irrespective of salt concentration. The properties of this electrolyte are compared against two benchmarks: an electrolyte obtained by infusing linear PEO into cross-linked PEO and cross-linked PEO with no added linear polymer. Measurements of storage moduli and ion transport efficacies are found to be similar across the three electrolytes, suggesting similar stability behavior against lithium metal anodes, based on current theoretical models. Instead, the PPM infused electrolyte outperforms the other two electrolytes. In the cycling tests, the current supported by the PPM infused electrolyte was a factor of 20 higher than that of the PEO infused electrolyte and a factor of 4 higher than that of the cross-linked PEO electrolyte. In the unidirectional plating experiments, the other two electrolytes fail after about 4 h or less, while the PPM containing electrolyte did not fail during the 140 h testing period. Insight into the nature of failure modes was obtained using synchrotron hard X-ray microtomography.

Gido, Lily [University of California, Berkeley]↗

Electron Delocalization Enables Sulfone-based Single-solvent Electrolyte for Lithium Metal Batteries

Li-metal batteries (LMB), although providing high energy density, face the grand challenge of identifying good electrolyte solvents for cycling. Common solvents are either only stable against lithium metal anode or only stable against LiNi x MnyCo 1-x-y O 2 (NMC) cathode. There is significant effort trying to increase the cathode stability for ether electrolytes, which are in general stable against lithium metal anode. In comparison, there is much less effort trying to increase the anode stability of electrolytes that are stable against NMC cathode. One example is the sulfone-based electrolyte. It has good cathode stability but is hindered from practical application because of (1) high viscosity and poor wetting capability and (2) poor anode stability. Here, we solve these issues by modifying the sulfone molecules using resonance and electron withdrawing effect. The viscosity is significantly reduced by delocalizing the electrons through introducing additional oxygen on the molecular backbone and applying appropriate fluorination. The resulting molecule 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl mesylate (TFEM) has decreased Lewis basicity and less reactivity toward Li + . In conclusion, the electrolyte based on TFEM as single solvent enables cycling of LMB under harsh conditions of low N/P ratio (21 mg/cm 2 NMC811 and 50 μm Li) with 90 % capacity retention after 160 cycles at C/3 discharge rate.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Electron Delocalization Enables Sulfone-based Single-solvent Electrolyte for Lithium Metal Batteries

Li-metal batteries (LMB), although providing high energy density, face the grand challenge of identifying good electrolyte solvents for cycling. Common solvents are either only stable against lithium metal anode or only stable against LiNi x Mn y Co 1-x-y O 2 (NMC) cathode. There is significant effort trying to increase the cathode stability for ether electrolytes, which are in general stable against lithium metal anode. In comparison, there is much less effort trying to increase the anode stability of electrolytes that are stable against NMC cathode. One example is the sulfone-based electrolyte. It has good cathode stability but is hindered from practical application because of (1) high viscosity and poor wetting capability and (2) poor anode stability. Here, we solve these issues by modifying the sulfone molecules using resonance and electron withdrawing effect. The viscosity is significantly reduced by delocalizing the electrons through introducing additional oxygen on the molecular backbone and applying appropriate fluorination. The resulting molecule 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl mesylate (TFEM) has decreased Lewis basicity and less reactivity toward Li + . The electrolyte based on TFEM as single solvent enables cycling of LMB under harsh conditions of low N/P ratio (21 mg/cm 2 NMC811 and 50 μm Li) with 90 % capacity retention after 160 cycles at C/3 discharge rate.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Uncovering the Solvation Structure of LiPF 6 –Based Localized Saturated Electrolytes and Their Effect on LiNiO 2 –Based Lithium–Metal Batteries

Electrolytes play a critical role in stabilizing highly reactive lithium-metal anodes (LMAs) and high-voltage cathodes for rechargeable lithium-metal batteries (LMBs). Localized high concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have achieved remarkable success in the context of LMBs. However, the state-of-the-art LHCEs are based on LiFSI salt, which is prohibitively expensive. Here, the utility of low-cost LiPF 6 salt in localized saturated electrolytes (LSEs) with a series of solvents and diluents in LMBs with cobalt-free LiNiO 2 cathode is systematically explored. Experimental and theoretical analyses reveal that the unique solvation structure formed not only changes the distribution of solvents and anions but also alters the atom–atom distances within them, leading to different reduction and oxidation stabilities compared to low-concentration electrolytes. In addition, LSEs help form LiF-rich interphase layers on the LMA and LiNiO 2 cathode, protecting the electrodes from degradation during cycling. Different LSEs also lead to differences in lithium plating morphology and impedance buildup during cycling, impacting the performance of LMBs. Finally, the solvent and diluent must be carefully selected for compatibility with a lithium salt when developing LHCEs and LSEs for LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Scalable Metal Phosphides as a Dual-Function Catalyst and Lithium–Metal Stabilizer for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Although lithium-sulfur batteries are a promising approach for achieving high energy density, their commercial viability is limited by poor sulfur redox kinetics, polysulfide shuttling, and lithium metal instability. To resolve these issues concurrently, we utilize titanium phosphides (TiP x ) as dual-function materials to catalyze the sulfur redox kinetics at the cathode and stabilize the lithium metal at the anode. Importantly, these phosphides are synthesized via a facile, highly scalable one-step mechanochemical ball-milling process that does not generate toxic phosphine gas as a byproduct, making it more viable compared to traditional synthesis routes. At the cathode, we find that higher phosphorus contents in the phosphide as in TiP 2 leads to superior redox kinetics and reduced polysulfide shuttling due to improved polysulfide adsorption ability. Meanwhile, at the anode, TiP 2 acts as a lithiophilic seed in a 3-dimensional carbonaceous host that can be lithiated to form a Li-TiP 2 /C composite. This composite alleviates the volume changes of lithium metal while utilizing TiP 2 to form a more favorable solid-electrolyte interface (SEI). Full coin cells employing TiP 2 in the cathode and anode were assembled with a sulfur loading of 4 mg cm -2 and a negative to positive capacity (N/P) ratio of 6. After 50 cycles, the TiP 2 full cells retain a higher capacity of 643 mA h g -1 compared to 422 mA h g -1 for the conventional cell, despite the higher N/P ratio of 12 for the conventional cell. Altogether, we showcase the viability of employing metal phosphides as catalysts in practical lithium-sulfur batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Chemical and Electrochemical Characterization of Hot–Pressed Li 6 PS 5 Cl Solid State Electrolyte: Operating Pressure–Invariant High Ionic Conductivity

Sulfide solid state electrolytes (SSE) are among the most promising materials in the effort to replace liquid electrolytes, largely due to their comparable ionic conductivities. Among the sulfide SSEs, Argyrodites (Li 6 PS 5 X, X=Cl, Br, I) further stand out due to their high theoretical ionic conductivity (~1×10 –2 S cm –1 ) and interfacial stability against reactive metal anodes such as lithium. Generally, solid state electrolyte pellets are pressed from powder feedstock at room temperature, however, pellets fabricated by cold pressing consistently result in low bulk density and high porosity, facilitating interfacial degradation reactions and allowing dendrites to propagate through the pores and grain boundaries. Here, we demonstrate the mechanical and electrochemical implications of hot-pressing standalone LPSCl SSE pellets with near-theoretical ionic conductivity, superior cycling performance, and enhanced mechanical stability. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and x-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD) analysis reveal no chemical changes to the Argyrodite surface after hot pressing up to 250°C. Furthermore, we use electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to understand mechanical stability of Argyrodite SSE pellets as a function of externally applied pressure, demonstrating for the first time pressed standalone Argyrodite pellets with near-theoretical conductivities at external pressures below 14 MPa.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Large-Area Lithium Electrode Sub-Assemblies (LESAs) Protected by Self Forming Microstructured Polymer-Inorganic Single-Ion Conducting Composites (Final Report)

The aim of this project is to realize a low-cost, safe, reversible, high-areal capacity lithium metal electrode though the use of scalable, low-cost Lithium Electrode Sub-Assembly (LESA). At its core, the LESA applies novel polymer scaffolds to nanostructure inorganic ionic materials into high-conductivity composites that stabilize lithium anodes during high-rate, high-capacity cycling in lithium metal batteries. Fundamental investigations from this project identified a newly defined region of stability for composites with respect to the shear modulus and lithium molar volume ratio which have been broadly applied in the scientific literature for a multitude of different systems. The advancements achieved in this field have furthered the fundamental understanding of lithium metal electrode chemistry and degradation mechanisms and resulted in a lithium metal anode with improved cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Bi-Layer Dense/Porous Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Enhanced Lithium-Metal Stability

Due to its high theoretical capacity and low electrochemical potential, lithium metal is a highly investigated anode for next-generation high-energy batteries. However, the unstable chemical and topographical heterogeneous surface of lithium gives rise to safety and efficiency concerns that prevent it from being utilized in practical applications. Exposure to electrolyte leads to non-uniform, mixed organic-inorganic solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation, starting a cascading to non-uniform flux distribution, consumption of active materials, and dendrite growth. The SEI is the key feature that will lead to harnessing the capabilities possible with lithium metal. In this work, the formation of a closed-host bi-layer solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) improves the stability of lithium anode. This is successfully realized by forming an interconnected porous LiF-rich artificial SEI in contact with Li metal, and a dense, stable in-situ formed upper layer SEI. The porous layer increases the number of Li/LiF interfaces, which reduces local volume fluctuations and improves Li+ diffusion along these interfaces. Additionally, the tortuous porous structure guides uniform Li+ flux distribution and mechanically suppresses dendrite propagation. The dense upper layer of the SEI accomplishes a closed-host design through reaction with LiNO3 additive and prevents continuous consumption of active materials seen without the additive included in the electrolyte. The duality of a dense top layer with porous bottom layer led to extended cycle life and improved rate performance, evidenced with symmetric cell testing, as well as full cell testing paired with sulfur and LiFePO4 (LFP) cathodes. This work is a good example of a rational design of the SEI, based on comprehensive consideration of various critical factors to improve Li-metal anode stability, and highlights a new pathway to improve cycling and rate performances of Li metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

In-situ formation of stable interface towards Li-in anode for halide solid-state electrolyte

Halide-based solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) are promising candidates for next-generation all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) due to their high ionic conductivity and chemical stability. However, their poor interfacial compatibility with lithium metal anode and Li-In alloy significantly hinder practical application due to the requirement for a protective interlayer. In this study, a novel approach to overcome this limitation is presented by introducing iron (Fe) doping into Li 3 InCl 6 (LIC), which enables direct and stable contact with lithium-indium (Li-In) metal without a protective interlayer. Thermodynamic and computational analyses identified Fe 3+ as a suitable dopant based on its similar reduction potential to In 3+ and structural compatibility within the halide lattice. The synthesized 10 at. % Fe-doped LIC exhibits high phase purity, retained ionic conductivity, and notably improved interfacial stability. Full-cell tests using Fe-LIC achieve over 300 cycles with 80 % capacity retention. At the same time, symmetric Li-In/ Fe-LIC/ Li-In cells sustain over 500 h of operation, representing the first reported long-term cycling of LIC-based ASSLB without a protective interlayer. In conclusion, this work establishes Fe doping as an effective strategy to stabilize halide SSEs of In system against Li-In alloy, thereby simplifying cell architecture and advancing the development of safer, high-performance halide-based solid-state electrolytes.

Halide-based solid-state electrolytes↗

A Fluoride-Rich Solid-Like Electrolyte Stabilizing Lithium Metal Batteries

To address the problems associated with Li metal anodes, a fluoride-rich solid-like electrolyte (SLE) that combines the benefits of solid-state and liquid electrolytes is presented. Its unique triflate-group-enhanced frame channels facilitate the formation of a functional inorganic-rich solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), which not only improves the reversibility and interfacial charge transfer of Li anodes but also ensures uniform and compact Li deposition. Furthermore, these triflate groups contribute to the decoupling of Li + and provide hopping sites for rapid Li + transport, enabling a high room-temperature ionic conductivity of 1.1 mS cm -1 and a low activation energy of 0.17 eV, making it comparable to conventional liquid electrolytes. Consequently, Li symmetric cells using such SLE achieve extremely stable plating/stripping cycling over 3500 h at 0.5 mA cm -2 and support a high critical current up to 2 mA cm -2 . Here, the assembled Li||LiFePO 4 solid-like batteries exhibit exceptional cyclability for over 1 year and a half, even outperforming liquid cells. Additionally, high-voltage cylindrical cells and high-capacity pouch cells are demonstrated, corroborating much simpler processibility in battery assembly compared to all-solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Enhanced cycling stability of Ni-rich Li-metal cells enabled by dual vinylene carbonate and tris(trimethylsilyl)borate electrolyte additives

NMC811 (LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 ) and other high-Ni chemistries are promising cathode candidates for high-performance electric vehicles, owing to their high energy density and reduced cobalt content. However, their long-term cycling stability is hindered by surface degradation, particularly when paired with conventional electrolytes and a lithium metal anode. Electrolyte additives represent a practical approach to enhance interfacial stability and improve overall battery performance by promoting the formation of a robust electrolyte–electrode interphase (EEI). In this study, we revisit the effects of vinylene carbonate (VC) and tris(trimethylsilyl)borate (TMSB) additives on single-crystal SC-NMC811||Li cells. While TMSB only increases the open-circuit voltage and initial overpotential, it delivers superior capacity retention at C/3 compared to cells containing only VC or a dual additive system (VC and TMSB). Notably, under fast-charging conditions (1C, 2C, and 5C), the dual-additive system significantly outperforms other formulations, achieving markedly enhanced long-term capacity retention. Comprehensive electrochemical and spectroscopic analyses reveal that the VC/TMSB dual-additive system suppresses surface transition in NMC811, mitigates structural degradation by forming a thin, LiF-deficient cathode-electrolyte interface (CEI) layer. Moreover, they promote smooth and dense Li deposition and generate a LiF-deficient solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Consequently, the synergistic stabilization of both the CEI and SEI effectively limits the overall cell impedance growth during extended cycling. These findings provide key insights into co-additive strategies for engineering stable interfaces in high-energy Ni-rich Li-metal batteries.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Design rules for liquid crystalline electrolytes for enabling dendrite-free lithium metal batteries

Significance Lithium metal anodes offer a promising approach to improve the energy density of batteries to enable electrification of transportation. Dendrite suppression plagues the safety and cycle life of lithium metal anodes. In this work, we perform a comprehensive analysis of the use of liquid crystalline electrolytes in lithium metal anodes. We report theoretical demonstration of spontaneous stabilization of metal-electrode position using a liquid crystalline electrolyte due to the energy that arises when the molecules of the liquid crystal reorient. Building on this, we develop a comprehensive set of molecular-level design rules that will pave the way toward the realization of this new class of electrolytes for practical lithium metal batteries.

Ahmad, Zeeshan↗

Diversity-oriented synthesis of polymer membranes with ion solvation cages

Microporous polymers feature shape-persistent free volume elements (FVEs), which are permeated by small molecules and ions when used as membranes for chemical separations, water purification, fuel cells, and batteries. It remains a significant challenge to identify FVEs with analyte specificity, due to difficulties in generating microporous polymer libraries with sufficient diversity for screening their properties. Here, we describe a diversity-oriented synthetic (DOS) strategy for microporous polymer membranes from which we identified those whose FVEs serve as solid solvation cages for lithium ions (Li + ). Furthermore, key elements of our strategy included diversification of bis(catechol)-type monomers via multi-component Mannich reactions to introduce Li+-coordinating functionality within individual FVEs, topology-enforcing polymerizations for generating macromolecular skeletal diversity for networking FVEs into different pore architectures, and several classes of on-polymer reactions for diversifying pore geometries and dielectric properties. Lead candidate polymer membranes featuring explicit ion solvation cages exhibited both higher ionic conductivity and higher cation transference number than control membranes where FVEs were aspecific, which indicates conventional bounds for membrane permeability and selectivity for ion transport can be overcome.4 These advantages are tied to enhanced Li + partitioning from the electrolyte when the cages are present, higher diffusion barriers for anions within the pores, and network-enforced restrictions on the number of solvent molecules bound to Li+ by comparison to the bulk electrolyte, which reduces the effective mass of the working ion. Such membranes show promise as anode-stabilizing interlayers in high-voltage lithium-metal batteries for electric mobility.

42 ENGINEERING↗