Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium sulfide”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

A Nickel-Decorated Carbon Flower/Sulfur Cathode for Lean-Electrolyte Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries involve a reversible conversion reaction between sulfur and lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) via a series of soluble lithium polysulfide intermediates (LiPSs), enabling a high theoretical specific capacity of 1675 mAh g –1 . However, this process exhibits large polarization and low sulfur utilization and suffers critical capacity fade. The primary approach to tackle the problem has so far been to infiltrate sulfur into nanostructured carbon. Furthermore, most studies using porous carbon as host materials have tested with high electrolyte to sulfur ratios (E/S) (generally > 15 µL mg –1 ) that compromise the cell-level energy density. Here, a flower-shaped porous carbon structure with nickel nanoparticles that can address the problems discussed above is designed. First, the 3D flower-shaped carbon structure enables short ionic transport lengths. Second, the small pore diameters <10 nm and high specific surface areas > 3300 m 2 g –1 with sufficient pore volume are ideal for charging performance for low E/S ratios. Finally, Ni nanoparticles are employed onto the flower-shaped network to improve the reaction kinetics. Collectively, it is successfully demonstrated that the batteries with a high mass loading of 5 mg cm –2 and a 5 µL mg –1 E/S ratio can retain cycle retention of 70% after 150 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Fluorinated Glyme Solvents to Extend Lithium-Sulfur Battery Life (Final Technical Report, Unlimited)

This project investigated a number of partially fluorinated glymes (PFGs) as electrolyte cosolvents to improve the performance of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. A major issue in Li-S cells is the electrochemical reaction of sulfur in the cathode to form lithium polysulfides (LPS) that dissolve in the electrolyte. Those LPS are electrochemically and chemically reactive at the lithium anode, resulting in lithium sulfide deposition on the anode and also electrochemical reaction at both the anode and cathode, leading to a “polysulfide shuttle” and reduced coulombic efficiency (CE) and self-discharge of the cell. PFGs reduce the solubility of LPS while maintaining good solubility of lithium salts such as LiTFSI. By adjusting the amount of PFG as cosolvent in the electrolyte, we showed that the solubility of LPS in the electrolyte can be tuned. (It is not desirable to completely eliminate LPS in the electrolyte, as they facilitate electrochemical reaction of the electrically insulating S 8 and Li 2 S within the cathode by shuttling charge between them and the conductive carbon.) Another issue in Li-S cells is degradation of the Li anode over many cycles of stripping (discharge) and plating (charge). We showed that PFGs have a beneficial effect on the physical morphology of the Li anode, SEI formation, and the CE of a Li-Li cell. Among the many PFGs tested, we found the best performance from PFGs designated PFG2 and PFG5, and these two PFGs were thoroughly studied. A systematic coin-cell study of electrolyte solvents of 90:10, 80:20, or 70:30 DME:PFG (DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane) revealed some systematic trends: a higher percentage of PFG solvent led to substantially longer cycle life, but at the same time reduced specific capacity (mAh/g(S)) and cell capacity at higher rates. These studies used LiFSI as the electrolyte salt, as it was found to extend cycle life compared to LiTFSI. Finally, the addition of a small amount of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) to the electrolyte was found to be beneficial. The overall optimal electrolyte solution was found to be 0.6 M LiFSI + 0.5 M LiNO 3 in 75:5:20 DME/DOL/PFG (either PFG2 or PFG5).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Tailoring Electrolytes by Decoupling the Roles of Li + and Lithium Polysulfides in Li–S Batteries

Understanding the distinct roles of lithium ions (Li + ) and lithium polysulfide intermediates, Li 2 S x (LiPS) is critical for designing electrolytes that can extend the practical cycle life of lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. Here, in this work, we decouple the solvation and solubility effects of Li + and LiPS and correlate them with electrochemical performance through a cosolvent strategy. Li + solubility and solvation primarily dictate the electrolyte’s ionic conductivity and the reversibility of lithium anode stripping/plating. In contrast, LiPS solvation governs the thermodynamics of sulfur (S 8 ), LiPS, and lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) interconversion, while the LiPS solubility determines their redox kinetics. By employing a fluorinated–glyme (F-glyme) cosolvent, specifically 1,2-bis­(2,2-difluoroethoxy)­ethane (F4DEE), that exhibits low LiPS solubility yet moderate Li + solvation, we designed an electrolyte that enhances lithium anode stability while maintaining sufficient sulfur cathode kinetics, thereby prolonging Li–S cell cycle life. This study provides mechanistic insights into the interplay between Li+ and LiPS in Li–S electrochemistry and offers design principles for next-generation electrolytes for Li–S batteries.

Yang, Jingtian [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL),↗
DOE OSTI2026

A Holistic Stabilization of the Anode in Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries Through a Ternary Alloy Fusion

The anode in lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) is plagued by not only inhomogeneous lithium (Li) deposition, but also by parasitic side-reactions. Often, a thick anode (∼400 µm) is used to compensate for these drawbacks, lowering gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. In this work, we demonstrate a ternary alloy anode fabricated via scalable thermal fusion of Li with aluminum (Al) and tellurium (Te) to cohesively address these issues. The Al–Li skeleton serves to homogenize Li deposition as well as reinforce the anode, allowing it to be rolled down to low thicknesses. Te incorporation suppresses the reaction of Li with polysulfides (Li 2 Sn) to form lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) and electrolyte degradation. It can also facilitate the formation of polytellurosulfides (Li 2 Te x Sy), which are far more conducive to Li + -ion diffusion. Even under a lean electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratio of 8 µL mg −1 and a low negative/positive (N/P) ratio of 3, capacities over 900 mA h g −1 at a C/5 rate are obtained in cells with Li–Te–Al anodes with a capacity retention of 80% after 70 cycles. In comparison, the baseline lithium-metal anode retains only 35% after 50 cycles. Furthermore, the Li–Te–Al anodes confer a 24% boost to gravimetric energy density at the pouch cell level.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Theoretical Calculation Guided Design of Single-Atom Catalysts toward Fast Kinetic and Long-Life Li–S Batteries

Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are enticing next-generation energy storage technologies due to their high theoretical energy density, environmental friendliness, and low cost. Yet, low conductivity of sulfur species, dissolution of polysulfides, poor conversion from sulfur reduction, and lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) oxidation reactions during discharge–charge processes hinder their practical applications. Herein, under the guidance of density functional theory calculations, we have successfully synthesized large-scale single atom vanadium catalysts seeded on graphene to achieve high sulfur content (80 wt % sulfur), fast kinetic (a capacity of 645 mAh g –1 at 3 C rate), and long-life Li–S batteries. Both forward (sulfur reduction) and reverse reactions (Li 2 S oxidation) are significantly improved by the single atom catalysts. This finding is confirmed by experimental results and consistent with theoretical calculations. The ability of single metal atoms to effectively trap the dissolved lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) and catalytically convert the LiPSs/Li 2 S during cycling significantly improved sulfur utilization, rate capability, and cycling life. Our work demonstrates an efficient design pathway for single atom catalysts and offers solutions for the development of high energy/power density Li–S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Tackling the Capacity Fading Issue of Li–S Battery by a Functional Additive—Hexafluorobenzene

Due to the strong electron-withdrawing fluorine groups, the aromatic ring of hexafluorobenzene (HFB) becomes more electron-deficient and strongly interacts with the lone-pair electrons of the medium. When used as an electrolyte additive for Li-S cell, HFB preferably coordinates with low-order lithium sulfides Li 2 S and Li 2 S 2 and subsequently reacts and converts both into active aromatic sulfides-bis(pentafluorophenyl) disulfides and bis-(pentafluorophenyl) polysulfides in situ-thus facilitating the utilization of the electronically insulating Li 2 S and Li 2 S 2 and improving the cycling stability of the Li-S cell. Finally, this research opens a new avenue to tackle the inherent issues associated with the Li-S chemistry.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Design Strategies Based on Electronic Interactions for Effective Catalysts in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) are considered promising next‐generation batteries due to their high energy density (>500 W h kg −1 ). However, LSBs exhibit an unsatisfactory energy density (<400 W h kg −1 ) and cycle life (<300 cycles) because of the shuttle effect caused by soluble lithium polysulfide (LiPS) intermediates and the sluggish conversion reaction kinetics caused by insulating sulfur (S 8 ) and lithium sulfide (Li 2 S). Although various types of catalysts, including metal‐based compounds to single‐atom catalysts, have been reported to address these issues, most catalysts exhibited limited catalytic activity under practical lean electrolyte conditions (<5 µL mg −1 ). A comprehensive understanding of the synthetic strategy and catalytic mechanism of catalysts is essential for their design, but understanding the electronic effects of the catalysts and LiPS is more important. Furthermore, the electronic design of these catalysts is not well understood. In this review, we introduce the catalytic mechanisms in LSBs and discuss catalyst design strategies in terms of electronic effects on the interactions between reactants and catalysts, with a primary focus on heterogeneous catalytic systems. We additionally consider how the electronic property of homogeneous systems, particularly redox mediators, affects catalytic behavior under lean electrolyte conditions and propose future research directions for catalyst development in LSBs.

Chemistry↗
DOE OSTI2026

Anode-less Solid-State Li–S Batteries Enabled by Fe-Stabilized Polysulfides

Anode-less solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries (SSLSBs) with lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) as the cathode promise a high energy density and ease of manufacturing. However, Li 2 S is plagued by poor conductivity, sluggish activation kinetics, and a poor cycle life. Here, in this study, we report an FeCl 3 -activated Li 2 S (FLS) cathode with solid-state polysulfide intermediates generated through a redox reaction between FeCl 3 and Li 2 S. This strategy is shown to boost the electrical conductivity of Li 2 S by 7 orders of magnitude and lower the activation barrier. During cycling, Fe plays a significant role in stabilizing the highly active polysulfide species, contributing to the exceptional electrochemical performance. The FLS cathode achieves 80% capacity retention over 500 cycles with >99% Li 2 S utilization. Furthermore, a Li-metal-free (anode-less) full cell retained over 80% of its initial capacity after 240 cycles. This work underscores the promise of leveraging Fe-stabilized polysulfides in enabling high-energy, long-lasting, solid-state Li-S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

All-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries Enhanced by Redox Mediators

We report redox mediators (RMs) play a vital role in some liquid electrolyte-based electrochemical energy storage systems. However, the concept of redox mediator in solid-state batteries remains unexplored. Here, we selected a group of RM candidates and investigated their behaviors and roles in all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs). The soluble-type quinone-based RM (AQT) shows the most favorable redox potential and the best redox reversibility that functions well for lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) oxidation in solid polymer electrolytes. Accordingly, Li 2 S cathodes with AQT RMs present a significantly reduced energy barrier (average oxidation potential of 2.4 V) during initial charging at 0.1 C at 60 °C and the following discharge capacity of 1133 mAh g s -1 . Using operando sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy, we directly tracked the sulfur speciation in ASSLSBs and proved that the solid-polysulfide-solid reaction of Li 2 S cathodes with RMs facilitated Li 2 S oxidation. In contrast, for bare Li 2 S cathodes, the solid-solid Li 2 S-sulfur direct conversion in the first charge cycle results in a high energy barrier for activation (charge to ~4 V) and low sulfur utilization. The Li 2 S@AQT cell demonstrates superior cycling stability (average Coulombic efficiency 98.9% for 150 cycles) and rate capability owing to the effective AQT-enhanced Li-S reaction kinetics. This work reveals the evolution of sulfur species in ASSLSBs and realizes the fast Li-S reaction kinetics by designing an effective sulfur speciation pathway

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

An in situ generated polymer electrolyte via anionic ring-opening polymerization for lithium–sulfur batteries

The use of solid polymer electrolytes has previously proven to be an effective approach to address the lithium polysulfide dissolution and high electrode interfacial impedance of Li–S batteries via an in situ polymerization process. However, the conventional in situ synthesis employs a cationic ring-opening polymerization (CROP) of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) catalyzed by a strong Lewis acid. New polymerization chemistry that is more compatible with Li–S chemistry needs to be developed to mitigate the disadvantages associated with the CROP process. Herein we report a new approach to in situ polymerize a set of new episulfide monomers in solution with LiTFSI salt via an anionic ring-opening polymerization (AROP). This new polymer system takes advantage of the inherent cell chemistry present in the Li–S cell through the nucleophilic lithium sulfides which are generated during the initial discharge cycle and act as the initiator for the polymerization. Additionally, their presence was shown to initiate the monomer solvents through AROP with no need for additional catalysts, rather than the more commonly utilized cationic systems which require an external Lewis acid catalyst. This work offers an important pathway toward in situ polymer electrolytes for Li–S batteries and offers a new avenue of exploration for polymer electrolyte synthesis.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Current Status and Future Directions of All-Solid-State Batteries with Lithium Metal Anodes, Sulfide Electrolytes, and Layered Ternary Oxide Cathodes

All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) offer great promise as a next-generation energy storage technology with higher energy density, wider operating temperature range, and improved safety for electric vehicles. ASSBs employing lithium metal anodes (Li), sulfide-based solid-state electrolytes (SSE), and Ni-rich layered transition metal oxide cathodes (LiMO 2 , M = Ni, Mn, Co, Al) are particularly promising due to its superior electrochemical performance compared to other solid-electrolyte systems. However, the battery cycle life at high cathode mass loading and high current is still limited because the failure mechanism is not fully understood. Lithium dendrite growth at the anode or inside a solid electrolyte still represents as a serious risk of cell failure. Interfacial resistance increases attributed to electrolyte decomposition and interfacial void formation at both cathode–electrolyte and anode–electrolyte interfaces lead to gradual capacity fading. In this Review, we present the fundamental challenges and recent scientific understandings of each component in ASSBs. The novel diagnostic tools for these components, especially the interfaces buried under the surface that are often hard for characterization are mainly examined. Lastly, we offer a perspective for future research directions. We hope this Review will provide a timely snapshot of state-of-the-art research progress in ASSBs to accelerate the development of ASSBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Degradation of Lithium Iron Phosphate Sulfide Solid-State Batteries by Conductive Interfaces

The superionic solid-state argyrodite electrolyte Li 6 PS 5 Br can improve lithium and lithium-ion batteries' safety and energy density. Despite many reports validating the conductivity of this electrolyte, it still suffers from passivating electrode degradation mechanisms. At first analysis, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) should be more thermodynamically stable in contact with sulfide electrolytes. However, without substantial improvements to interfacial engineering, we find that LFP is not inherently stable against Li 6 PS 5 Br. We hypothesize argyrodite oxidation favorably competes with LFPAs delithiation, insulating the electrolyte-electrode interface and causing large overpotential losses. We show that compared to LiNi x Mn y Co z O 2 , LFP has no actual electrochemical stability advantage despite operating at a lower voltage. We utilize tender energy XAS and XPS to show that chemical reactions occur between LFP and the Li 6 PS 5 Br solid electrolyte and these reactions are exacerbated by cycling. We also show that electrochemical degradation occurs at the interface between the solid electrolyte ion conductor and any electron conductor, namely the active material and carbon additives. We further demonstrate that LiNbO 3 cathode coatings on LFP can delay electrochemical degradation by electronically insulating the LFP-sulfide electrolyte interface but not prevent its occurrence at the carbon-electrolyte interface.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Electrochemically Stable High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

Lithium-Sulfur batteries (LSB) have emerged as one of the strong contenders for high energy density rechargeable batteries in the Li-ion battery domain. The LSB system is considered as the most promising to achieve the next milestone in energy density of 500 Wh/kg. However, the LSB system is plagued with problems of polysulfide formation which are soluble in the organic electrolyte leading to loss in capacity and eventual cell failure. The problem is further compounded by dendrite formation on the Li anode during electrochemical cycling leading to puncturing of the separator causing eventual short-circuiting of the cell and consequent heat generation resulting in major safety hazards of flammability of the organic liquid electrolyte and impending explosion. This chapter describes various approaches developed to combat both cathode and anode issues. These involve synthesis and characterization of complex framework materials (CFMs) for confining the polysulfides and sulfur in the LSB cathodes. The CFMs include a CFM host and a coating applied to the CFM host, which includes one or more form of an electronic conductor, a lithium-ion conductor and a functional electrocatalyst for electrocatalytically converting the soluble polysulfides to Li 2 S. Further, sulfur is infiltrated into the CFM host creating a sulfur-carbon linkage serving as effective anchors for trapping the ensuing polysulfides. The systems have been tested in coin cells and pouch cells with metallic Li anodes under lean electrolyte conditions of 3-4 μl/mg of electrolyte (E) to sulfur (S) ratios showing promise and feasibility. New emergent dendrite-free alloys have also been identified to test against pure Li and CFM cathodes in coin cell and pouch cell configurations under lean electrolyte conditions. Results of these studies are described and discussed with thoughts on future directions.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Vitreous solid electrolyte sheets of Li ion conducting sulfur-based glass and associated structures, cells and methods

A lithium ion-conductive solid electrolyte including a freestanding inorganic vitreous sheet of sulfide-based lithium ion conducting glass is capable of high performance in a lithium metal battery by providing a high degree of lithium ion conductivity while being highly resistant to the initiation and/or propagation of lithium dendrites. Such an electrolyte is also itself manufacturable, and readily adaptable for battery cell and cell component manufacture, in a cost-effective, scalable manner.

Visco, Steven J.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Vitreous solid electrolyte sheets of Li ion conducting sulfur-based glass and associated structures, cells and methods

A lithium ion-conductive solid electrolyte including a freestanding inorganic vitreous sheet of sulfide-based lithium ion conducting glass is capable of high performance in a lithium metal battery by providing a high degree of lithium ion conductivity while being highly resistant to the initiation and/or propagation of lithium dendrites. Such an electrolyte is also itself manufacturable, and readily adaptable for battery cell and cell component manufacture, in a cost-effective, scalable manner.

Visco, Steven J.↗