Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “lithium-metal anodes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

Modeling Electrodeposition in 3D Porous Architectures for Solid-State Li-Metal Batteries

Li-metal storage in three-dimensional (3D) electrodes is considered a potential dendrite-mitigation strategy. The large surface area and high porosity of these electrodes result in reduced local Li-plating current densities. The porous topology provides a scaffold for Li-deposition and stripping, maintaining both mechanical integrity and Li accessibility. The goal of this study is to understand how characteristics, such as geometry and material properties, affect the current distribution and deposition pattern. To this end, we developed a computational method to track material growth driven by electrodeposition within a complex geometry. This method ensures that the finite-element discretization remains conforming to the moving boundary while preserving an adequate mesh quality, and thus maintains solution accuracy. Using this new computational tool, we analyze the conditions under which porous anode architectures effectively expand the surface area of the charge-transfer interface, and self-regulate current density and dendrite growth.

3D electrode architectures↗

Demarcating the Impact of Electrolytes on High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anode

The ever-growing demand for low-cost, high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) makes high-nickel layered oxide cathodes, especially LiNiO 2 (LNO), one of the most appealing candidates. However, poor structural and surface instability that leads to a short cycle life remains a formidable challenge. Herein, a systematic investigation of LNO performance in two different electrolytes (a conventional carbonate-based LP57 electrolyte and an ether-based localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE)) with different charge cut-off voltages is presented. These findings show that the cathode-electrolyte reactivity is the main factor dictating the performance degradation of LNO at high voltages rather than bulk integrity. While LHCE can provide good stability beyond 4.2 V with a robust, uniform solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on the Li-metal anode, there is no significant difference in cyclability at 4.15 V (96% capacity retention after 200 cycles) for both LP57 and LHCE. From LNO symmetric cells, carbonate-based electrolyte is found to be good for LNO stability while ether-based electrolyte is beneficial toward Li-metal anode. Furthermore, a suitable electrolyte or a low cut-off voltage is necessary to maintain a decent cycle life. Altogether, this work highlights the impact of electrolyte and cut-off voltage on LNO and Li-metal, which can help guide the development of cells based on LNO.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Crossover Effects in Lithium–Metal Batteries with a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and High–Nickel Cathodes

While crossover effects, such as transition–metal dissolution, are well–understood in lithium–ion batteries, there is a limited understanding of the effect of crossed–over chemical species in cells with oxide cathodes and lithium–metal anodes. In this work, the effects of cathode–to–anode and anode–to–cathode crossover are explored in cells with a high–nickel cathode, lithium–metal anode, and a localized high–concentration electrolyte (LHCE). Dramatic differences are found among cells; a lithium–metal anode paired with a high–nickel cathode has three times less solid–electrolyte interphase growth than a lithium–metal anode paired with lithium metal. Meanwhile, the cathode paired with lithium metal has 2–3 times higher capacity fade than the same cathode paired with graphite. Decomposition and crossover of the FSI salt is identified as the main source of these changes. The fluorine in the salt is first stripped off at the lithium–metal anode, and the remaining sulfur and nitrogen cross over to the cathode. Although the reduction in fluorine content harms the surface stability of the cathode, the lithium–metal anode benefits from the increased fluorine content. Furthermore, because the lithium–metal anode is typically the bottleneck for cells with thin lithium, crossover is a major factor in the enhanced performance of lithium–metal batteries with LHCE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Lithium–Metal Batteries via Suppressing Li Dendrite Growth and Improving Coulombic Efficiency

Lithium–metal batteries (LMB) are recognized as one of the most promising candidates for the next generation of batteries due to their high energy density. Extensive studies have been refocused on the field in the past decade to make the technology commercially viable. Unfortunately, despite exciting progress that has been made, the practical application of LMBs is still hampered by the uncontrollable Li plating morphology and inferior Coulombic efficiency (CE) during cycling. Herein, first, the relevant research that has been carried out in the past decade (2010–2021) is briefly summarized and then the Li plating behaviors, mechanistic understanding of these behaviors, and strategies to suppress Li dendrite growth are discussed. Finally, the methods and techniques to improve Coulombic efficiency (CE) is discussed, especially the design of liquid electrolytes, and possible research directions for the future development of LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Resolving three-dimensional nanoscale heterogeneities in lithium metal batteries with cryoelectron tomography

Current direct observation of sensitive battery materials and interfaces primarily relies on two-dimensional (2D) imaging, leaving out their three-dimensional (3D) relationship. Here, in this study, we used cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET) to visualize the lithium metal anode in 3D at nanometer resolution and cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) to reveal atomic details in local regions. We imaged both freshly prepared and calendar-aged Li metal anodes to reveal the development of LiH in Li dendrites and the Li-LiH interface, as well as the development of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Using a convolutional neural network-based technique, the 3D arrangement of Li metal, along with nanoscale LiH and Cu heterogeneities in dendrites, was visualized and annotated. In longer-term calendar aging, we observed more substantial LiH growth accompanied by extended SEI growth. Our results show that the growth of LiH and the extended SEI during battery calendar aging are temporally and spatially separate processes.

LiH↗

The Microscopic Mechanism of Lithiation and Delithiation in the Ag/C Buffer Layer for Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract Lithium metal solid‐state batteries (LMSSBs) have demonstrated their high energy density and cycling performance at high current densities in an anode‐free architecture, featuring a thin Ag/C composite buffer layer (BL) between the current collector (CC) and the solid electrolyte (SE). This study explains the microscopic mechanism of the Ag/C BL by using first‐principles atomistic and continuum modeling. It is shown that Ag effectively acts as a homogeneous solid‐solution beyond AgLi 2.32 and maintains a positive potential even at AgLi 25 during lithiation. Key factors underlying the working of the Ag/C BL include lower interfacial resistance at the BL/CC interface than at the BL/SE interface, leading to predominant Li deposition on BL/CC, and substantial Ag–Li volume expansion during lithiation. This, combined with stronger BL/SE adhesion, causes BL/SE separation and Ag–Li extrusion toward the CC side. During delithiation, Ag re‐precipitates as nanoparticles uniformly on the CC, with its positive lithiation potential homogenizing Li currents in subsequent cycles. Other metals are less effective due to their relatively large overpotential, premature lithiation termination, and limited volume expansions hindering movement toward the CC. The study aids the BL design, focusing on metal choice and optimization material and microstructural properties, such as the Li‐ion conductivity and interfacial resistance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

A Dual–Phase Electrolyte for High–Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Dissolution of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) is essential for fast cathode kinetics, but detrimental for anode stability, especially under lean electrolyte conditions. Here in this work, the phase separation phenomenon between solvents with different polarities (tetramethyl sulfone [TMS] and dibutyl ether [DBE]) is utilized to enable the design of a dual-phase electrolyte. High-polarity, high-density TMS–lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide–ammonium trifluoroacetate as the cathode electrolyte strongly solvates LiPSs, which propel the sulfur redox reaction. Moreover, the composite of DBE and a polymeric ion conductor serves as the anode electrolyte. The addition of DBE in the anode side effectively prevents the crossover of corrosive species (LiPSs and ammonia trifluoroacetate), enabling a significant improvement in Li-metal anode stability. The electrode-specific dual-phase electrolyte design provides electrochemical performance superior to conventional electrolytes. Without additional electrode engineering, pouch cells assemble with the dual-phase electrolyte cycle under a lean electrolyte (4 µL mg –1 ) and low-Li-excess condition (N/P = 3) for 120 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Precise Tailoring of Lithium-Ion Transport for Ultralong-Cycling Dendrite-Free All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

All-solid-state lithium metal batteries can address crucial challenges regarding insufficient battery cycling life and energy density. The demonstration of long-cycling dendrite-free all-solid-state lithium metal batteries requires precise tailoring of lithium-ion transport of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). Here, in this work, a proof of concept is reported for precise tailoring of lithium-ion transport of a halide SSE, Li 3 InCl 6 , including intragranular (within grains) but also intergranular (between grains) lithium-ion transport. Lithium-ion migration tailoring mechanism in crystals is developed by unexpected enhanced Li, In, and Cl vacancy populations and lower energy barrier for hopping. The lithium-ion transport tailoring mechanism between the grains is determined by the elimination of voids between grains and the formation of unexpected supersonic conducting grain boundaries, boosting the lithium dendrite suppression ability of SSE. Due to boosted lithium-ion conduction and dendrite-suppression ability, the all-solid-state lithium metal batteries coupled with Ni-rich LiNi 0.83 Co 0.12 Mn 0.05 O 2 cathodes and lithium metal anodes demonstrate breakthroughs in electrochemical performance by achieving extremely long cycling life at a high current density of 0.5 C (2000 cycles, 93.7% capacity retention). This concept of precise tailoring of lithium-ion transport provides a cost, time, and energy efficient solution to conquer the remaining challenges in all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries for fast developing electric vehicle markets.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interface Design for High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

All‐solid‐state batteries suffer from high interface resistance and lithium dendrite growth leading to low Li plating/stripping Coulombic efficiency (CE) of <90% and low critical current density at high capacity. Here, in this work, both challenges are simultaneously addressed and the Li plating/stripping CE is significantly increased to 99.6% at 0.2 mA cm −2 /0.2 mAh cm −2 , and critical current density (CCD) of > 3.0 mA cm −2 /3.0 mAh cm −2 by inserting a mixed ionic‐electronic conductive (MIEC) and lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi nanocomposite interlayer between Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte and Li anode. The highly lithiophobic LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer with high ionic conductivity (10 −5 S cm −1 ) and low electronic conductivity (3.4×10 −7 S cm −1 ) enables Li to plate on the current collector (CC) surface rather than on Li 6 PS 5 Cl surface avoiding Li 6 PS 5 Cl electrolyte reduction. During initial Li plating on CC, Li penetrates into porous LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Bi interlayer and lithiates Bi nanoparticles into Li 3 Bi. The lithiophilic Li 3 Bi and Li 3 N nanoparticles in LiF‐C‐Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi sub‐interlayer will move to CC along with plated Li, forming LiF‐C/Li 3 N‐Li 3 Bi lithiophobic/lithiophilic sublayer during the following Li stripping. This interlayer enables Co 0.1 Fe 0.9 S 2 /Li 6 PS 5 Cl/Li cell with an areal capacity of 1.4 mAh cm −2 to achieve a cycle life of >850 cycles at 150 mA g −1 . The lithiophobic/lithiophilic interlayer enables solid‐state metal batteries to simultaneously achieve high energy and long cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Highly Efficient Organosulfur and Lithium-Metal Hosts Enabled by C@Fe 3 N Sponge

Lithium-organosulfur (Li-OS) batteries, despite possessing high theoretical specific capacity, encounter a few practical challenges, including unsatisfactory lifespan and low active material utilization under realistic conditions. Here, diisoropyl xanthogen polysulfide (DIXPS) has been selected as a model organosulfur compound to investigate the practical feasibility of Li-OS batteries under realistic conditions. A well-designed freestanding carbon sponge decorated with Fe 3 N nanoparticles (C@Fe 3 N) is introduced into the Li-OS cells as a scaffold for both Li and DIXPS. The lithiophilic property of the C@Fe 3 N host guides uniform lithium deposition at the anode, and the catalysis of the DIXPS conversion reaction promotes the kinetics at the cathode. Impressively, the synergistic effect of C@Fe 3 N leads to an extremely stable cycling performance over 1000 cycles in a Li-OS full cell under realistic conditions.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Visualizing electrode assembly movement and lithiation heterogeneity in lithium-metal batteries using operando energy dispersive X-ray diffraction

There is renewed interest in Li-metal anodes in order to increase the energy density of battery cells. Here, we demonstrate an operando X-ray crystallography method to visualize lithiation gradients and electrode assembly movement during electrochemical cycling of a Li-metal cell containing a Ni-Mn-Co layered oxide cathode (NMC811). During charge, deposition of Li + ions from the cathode increases the Li foil thickness; during discharge, the thickness decreases as Li + ions are stripped off the foil. Additionally, the resulting periodic movement is observed through tracking of Bragg peaks from the ordered phases of the cathode and separator. In addition to this 3.6 μm/mAh displacement, continuous mossy Li build-up on the anode causes an irreversible drift of the assembly, which is similar to 11.3 μm/cycle. Furthermore, our data indicate significant lithiation gradients in the NMC811 cathode during the oxide relithiation, which is not observed during the delithiation.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Advancements in active filler-contained polymer solid-state electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries: A concise review

Lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) usually are regarded as the pinnacle of next-generation energy storage due to the high specific capacity and low redox potential of the Li-metal anode. However, their development is hindered by safety hazards related to flammable electrolytes and uncontrolled side reactions within the battery. Both polymer and solid-state inorganic electrolytes, despite their potential, exhibit shortcomings that limit their practical applications. Active filler-containing polymer electrolytes (AFPEs) offer a promising solution by combining the benefits of both types. Enhanced by supramolecular interactions between the polymer matrix and active fillers, AFPEs demonstrate superior electrochemical performance over traditional polymer electrolytes. This review discusses the progress in active fillers and various polymer matrices, examining the factors that enhance performance, particularly ionic conductivity. It also outlines the future research directions of AFPEs, aiming to broaden the application of solid electrolytes in high-performance LMBs.

All solid-state batteries↗

Voltage and Temperature Limits of Advanced Electrolytes for Lithium-Metal Batteries

Several advanced electrolytes (mainly ether-based) have recently demonstrated excellent electrochemical performance in high energy density lithium (Li)-metal batteries. However, the safety of these ether-based electrolytes is still unknown. This work evaluates the thermal stability of these new formulations to understand their safety limits of operation in comparison to carbonate electrolytes typically used in Li-ion batteries. Electrolyte stability is assessed in conjunction with LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cathode and Li-metal anode at ultra-high voltages (≤ 4.8 V) and temperatures (≤ 300°C) to trigger thermal runaway, where onset and extent of heat release are monitored via isothermal microcalorimetry and differential scanning calorimetry Most ether-based electrolytes show improved thermal resilience over commercial carbonate formulations when heated up to 300°C. The thermal behavior in presence of charged cathode and Li-metal suggests that the new electrolytes may be better at stabilizing active material surfaces than carbonate electrolytes. Although extreme voltages severely destabilize the ether-based formulations, prompting thermal runaway, a phosphate based localized high concentration electrolyte exhibits superior stability over commercial carbonate electrolytes at all tested temperatures (32°C, 45°C, and 60°C). Although thermal analysis during the first charge process (as adopted in this preliminary study) may be insufficient to conclude the long-term advantages of these electrolytes, a more stable electrolyte identified under extreme voltage and temperature conditions will provide valuable guidance for the safety of future electrolyte designs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Single-phase local-high-concentration solid polymer electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries

Solid polymers are promising electrolytes for Li-metal batteries, but they have limitations: they cannot simultaneously achieve high ionic conductivity, good mechanical strength and compatibility with high-voltage cathodes while suppressing Li dendrites. Here, we design a class of locally high-concentration solid polymer electrolytes based on polymer blends, which are termed Li-polymer in F diluter (LPIFD). The Li-polymer (polymer-in-salt) ensures continuous Li-ion conduction channels and contributes to the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), and the F diluter (inert fluorinated polymer) adds mechanical strength. Studies reveal that a single-phase LPIFD, which is based on a miscible polymer blend, lacks phase boundaries and forms an organic-less and LiF-rich SEI, effectively suppressing lithium dendrites. The single-phase LPIFD delivers ionic conductivity of 3.0 x 10 -4 S cm -1 and enables the Li anode to reach a high coulombic efficiency of 99.1% and a critical current density of 3.7 mA cm -2 . Furthermore, the ability to form an F-rich cathode electrolyte interphase allows LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 ||Li cells to achieve a cycle life of 450 cycles at a high operating voltage of 4.5 V. In conclusion, this design will inspire efforts to commercialize polymer electrolytes for high-energy Li-metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Characterization of the structure and chemistry of the solid–electrolyte interface by cryo-EM leads to high-performance solid-state Li-metal batteries

Solid-state lithium-metal (Li 0 ) batteries are gaining traction for electric vehicle applications because they replace flammable liquid electrolytes with a safer, solid-form electrolyte that also offers higher energy density and better resistance against Li dendrite formation. Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) are highly promising candidates because of their tunable mechanical properties and easy manufacturability; however, their electrochemical instability against lithium metal (Li 0 ), mediocre conductivity, and poorly understood Li 0 /SPE interphases have prevented extensive application in real batteries. In particular, the origin of the low Coulombic efficiency (CE) associated with SPEs remains elusive, as the debate continues as to whether it originates from unfavored interfacial reactions or lithium dendritic growth and dead lithium formation. In this work, we use state-of-the-art cryo-electromicroscopy (cryoEM) imaging and spectroscopic techniques to characterize the structure and chemistry of the interface between Li 0 and a polyacrylate-based SPE. Contradicting the conventional knowledge, we find that no protective interphase forms, owing to the sustained reactions between deposited Li dendrites and polyacrylic backbones and succinonitrile plasticizer. Due to the reaction induced volume change, large amounts of cracks form inside the Li dendrites with a stress corrosion-cracking behavior, indicating that Li0cannot be passivated in this SPE system. Based on this observation, we then introduce additive engineering leveraging on the knowledge of liquid electrolytes, and demonstrate that the Li 0 surface can be effectively protected against corrosion using fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), leading to densely packed Li 0 domes with conformal and stable solid-electrolyte interphases (SEIs) films. Owing to the high room temperature ionic conductivity of 1.01 mS/cm -1 , the high transference number of 0.57 and the stabilized lithium electrolyte interface, this improved new SPE delivers an excellent lithium plating/stripping CE of 99% and 1800 hours of stable cycling in Li||Li symmetric cells (0.2 mA/cm -2 , 1mAh/cm -2 ). Furthermore, this improved cathodic stability along with the high anodic stability enables record high cycle life of >2000 cycles for Li||LiFePO 4 and >400 cycles for Li||LiCoO 2 full cells.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation at the Ionic Liquid Electrolyte—Lithium-Metal Interface Using an Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Approach

An interfacial study is performed using ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations to elucidate the electrochemical interfacial stability of an ionic liquid (IL) as component of an electrolyte in contact with a Li-metal anode when an additive, vinylene carbonate (VC), is added to the electrolyte. The IL electrolyte is composed of 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(fluoro-sulfonyl)-imide (PYR14 + FSI − ) with lithium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)imide salt (Li + TFSI − ) in a 8:2 concentration ratio. Reactions observed at the interface electrolyte/Li-metal during the AIMD simulations are verified by electronic structure calculations using density functional theory calculations considering a continuum solvent model. We found that the addition of VC to the IL prevents further reduction of the counter-ion TFSI − and retards reduction of FSI − in comparison to the case when the additive VC is absent. The PYR14 + reduction is never observed with or without the additive. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd electron affinities of the PYR14 + are −0.08, −0.36 and −3.65 eV, indicating little to large repulsive behavior against electrons. The opposite is observed for the two negative ions, FSI − and TFSI − , which yield 1st electron affinities of 1.73 and 1.83 eV, respectively. Reactions obtained under open circuit conditions. Dissociation mechanisms are presented for all IL components reduced at the IL/Li-metal interface.

Electrochemistry↗