SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “mcnp”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2024

The gravity extension for MCNP 6.2

Standard MCNP particle tracking takes place along straight-line trajectories from interaction point to interaction point. There is a feature within MCNP that is planned for deprecation that provides surface boundary conditions for approximating gravity for planetary cases, but this feature is not applicable to a cold neutron beam. A new extension has been developed to track particles along parabolic trajectories with a constant acceleration. MCNP contains 1st and 2nd-order surfaces as well as a special case of 4th-order surfaces for simple tori, and the intersection of parabolic trajectories with these surfaces becomes 2nd, 4th, and 8th-order equations in time, respectively. Solving these equations utilizes a fast algorithm for finding the roots of polynomials. Finally, the theory, MCNP input card, and examples of using this new feature will be discussed.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2024

Monte Carlo Perturbation Analysis of Fuel Temperature Variations in the MCNP Model of the Annular Core Research Reactor

The Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) model is used by ACRR reactor operators and experiment designers at Sandia National Laboratories for a variety of computational calculations ranging from reactor kinetics parameter estimates and safety analyses to experimental planning. To understand the dominant source of uncertainty within the MCNP model, perturbations in temperature were applied to individual ACRR MCNP fuel rods. Fuel rod temperatures were randomly sampled from a uniform distribution from operational temperatures to quantify temperature-related uncertainty effects. Stochastic mixing was used to blend the cross sections of the desired temperatures using the MCNP continuous and Thermal Neutron Scattering Treatment [S(α,β)] libraries in ENDF/B-VII.1. Furthermore, this uncertainty analysis produced a 640 row × 640 column correlation and covariance matrix of the neutron energy spectra. Positive covariance was produced around the 1-MeV region and the 0.2-eV region. Correlation was found in the thermal and fast energy regions, but no correlation was observed in the slowing-down energy region because interactions in this region are not dominated by fuel.

ACRR↗

DOE OSTI2023

Improvements to Contributions from Neutron Inelastic Scattering for Next-Event Estimators in MCNP ® Software

An improvement to the handling of contributions from neutron inelastic scattering to next-event estimators has been implemented in the MCNP6 ® software for release with version 6.3.1. The kinematic equations that govern the outgoing energy of inelastic neutron scattering contributions to next-event estimators have two roots. Historically, the implementation in the MCNP coding has only used the upper root to the quadratic equation. This includes all versions predating version 6.3.1 including all versions of MCNP5 and MCNPX software. However, a review of the neutron next-event estimator physics has shown that this does not reproduce the track-length estimator results at low energies. Several examples are presented that test single neutron inelastic scattering reaction types, Level Scattering (Law 3), Tabulated Energy Angle (Law 61), and Kalbach-Mann distribution (Law 44). The test problems compare the track-length estimator (f4 tally) in the MCNP software, with the existing implementation of the neutron next-event estimator (f5 tally), and the modified changes to the neutron next-event estimator implementation. As the MCNP implementation ignores the lower root, the unmodified neutron next-event estimators will generally underestimate the lower energy contribution. However, a second issue with the Kalbach-Mann distribution (Law 44) implementation allows contributions to backward scattering in the center-of-mass frame that is not kinematically possible, thus overestimating backward scattering contributions. A third issue with the way the MCNP implementation handles floating point comparison for scattering directly ahead or directly backward in the center-of-mass frame generally leads to underestimation (except for backwards scattering for Law 44).

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Comparison of Modeled to Measured Spectra using MCNP and GADRAS to Benchmark and Contrast Modeling Limitations

The desire to improve nuclear material detection through portal monitors and other low resolution detectors has led to interest in benchmarking the performance of radiation transport codes. These codes can be used to generate a variety and quantity of spectra that may be cost prohibitive to measure directly. Particular characteristics of typical detection scenarios were isolated to compare the performance of radiation transport codes to laboratory experiments. These benchmark experiments were performed to validate simulations in a number of key areas. These experiments included high areal density configurations in both one- and three-dimensional configurations. In addition, off-angle measurements were conducted to investigate the impact of detector response assumptions on complex geometries, for example where an unknown source is not physically collocated with an apparent hot spot. Furthermore, by examining both simple shielding and backscatter configurations, isolation of the scatter emanating from the object and environmental background scatter contributions to the spectra could be elucidated. A series of experiments were performed in which the order of shielding layers and the thickness were evaluated to examine the ability of the simulations to address these variables. Experiments with increasing thickness of polyethylene around a neutron source also allows for examinations of the ability of the transport simulations to properly model n,γ reactions. Finally, depleted uranium (DU) measurements have more complicated spectra than the cobalt-60 and consequently allow for investigations into the ability of transport simulations to model self-shielding. In each case, the results of the experiments were compared to MCNP simulations to judge the performance of the code, as was done previously with GADRAS 18.7.9 simulations [7]. All of the benchmark measurements were taken with a liquid nitrogen cooled 140% high purity germanium (HPGe) detector with a bismuth collimator that had the front tin filter removed. The measurement location and detector configuration were subsequently used for all experimental configurations. The remainder of this report details the experimental measurements, Section 2 and the MCNP model, Section 3. Comparisons between the experimental results and MCNP-generated spectra are performed, Section 4. Section 5 compares the results obtained with MCNP with the previously reported results obtained with GADRAS [2]. Finally, Section 6 presents the conclusions.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗

DOE OSTI2020

Generating MCNP Input Files for Unstructured Mesh Geometries

Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code version 6 has the capability for tracking particles on unstructured mesh (UM) geometry models. The MCNP UM feature has been developed for performing calculations of complex geometry models. This capability tracks particles on hybrid geometries where finite element meshes are embedded into constructive solid geometry (CSG) cells. The MCNP UM feature was originally designed to read UM models created by Abaqus/CAE software suite. MCNP versions 6.2.0 and later can process UM models read from Abaqus input les or MCNPUM les converted from Abaqus input les. Sandia National Laboratory's Cubit Toolkit and other finite element analysis software packages may generate UM models and then convert these models into Abaqus input formats.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Evaluation of Attila and MCNP computational methods for dose and exposure estimation

Radiation transport calculations are often used to estimate dose or exposure to components and personnel surrounding a radiation source. The sources for these calculations are decaying radionuclides within various nuclear materials. Historically, dose calculations use MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle) transport code as the primary particle transport tool without a secondary computational tool to validate the results from the MCNP simulations [1]. The goal of this study is to make an independent check of the Monte Carlo solution from MCNP6 Version 6.2.1 with the discrete ordinates solution from Attila 10.2.0 Beta 3. As an example problem for this study, water-filled, stainless-steel vessels, modeled with an unstructured mesh (UM) with both MCNP and Attila [2], are exposed to 252Cf and 60Co point sources. This report also includes a discussion of the limitations of unstructured mesh in a MCNP calculation.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗

DOE OSTI2023

The History of MCNP and about 20 Related Programs

The history of the MCNP code is a long and complicated one that touches a huge number of other software packages over the decades. This document will attempt to place the direct lineage of the MCNP code into a single document and track the people who worked on and around the software. This report is necessarily incomplete. The author only has access to the LANL archives, which have gaps in key areas. Speculation will be used to fill gaps where necessary. It is hoped that future revisions will have more detail than this report, especially as others come forward with their knowledge. The history will be broken into a few segments. Sec. 1 will go through the low-energy history from MCS to MCNP version 4. In Sec. 2, the history of high-energy physics from Oak Ridge’s NTC to MCNP version 6 will be discussed. Sec. 3 will go through some important notes to complete this history. Finally, Sec. 4 contains a chart of the lineage of the code.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2023

Electron Target Cooling Analyses of the KIPT ADS Using MCNP and Ansys Fluent

This study presents multiphysics analyses of the electron target cooling system of the accelerator-driven system (ADS) of the Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (KIPT) using MCNP and Fluent computer programs. MCNP has been used to transport electrons, gammas, and neutrons, and to calculate the energy deposition in the target materials. The MCNP mesh-tally data have been imported into Fluent by a C subroutine that has been compiled and linked to Fluent as a user-defined function.The KIPT ADS is located in Ukraine and was in operation until February 2022. The Fluent model is based on the computer-aided design files from the manufacturing process of the target assembly. Here, the Fluent results for the reference case match very well the literature results obtained by STAR-CCM+ during the design phase. Other cases that differ from the reference one have been analyzed; in these cases, it is assumed a malfunction of the electron accelerator or of the water cooling system. The target cooling system operates normally for all the analyzed cases except when the inlet water mass flow rate is decreased. The transient analysis showed that the target cooling system can operate for 180 s with full power when the inlet water mass flow rate is decreased down by 75%.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Analytic Insights into the Neutronic Characteristics of Neutron Moderators from MCNP Calculations

In the course of re-processing the ENDF/B VIII.0 thermal scattering law data, formulas and data checking insights were developed from MCNP calculations into the neutronic characteristics of moderators. Infinite medium test calculations were carried out in MCNP as part of the verification effort for the ACE formatted thermal scattering files. Edit results from MCNP were combined with derived results to formulate several equations which give analytic insights into the neutronic behavior of moderators.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2021

The History of Monte Carlo and MCNP at Los Alamos [Slides]

The Monte Carlo method for radiation particle transport has its origins at LANL dating back to the 1940’s. The creators of these methods were Drs. Stanislaw Ulam, John von Neumann, Robert Richtmyer, and Nicholas Metropolis. Monte Carlo methods for particle transport have been driving computational developments since the beginning of modern computers; this continues today. In the 1950’s and 1960’s, these new methods were organized into a series of special-purpose Monte Carlo codes, including MCS, MCN, MCP, and MCG. These codes were able to transport neutrons and photons for specialized LANL applications. In 1977, these separate codes were combined to create the LANL Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) radiation particle transport code. In 1983, MCNP3 was released for public distribution to the Radiation Safety Information Computational Center (RSICC). MCNP6.3 will be released late in 2021. Each year, LANL has ~100 MCNP new users and RSICC ~1250 new licenses distributed. This talk will review the Los Alamos history of the development of the modern Monte Carlo method and MCNP.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2025

A Practical guide to Parsing MCNP Inputs: Lessons Learned from Implementing Context-Free Parsing in MontePy

Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) is a widely used Monte Carlo transport solver that began development in the 1960’s. Due to this MCNP input files uses a custom input syntax, for which there are no off-the-shelf parsing libraries available. For MontePy to create an effective Object-Oriented interface for MCNP input files, an context-free parser was implemented to be able to fully parse the files. MontePy uses a number of shortcuts and optimizations to avoid creating a single universal input file parser. . These lessons can be applied to working with the many other custom input syntax languages persistent throughout the nuclear industry.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2023

Validation of the single-event method for low-energy electron transport via stopping power calculations with $\mathrm{MCNP}$

Monte Carlo simulations of low-energy ( <50 keV) electron transport in matter are essential for a broad range of application fields. Several Monte Carlo codes have developed specialized treatments for this case, but a comprehensive validation of low-energy electron transport for general-purpose simulations remains lacking in the literature. One approach to accomplish this validation is calculation of stopping power using low-energy electron transport physics, as stopping power is a fundamental radiation transport quantity which must be simulated accurately for nearly any application. Here in this work, we use the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) radiation transport code with the single-event method for electron transport to calculate stopping powers of low-energy electrons (50 eV to 30 keV) in 41 elemental solids, 14 compound solids, and five rare gas solids, comparing simulation results to published semi-empirical stopping power calculations from optical measurements. In general, the simulations give good agreement (typically within ±10%) with semi-empirical stopping power values at higher energies: 300 eV and above for most elemental solids, 1 keV and above for compound solids, and 400 eV and above for rare gas solids. Agreement between MCNP and semi-empirical values is worse below these energies. The most significant source of error is the EPRDATA14 cross section data, which does not account for changes in electronic structure due to solid-state bonding, particularly in compound materials. The simplistic model of atomic excitation used to generate the EPRDATA14 cross sections is another key source of error. Additionally, the breakdown of the continuous slowing-down approximation introduces significant uncertainty at low energies, although this is a limitation of the calculation method and not of the simulation procedure. Accounting for these and other uncertainty sources, the single event method in MCNP is robust and able to give good accuracy for a variety of low-energy electron transport problems through diverse kinds of materials.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

DOE OSTI2020

Processing MCNP Elemental Edit Outputs

The Los Alamos National Laboratory's (LANL) Monte Carlo N-Particle® (MCNP®) transport code version 6 has the capability for tracking particles on unstructured mesh (UM) geometry models. The MCNP UM feature was originally designed for the UM models created by the Abaqus/CAE software product. The MCNP version 6.2.0 and later recognizes the UM models read from Abaqus INP files or MCNPUM files converted from Abaqus INP files. Other finite element analysis software packages may generate UM models and then convert these models into Abaqus INP formats.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2021

MCNP ® Particle Transport Code: Its History and Future [Slides]

The history, development and application uses of Monte Carlo particle transport codes at LANL are extensive. Recent and ongoing investments in MCNP modernization are enabling new code developments using modern programming tools and languages. New and challenging applications continue to drive new research and developments beyond the rich set of established MCNP capabilities. The LANL MCNP radiation transport code has been the international gold standard for particle transport applications for over three decades.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Perform Design Support with MCNP for New Measurements

This report incorporates our work carried out during our 5-month internship at LANL under an internship agreement with EAMEA (École des Applications Militaires de l’Énergie Atomique). After outlining the context in which we worked, we present our work as aid to modeling and predicting the neutronic behavior of nuclear systems, with a view to carrying out criticality experiments qualifying the MCNP code as part of innovative projects. Fourth generation reactors will enable to tackle a lot of issues such as environmental crisis, affordable energy access, and nuclear waste management. They seem to be one of the keys for a sustainable future. Most of the projects that emerge nowadays include the use of HALEU (high assay low enriched uranium) or MOX recycled fuels. Our projects are part of this dynamic and addresses concrete scientific research issues in the nuclear field. Studies of HALEU package are essential to anticipate the need, therefore the Optimus L (OPTImal Modular Universal Shipping cask technology) designed by NAC (Nuclear Assurance Corporation) international but filled with 20 % enriched uranium dioxide (UO 2 ) will be studied to support safe transportation. However, it seems there is no benchmark with a high correlation with the combination of this fuel and this package to validate MCNP simulations. As such, the study will focus on the development of new criticality safety benchmarks for this case. On the other hand, there is a great need for critical benchmarks in the intermediate energy range with MOX fuel. An IER (Integral Experiment Request) has then be requested to answer it through a partnership between French institution IRSN and U.S. Department of Energy's Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP). This experience planned for 2025 requires to gather calculated data through a MCNP model to be realized safely. Finally, a presentation of our one-week experience at the DAF as part of our discovery of criticality experiments will be introduced in Appendix 1: Week at the DAF (Device Assembly Facility)

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2025

Updating the MCNP neutron guide extension for supermirror absorption, gamma production, and neutron polarization

As supermirror technology has developed, there is a trend towards higher m-values for supermirrors which propagate more neutrons with higher divergence to experimental areas. These supermirrors have thousands of alternating layers of typically nickel and titanium with varying thicknesses deposited on the surface. Neutrons of grazing incidence are reflected from these layers with a probability dependent on the angle of incidence and the wavelength of the neutron. Those neutrons that are not reflected may be captured in the supermirror layers and produce high energy gamma rays that require shielding. The supermirror extension for MCNP has been updated to estimate the capture of neutrons in the supermirror layers of a neutron guide through the banking of photons in a virtual supermirror layer and the reduction of the weight of the neutrons transmitted into the substrate. A new functionality has been added to simulate neutron polarization specifically in the context of a supermirror polarizer for neutron beamlines. In conclusion, the underlying theory, code implementation in MCNP, and examples of gamma production and a V-cavity polarizer will be discussed.

Gamma production↗

DOE OSTI2025

An NCrystal extension for thermal neutron scattering in MCNP

A new extension for MCNP has been developed that incorporates the NCrystal thermal scattering package in the form of a Fortran to C++ wrapper, which adds the capability to describe thermal neutron scattering in the NCrystal formalism instead of the ACE tabular format. This can be used to described poly- or single-crystalline materials as well as liquids. In conclusion, the functionality of this extension to MCNP is illustrated using a layered crystal monochromator, leakage of neutrons from a moderating sphere of material, and by simulating criticality benchmarks.

MCNP↗

DOE OSTI2020

Experimental validation of scintillator detector response to correlated neutrons with MCNP and associated packages

Time, energy, and angle correlated neutrons are emitted in nuclear fission. New, physics-based fission event generators that capture these correlations have been incorporated into MCNP6.2 because correlations can impact nuclear non-proliferation and safeguards systems response. DRiFT is a detector response code that takes MCNP outputs and reproduces laboratory analogous detector quantities. Previous work has compared DRiFT to single detector experiment data and has discussed recent updates to DRiFT specific to correlated fission experiments. In this work, we demonstrate a validation of recent updates to DRiFT for organic scintillator response in correlated fission neutron experiments using a 252Cf source. Furthermore, outputs from MCNP with the FREYA fission event generator were post-processed with DRiFT and compared to experiment data. Simulation and experiment results are in reasonably good agreement for multiple correlated neutron quantities.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗