Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “radiometric correction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

LAPR - An experimental pushbroom scanner

A three-band Linear Array Pushbroom Radiometer (LAPR) was built and flown on an experimental basis by NASA, at the Goddard Space Flight Center. The functional characteristics of the instrument and the methods used to preprocess the data, including radiometric correction, are described. The radiometric sensitivity of the instrument was tested and compared to that of the Thematic Mapper and the Multispectral Scanner. The radiometric correction procedure was evaluated quantitatively, using laboratory testing, and qualitatively, by visual examination of the LAPR test flight imagery. Although effective radiometric correction could not yet be demonstrated by laboratory testing, radiometric distortion did not preclude the visual interpretation or classification of the test imagery.

Wharton, S. W.↗

NASA IKONOS Radiometric Characterization

NASA acquired imagery from the IKONOS satellite as part of its Scientific Data Purchase (SDP) program, which purchases scientific data sets from commercial sources. This viewgraph presentation describes the IKONOS satellite and its sensors, and then gives an overview of characterization efforts undertaken by NASA in cooperation with other government agencies. The characterization included relative radiometric correction, absolute radiometric characterization of data from Lunar Lake Playa, Nevada, and calibration of data from Stennis Space Center, Mississippi.

Pagnutti, Mary↗

Overview of atmospheric correction and radiometric calibration efforts during FIFE

The primary responsibility within the First International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE) for understanding the radiometric properties of the remote sensing instrumentation and the atmospheric optical properties affecting measurements with these instruments rested within the atmospheric corrections and radiometric calibration subgroup of FIFE, called the correction/calibration group for short. Specific activities included (1) calibration of remote sensing instrumentation used on aircraft and surface platforms, (2) formulation of recommendations for calibrating data from satellite sensors, (3) measurement and analysis of atmospheric properties, (4) development and evaluation of radiative transfer algorithms which perform the atmospheric correction of remotely sensed data, and (5) derivation and evaluation of surface properties such as reflectances and temperatures. A review of the activities performed by this group and a discussion of the importance of these activities in retrieving surface parameters is presented here.

Halthore, Rangasayi N.↗

Producing Science-Ready Radar Datasets for the Retrieval of Forest Structure Parameters from Backscatter: Correcting for Terrain Topography and Changes in Vegetation Reflectivity

Radar backscatter data contain both geometric and radiometric distortions due to underlying topography and the radar viewing geometry. Our objective is to develop a radiometric correction algorithm specific to the UAVSAR system configuration that would improve retrieval of forest structure parameters. UAVSAR is an airborne Lband radar capable of repeat?pass interferometry producing images with a spatial resolution of 5m. It is characterized by an electronically steerable antenna to compensate for aircraft attitude. Thus, the computation of viewing angles (i.e. look, incidence and projection) must include aircraft attitude angles (i.e. yaw, pitch and roll) in addition to the antenna steering angle. In this presentation, we address two components of radiometric correction: area projection and vegetation reflectivity. The first correction is applied by normalization of the radar backscatter by the local ground area illuminated by the radar beam. The second is a correction due to changes in vegetation reflectivity with viewing geometry.

polarimetry↗

Adjustments to the MODIS Terra Radiometric Calibration and Polarization Sensitivity in the 2010 Reprocessing

The Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA s Earth Observing System (EOS) satellite Terra provides global coverage of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiances that have been successfully used for terrestrial and atmospheric research. The MODIS Terra ocean color products, however, have been compromised by an inadequate radiometric calibration at the short wavelengths. The Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) at NASA has derived radiometric corrections using ocean color products from the SeaWiFS sensor as truth fields. In the R2010.0 reprocessing, these corrections have been applied to the whole mission life span of 10 years. This paper presents the corrections to the radiometric gains and to the instrument polarization sensitivity, demonstrates the improvement to the Terra ocean color products, and discusses issues that need further investigation. Although the global averages of MODIS Terra ocean color products are now in excellent agreement with those of SeaWiFS and MODIS Aqua, and image quality has been significantly improved, the large corrections applied to the radiometric calibration and polarization sensitivity require additional caution when using the data.

Meister, Gerhard↗

Evaluating SAR Radiometric Terrain Correction Solutions: Optimal products for applied users

Operational applications of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) are under development around the world, driven by the regularly-acquired, free-and-open source C-band SAR observations provided by ESA’s Sentinel-1 sensor constellation since 2014. Groups like SERVIR, a joint NASA and USAID initiative, are at the forefront of remote sensing applications for societal benefit. A takeaway from SERVIR’s experience is the need for appropriately geocoded and fully calibrated SAR data that is ready to use for a range of ecosystems-related applications. Radiometric Terrain Corrected (RTC) data are key entry-level products for multiple applications that range from ecosystems to hazards. This work fills a gap in current research by evaluating several RTCs produced by open-source software solutions (SNAP-7 and ISCE-2), the gold standard commercial software (GAMMA), a Google Earth Engine (GEE) based workflow, and the uncorrected GRD products currently available in GEE. RTCs were analyzed for geolocation quality, absolute radiometric calibration, and fidelity of the radiometric terrain flattening over ten sites representing varied terrains. In addition, a time series analysis was conducted over two locations. Overall, no significant differences for radiometric calibration were found across RTC products. However, all RTCs performed better than uncorrected GRD products. The main differences between products were found in geolocation quality. These results not only demonstrate the need for the uptake and distribution of RTC products for ecosystems applications, but demonstrate the ability to do so with open source methods, adding value to developing affordable operational applications.

Helen Blue Parache↗

Validation of the Thematic Mapper radiometric and geometric correction algorithms

The radiometric and geometric correction algorithms for Thematic Mapper are critical to subsequent successful information extraction. Earlier Landsat scanners, known as Multispectral Scanners, produce imagery which exhibits striping due to mismatching of detector gains and biases. Thematic Mapper exhibits the same phenomenon at three levels: detector-to-detector, scan-to-scan, and multiscan striping. The cause of these variations has been traced to variations in the dark current of the detectors. An alternative formulation has been tested and shown to be very satisfactory. Unfortunately, the Thematic Mapper detectors exhibit saturation effects suffered while viewing extensive cloud areas, and is not easily correctable. The geometric correction algorithm has been shown to be remarkably reliable. Only minor and modest improvements are indicated and shown to be effective.

Fischel, D.↗

Evaluating SAR Radiometric Terrain Correction products: Optimal products for applied users

Operational applications for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) are under development around the world, driven by the free-and-open access of SAR C-band observations that Sentinel-1 of Copernicus has been providing since 2014. Groups like SERVIR, a joint initiative between NASA and USAID, are at the forefront of remote sensing applied uses, and have made many significant contributions to lower the barrier to access, process, and apply SAR for ecosystem services. A takeaway from the SERVIR experience in using SAR is the need to use the appropriate SAR polarimetric product. Radiometric Terrain Correction (RTC) is a key entry-level product for multiple applications that range from ecosystems to hazards. Many software packages exist to create RTC products from SLC or GRD-type Level-1 SAR data, some of which were released only recently, e.g. Interferometric SAR Computing Environment (ISCE) added an RTC module in April 2020. In addition, new versions of open source softwares are expected to address known issues from previous versions, such as Sentinel-1 Toolbox from the European Space Agency (SNAP-7). Despite the growing availability of RTC software solutions, little work has been done to identify differences between RTC products from different softwares. And to address the question, which open-source software produces the most accurate RTC product? This work evaluates Sentinel-1 RTC products created with three different softwares and approaches, including SNAP-7, ISCE-2, and a pseudo RTC product derived from GEE. The GAMMA-derived RTC product, a known optimal RTC and implemented by Alaska Satellite Facility (ASF), is used as a reference. Time series stacks over ten different sites representing varied terrain and ecosystems are evaluated. Products are evaluated for geolocation quality, absolute radiometric calibration, and for the fidelity of the radiometric terrain flattening. The results provide direct guidance and recommendations about the quality of the RTC products obtained from open source methods. This understanding is key to develop operational applications that rely on SAR Sentinel-1 data that need affordable and scalable solutions.

Africa Flores-Anderson↗

An Efficient Area-Based Algorithm for SAR Radiometric Terrain Correction and Map Projection

This article presents a projection algorithm based on the representation of radar samples as area elements, rather than point elements as traditionally done in previous works. Each area element in the geographic grid (geogrid) is associated with a set of samples in the radar grid that intersect completely or partially the area element according to the topography and the radar geometry. Accurate geocoding with adaptive multi-looking is achieved by successively assigning the weighted average of the radar samples to the corresponding geogrid elements. Analogously, the slant-range projection of geocoded data is improved by projecting the geogrid pixels onto the radar grid according to their projected area. When our slant-range projection approach is used within previously-published radiometric terrain correction (RTC) algorithms, the processing time is significantly reduced, performing 3.6 to 5.2 times faster over multi-looked data and up to 8.9 over single-look data. We demonstrate the strength of the area projection algorithm for RTC and geocoding using UAVSAR and Sentinel-1 data, and evaluate the results in the context of the upcoming NISAR mission.

Shiroma, Gustavo H↗

Topographic mapping using a monopulse SAR system

Terrain height variations in mountainous areas cause two problems in the radiometric correction of SAR images: the first being that the wrong elevation angle may be used in correcting for the radiometric variation of the antenna pattern; the second that the local incidence angle used in correcting the projection of the pixel area from slant range to ground range coordinates may vary from that given by the flat earth assumption. We propose a novel design of a SAR system which exploits the monopulse principle to determine the elevation angle and thus the height at the different parts of the image. The key element of such a phase monopulse system is an antenna, which can be divided into a lower and upper half in elevation using a monopulse comparator. In addition to the usual sum pattern, the elevation difference pattern can be generated by a -pi phase shift on one half of the antenna. From the ratios of images radiometrically modulated by the difference and sum antenna pattern in cross-track direction, we can derive the appropriate elevation angle at any point in the image. Together with the slant range we can calculate the height of the platform above this point using information on the antenna pointing and the platform attitude. This operation, repeated at many locations throughout the image, allows us to build up a topographic map of the height of the aircraft above each location. Inversion of this map, using the precisely determined aircraft altitude and the accurate flight path, leads to the actual topography of the imaged surface. The precise elevation of one point in the image could also be used to convert the height map to a topographic map. In this paper, we present design considerations for a corresponding airborne SAR system in X-Band and give estimates of the error due to system noise and azimuth ambiguities as well as the expected performance and precision in topographic mapping.

Zink, M.↗

Radiometric performance of the Voyager cameras

The Voyager Imaging Experiment provided high-quality data of Jupiter and the Galilean satellites with the two flyby trajectories in March and July of 1979. Moderately accurate radiometric measurements have been made using these data. This paper evaluates the radiometric results and describes the inflight and ground geometric and radiometric correction factors. The radiometric quantities of intensity I and geometric albedo I/F are derived, and scaling factors for each of the filters are tabulated for correcting the 'calibrated' data from the Image Processing Laboratory at JPL. In addition, the key characteristics of both Voyager I and Voyager 2 cameras are tabulated.

Danielson, G. E.↗

Characteristics of Forests in Western Sayani Mountains, Siberia from SAR Data

This paper investigated the possibility of using spaceborne radar data to map forest types and logging in the mountainous Western Sayani area in Siberia. L and C band HH, HV, and VV polarized images from the Shuttle Imaging Radar-C instrument were used in the study. Techniques to reduce topographic effects in the radar images were investigated. These included radiometric correction using illumination angle inferred from a digital elevation model, and reducing apparent effects of topography through band ratios. Forest classification was performed after terrain correction utilizing typical supervised techniques and principal component analyses. An ancillary data set of local elevations was also used to improve the forest classification. Map accuracy for each technique was estimated for training sites based on Russian forestry maps, satellite imagery and field measurements. The results indicate that it is necessary to correct for topography when attempting to classify forests in mountainous terrain. Radiometric correction based on a DEM (Digital Elevation Model) improved classification results but required reducing the SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) resolution to match the DEM. Using ratios of SAR channels that include cross-polarization improved classification and

Ranson, K. Jon↗

An industrial perspective of the LANDSAT opportunity

The feasibility of enhancing LANDSAT products to provide the greatest usability low cost data possible can be determined through government sponsorship and finance of one or more task forces composed of a critical number of experts in multiple disciplines from many industries and academia. The synergism of multiple minds addressing singular problems without the creation of permanent or perpetual structures must yield output in the form of implementable specifications, even if presented as alternatives. Changes are needed within the spacecraft in order to account for Sun angle changes. The use of pointing accuracy to make geometric corrections (and possible radiometric corrections, is needed more than onboard data reduction and information extraction, which assume a proper knowledge of application and reduce potential utilization. Multilinear arrays need to be investigated and methods for sensor calibration and for determining the effects of atmospheric inversion, as well as the best way to back out the modulation transfer function must be determined.

Williams, B. F.↗

Geometric and radiometric characterization of LANDSAT-D thematic mapper and multispectral scanner data

A geometrically raw image of Washington, D.C. was acquired and radiometrically corrected. The data show little of the detector stripping common in earlier MSS images. The radiometrically corrected data have uniform means and standard deviations for the detectors in each band; however, the data for different detectors utilize a different pattern of DN levels, resulting in ubiquitous stripping of 1 DN amplitude. Band-to-band registration was assessed using color composites and small area correlation techniques. The spectral equivalency of the first four bands of the thematic mapper with the four bands of the MSS is being examined. Geometric analysis of the Washington, D.C. scene have started and a generalized routine for examining the contents of the label files and nonvideo data files was implemented. Several discrepancies from the documentation are described. Night scenes and daytime ocean scenes required for radiometric purposes were identified and the data ordered.

Kieffer, H. H.↗

Scan Angle and Detector Effects in Thematic Mapper Radiometry

The effects of scan angle and interdetector differences on thematic mapper radiometry were analyzed. The data set used for this study consisted of computer compatible tapes (CCT's) of raw data (CCT-BT), radiometrically corrected data (CCT-AT), and geometrically corrected data (CCT-PT) for two scenes, 40049-16262 (north central Iowa) and 40037-16031 (Arkansas). Radiometric corrections currently performed were found to improve overall consistency of data, but some residual stripping remains in the corrected data due to the quantization of signal values and other effects. A new type of banding was discovered which is related to the bi-directional scanning of TM. An initial empirical model was developed for correcting this effect in band 1, but should receive additional development. The scan angle effects observed corresponded to those expected based on atmospheric considerations and scene characteristics. Low frequency scan-to-scan noise was detected in band 1, band 7, and to a lesser extent in bands 2 and 3. The band 1 detectors which exhibited this noise showed strong correlation in their variation.

Metzler, M. D.↗

In Situ Mosaic Brightness Correction

In situ missions typically have pointable, mast-mounted cameras, which are capable of taking panoramic mosaics comprised of many individual frames. These frames are mosaicked together. While the mosaic software applies radiometric correction to the images, in many cases brightness/contrast seams still exist between frames. This is largely due to errors in the radiometric correction, and the absence of correction for photometric effects in the mosaic processing chain. The software analyzes the overlaps between adjacent frames in the mosaic and determines correction factors for each image in an attempt to reduce or eliminate these brightness seams.

Deen, Robert G.↗

LANDSAT-D data format control book. Volume 6: (Products)

Four basic product types are generated from the raw thematic mapper (TM) and multispectral scanner (MSS) payload data by the NASA GSFC LANDSAT 4 data management system: (1) unprocessed data (raw sensor data); (2) partially processed data, which consists of radiometrically corrected sensor data with geometric correction information appended; (3) fully processed data, which consists of radiometrically and geometrically corrected sensor data; and (4) inventory data which consists of summary information about product types 2 and 3. High density digital recorder formatting and the radiometric correction process are described. Geometric correction information is included.

Kabat, F.↗