NASA NTRS1961
Results of flutter tests on some simple all-movable-control-type models are given. One set of models, which had a square planform with double-wedge airfoils with four different values of leading- and trailing-edge radii from 0 to 6 percent chord and airfoil thicknesses of 9, 11, 14, and 20 percent chord, was tested at Mach numbers from 0.7 to 6.86. The bending-to-torsion frequency ratio was about 0.33. The other set of models, which had a tapered planform with single-wedge and double-wedge airfoils with thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 percent chord, was tested at Mach numbers from 0.7 to 3.98 and a frequency ratio of about 0.42. The tests indicate that, in general, increasing thickness has a destabilizing effect at the higher Mach numbers but is stabilizing at subsonic and transonic Mach numbers. Double-wedge airfoils are more prone to flutter than single-wedge airfoils at comparable stiffness levels. Increasing airfoil bluntness has a stabilizing effect on the flutter boundary at supersonic speeds but has a negligible effect at subsonic speeds. However, increasing bluntness may also lead to divergence at supersonic speeds. Results of calculations using second-order piston-theory aerodynamics in conjunction with a coupled-mode analysis and an uncoupled-mode analysis are compared with the experimental results for the sharp-edge airfoils at supersonic speeds. The uncoupled-mode analysis more accurately predicted the flutter characteristics of the tapered-planform models, whereas the coupled-mode analysis was somewhat better for the square-planform models. For both the uncoupled- and coupled-mode analyses, agreement with the experimental results improved with increasing Mach number. In general, both methods of analysis gave unconservative results with respect to the experimental flutter boundaries.