Remote Sensing of Coronal Forces during a Solar Prominence Eruption
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The theoretical and observed level populations are compared. These levels are: helium 2P3, hydrogen second, ionized helium fourth ones. The obtained results are as follows: (1) helium, hydrogen, and metals may be emitted by the same filaments; (2) bright quiescent prominence filaments have electron temperature and electron density in the line of sight near T sub e = 7000 deg, n sub e = 10 to the 12th power, alpha = 0.0001; (3) under these conditions the average effective thickness is 5 million hence quiescent prominences have a fine filamentary structure: (4) the conditions in the interfilament areas are T sub e = 20,000 to 70,000 deg, n sub e = 10 to the 10th power to 10 to the 11th power/cu cm.
Spectra and spectroheliograms of prominences have been obtained at wavelengths of 300 to 1400 A from instruments aboard the OSO 4 and OSO 6 spacecraft. Quiescent prominences appear in emission above the limb for all strong lines formed at temperatures below 300,000 K, but not at higher temperatures. The gas pressure in the 100,000-K transition zone around prominences is approximately equal to that in the cooler (6500 K) central regions. The temperature and the hydrogen ground-state departure coefficient in the central regions are determined from the Lyman-continuum spectrum. Prominences on the disk (filaments) are visible in absorption in many lines, especially those at wavelengths below the hydrogen Lyman limit at 912 A.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Observations of the H I Lyman continuum are presented for nine hedgerow prominences observed at the limb with the Harvard EUV spectrometer on Skylab. Methods of analysis for both the continuum emission and absorption are developed for two contrasting models for the prominence fine structure, namely multiple resolved slabs, and multiple unresolved cylindrical threads. The absorption data set a lower limit on the total optical thickness at 912 A and on the number of structures in the line of sight. The emission data yield a mean electron temperature of 7524 + or - 739 K and a mean brightness temperature of 6316 + or - 75 K. Taken together the emission and absorption data set firm constraints on the ionization, density, and fractional volume.
The optical depth at the head of the Lyman continuum, tau sub H, was determined at several positions in three hedgerow prominences using spectroheliograms of C III 977 A, LC 896 A, and O IV 554 A, observed with the Harvard experiment on Skylab. It is found that tau sub H varies over a wide range at positions even in a single prominence. At the central part of the prominences where the opacity is largest, tau sub H reaches a maximum value of 30 to 50 for the three prominences. In general, tau sub H decreases with height in the prominences. Most positions near the outer boundary of the prominences are optically thin in the LC (tau sub H less than 1). The determination of tau sub H for P23 is consistent with the data of the Mg X spectroheliograms
Prominences are relatively cool (10,000 K) and dense plasma clouds which may persist for 100 days or more in the midst of the much hotter (1 million K) and more tenuous (10 exp 9/cu cm) corona. Many observations imply that the magnetic field in and around prominences is responsible both for isolating prominences from the corona and for supporting them against gravity. It is not at all obvious how the magnetic field can do both these tasks, but the limited theoretical models that are available suggest that a magnetic-flux rope is involved. Using a new analytical model, it is argued that the flux rope could also play a key role in the eruption of a prominence by supplying the magnetic energy necessary to drive the prominence outwards.
The present numerical method for the computation of force-free, cancelling magnetic structures shows that flux cancellation at the neutral line in a sheared magnetic arcade generates helical field lines that can support a prominence's plasma. With increasing flux cancellation, the axis of the helical fields moves to greater heights; this is suggestive of a prominence eruption. Two alternative scenarios are proposed for the formation of polar crown prominences which yield the correct axial magnetic field sign. Both models are noted to retain the formation of helical flux tubes through flux cancellation as their key feature.
The outstanding questions on the formation of quiescent prominences are discussed. One key issue is identified to be the formation of dips in coronal magnetic field lines. A model is presented which can account for such dipped field lines. The critical ingredients of the model are that the prominence magnetic field is a truly three dimensional structure with significant variation along the prominence length, and the magnetic field has strong shear concentrated at the photospheric neutral line. Simulations which demonstrate that these two features lead to dip formation and that the geometry of the dips are such that inverse polarity prominences can be explained are presented. Another key issue is identified to be the formation of prominence condensations on dipped field lines. It is argued that a spatially varying coronal heating rate which is maximum near the chromosphere explain these condensations.
A model is presented which accounts for the formation of coronal magnetic field lines with the appropriate 'dipped' structure to support prominences. The critical ingredients of the model are that the prominence magnetic field is a truly three-dimensional structure with significant variation along the prominence length, and the magnetic field is strongly sheared near the photospheric neutral line. Numerical calculations are presented which demonstrate that these two features lead to dip formation. In addition our model is able to account for the long-puzzling observation of inverse polarity in quiescent prominences.
The prominence that erupts in a prominence eruption is a magnetic structure in the chromosphere and corona. It is visible in chromospheric images by virtue of chromospheric-temperature plasma suspended in the magnetic field, and belongs to that large class of magnetic structures appropriately called filaments because of their characteristic sinewy sigmoidal form. Hence, the term "filament eruption" is used interchangeably with the term "prominence eruption". The magnetic field holding a filament is prone to undergo explosive changes in configuration. In these upheavals, because the filament material is compelled by its high conductivity to ride with the magnetic field that threads it, this material is a visible tracer of the field motion. The part of the magnetic explosion displayed by the entrained filament material is the phenomenon known as a filament eruption, the topic of this article. This article begins with a description of basic observed characteristics of filament eruptions, with attention to the magnetic fields, flares, and coronal mass ejections in which erupting filaments are embedded. The present understanding of these characteristics in terms of the form and action of the magnetic field is then laid out by means of a rudimentary three-dimensional model of the field. The article ends with basic questions that this picture leaves unresolved and with remarks on the observations needed to probe these questions.
In the present work we extend the use of this mass-inference technique to a sample of prominences observed in at least two coronal lines. This approach, in theory, allows a direct calculation of prominence mass and helium abundance and how these properties vary spatially and temporally. Our motivation is two-fold: to obtain a He(exp 0)/H(exp 0) abundance ratio, and to determine how the relative spatial distribution of the two species varies in prominences. The first of these relies on the theoretical expectation that the amount of absorption at each EUV wavelength is well-characterized. However, in this work we show that due to a saturation of the continuum absorption in the 625 A and 368 A lines (which have much higher opacity compared to 195 A-) the uncertainties in obtaining the relative abundances are too high to give meaningful estimates. This is an important finding because of its impact on future studies in this area. The comparison of the spatial distribution of helium and hydrogen presented here augments previous observational work indicating that cross-field diffusion of neutrals is an important mechanism for mass loss. Significantly different loss timescales for neutral He and H (helium drains much more rapidly than hydrogen) can impact prominence structure, and both the present and past studies suggest this mechanism is playing a role in structure and possibly dynamics. Section 2 of this paper contains a description of the observations and Section 3 summarizes the method used to infer mass along with the criteria imposed in choosing prominences appropriate for this study. Section 3 also contains a discussion of the problems due to limitations of the available data and the implications for determining relative abundances. We present our results in Section 4, including plots of radial-like scans of prominence mass in different lines to show the spatial distribution of the different species. The last section contains a discussion summarizing the importance of the qualitative results found in this work. The Appendix provides a detailed derivation of how to obtain prominence mass and helium abundance (A 1) and includes the data for all prominences studied (A2).
This review paper outlines background information and covers recent advances made via the analysis of spectra and images of prominence plasma and the increased sophistication of non-LTE (i.e. when there is a departure from Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium) radiative transfer models. We first describe the spectral inversion techniques that have been used to infer the plasma parameters important for the general properties of the prominence plasma in both its cool core and the hotter prominence-corona transition region. We also review studies devoted to the observation of bulk motions of the prominence plasma and to the determination of prominence mass. However, a simple inversion of spectroscopic data usually fails when the lines become optically thick at certain wavelengths. Therefore, complex
Small scaleoscillations were recently observed in prominences with high resolution Hinode/SOT and IRIS SJI in unprecedented detailand identified as fast magnetosonic waves. The high-resolution observations provide evidence of flows of cool material, fluid instabilities such as Kelvin-Helmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor, and the spectroscopic information provides evidence of Doppler shifts, heating, and cooling of the prominence material. Recently nonlinear fast magnetosonic waves were observed withperiods in the range of 5–11 minutes and wavelengths in the plane of the sky (POS) of ~2000kmand flows, and the flows in narrow threads withPOS speed ∼16–46 km/s. Thenonlinear fast magnetosonic waves and flows were modeled using 2.5D MHD (Ofman & Kucera 2020). Here, we extend the studyof the nonlinear fast magnetosonic waves using more realistic 3D MHD model. The model includes the 3D structure of the density and the magnetic fieldas well as mode coupling anddemonstrate the propagating density compressions associated with the nonlinear fast magnetosonicwaves, as well as the guided modesin the pillar. The 3DMHD modelingimprove understanding ofthe POSeffects in limb prominence oscillations observations.The results of the modeling are useful for coronal seismology of the prominence structure.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Various aspects of solar prominences and the solar corona are discussed. The formation of prominences, prominence diagnostics and structure, prominence dissappearance, large scale coronal structure, coronal diagnostics, small scale coronal structure, and non-equilibrium/coronal heating are among the topics covered.
The support of solar prominences is normally described in terms of a magnetic force on the prominence plasma that balances the solar gravitational force. Because the prominence plasma is only partially ionized. it is necessary to consider in addition the support of the neutral component of the prominence plasma. This support is accomplished through a frictional interaction between the neutral and ionized components of the plasma, and its efficacy depends strongly on the degree of ionization of the plasma. More specifically, the frictional force is proportional to the relative flow of neutral and ion species, and for a sufficiently weakly ionized plasma, this flow must be relatively large to produce a frictional force that balances gravity. A large relative flow, of course, implies significant draining of neutral particles from the prominence. We evaluate the importance of this draining effect for a hydrogen-helium plasma, and consider the observational evidence for cross-field diffusion of neutral prominence material,