NASA NTRSDate not supplied
Astronaut crews have historically averaged around six hours of sleep per night, especially during missions that required a high tempo work environment, confined spacecraft without crew quarters, and frequent sleep schedule changes. In recent years, crew aboard the ISS have had much more stable schedules, with a consistent bedtime at 2130 and wake time at 0600 Greenwich Mean Time. Despite these improvements to sleep conditions on the ISS, sleep schedules are disrupted by visiting vehicles that arrive or leave the ISS or when uncontrollable operational events require the crewmembers to shift their sleep. We characterized the approaches to sleep shifting, including shifting sleep earlier and later and split sleep to determine the impact on sleep duration and quality. METHODS Data were gathered though the Spaceflight Standard Measures protocol. These consisted of objective measures of sleep duration (calculated via a wrist-worn accelerometer) collected by 19 crewmembers (7 females; mean age 46 ± 7 years) throughout their tenure aboard the ISS. We first categorized episodes of “split sleep” whereby a person attempts sleep on two separate occasions in a 24-hour period that are similar in length. For example, they might have a 4-hour sleep opportunity followed by a night awake, followed by another 4-hour sleep opportunity the next morning. RESULTS Out of the 19 crewmembers, a total of 8 engaged in 11 episodes of split sleep while inflight. These periods all surrounded visiting vehicle events that interfered with their nominal sleep window, including docking, relocation, and undocking events. The first sleep opportunity typically took place during the afternoon before the disrupting event (all sleep periods were contained between 1151 and 2009), while the second episode took place the following morning (between 0343 and 1325) On average, the time in bed of the first sleep opportunity was shorter than the second (M1=2.89±0.82 vs. M2=4.30±1.41). DISCUSSION Next in our analysis, we will compare the crewmembers’ split sleep outcomes to those from other strategies (e.g., phase delays). We aim to determine which strategies yield the best sleep outcomes and to determine whether the sleep shifting strategy has consequences to subsequent sleep. Understanding these impacts will aid in decision making for future ISS operations and will also help us better understand the impacts of various strategies to adjust sleep and help guide scheduling in future missions where consistent schedules may not be possible.