The Need to Revise the Flattop- Plutonium Benchmark [Slides]
This presentation begins with a flattop description then touches on current benchmark model, path to reevaluation, planned revision configurations and ends with conclusions.
Benchmarks↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “touch safety”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Covariance Testing and Update on 239 Pu and 235 U PFNS Covariances [Slides]
This presentation discusses in detail how covariances were obtained and tested. Along with a look into some of the mathematical checks that were performed. Possible "physics issues" in covariances were highlighted and addressed. Covariances for Dysprosium and Erbium-169 were touched on along with various uncertainties and issues. An update on Uranium-235 and Plutonium-239 Pu PFNS covariances was given.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Validation and Evaluation Uses of Quasi-Differential High-Energy Scattering Data [Slides]
This presentation covers the validation and evaluation uses of quasi-differential high-energy scattering data. This lecture covers motivation behind this work. The lecture then touches on quasi-differential for evaluation, quasi-differential for covariance, and quasi-differential for validation. The presentation concludes with a summary.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Light Elements $R$-matrix Analyses with the SAMMY code towards the Foundation of Charged-particle Nuclear Data Libraries [Slides]
This presentation covers newly developed SAMMY module for inverse channel transformation. Additionally covered is the R-matrix analysis of 7 Be compound nucleus and the R-matrix analysis of 17 O compound nucleus. Further touched on is the evaluated Nuclear Data File generation and processing with the AMPX code. The presentation concludes with talks on future evaluation work and tests on light nuclei.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Completion of IER 305: Molybdenum Sleeve Experiments and Preparations for Performing IER 441: Epithermal Tantalum Experiments [Slides]
This presentation includes a look into Sandia critical experiments including the 7uPCX, BUCCX, and assembly design. This presentation touches on the completion of IER 305 with CED-3b, CED-4a, and CED-4b. Finally, there are preparations to perform IER 441 including new hardware, critical configurations, and next steps.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
American Nuclear Society 2023 Student Conference [Slides]
This presentation is titled American Nuclear Society 2023 Student Conference and is led by with introductions from a few of the students. This presentation touches on how operations serve the mission, and everyone is a part of it. In order for anyone to operate with special nuclear material (SNM) the responsible contractor or licensee must comply with several regulations. The presentation touches on how there are several roles involved in operations. This talk also includes a page of references, regulations, standards and guidance. The presentation concludes with a section on Material Balance Areas (MBA).
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Status of ANS-8 and TC85/SC5/WG8 NCS Consensus Standards [Slides]
This presentation covers ANS-8 and its status. The presentation starts with an introduction into ongoing projects. Including touching upon on ANS standard development steps and a status report. Finally, the lecture covers ISO WG8 Standards. with a special focus on recent ISO TC85/SC5 Plenary in Tsukuba, Japan and ISO development process + road map and a final status report.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
ENDF/B-VIII.1 Validation: Covariance [Slides]
This presentation touches on ENDF/B-VIII.1 Validation: Covariance. Topics include inconsistencies in the ENDF files, derived matrices, lumped reactions and process ENDF data file with PUFF. Finally correcting data with cognac and redundant covariance that are not consistent are discussed.
Cognac↗
International collaboration in disposal research: comparative modeling of coupled processes in the DECOVALEX project
Abstract. This presentation gives an overview of an international research collaboration for advancing the understanding and modeling of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical (THMC) processes in geological systems. The creation of the international DECOVALEX project, now running for more than 25 years, was motivated by the recognition that prediction of these coupled effects is an essential part of the performance and safety assessment of geologic disposal systems for radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. DECOVALEX emphasizes joint analysis and comparative modeling of state-of-the-art field and laboratory experiments, across a range of host rock options and repository designs. Participating research teams are from radioactive waste management organizations, national research institutes, regulatory agencies, universities, and consulting groups, providing a wide range of perspectives and solutions to these complex problems. The presentation provides examples of the research contributions made collectively in past DECOVALEX tasks and also touches on the unique modeling challenges tackled in the ongoing project phase, referred to as DECOVALEX-2023. The current phase comprises 17 partner organizations, about 50 modeling teams, and 7 modeling tasks, which cover a broad portfolio from fundamental studies on gas migration to full-scale in situ heater experiments in different host rocks to performance assessment studies. Together, these examples illustrate that the insight and scientific knowledge gained within the DECOVALEX project would not have been possible if one group had studied these complex THMC modeling challenges alone rather than within a truly collaborative setting.
Birkholzer, Jens T.↗
Covariance Data in Unresolved Range [Slides]
This presentation touches on the covariance data in unresolved range. This presentation talks about how the URR has several limitations and the focus on covariance information. The talk briefly outlines the limitations and fosters a discussion that can lead to format proposals.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Contributions for ENDF/B-VIII.1 Paper
This paper is on contributions for ENDF/B-VIII.1. The paper covers neutron reaction covariances and touches on improved testing of nuclear data covariances. Additionally, fission is discussed along with the prompt fission neutron spectrum. Finally, it ends with a look into validation with LLNL pulsed spheres.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
Quasi-Differential Neutron Scattering Measurements of 181 Ta and Teflon from 1.5 to 20 MeV [Slides]
This presentation covers motivation for the Experiments Performed. Secondly, it touches on upgrades to the Experimental Apparatus for Measurements. Thirdly, it presents quasi-Differential Experimental Methodology a) Pulse Shape Discrimination b) Validation Measurement of Carbon. The presentation concludes with Preliminary Results and Future Studies.
46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
Protecting Against Potential Issues in Thermal Neutron Scattering [Slides]
This presentation touches upon the TSL community that has been growing rapidly. Additionally, this presentation mentions the more exotic materials and theories that are being implemented in TSL files. This lecture concludes on three areas of potential concern: Coherent scattering, Computational simulations, and Isotopic distribution.
07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗
Site Integration and Regulatory Considerations for a Nuclear Power Plant Colocated with Industrial Facilities: Colocation Studies for a Petroleum Refinery, Methanol Plant, and Wood Pulp Plant
This research explores the colocation of nuclear power plants (NPPs) with industrial applications. Three existing industrial sites were considered to demonstrate the siting process and illuminate technological gaps for future work. The three applications demonstrated for colocation here are a petroleum refinery, a methanol production plant, and a pulp and paper plant. This study uses a modified version of the EPRI siting criteria to explore the geological and demographic characteristics of the location of the current industrial site, as well as exploring external hazards from the industrial plant and its surrounding land use. Data was collected from public databases to estimate site characteristics. We then discuss how the site characteristics may impact the ability to colocate an NPP with an industrial application. The application site and 5 additional sites were explored for each application to give a general indication of the siting implications for an NPP in each area. The hazards for each industrial application was also explored to determine how colocation may impact reactor safety. The following gaps have been identified and should be explored in future research on colocation of NPPs with petroleum refineries, methanol plants, and pulp and paper plants: - There is a variety of industrial use, hazards, and pipelines in the surrounding area. A more thorough review of these hazards should be considered for colocation. - In general, the whole region around some applications seems to have softer soil, with implications for large site preparation costs. Further site investigations should prioritize looking into the geotechnical conditions. - Applications along coastlines are susceptible to flooding and hurricanes. The benefits of colocation should be weighed against the potential design implications. - The benefits of natural gas pipeline infrastructure in place should be explored further. If heat supply from the NPP is not required or not feasible due to the distance between the NPP and the application, there may be an opportunity to supply hydrogen to the plant through an existing pipeline. - Because there are several collocated industrial plants in the regions for the refinery and methanol plant, the benefits of sharing resources from the NPP should be explored further. This may open up additional sites for colocation. The following knowledge gaps were identified for the colocation of NPPs with these three industries, and industrial applications in general. These gaps are: - While the STAND tool contains many important characteristics for the reactor siting process, it is not calibrated for the colocation of NPPs with industrial facilities. - There are aspects of both the NPP and industrial application that need to be quantified for a siting analysis. Particularly, we need to understand the water intake requirements for NPPs and each application. - Further work may focus on adapting the STAND site comparison methodology to comparison of sites for co-location. This will involve using the data documented in this report as a starting point and performing a comprehensive and quantitative comparison. - Without spending significant resources, it would be impossible to gather data for each site to evaluate all aspects of siting. One approach to finding data and understanding its implications to siting is looking at FSARs for existing plants. For example, most sites considered in this study have small Vs30 values, indicating soft soil. However, there are NPPs located in the vicinity of most of the sites (e.g., Waterford Steam Electric Station near New Orleans) and reviewing available site characteristics and geotechnical data for these NPPs, might provide further information for siting. - The siting analysis in this study indicates that colocation of the NPP with the industrial site could be difficult based on external hazards, cooling requirements, weather, or population. We need to determine the impact of distance between the two facilities on cost and quality of energy transport. - This study did not touch on socioeconomic impacts for NPP colocation with industrial facilities. The input-output analysis methodology could be applied to the communities referenced in this study to determine the socioeconomic impact of these projects. - Similarly, the impacts of colocation on emergency planning was not explored in this study. The impacts on emergency planning infrastructure are somewhat related to the socioeconomic impacts, and could be explored using a similar methodology. - This study also did not address physical and cybersecurity, which will be important aspects of co-location [ref] . Cybersecurity will be important, regardless of the distance, but physical security will be important if the facilities are located very closely. Physical security might also be important for the steam lines between the plants, unless they are determined to be non-safety significant. - In many site l
08 HYDROGEN↗
Site Integration and Regulatory Considerations for an NPP Colocated with a Petroleum Refinery, Methanol Plant, and Wood Pulp Plant
This research explores the colocation of nuclear power plants (NPPs) with industrial applications. Three existing industrial sites were considered to demonstrate the siting process and illuminate technological gaps for future work. The three applications demonstrated for colocation here are a petroleum refinery, a methanol production plant, and a pulp and paper plant. This study uses a modified version of the EPRI siting criteria to explore the geological and demographic characteristics of the location of the current industrial site, as well as exploring external hazards from the industrial plant and its surrounding land use. Data was collected from public databases to estimate site characteristics. We then discuss how the site characteristics may impact the ability to colocate an NPP with an industrial application. The application site and 5 additional sites were explored for each application to give a general indication of the siting implications for an NPP in each area. The hazards for each industrial application was also explored to determine how colocation may impact reactor safety. The following gaps have been identified and should be explored in future research on colocation of NPPs with petroleum refineries, methanol plants, and pulp and paper plants: - There is a variety of industrial use, hazards, and pipelines in the surrounding area. A more thorough review of these hazards should be considered for colocation. - In general, the whole region around some applications seems to have softer soil, with implications for large site preparation costs. Further site investigations should prioritize looking into the geotechnical conditions. - Applications along coastlines are susceptible to flooding and hurricanes. The benefits of colocation should be weighed against the potential design implications. - The benefits of natural gas pipeline infrastructure in place should be explored further. If heat supply from the NPP is not required or not feasible due to the distance between the NPP and the application, there may be an opportunity to supply hydrogen to the plant through an existing pipeline. - Because there are several collocated industrial plants in the regions for the refinery and methanol plant, the benefits of sharing resources from the NPP should be explored further. This may open up additional sites for colocation. The following knowledge gaps were identified for the colocation of NPPs with these three industries, and industrial applications in general. These gaps are: - While the STAND tool contains many important characteristics for the reactor siting process, it is not calibrated for the colocation of NPPs with industrial facilities. - There are aspects of both the NPP and industrial application that need to be quantified for a siting analysis. Particularly, we need to understand the water intake requirements for NPPs and each application. - Further work may focus on adapting the STAND site comparison methodology to comparison of sites for co-location. This will involve using the data documented in this report as a starting point and performing a comprehensive and quantitative comparison. - Without spending significant resources, it would be impossible to gather data for each site to evaluate all aspects of siting. One approach to finding data and understanding its implications to siting is looking at FSARs for existing plants. For example, most sites considered in this study have small Vs30 values, indicating soft soil. However, there are NPPs located in the vicinity of most of the sites (e.g., Waterford Steam Electric Station near New Orleans) and reviewing available site characteristics and geotechnical data for these NPPs, might provide further information for siting. - The siting analysis in this study indicates that colocation of the NPP with the industrial site could be difficult based on external hazards, cooling requirements, weather, or population. We need to determine the impact of distance between the two facilities on cost and quality of energy transport. - This study did not touch on socioeconomic impacts for NPP colocation with industrial facilities. The input-output analysis methodology could be applied to the communities referenced in this study to determine the socioeconomic impact of these projects. - Similarly, the impacts of colocation on emergency planning was not explored in this study. The impacts on emergency planning infrastructure are somewhat related to the socioeconomic impacts, and could be explored using a similar methodology. - This study also did not address physical and cybersecurity, which will be important aspects of co-location [ref] . Cybersecurity will be important, regardless of the distance, but physical security will be important if the facilities are located very closely. Physical security might also be important for the steam lines between the plants, unless they are determined to be non-safety significant. - In many site l
08 - HYDROGEN↗
Verification and Validation of the New MCNP6.3 Criticality Features [Slides]
This presentation touches on a separate MCNP6.3 V&V document reports on all the default calculations for all test suites. Here, we look at new optional features of the MCNP6.3 code with Fission-matrix-based options, Convergence and population testing, and Automated acceleration of the fission source additionally Doppler Broadening Resonance Correction. Also touched on are validation benchmarks: criticality, crit_expanded, and Rossi-α. All the new MCNP6.3 options give statistically equivalent results and either provide a reduction or no change in computational cost. We consider giving these new features a try and using them for all criticality calculations.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
Covariance Testing Progress for ENDF/B-VIII.1β1 at ORNL [Slides]
This presentation touched on how data-induced uncertainty significantly increased for thermal 235 U-fueled systems. And how 239 Pu covariance changes are worrying. Additionally discussed is how 103 Rh is the only significant important fission product change. The Impact of ENDF/B-VIII.1β1 on burnup credit similarity assessments is similar to ENDF/B-VII.1 data.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Evaluated Nuclear Data Requirements in Support of Fission and Fusion Applications [Slides]
This presentation touches on thermal scattering cross section and scattering lengths including criticality benchmarks (fission). Secondly, development and completeness of charged particle libraries: criticality benchmarks (fission), neutron source (fission/fusion), simulation benchmarks and light elements generation (fusion). Additionally, this presentation details on the covariances (methodology and completeness) with adjustment and optimization of nuclear data libraries (fission/fusion). Finally nuclear data reproducibility and conclusions are discussed.
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗