Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “vehicle deployment”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

Pterodactyl: Control System Design for Deployable Entry Vehicles

As space exploration missions continue to get more complex, greater demands for mass and volume are being placed on planetary entry vehicles. At the same time, the desire for precision entry targeting to enable surface missions at very specific locations is becoming common. Deployable aeroshells are one type of technology that is being developed to increase the down-mass capability of planetary entry vehicles while complying with current launch vehicle volume constraints. Propulsive control can be used for precision entry targeting but can require a large percentage of the vehicle's total mass or volume for propellant. The Pterodactyl project is studying alternative entry control systems on a Deployable Entry Vehicle to potentially introduce a mass and volume efficient entry system that can achieve precision targeting. This paper presents the mechanical design work undertaken to support the Pterodactyl trade study of three entry vehicle control system options: 1) Flaps, 2) Mass Movement, and 3) Reaction Control System.

D'Souza, Sarah↗
NASA NTRS1999

Laser Lightcraft Vehicle Design

Current space deployment vehicle research is investigating ways to lower the cost to place payloads into orbit. Beamed energy propulsion is one of the areas that are being studied. The Laser lightcraft concept, which uses a ground based laser as part of its propulsion system, falls into this category. This concept has been developed by previous Strategic Defense Initiative Office (SDIO) research. In this concept, the laser energy is reflected off of a mirror on the craft and is focused inside the cowl to created optical breakdown of the propellant. There are several concerns about the design that must be further studied. These include: 1) Thermodynamic analysis of the cryogenic fuel storage and feed systems, 2) Analysis of the regenerative cooling system for the primary optic, and 3) Analysis of focal blurring of the laser due to off-axis flight.

Buch, Kevin↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis CubeSats Help Advance Exploration of the Moon, Mars, and Beyond

On April 1, NASA launched the Artemis II mission – the first crewed mission of the Artemis campaign. The nine-day lunar flyby launched on the agency’s SLS (Space Launch System) rocket and had four astronauts test the Orion spacecraft in high Earth orbit and in deep space. Four 12U CubeSats also launched on the mission, housed within the SLS’s Orion stage adapter (OSA). The spacecraft were deployed approximately five-and-a-half hours into the flight, following Orion separation and departure from SLS, as the SLS interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) and the attached OSA were in a high Earth orbit on an atmospheric disposal trajectory. All four CubeSats were successfully deployed from the launch vehicle. Deployment statuses of the spacecraft, along with updates about the SLS rocket and Artemis missions, are reported in this paper. The paper will also discuss opportunities for CubeSat payloads on future Artemis missions.

Russell Lane↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis CubeSats Help Advance Exploration of the Moon, Mars, and Beyond

On April 1, NASA launched the Artemis II mission – the first crewed mission of the Artemis campaign. The nine-day lunar flyby launched on the agency’s SLS (Space Launch System) rocket and had four astronauts test the Orion spacecraft in high Earth orbit and in deep space. Four 12U CubeSats also launched on the mission, housed within the SLS’s Orion stage adapter (OSA). The spacecraft were deployed approximately five-and-a-half hours into the flight, following Orion separation and departure from SLS, as the SLS interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) and the attached OSA were in a high Earth orbit on an atmospheric disposal trajectory. All four CubeSats were successfully deployed from the launch vehicle. Deployment statuses of the spacecraft, along with updates about the SLS rocket and Artemis missions, are reported in this paper. The paper will also discuss opportunities for CubeSat payloads on future Artemis missions.

David Hitt↗
NASA NTRS2018

TPSAS-NF1676L-31282-DND

Several technology investments, beyond those used for robotic missions, are required to develop Mars human scale Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) systems. In a resource-constrained environment, studies play the critical role of identifying the most feasible technical paths and high payoff investments. One such NASA multi-directorate, multi-center study, is called the Entry, Descent and Landing Architecture Study (EDLAS). This paper presents a summary of phase two of the study conducted from October 2016 to September 2017. Study ground rules and assumptions are provided by NASA?s Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate (HEOMD) and include a Mars architecture and Mars surface lander payload manifests. Four unique entry technologies with the potential to deliver a specified 20 t human scale payload to the Mars surface are considered for analysis. Two of these techniques are evolutionary rigid vehicles, derived from robotic capsule missions and the space shuttle. Likewise, two revolutionary deployable vehicles are considered, the Adaptable Deployable Entry Placement Technology (ADEPT) and Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD). This paper summarizes updates to the entry technology designs, the analysis motivation and approach, figures of merit by which the configurations are compared, and results of the analyses. Finally, findings are presented with the recommendation that two of the four configurations, one evolutionary and one revolutionary technology, continue to be studied in future human scale EDL studies.

Alicia Dwyer Cianciolo↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Pterodactyl: Aerodynamic and Aerothermal Modeling for a Symmetric Deployable Earth Entry Vehicle with Flaps

NASA’s Pterodactyl project has investigated a deployable atmospheric entry vehicle integrated with a flap control system that provides precision targeting during reentry. The control system consists of eight flaps mounted at the edge of a heatshield that can deflect in and out of the flow. An aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic analysis process was developed for preliminary vehicle design and aerodynamic database generation using engineering and CFD tools with varying levels of fidelity. The objective of this analysis was to: 1) understand the inherent aerodynamics, 2) provide an aerodynamics database for stability and control analysis, and 3) provide qualitative and quantitative aeroheating analysis for Thermal Protection System modeling of the flaps. A high fidelity Euler code, Cart3D, was used to resolve complex flow features such as secondary shocks and shock impingement. A wide range of supersonic (Mach 2) and hypersonic Mach numbers (up to Mach 40) were tested with an Earth atmosphere model. A process was developed to utilize the adaptive volume mesh generator utility of the perfect gas model of Cart3D to create meshes with high cell efficiency and numerical stability prior to running a 2nd order accurate solution with a real gas model. High-fidelity aerothermal CFD simulations were performed using US3D to further improve the aerothermal analysis on hypersonic flow around a complex entry vehicle shape including viscosity, chemical reactions of air species, vibrational energy, and catalytic surface reactions. In this process, it was found that the flap control system provided multi-axis control that can be utilized for entry precision targeting. Additionally, the Pterodactyl vehicle can achieve up to a trim L/D of 0.2. Finally, the increased fidelity of the aerothermal heating environments revealed that the shear stress contributes to increasing the heating on the flaps.

Deployable Entry Vehicle↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Pterodactyl: Aerodynamic and Aerothermal Modeling for a Symmetric Deployable Earth Entry Vehicle with Flaps

NASA’s Pterodactyl project has investigated a deployable atmospheric entry vehicle integrated with a flap control system that provides precision targeting during reentry. The control system consists of eight flaps mounted at the edge of a heatshield that can deflect in and out of the flow. An aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic analysis process was developed for preliminary vehicle design and aerodynamic database generation using engineering and CFD tools with varying levels of fidelity. The objective of this analysis was to: 1) understand the inherent aerodynamics, 2) provide an aerodynamics database for stability and control analysis, and 3) provide qualitative and quantitative aeroheating analysis for Thermal Protection System modeling of the flaps. A high fidelity Euler code, Cart3D, was used to resolve complex flow features such as secondary shocks and shock impingement. A wide range of supersonic (Mach 2) and hypersonic Mach numbers (up to Mach 40) were tested with an Earth atmosphere model. A process was developed to utilize the adaptive volume mesh generator utility of the perfect gas model of Cart3D to create meshes with high cell efficiency and numerical stability prior to running a 2nd order accurate solution with a real gas model. High-fidelity aerothermal CFD simulations were performed using US3D to further improve the aerothermal analysis on hypersonic flow around a complex entry vehicle shape including viscosity, chemical reactions of air species, vibrational energy, and catalytic surface reactions. In this process, it was found that the flap control system provided multi-axis control that can be utilized for entry precision targeting. Additionally, the Pterodactyl vehicle can achieve up to a trim L/D of 0.2. Finally, the increased fidelity of the aerothermal heating environments revealed that the shear stress contributes to increasing the heating on the flaps.

Deployable Entry Vehicle↗
NASA NTRS2023

In Situ Sensors for Monitoring the Space Environment and Its Effect Upon Satellite Materials

Development of advanced materials for space requires both an understanding of the space environment and how a material might be affected by the environment. Despite a long history of space missions, we have insufficient knowledge to fully characterize the exposure that spacecraft materials experience over a mission lifetime, much less the effects that this exposure induces upon spacecraft materials. In addition, the physics of materials/environment interactions is less well understood than optimum owing to the complex nature of the space environment and the challenges in simulating this environment in the laboratory. Our understanding of both the environment and materials behavior in that environment would be advanced by the development of sensors that could be deployed on a variety of missions and collect sufficient data. In-situ environmental sensors would improve both our understanding of spacecraft materials environmental durability and lead to improved ground-laboratory investigations. There are a number of factors that have limited the development of a widespread network of space environmental sensors intended to fill this need. The cost of deploying space systems generally encourages system designers to minimize any functionality that is extraneous to the main mission of a space vehicle. Deploying additional sensors adds cost, size, weight, power and telemetry bandwidth that could interfere with mission goals. The complexity of the space environment makes it challenging to manufacture a sensor that provides a complete characterization of its environment, especially with a limited impact upon the host. Finally, such a hosted sensor could impact the security or reliability of the main mission.

Jim Barrie↗
NASA NTRS2009

Ares I-X: On the Threshold of Exploration

Ares I-X, the first flight of the Ares I crew launch vehicle, is less than a year from launch. Ares I-X will test the flight characteristics of Ares I from liftoff to first stage separation and recovery. The flight also will demonstrate the computer hardware and software (avionics) needed to control the vehicle; deploy the parachutes that allow the first stage booster to land in the ocean safely; measure and control how much the rocket rolls during flight; test and measure the effects of first stage separation; and develop and try out new ground handling and rocket stacking procedures in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) and first stage recovery procedures at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida. All Ares I-X major elements have completed their critical design reviews, and are nearing final fabrication. The first stage--four-segment solid rocket booster from the Space Shuttle inventory--incorporates new simulated forward structures to match the Ares I five-segment booster. The upper stage, Orion crew module, and launch abort system will comprise simulator hardware that incorporates developmental flight instrumentation for essential data collection during the mission. The upper stage simulator consists of smaller cylindrical segments, which were transported to KSC in fall 2008. The crew module and launch abort system simulator were shipped in December 2008. The first stage hardware, active roll control system (RoCS), and avionics components will be delivered to KSC in 2009. This paper will provide detailed statuses of the Ares I-X hardware elements as NASA's Constellation Program prepares for this first flight of a new exploration era in the summer of 2009.

Davis, Stephan R.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Missions to Titan /1983-2000/ - An analysis of orbiters and entry vehicles

Mission Analysis data is presented which forms a basis for planning future missions to Titan, the seventh moon of Saturn. Four Titan mission options are studied: orbiters, probes, penetrators and landers. The generated data supports these mission modes. A comprehensive launch and trajectory analysis of earth to Saturn opportunities from 1983 to 2000 is given. Direct ballistic and Delta VEGA trajectory modes are evaluated. Orbital insertion, orbital trim, entry vehicle deployment options are all studied in parametric detail.

Hendricks, T. C.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Pathfinder Program

The Pathfinder Program is presented. The topics include: 1) High Visibility Flight Projects; 3) Significant Events/Accomplishments; 4) Pathfinder Flight Experiments; 5) Top level Goals; 6) Flight Testing for a Multistage Reusable System; 7) Key Embedded Technologies; 8) X-34 Vehicle Description; 9) Government Participation; 10) X-37 Vehicle Characteristics; 10) X-37 Vehicle Deployment Process; and 11) X-37 Configuration Modification Options.

London, John R., III↗
NASA NTRS2011

Space Smackdown 101

Space Smackdown is a competition that involves a collaborative multi-team exercise that engages in constructive simulation of a world with simulation of vehicles deployed in that world including stand-alone and integrated missions.

Hasan, David A.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Apollo 16 Press Kit

The Apollo 16 spacecraft is scheduled for launch on Apr. 16, 1972 from Complex 39A at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida by the Saturn V launch vehicle. Crewmen are mission commander John W. Young, command module pilot Thomas K. Mattingly II and lunar module pilot Charles M. Duke Jr. Objectives of the mission, to last up to 12 days, as outlined by NASA: to perform selenological inspection, survey and sampling of materials in a preselected region of Descartes using a lunar roving' vehicle; deploy and activate Apollo surface experiments; develop man's capability to work in the lunar environment; obtain photographs of candidate exploration sites; and toconduct inflight experiments and photographic tasks in lunar orbit. Following launch, the spacecraft will reach Earth Parking Orbit and remain in orbit for about two and one-half revolutions prior to Translunar Injection. Next, the Command and Service Module docks with the Lunar Module and the spacecraft "coasts" to the moon. In orbit around the moon, the Command and Service Module/Lunar Module combination will descend to within 50,000 feet of the lunar surface before undocking. The Lunar Module will continue to descend while the Command and Service Module returns to an orbit approximately 60 miles high. Stay time on the lunar surface is scheduled for approximately 73 hours. The ascent stage of the Lunar Module then lifts the astronauts back into lunar orbit where they will dock with the Command/Service Module. The Lunar Module is jettisoned and Transearth Injection follows. Just prior to reentry into the earth's atmosphere, the Service Module is jettisoned, and the astronauts in the Command Module splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. The target point for end-of-mission splashdown is at 05 degrees 0 minutes north latitude and 158 degrees 40 minutes west longitude or approximately 985 nautical miles south of Honolulu, Hawaii. Splashdown is scheduled for Apr. 28, 1972 at 10:30 a.m. Hawaiian Standard Time (2:30 p.m. CST). Recovery forces for Apollo 16, stationed in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, will consist of three ships, nine aircraft and nearly 1,700 personnel. CTF-130 (Manned Spacecraft Recovery Force, Pacific) forces will be stationed south of Hawaii. Three ships, eight helicopters and three Air Force HC-130H aircraft, and nearly 1,100 personnel, will take part. Task Force 140 (Manned Spacecraft Recovery Force, Atlantic), comprising one ship, six HC-130H aircraft, three helicopters and approximately 300 personnel, will be positioned for possible launch abort operations. Two ships in the Atlantic will also be used for acoustical testing. Other forces, primarily aircraft and personnel of the Air Force Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Service will be on alert around the world for contingency recovery support.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2020

Enabling Assurance in the MBSE Environment

A number of specific benefits that fit within the hallmarks of effective development are realized with implementation of model-based approaches to systems and assurance. Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) enabled by standardized modeling languages (e.g., SysML®) is at the core. These benefits in the context of spaceflight system challenges can include [1]: • Improved management of complex development • Reduced risk in the development process • Improved cost management • Improved design decisions With appropriate modeling techniques the assurance community also can improve early oversight and insight into project development. NASA has shown the basic constructs of SysML in an MBSE environment offer several key advantages, within a Model Based Mission Assurance (MBMA) initiative [2, 3]. These include the following: • Model viewpoints that promote rapid and systematic assessment of requirements coverage, hazard tagging and risk management • Embedded safety assessments for launch vehicles • Deployment of model assisted development of reliability products - Failure Modes and Effects Analyses (FMEAs) and Fault Trees • Test Planning • Validation and Verification of complex functions • Support of Assurance Case development for complex systems In addition, while there are benefits to be harvested, there is a realization that these do not come without effort and cost. Enabling model-based approaches requires structure, not only in an organizational context, but in a modeling context as well. There can be a steep learning curve and costs associated to train skilled modelers. But, on the other hand, not all of the assurance community need to be modelers. Models themselves must conform to ontologies that enable assurance. This places constraints upon the models and modelers. Optimums have yet to be developed where resources and constraints on modeling must be traded off in the organization and modeling efforts for projects. A number of barriers need to be overcome, as well, which pose challenges to the developers of the software that supports MBSE/MBMA. Information and data must be made to flow seamlessly through the life cycle. Because there is a wide variety of tools used in the community, to avoid the problems of the past of silos, delays, and diverging interests, information should flow among these tools to support the “single source of truth” paradigm of MBSE. This will greatly facilitate MBMA and advancement of assurance functions.

Evans, John W.↗
NASA NTRS2025

The Lucy Spacecraft

The Lucy spacecraft is developed from a combination of heritage components used on other NASA deep space missions, combined with a set of newly developed hardware specific to Lucy’s mission, most critically the solar arrays. These components are configured into a spacecraft capable of launching on the least expensive Atlas launch vehicle, deploying into a power-safe configuration, executing the high-precision Trojan asteroid encounters, and surviving the 12-year mission timeline.

planetary↗