Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Solid polymer electrolyte”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20

Energy Arbitrage: Comparison of Options for use with LWR Nuclear Power Plants

Arbitrage is the opportunistic buying and selling of a commodity during local pricing valleys and peaks respectively to maximize economic value. This report evaluates options for energy arbitrage integrated with existing light water reactor (LWR) nuclear power plants (NPPs) where nuclear energy could be stored in a variety of forms and later recovered to generate electrical power during periods when grid electricity demand and pricing are high. The forms of energy storage examined in this report include the potential value of batteries, hydrogen, and thermal energy storage for coupling with nuclear power. Various large demand response options are also analyzed, including the production of liquid nitrogen via air separation and liquefaction, liquefaction of hydrogen, compressed hydrogen, and the cryogenic capture of CO2. Demand response refers to dispatchable loads that can cycle up or down depending on-grid electricity demand to aid in balancing the grid. Large demand response options could dispatch to aid nuclear power stations in avoiding power turndowns by providing an alternate disposition for electrical energy by producing marketable products (e.g., liquid nitrogen, hydrogen, or captured CO2). Static conditions were chosen and analyzed in this report for each option. Dynamic operation or optimization of energy arbitrage or demand response are out of scope for this report. The analysis is based on storage systems with discharge capacities of 500 MW for which various durations of storage and costs of charging (electricity cost) are examined. While the value of thermal energy to an industrial user for flexible plant operations has been previously proven as a business case, this report evaluates costs of hydrogen energy storage and leading thermal energy storage options, and large demand response loads that could be integrated with LWRs in comparison to utility-scale battery storage for use of off-peak nuclear energy. Compilation of this information will be used by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) RAVEN/HERON systems integration and economics tool to evaluate thermal energy dispatch to industrial users. Relative ranking of energy storage options was done using a levelized cost of storage (LCOS) metric which calculates a rough breakeven cost for the system, taking into account the capital and operating costs as well as the revenue from arbitrage. Table ES1 below shows the LCOS for each of the energy storage options considered. First, in the table, lithium iron (Fe) phosphate batteries are listed as the base case for comparison against the other options. Next is hydrogen storage where most of the hydrogen analyses assumed the hydrogen to be produced using solid oxide electrolytic cell (SOEC) high temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE). The others used existing models of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) low temperature electrolysis to produce hydrogen. HTSE performance parameters and costs were taken from existing INL models. Various means were assumed to convert the hydrogen to electricity, including PEM fuel cells (FCs) and a gas turbine mixed in a 30 vol% mixture with natural gas. Physical storage (pressure vessels) and geological storage (natural underground features) were used to store the hydrogen as noted. Geological storage is more economical, but the locations are limited because of the requirement for pre-existing geological formations that will support storage. Thermal energy storage (TES) options were also analyzed including electro-thermal energy storage (ETES) and four different liquid sensible heat TES storage media as noted (Hitec, Hitec XL, Therminol-66, and Dowtherm A). The ETES process considered was modified using existing public documentation on an Echogen process and uses a separate supercritical CO2 charge and discharge cycle with sand as the heat storage media.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Anion sublattice design enables superionic conductivity in crystalline oxyhalides

Solid-state batteries are attractive energy storage systems as a result of their inherent safety, but their development hinges on advanced solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). Most SSEs remain largely confined to single-anion systems (e.g., sulfides, oxides, halides, and polymers). Through mixed-anion design strategy, we develop crystalline Li 3 Ta 3 O 4 Cl 10 (LTOC) and its derivatives with excellent ionic conductivities (up to 13.7 millisiemens per centimeter at 25°C) and electrochemical stability. The LTOC structure features mixed-anion spiral chains, consisting of corner-shared oxygen and terminal chlorine atoms, which induces continuous “tetrahedron-tetrahedron” Li-ion migration pathways with low energy barriers. Additionally, LTOC demonstrates holistic cathode compatibility, enabling solid-state batteries operation at 4.9 volts versus Li/Li + and low temperature, down to −50°C. In conclusion, these findings describe a promising class of superionic conductors for high-performance solid-state batteries.

Zhao, Feipeng [Western University, London, ON (Can↗

Interconnected cathode-electrolyte double-layer enabling continuous Li-ion conduction throughout solid-state Li-S battery

All-solid-state lithium (Li) batteries with high energy density are a promising solution for the next-generation energy storage systems in large-scale devices. To simultaneously overcome the challenges of poor ionic conduction of solid electrolytes and shuttling of active materials, here we introduce a functional electrolyte-cathode bilayer framework with interconnected LLAZO channels from the electrolyte into the cathode for advanced solid-state Li-S batteries. Differing from the traditional solid-state batteries with separated layer compositions, the introduced bilayer framework provides ultrafast and continuous ion/electron conduction. Instead of transferring Li+ across the polymer and garnet phases which involve huge interfacial resistance, Li+ is directly conducted through the LLAZO channels created continuously from the cathode layer to the solid electrolyte layer, significantly shortening the diffusion distance and facilitating the redox reaction of sulfur and sulfides. A stable cycle life is demonstrated in the prototype Li-S solid-state batteries assembled with the introduced LLAZO-LLAZO@CNF interconnected bilayer framework. High capacity is obtained at room temperature, indicating the superior electrochemical properties of the bilayer framework that result from the unique design of the interconnected LLAZO garnet phase.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of Polymer Precursors to Li x PON and Li x SiPON Glasses: Materials That Enable All-Solid-State Batteries (ASBs)

LiPON-like glasses that form lithium dendrite impenetrable interfaces between lithium battery components are enabling materials that may replace liquid electrolytes permitting production of all-solid-state batteries (ASBs). Unfortunately, to date, such materials are introduced only via gas-phase deposition. Furthermore, we demonstrate the design and synthesis of easily scaled, lowtemperature, low-cost, solution-processable inorganic polymers containing LiPON/LiSiPON elements. OPCl 3 and hexachlorophosphazene [Cl 2 P=N] 3 provide starting points for elaboration using MNH 2 (M = Li/Na) or (Me 3 Si)NH followed by reaction with controlled amounts of LiNH 2 to produce oligomers/polymers with molecular weights (MWs) ≈1–2 kDa characterized by multinuclear NMR, gel permeation chromatography (GPC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization (MALDI)-time-of-flight (ToF) offering stabilities to 150–200 °C and ceramic yields (800 °C) of 50–60%. 7 Li NMR suggests that precursor-bound Li + dissociates easily, beneficial for electrochemical applications. XPS shows higher N/P ratios (1–3) than via gas-phase methods (<1) correlating N/P ratios, 7 Li shifts, and Li + conductivities. Li 2 SiPHN offers the highest ambient conductivity of 3 × 10 –1 mS cm –1 at 400 °C/2 h/N 2 .

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Technology Strategy Assessment: Findings from Storage Innovations 2030 Bidirectional Hydrogen Storage

Hydrogen is the most common element in the universe, comprising nearly 75% of all normal matter, and it has been used by scientists for centuries, but it was not fully recognized as an element until 1766, when it was isolated by Henry Cavendish. Early work focused on the generation of hydrogen through the oxidation of metals in water, which released hydrogen gas. Hydrogen’s lighter-than-air and flammable properties were immediately used in engines, zeppelins, and as feedstock for a wide variety of chemical reactions. Several approaches were developed for the production of hydrogen with the most common being associated with the production and conversion of hydrocarbon-based fuels. Coal gasification, steam methane reforming, and other reformation processes provide the majority of current hydrogen production due to the relatively low cost of hydrogen produced through these processes. More than 95% of hydrogen production is used for industrial processes rather than energy storage. To facilitate affordable decarbonization of these industrial processes and to advance the use of hydrogen as a fuel in transportation, DOE launched the Hydrogen Shot as part of the Energy Earthshots Initiative. The goal of the Hydrogen Shot is to reduce the cost of clean hydrogen by 80% to $1/kg of clean hydrogen production within one decade (known as the “1 1 1” goal). This is distinct from the Long-Duration Storage Shot, which is the primary focus of this report; however, it is intrinsically linked to bidirectional hydrogen storage. Several important chemical synthesis processes are dependent upon hydrogen, and the production and use of hydrogen is generally driven by its connection to one of these markets. For example, ammonia is one of the most highly produced chemicals in the world and it depends chiefly on hydrogen. Ammonia is primarily used for agricultural fertilizer and is considered to be largely responsible for a doubling of agricultural production per unit of land over the last century. Another one of hydrogen’s primary uses is as a catalyst in petroleum refining during the desulfurization process. Beyond chemical production, hydrogen is used as a reductant in the production of steel and has been demonstrated as a substitute for metallurgical coal in the production of raw iron. It is even used in the hydrogenation reaction for food products to create more shelf-stable semi-solid fats. However, while hydrogen is produced on the order of 100 million metric tons/year globally to feed these industries, more than 95% of hydrogen is produced from hydrocarbons that emit CO2 during the process. Conversely, electrolysis is a process by which electricity is used to separate hydrogen and oxygen in water molecules, usually across a membrane. Hydrogen production via electrolysis lowers the carbon intensity of produced hydrogen when coupled with low-carbon electricity. Currently, global electrolysis capacity is on the order of 1 GW, which equates to about 500 metric tons/day of hydrogen production. To support large-scale industrial decarbonization, capacity will likely need to increase by two to three orders of magnitude. Electrolysis technology is broadly separated into groups that are defined by the electrolyte used, with further subdivision based on the operating characteristics. The majority of commercial electrolyzer systems are based around three main technology groups: liquid alkaline, proton exchange membrane, and solid oxide. Liquid Alkaline (LA) electrolysis is the oldest, most mature, least expensive, and most common commercial technology, with 400 plants in operation by 1902. Its hydrogen output is low relative to the size of the system due to a low current density. LA electrolysis utilizes a liquid potassium hydroxide solution as the electrolyte. Proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis (also known as polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis), described in 1960, relies on an acid-impregnated polymer membrane as the electrolyte and typically offers three to six times higher hydrogen production per unit cell area than LA electrolysis. Solid oxide electrolysis, or high-temperature electrolysis, utilizes a ceramic cell as the electrolyte and operates on steam rather than liquid water, enabling electrical efficiencies of more than 90%, which is up from 60% with PEM. Two pre-commercial electrolyzer technologies to note are alkaline exchange membrane (AEM) and proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC). AEM potentially has the advantages of both LA and PEM technologies in that it is able to use low-cost materials like LA but with the ability to operate at higher output pressures with a smaller footprint like PEM. Proton-conducting SOEC is similar to commercial SOEC, which uses an oxide-conducting ceramic; however, it uses a proton-conducting ceramic that has the potential to operate at lower temperatures and has lower capital costs. Each of these technologies is experiencing a rapid improvement in performance and a reduction in installed cost, and each appears to be well suited to specific applications. Besides differences in the type of electrolyzer used, the main difference in the architecture of bidirectional hydrogen systems is how the hydrogen is stored. Currently, the most cost-effective way to store large amounts of hydrogen gas is underground, such as in large salt caverns that have been hollowed out. These salt caverns are geographically concentrated in small portions of the United States and are not generally near large metropolitan areas; however, other subsurface architectures are being investigated to expand this reach. A more widely deployable option is aboveground pressurized tanks. These systems are about 10 times as expensive because of the materials and safety margins required to hold hydrogen at high pressures. A third option is using materials-based storage, such as liquid organic hydrogen carriers. By reversibly attaching the produced hydrogen to other molecules, it can be stored at near atmospheric pressure and room temperature. This has the potential to reduce the material cost of storage but may result in a reduction in the efficiency of the process because there are both hydrogen uptake and release processes. While materials-based storage has not been used extensively for large-scale hydrogen storage in the past, there is currently significant activity regarding developing materials and processes for use in large-scale hydrogen storage applications. Electrolysis-produced hydrogen offers an unusual opportunity for energy storage applications. Unlike more conventional energy storage approaches, such as batteries, which operate entirely within electrical markets, hydrogen is a valuable product beyond the electric market and can be directed to the most lucrative use. Hydrogen also can be directly converted back to electricity using either a fuel cell or turbine, or it can be sold to other markets, such as chemical synthesis, steel production, or even export. In this way, excess electricity can be upgraded to the most valuable product. Finally, its use can be actively managed between multiple off-takers; for example, local hydrogen storage can provide a specific amount of stored electricity and any excess can be exported to ammonia production. This flexibility is amplified by the fact that hydrogen storage has fully decoupled power and energy components, which allows for affordable scaling options. Together, this allows a substantial amount of creativity to enable the economic utilization of variable power resources while supporting decarbonization of the industry.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Pathway to High Rate Capability in Interconnected Composite Electrolytes: A Case Study with a Single-Ion-Conducting Polymer

In a three-dimensional interconnected polymer/ceramic composite electrolyte (3D composite), both the polymer and ceramic electrolyte phases are individually connected with a polymer-rich surface layer to provide conformal contact with the electrodes. This work investigates how the transference number of the polymer phase affects the electrochemical properties of the 3D composite. Here, we fabricate a 3D composite using a “single-ion” conducting polymer electrolyte (PE), Li 1+x+y Al x Ti 2–x Si y P 3–y O 12 (LICGC) ceramic, and compare its electrochemical properties with the neat polymer, and with a 3D composite made with a dual-ion-conducting PE (we reported previously). Our results reveal that changing the polymer phase from a dual-ion-conducting PE to a single-ion-conducting PE results in a 9-fold increase in the limiting current density, although the interfacial impedance between the polymer and LICGC ceramic remains high (and contributes significantly to the total impedance of the 3D composite). Further, the limiting current density of the 3D composite is dictated by the PE and minimally affected by the ceramic scaffold. The ceramic scaffold, however, helps to ease the concentration gradient buildup within the PE and moderately improves the overall transference number. The LICGC scaffold does not provide any additional Li dendrite resistance due to its high reactivity with Li.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Semi-tubular carbon film for stable lithium metal anodes and methods of manufacture thereof

A method of forming a battery electrode by forming, on a first substrate, a polymer template comprising interconnected polymer fibers, forming, on the polymer template, a carbon coating to form a carbon-coated polymer template, removing the carbon-coated polymer template from the first substrate, subsequent to removing the carbon-coated polymer template from the first substrate, removing the polymer template from the carbon coating, and disposing the carbon coating on a second substrate. A solid electrolyte interphase layer (SEI) comprising the carbon coating produced via the method, a battery electrode comprising such an SEI layer, and a battery comprising such a battery electrode are also provided.

Ren, Zhifeng↗

Characterizing Complex Gas–Solid Interfaces with in Situ Spectroscopy: Oxygen Adsorption Behavior on Fe–N–C Catalysts

Electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction within polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells based on iron, nitrogen, and carbon elements (Fe–N–C) are receiving significant research attention as they offer an inexpensive alternative to catalysts based on platinum-group metals. Although both the performance and the fundamental understanding of Fe–N–C catalysts have improved over the past decade, there remains a need to differentiate the relative activity of different active sites. Toward this goal, our study is focused on characterizing the interactions between O 2 and a set of five structurally different Fe–N–C materials. Detailed characterization of the Fe speciation was performed with 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy of the Fe L 3,2 -edge, whereas nitrogen chemical states were investigated with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In addition to initial sXAS and XPS measurements performed in ultra-high vacuum (UHV), measurements were also performed (at the identical location) in an atmosphere of 100 mTorr of O 2 at 80 °C (O 2 -rich). XPS and sXAS results reveal the presence of several types of FeNxCy adsorption sites. FeNxCy sites that are proposed as the most active ones do not show significant change (based on the techniques used in this study) when their environment is changed from UHV to O 2 -rich. Correlation with Mössbauer and sXAS results suggests that this is most likely due to the persistence of strongly adsorbed O 2 molecules from their previous exposure to air. However, other species do show spectroscopic changes from UHV conditions to O 2 -rich. This implies that these sites have a weaker interaction with O 2 that results in their desorption in vacuum conditions and re-adsorption when exposed to the O 2 -rich environment. The nature of these weakly and strongly O 2 -adsorbing FeN x C y sites is discussed in the context of different synthetic and processing parameters employed to fabricate each of these five Fe–N–C materials.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Enhanced Surface Interactions Enable Fast Li + Conduction in Oxide/Polymer Composite Electrolyte

Abstract Li + ‐conducting oxides are considered better ceramic fillers than Li + ‐insulating oxides for improving Li + conductivity in composite polymer electrolytes owing to their ability to conduct Li + through the ceramic oxide as well as across the oxide/polymer interface. Here we use two Li + ‐insulating oxides (fluorite Gd 0.1 Ce 0.9 O 1.95 and perovskite La 0.8 Sr 0.2 Ga 0.8 Mg 0.2 O 2.55 ) with a high concentration of oxygen vacancies to demonstrate two oxide/poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)‐based polymer composite electrolytes, each with a Li + conductivity above 10 −4 S cm −1 at 30 °C. Li solid‐state NMR results show an increase in Li + ions (>10 %) occupying the more mobile A2 environment in the composite electrolytes. This increase in A2‐site occupancy originates from the strong interaction between the O 2− of Li‐salt anion and the surface oxygen vacancies of each oxide and contributes to the more facile Li + transport. All‐solid‐state Li‐metal cells with these composite electrolytes demonstrate a small interfacial resistance with good cycling performance at 35 °C.

Wu, Nan↗

The Role of Water Volume Fraction on Water Adsorption in Anion Exchange Membranes

Water absorption plays a key role in the performance of polymeric anion exchange membranes. It influences important properties such as ionic conductivity and mechanical strength and alters their performance as solid electrolytes in hydrogen electrochemical devices for energy conversion. However, computational approaches that address the relationship between the polymer design and the absorption process are scarce. In this work, we introduce a simple thermodynamic model to predict the water absorption isotherms of polyelectrolyte membranes in contact with a water vapor reservoir that incorporates the specific chemical design of the polymers. The model accurately predicts the water content and macrostructural properties of polynorbornene membranes as a function of the water activity and successfully captures the effect of various polymer design parameters. The energy of pairwise attractive interactions predicted by our model provides a means to interpret the absorption process at the molecular level. The model also reveals the most significant favorable and unfavorable contributions to the free energy and indicates that their balance is solely governed by the water volume fraction, regardless of the polymer design. This universal behavior leads to important implications in the search for better ion exchange membranes.

Zaldivar, Gervasio [New York University, Brooklyn,↗

Thermal System Modeling for Lunar and Martian Surface Regenerative Fuel Cell Systems

The Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) Project is investigating different power systems for various lunar and Martian mission concepts. The AMPS Fuel Cell (FC) team has created two system-level models to evaluate the performance of regenerative fuel cell (RFC) systems employing different fuel cell chemistries. Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cells PEMFCs contain a polymer electrolyte membrane that separates the hydrogen and oxygen cavities and conducts hydrogen cations (protons) across the cell. Solid Oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) operate at high temperatures, using a zirconia-based solid ceramic electrolyte to conduct oxygen anions across the cell. The purpose of the modeling effort is to down select one fuel cell chemistry for a more detailed design effort. Figures of merit include the system mass, volume, round trip efficiency, and electrolyzer charge power required. PEMFCs operate at around 60 degrees Celsius versus SOFCs which operate at temperatures greater than 700 degrees Celsius. Due to the drastically different operating temperatures of the two chemistries the thermal control systems (TCS) differ. The PEM TCS is less complex and is characterized by a single pump cooling loop that uses deionized water coolant and rejects heat generated by the system to the environment via a radiator. The solid oxide TCS has its own unique challenges including the requirement to reject high quality heat and to condense the steam produced in the reaction. This paper discusses the modeling of thermal control systems for an extraterrestrial RFC that utilizes either a PEM or solid oxide fuel cell.

thermal modeling↗

Thermal Design for Extra-Terrestrial Regenerative Fuel Cell System

The Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Advanced Modular Power Systems (AMPS) Project is investigating different power systems for various lunar and Martian mission concepts. The AMPS Fuel Cell (FC) team has created two system-level models to evaluate the performance of regenerative fuel cell (RFC) systems employing different fuel cell chemistries. Proton Exchange Membrane fuel cells PEMFCs contain a polymer electrolyte membrane that separates the hydrogen and oxygen cavities and conducts hydrogen cations (protons) across the cell. Solid Oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) operate at high temperatures, using a zirconia-based solid ceramic electrolyte to conduct oxygen anions across the cell. The purpose of the modeling effort is to down select one fuel cell chemistry for a more detailed design effort. Figures of merit include the system mass, volume, round trip efficiency, and electrolyzer charge power required. PEMFCs operate at around 60 C versus SOFCs which operate at temperatures greater than 700 C. Due to the drastically different operating temperatures of the two chemistries the thermal control systems (TCS) differ. The PEM TCS is less complex and is characterized by a single pump cooling loop that uses deionized water coolant and rejects heat generated by the system to the environment via a radiator. The solid oxide TCS has its own unique challenges including the requirement to reject high quality heat and to condense the steam produced in the reaction. This paper discusses the modeling of thermal control systems for an extraterrestrial RFC that utilizes either a PEM or solid oxide fuel cell.

thermal modeling↗

Developing Materials for High-Energy-Density Solid State Li-S Batteries

Solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries are considered to be the next-generation power source for vehicle applications due to their high energy density (up to 3 times more than current Li-ion) and low cost of sulfur (100 times less than conventional cobalt oxide). However, issues with solid-state electrolyte stability, conduction pathways in the sulfur cathode, and the interface between solid-state electrolyte and sulfur cathode must be solved in order to allow commercialization. This project demonstrates the creation of new, advanced materials which overcome these inherent issues. Current approaches based on polymer or liquid electrolyte with additives have been able to improve stability at the cost of efficiency. In contrast, by creating new hybrid materials it is possible to achieve both stability and efficiency. We developed a novel sulfide-based solid electrolyte, a sulfur-carbon composite cathode, and explored various additives to stabilize the interface of solid electrolyte and cathode. After the desired properties were achieved, these materials were integrated into a high-performance solid-state battery, bringing low-cost high-energy solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries one step closer to reality.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Fabrication of Solid-State Li-S Battery Components for Electric Aviation

The development of high-energy, high-safety, and high-power batteries beyond electric automobile requirements is vital for future electric aviation applications. The transition to non-volatile solid-state electrolytes (SSE) promises many advantages over traditional flammable liquid electrolytes, and may also be an enabling technology for next generation chemistries. However, significant manufacturing challenges must be overcome before the adoption of such technology. Electrolytes developed in this study were produced as sulfide-polymer composites with densified thicknesses between 20-30 microns using several processing techniques [1]. Ionic conductivity and lithium metal compatibility for the composites were compared and shown to retain reasonable ionic conductivity with improved flexibility and scalability which identifies a critical path for the production of practical solid-state batteries. Films were produced 10-15 times thinner than comparable bulk cold pressed powder electrolytes and achieved thicknesses comparable to commercial polyolefin separators (25 micron) used in commercial liquid containing lithium-ion cells. Composite conductivities were maintained above 0.2mS/cm, which holds promise for future electric aviation applications. Processing techniques are investigated to further improve electrochemical performance.

battery↗

Glass-fiber-reinforced polymeric film as an efficient protecting layer for stable Li metal electrodes

With numerous reports on protecting films for stable lithium (Li) metal electrodes, the key attributes for how to construct these efficient layers have rarely been fully investigated. Here, we report a rationally designed hybrid protective layer (HPL) with each component aligning with one key attribute; i.e., cross-linked poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) enhances flexibility, polyethylene glycol (PEG) provides homogeneous ion-conducting channels, and glass fiber (GF) affords mechanical robustness. A significant improvement of the electrochemical performance of HPL-modified electrodes can be achieved in Li/HPL@Cu half cells, HPL@Li/HPL@Li symmetric cells, and HPL@Li/LiFePO 4 full cells. Even with an industrial standard LiFePO 4 cathode (96.8 wt % active material), the assembled cell still exhibits a capacity retention of 90% after 100 cycles at 1 C. More importantly, the functionality of each component has been studied comprehensively via electrochemical and physical experiments and simulations, which will provide useful guidance on how to construct efficient protective layers for next-generation energy storage devices.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Recovering carbon losses in CO 2 electrolysis using a solid electrolyte reactor

The practical implementation of electrochemical CO 2 reduction technology is greatly challenged by notable CO 2 crossover to the anode side, where the crossed-over CO 2 is mixed with O 2 , via interfacial carbonate formation in traditional CO 2 electrolysers. Here we report a porous solid electrolyte reactor strategy to efficiently recover these carbon losses. Furthermore, by creating a permeable and ion-conducting sulfonated polymer electrolyte between cathode and anode as a buffer layer, the crossover carbonate can combine with protons generated from the anode to re-form CO 2 gas for reuse without mixing with anodic O 2 . Using a silver nanowire catalyst for CO 2 reduction to CO, we demonstrated up to 90% recovery of the crossover CO 2 in an ultrahigh gas purity form (>99%), while delivering over 90% CO Faradaic efficiency under a 200 mA cm -2 current. A high continuous CO 2 conversion efficiency of over 90% was achieved by recycling the recovered CO 2 to the CO 2 input stream.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

The impact of residual solvent on catholyte performance in solid-state batteries

All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) are attractive due to their safety, use of the Li metal anode, high energy density, and innovative processing routes. However, high interfacial resistance, especially on the cathode side, is one of the major challenges for commercialization of ASSBs. Catholyte, either a liquid or solid, is added to lower the cathode/electrolyte interfacial resistance. In this study, we find that residual N-methylpyrrolidone solvent remaining in a PVDF/LiTFSI solid polymer catholyte after incomplete drying can dramatically lower the interfacial resistance between the Li 6.25 Al 0.25 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 electrolyte and LiNi 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 O 2 cathode-active material. Cells with varying amounts of residual solvent are compared to optimize the residual solvent loading. With moderate residual solvent, the discharge capacity reaches 142 mA h g -1 when cycled at 25 °C and 0.5 C and the capacity retention is 60.5% after 125 cycles. Discharge capacity retention is improved at -10 °C. The conductivity of the free-standing PVDF/LiTFSI film, mimicking the PVDF/LiTFSI catholyte, verifies the role of residual NMP in the cathode. Finally, this study demonstrates the possibility of widely differing results for ASSBs when the cathode is not completely dried. Also, it provides a hint for a potential method to lower the cathode/electrolyte interfacial resistance.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Polymer Precursor Derived Li x PON Electrolytes: Toward Li–S Batteries

Efforts to develop polymer precursor electrolytes that offer properties anticipated to be similar or superior to (lithium phosphorus oxynitride, LiPON) glasses are reported. Such precursors offer the potential to be used to process LiPON-like thin glass/ceramic coatings for use in all solid state batteries, ASBs. Here, LiPON glasses provide a design basis for the synthesis of sets of oligomers/polymers by lithiation of OP(NH 2 ) 3–x (NH) x [from OP(NH) 3 ],OP(NH 2 ) 3-x (NHSiMe 3 ) x and [P=N] 3 (NHSiMe 3 ) 6–x (NH) x . Furthermore, the resulting systems have degrees of polymerization of 5–20. Treatment with selected amounts of LiNH 2 provides varying degrees of lithiation and Li + conducting properties commensurate with Li + content. Polymer electrolytes impregnated in/on Celgard exhibit Li + conductivities up to ~1 × 10 –5 S cm –1 at room temperature and are thermally stable to ~150 °C. A Li–S battery assembled using a Li 6 SiPON composition polymer electrolyte exhibits an initial reversible capacity of 1500 mAh g sulfur –1 and excellent cycle performance at 0.25 and 0.5 C rate over 120 cycles at room temperature.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗