Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Surveyor”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1972

Analysis of Surveyor 3 television cable after residence on the moon

The Apollo 12 astronauts brought the Surveyor III television camera back from the moon in November 1969. Chemical analyses of a portion of television cable revealed changes in the glass fabric sleeve and in the wire insulation as a result of exposure to the lunar environment. Loss of volatile constituents from the glass fabric and a discoloration of the glass occurred. The Teflon layer on the wire showed a slight discoloration and possibly a slight change in its infrared spectrum. Both the polyimide layer and the Teflon layer of the wire insulation showed changes in tensile strength and elongation.

Gross, F. C.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Evaluation of mechanisms returned from Surveyor 3

The mechanisms of the TV camera and surface sampler retrieved from the Surveyor 3 spacecraft during the Apollo 12 mission are discussed. Data are presented showing the performance of these mechanisms before and after operation for one lunar day and storage for 2-1/2 years on the surface of the moon. An analysis of the critical component materials is also given.

Jones, J. R.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Lunar dust and radiation darkening of Surveyor 3 surfaces

Measured spectral reflectance, evidence obtained from photographs, scanning electron microscopy, and previous work on Surveyor hardware were used to develop an understanding of the observed discoloration and its meaning to future space and lunar operations. Measured reflectance data were analyzed to separate and understand the effects of lunar dust and radiation damage. It was concluded that organic contamination is not a major contributor to the discoloration. Radiation-induced discoloration on the various surfaces was found to be proportional to the degree of solar illumination. Photobleaching of the radiation damage was observed and was responsible for a gradual change in the color of the camera's surface during the evaluation.

Carroll, W. F.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Characterization of dust on clear filter from returned Surveyor 3 television camera

Surveyor 3 landed on the moon in April 1967. Part of the spacecraft was returned to earth in November 1969 by the Apollo 12 astronauts. A stripping film containing dust removed from the camera light filter was received for study. The study involved the characterization of the dust; the results of the study are presented.

Robertson, D. M.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Debris on the Surveyor 3 mirror

Work is described which was performed on debris that adhered to the Surveyor 3 camera mirror after it was returned from the moon by the Apollo 12 mission. The chemical and morphological natures of the debris are described and some fine scale features of the mirror surface are discussed. Supplementary information was provided on the adhering debris so that the causes of the optical degradation of the mirror could be determined more accurately.

Carr, M. H.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Particle impact and optical property analysis of the surfaces of Surveyor 3 materials

As part of the investigation of Surveyor 3 materials, a study was conducted to determine the effect of the lunar environment on some of the painted and unpainted exterior surfaces. Examination of the camera parts and tube sections was conducted using three techniques: (1) optical and scanning electron microscopy, (2) energy dispersive X-ray probe analysis, and (3) spectral reflectance measurements.

Anderson, D. L.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Movement of the Surveyor 3 spacecraft

It was concluded that the Surveyor 3 spacecraft moved, probably as a result of a sudden failure of the leg 3 shock absorber, between May 1967 and November 1969. The time at which the movement occurred can be estimated only from comparison of the shielded and unshielded portions of footpad 3 and a knowledge of the mechanism and rate of the process that tans the painted surface.

Scott, R. F.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Organic contamination analysis: High resolution mass spectrometric analysis of surface organics on selected areas of Surveyor 3

The mirror and middle shroud were extracted for organics by washing the surfaces with solvents. The techniques are discussed. Ion microprobe analyses of the primarily atomic species are presented. The sources of the organic contaminants are: (1) hydrocarbons from lubricating oils and general terrestrial contamination, (2) dioctyl phthalate, probably from polyethylene bagging material (the plasticizer), (3) carboxylic acids from decomposition of grease and general terrestrial contamination, (4) silicones from sources such as lubricating oil, (5) outgassing of electronics and plasticizer, (6) vinyl alcohol and styrene copolymer, probably from electronic insulation, and (7) nitrogenous compounds from the lunar module and possibly Surveyor 3 engine exhaust.

Simoneit, B. R.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Preliminary examination of Surveyor 3 components for impact phenomena

Two pieces of the Surveyor 3 spacecraft recovered during the Apollo 12 mission were examined for secondary lunar ejecta and micrometeorite impacts. One piece was section E of the aluminum strut; the other was the nickel-coated beryllium television camera mirror.

Hallgren, D. S.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Surface studies on Surveyor 3 tubing sections

Sections C and E of the unpainted, polished aluminum tubing from the strut of the radar altimeter and Doppler velocity sensor were examined in a transmission electron microscope for micrometeorite damage and ion bombardment. Both sections were contaminated and eroded on one side; it is suggested that these conditions were caused by sandblasting by lunar dust and retrorocket plume contamination during Surveyor 3 landing. Microcraters of different configurations were found on the bright sides of the tubes. Several degrees of violence were involved in the formation of the craters, and the particle size could be responsible for some differences. All micropits found were on the bright areas and data indicate 0.2 hypervelocity impact/sq cm and 2/sq cm for other types of craters. The greatest degree of damage resulted from particle impact and was limited to a maximum depth of 2 microns.

Buvinger, E. A.↗