SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Waste Repository”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2023

Advective gas flow in bentonite: Development and comparison of enhanced multi-phase numerical approaches

Understanding the impact of repository gas, generated from degradation of waste and its interaction with the host rock, is essential when assessing the performance and safety function of long-term disposal systems for radioactive waste. Numerical models based on conventional multi-phase flow theory have historically been applied to predict the outcome and impact of gas flow on different repository components. However, they remain unable to describe the full complexity of the physical processes observed in water-saturated experiments (e.g., creation of dilatant pathways) and thus, the development of novel representations for their description is required when assessing fully saturated clay-based systems. This was the primary focus of Task A within the international cooperative project DECOVALEX-2019 (D-2019) and refinement of these approaches is the primary focus of this study (Task B in the current phase of DECOVALEX-2023). This paper summarises development of enhanced numerical representations of key processes and compares the performance of each model against high-quality laboratory test data. Experimental data reveals that gas percolation in water-saturated compacted bentonite is characterised by four key features: (i) a quiescence phase, followed by (ii) the gas breakthrough, which leads to a (iii) peak value, which is then followed by (iv) a negative decay. Three models based on the multiphase flow theory have been developed. These models can provide good initial values and reasonable responses for gas breakthrough (although some of them still predict a too-smooth response). Peak gas pressure values are in general reasonably well captured, although maximum radial stress differences are observed at 48 mm from the base of the sample. Here, numerical peak values of 12.8 MPa are predicted, whereas experimental values are about 11 MPa. These models are also capable of providing a reasonable representation of the negative pressure decay following peak pressure. However, other key specific features (such as the timing of gas breakthrough) still require a better representation. The model simulations and their comparison with experimental data show that these models need to be further improved with respect to model parameter calibration, the numerical representation of spatial heterogeneities in material properties and flow localisation, and the upscaling of the related physical processes and parameters. To further understand gas flow localisation, a new conceptual model has been developed, which shows that discrete channels can possibly be induced through the instability of gas-bentonite interface during gas injection, thus providing a new perspective for modeling gas percolation in low-permeability deformable media.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

DOE OSTI2019

Lessons Learned from the Development of the DGR Konrad - 19619

The Federal Republic Germany builds the deep geological repository Konrad. The repository is suitable for low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste (LAW and MAW) and it is the first German repository site, which is not located in a salt geological formation. Konrad is a former iron ore mine in Salzgitter (in southeast Lower Saxony) with an active production time between 1961 and 1976. In 2007, the BGE started with the conversion of the mine infrastructure above and underground to build the repository while using the shafts and some roadways of the former mine. The experiences gained from ten years project progress with its complexities and difficulties can be used for similar repository projects in the future. The Konrad repository is designed for 303,000 m{sup 3} of LAW and MAW, which will be emplaced in chambers. The emplacement chambers are located outside of the existing mine, so an impairment by the old mine workings can be excluded. So far, the first area with emplacement chambers has been excavated. In order to be able to start repository operations in 2027, a wide range of work in building construction, civil engineering, shaft sinking and infrastructure development above and below ground has been necessary and will be completed in the next years. The main activities are focused on the Konrad 1 and 2 sites and the part of the infrastructure located in the future control area, which is used for repository operations. There are still many challenges to overcome in the Konrad repository project, although many processes have been put on the right track in recent years. Looking back on past activities and in the cautious preview, this paper gives some indications from which lessons can be drawn and should be applied to similar projects in the future. - Prefer small dimensions for the infrastructure, such as insets and roadway cross-section, and the appropriate machinery and handling equipment; - Detailed process planning for construction in existing infrastructure in the run-up to implementation; - Intensive communication with contracted partners on the preparation of planning documents for nuclear examination procedures and ensuring an excellent contract management; - Early start of the implementation planning for projects under nuclear law, taking into account the relevant boundary conditions; - Ensuring the support of the project by the local community and other stakeholders. Overall, the use of parts of the existing above and underground infrastructure for the construction of a new repository is more difficult than for a complete new construction. But using the shafts of an existing mine delivers the advantage of very good knowledge about the underground environment. In addition, the areas necessary for the construction and operation of the buildings and facilities are already available and secured and do not compete with other projects.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Roadmap for disposal of Electrorefiner Salt as Transuranic Waste.

The experimental breeder reactor (EBR-II) used fuel with a layer of sodium surrounding the uranium-zirconium fuel to improve heat transfer. Disposing of EBR-II fuel in a geologic repository without treatment is not prudent because of the potentially energetic reaction of the sodium with water. In 2000, the US Department of Energy (DOE) decided to treat the sodium-bonded fuel with an electrorefiner (ER), which produces metallic uranium product, a metallic waste, mostly from the cladding, and the salt waste in the ER, which contains most of the actinides and fission products. Two waste forms were proposed for disposal in a mined repository; the metallic waste, which was to be cast into ingots, and the ER salt waste, which was to be further treated to produce a ceramic waste form. However, alternative disposal pathways for metallic and salt waste streams may reduce the complexity. For example, performance assessments show that geologic repositories can easily accommodate the ER salt waste without treating it to form a ceramic waste form. Because EBR-II was used for atomic energy defense activities, the treated waste likely meets the definition of transuranic waste. Hence, disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in southern New Mexico, may be feasible. This report reviews the direct disposal pathway for ER salt waste and describes eleven tasks necessary for implementing disposal at WIPP, provided space is available, DOE decides to use this alternative disposal pathway in an updated environmental impact statement, and the State of New Mexico grants permission.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Mobility of Radionuclides in Fractured Carbonate Rocks: Lessons from a Field-Scale Transport Experiment

Current research on radionuclide disposal is mostly conducted in granite, clay, saltstone, or volcanic tuff formations. These rock types are not always available to host a geological repository in every nuclear waste-generating country, but carbonate rocks may serve as a potential alternative. To assess their feasibility, a forced gradient cross-borehole tracer experiment was conducted in a saturated fractured chalk formation. The mobility of stable Sr and Cs (as analogs for their radioactive counterparts), Ce (an actinide analog), Re (a Tc analog), bentonite particles, and fluorescent dye tracers through the flow path was analyzed. The migration of each of these radionuclide analogs (RAs) was shown to be dependent upon their chemical speciation in solution, their interactions with bentonite, and their sorption potential to the chalk rock matrix. The brackish groundwater resulted in flocculation and immobilization of most particulate RAs. Nevertheless, the high permeability of the fracture system allowed for fast overall transport times of all aqueous RAs investigated. This study suggests that the geochemical properties of carbonate rocks may provide suitable conditions for certain types of radionuclide storage (in particular, brackish, high-porosity, and low-permeability chalks). Nevertheless, careful consideration should be given to high-permeability fracture networks that may result in high radionuclide mobility.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

DOE OSTI2019

Processes in Salt Repositories

This report presents a discussion of processes relevant in a repository for heat-generating waste in geologic salt, from the point of view of coupled process models. This report is in essentially an update of Kuhlman, in light of recent R&D in the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy (DOENE) Salt Disposal Research and Development program, including the heater test being planned at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Dual Purpose Canister Reactivity and Groundwater Absorption Analyses

The current spent nuclear fuel (SNF) management strategy includes reliance on dry storage. Utilities are meeting their interim storage needs on an individual basis with use of large-capacity dry storage casks, with a current focus on meeting existing storage and transportation requirements, as disposal requirements are not currently available. These casks are commonly known as dual-purpose (i.e., storage and transportation) canisters (DPCs). However, a small percentage of single-purpose (storage only) systems is also being used to meet storage needs. These are included under the “DPC” heading. This report investigates the postclosure criticality safety aspects of DPCs. Placing large, heavy waste packages containing DPCs into a repository for direct disposal has not yet been implemented domestically or internationally. Therefore, direct disposal of DPCs represents new engineering and scientific challenges. Some of the engineering challenges that have already been addressed include handling and placement, use of ramps vs. shafts, use of hoists, use of transport equipment, and thermal management. Additionally, some studies have been conducted in the past regarding the feasibility of direct disposal from a criticality analysis perspective and have concluded that while possible, demonstrating subcriticality over the disposal time period is a challenge. The alternative to direct disposal of DPCs into a repository is to repackage the SNF into different canisters. The direct disposal of DPCs without cutting them open and repackaging is appealing because it could be more cost-effective, reduce the complexity of fuel management operations both in and outside reactor facilities, and result in less cumulative worker dose during interim storage and handling before eventual disposal in a deep geologic repository.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2023

Underground Experiments [Slides]

The aim of the Low Background Radiation Experiment (LBRE) has been to clarify the effects that low levels of radiation have on biological systems. Experiments started in 2009 and continue each summer. Research for the potential performance of a repository for heat-generating waste in bedded salt. A full-scale prototype heater canister was designed and fabricated in fiscal year 2014 to demonstrate the ability of the prototype canister-heater to operate under realistic conditions for performance and reliability. Testing in the underground started in September 2017 and is ongoing. Currently, there is no power to this experiment due to maintenance in the underground.

63 RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRON. POLLUTAN↗

DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 32: Panel: Bringing First-of-a-Kind Treatment Facilities On-Line: Idaho IWTU Commissioning Approach (2/5)

This panel discussed the activities of bringing a first-of-a-kind treatment facility online: The Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU). The design was designed to treat 900,000 gallons of sodium-bearing liquid waste. Construction of this first-of-a-kind treatment facility was completed in 2012. A new approach was adopted in 2016 after multiple challenges were encountered during facility commissioning. This session focused on the Integrated Waste Treatment Unit (IWTU), which was constructed to convert the remaining 900,000 gallons of liquid sodium-bearing waste at the Idaho National Laboratory Site, Idaho, USA, to a granular solid. The liquid waste was generated during historic spent nuclear fuel reprocessing campaigns at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center and was transferred to three underground storage tanks. The waste was not first-cycle waste but was rather the liquid rinse waste from flushing waste transfer lines between reprocessing runs. IWTU will employ a steam-reforming process to treat the liquid waste. The resulting granular solid will be transferred to stainless steel canisters and then to concrete vaults, which will be stored on site until an off-site national geologic repository is available to accept the waste. Presentation proposed: Bringing First-of-a-Kind Treatment Facilities On-Line: Idaho IWTU Commissioning Approach (Joel Case, US DOE (USA), Leo Thompson, Sterling Engineering and Consulting Group, LLC (USA), Joseph Giebel, Fluor Idaho, LLC (USA), Richard Boardman, Idaho National Laboratory (USA), Kevin O'Neill, US DOE (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Efficient Multi-Scale, Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Numerical Model for Simulation of Long-Term Stability of Rooms for Nuclear Waste Disposal

This project demonstrated the feasibility of developing a numerical modeling tool that provides an efficient and unique approach to analyze the geomechanical performance of a deep geological repository (DGR) for high-level nuclear waste. The numerical modeling tool is physics-based and models the thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) processes during the required time (up to one million years) for a DGR. The unique capability of the developed code is explicit representation of fracturing and a discrete fracture network (DFN) in the model that includes the entire repository layout for simulated time of one million years. Therefore, it can potentially address one of the challenges of analysis of a DGR, which is efficient numerical simulation of a multi-scale, physics-based models.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Technical Feasibility of Direct Disposal of Electrorefiner Salt Waste

The experimental breeder reactor (EBR-II) used fuel with a layer of sodium surrounding the uranium-zirconium fuel to improve heat transfer. Disposing of this EBR-II used fuel in a geologic repository without treatment is not prudent because of the potentially energetic reaction of the sodium with water. In 2000, the US Department of Energy decided to treat the EBR-II sodium-bonded used fuel in an electrorefiner (ER), which produces a metallic waste, mostly from the cladding. The salt remaining in the ER contains most of the actinides and fission products. Two baseline waste forms were proposed for disposal in a mined repository; the metallic waste, which was to be cast into ingots, and the ER salt waste, which was to be further treated to produce a ceramic waste form. However, alternative disposal pathways for metallic and salt waste streams are being investigated that may reduce the complexity. For example, performance assessments show that both mined repositories in salt and deep boreholes in basement crystalline rock can easily accommodate the ER salt waste without treating it to form a ceramic waste form. Hence the focus of a direct disposal option, as described herein, is now on the feasibility of packaging the ER salt waste in the near term such that it can be transported to a repository in the future without repackaging. A vessel for direct disposal of ER salt waste has been previously proposed, designed, and a prototype manufactured based on desirable features for use in the hot cell. The reported analysis focused on the feasibility of transporting this proposed vessel and whether any issues would suggest that a smaller or larger size is more appropriate. Specifically, three issues are addressed (1) shielding necessary to reduce doses to acceptable levels; (2) the criticality potential and the ease which it can be shown to be inconsequential, and (3) temperatures of the containers in relation to acceptable cask limits. The generally positive results demonstrate that direct disposal of ER in the proposed packaging is feasible without the need to secure funding to modify the facility.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Should WIPP Resume Unfiltered Discharge of Underground Ventilation?

On February 14, 2014 an incident in Panel 7, Room 7 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) underground repository resulted in the release of americium and plutonium (mostly {sup 241}Am) into the environment and contaminated portions of the repository primarily along the ventilation path from the location of the incident. The WIPP uses a ventilation system to ensure that underground air is circulated throughout the repository and to ensure that conditions are safe for the workers. Since the air in the repository exits to the surface through an exhaust shaft, this shaft is the sole potential pathway for airborne radioactivity release from the repository. During normal operations, exhaust air is released to the environment unfiltered. However, since the radiation release event, the WIPP ventilation system has been, and will likely remain in what is called 'filtration mode', (i.e., exhaust air is routed through a HEPA filter system). Redirection of the ventilation system through the HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filter system was necessary at the peak of the radiation release event to protect aboveground workers at the site and the public in the surrounding areas. However, evaluation of more than two years of underground ventilation sampling data indicates that residual radioactivity levels in the underground no longer warrant HEPA filtration in order to meet either worker or environmental protection criteria. WIPP should consider resumption of the unfiltered discharge of underground ventilation to the environment. Recent sampling data indicate that there have been no detectable releases that would have resulted in a hypothetical dose to a worker or a member of the public in excess of the 0.1 mSv (10 mrem) per year limit for periodic confirmatory sampling as required for operating repositories by the Environmental Protection Agency (40 CFR 191)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2018

Updated Declaration of Legacy Waste Based on Re-evaluated Records - 18283

Kerntechnische Entsorgung Karlsruhe (KTE) has the assignment to decommission and dispose of the nuclear installations on the Karlsruhe site. The entire inventory of these installations as well as the existing waste materials stored in the interim storage of the central waste management section (formerly central decontamination department / HDB) is planned to be sent to the repository Konrad commissioned for the acceptance of low level waste and intermediate level waste. Therefore it is treated according to the respective acceptance criteria. KTE has approximately 45.000 m{sup 3} of legacy waste, which was produced prior to the first issue of these acceptance criteria [1] and hence has to be re-qualified. Legacy waste generally has a radiological declaration, which is not sufficient to meet the criteria applied by the regulators and independent experts today. In order to achieve a modern declaration, additional information such as acquisition records, operational reports, calculated activation, old and new analyses and burn-up calculations as well as knowledge of the physical and chemical boundary conditions of defined material streams is needed. At KTE the waste was treated in batches according to accepted methods documented in the database system KADABRA. For each batch, records regarding the waste type, activity and mass are available for reevaluation. Each batch record consists of information on the raw waste treated in the batch, on the batch itself and on the resulting interim products or waste products. On the basis of this existing or additionally acquired knowledge a declaration concept matching the existing information and the requirements of the repository can be derived and discussed with the independent expert and the regulator. (author)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2026

Improbability of Post-Closure Criticality in Array of Transuranic Waste Containers after Compaction by Salt Creep at Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Based on the rationale presented, post-closure nuclear criticality is improbable when room closure compacts containers disposing transuranic (TRU) waste emplaced at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), an operating repository in bedded salt in southeastern New Mexico. As described in the original WIPP certification, a qualitative estimate of the probability of post-closure criticality in TRU waste produced from atomic energy defense activities has been low either because remote-handled TRU waste canisters are neutronically isolated by the bedded salt or because the low fissile mass in an array of contact-handled TRU waste drums cannot be compacted sufficiently by room closure from salt creep. These situations are still valid for the majority of TRU waste that is disposed at WIPP without any disposal constraints, as updated herein. This report also qualitatively evaluates the probability of criticality after disposal of TRU waste in pipe overpack containers (POC) where every POC in a shipment may have the maximum 200 fissile gram equivalent of 239Pu content. The probability of criticality for a disposal room filled with POCs is estimated during four representative phases of repository evolution: (1) a large salt block falls onto POCs in the first 20 years, (2) salt creep closes a disposal room in the first 1000 years without brine seepage and subsequent gas generation, which permits maximum compaction, (3) some brine seepage occurs into the closed room, which initiates consumption of the fiberboard (cellulose) impact absorber in the POC in the second 1000 years, and (4) full brine inundation of a room and consumption of all fiberboard thereafter. Salt-block fall in the first phase does not greatly disrupt three tiers of POCs. The compacted spacing of POCs in the later three repository conditions is calculated through high-fidelity, geomechanical modeling. Criticality evaluation of compacted 200-g 239 Pu spheres at the compacted spacing shows that neither 12-inch nor 6-inch POCs are critical after the first 1000 years, the second 1000 years, or thereafter as the sea of reflector material changes to represent the three repository conditions. Specifically, fiberboard and iron isolates 239 Pu while dry, and brine reduces the reactivity when a room is partially and fully inundated. Because POC behavior bounds behavior of other standard TRU waste containers, post-closure criticality caused by room closure compacting containers is omitted in the performance assessments for the 2019 and 2026 WIPP compliance re-certification applications to the US Environmental Protection Agency.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Qualification of Pre-existing Containers According to the Acceptance Criteria of the Repository Konrad - 17204

As well as working in the field of waste management, Kerntechnische Entsorgung Karlsruhe GmbH (KBE) is, for historical reasons, one of Germany's three constructors of repository containers for the repository Konrad. The focus of this container production is merely on the side of requalification of the existing legacy containers, which are partly already loaded and grouted. To a smaller extend, KTE also produces new containers for its own use because the containers exactly match the waste properties present on the Karlsruhe site. There are three major container types in the process of requalification: - The Type-IV-Drum-Steel-Container FSC-IV-D was successfully licensed in 2014 and regularly produced thereafter. At the same time, the pre-existing containers of this type are re-qualified on the basis of this license by proof of the compliance with this license. - The Type-IV-Product-Container PSC-I-D is identical to the FSC-VI-D in terms of steel construction but also contains a liner of concrete for shielding and protection of the steel construction. This container is designed for large components and demolition waste. After a successful drop test, it is currently in the advanced process of licensing. - Type I cylindrical concrete containers are simple single drum shieldings which were produced in large numbers in the 1970's and 1980's. KTE owns 7,000 of those containers, thus making requalification and licensing cheaper than retreatment of the waste after demolition of the containers. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

'A Good Decision Is Based On Information, Not On Numbers' - A Process For National Strategic Decision Making - 17203

Waste management decision making is the process used by waste owners to determine and justify choices in across the lifecycle of a waste (from the manner of generation or retrieval to final disposition). In the UK, waste owners in the nuclear industry are obligated, by their environmental permits and authorisations, to demonstrate the application of robust and well-underpinned decision making processes for waste management. This is captured through the requirement for waste owners to demonstrate the identification and implementation of Best Available Technique (BAT). The National Waste Programme (NWP), led by LLW Repository Ltd, is a UK wide programme which leads the implementation of the UK National Strategy for the management of solid LLW from the nuclear industry [1] and which aims to deliver a self-sustaining culture for optimised management of Low Level Waste (LLW) in the UK. Recognising the requirement on waste owners, the NWP has - in conjunction with appointed contractors - led the development and publication of national strategic optioneering studies (so-called national strategic BAT studies) to support waste owners. Recognising the benefits that this approach to optioneering and strategic decision making could have for other waste producers, this paper provides an overview of the process used for the development of the suite of national strategic BAT assessments for the NWP. It details: the main phases of the process, the key features of each process phase, the benefits of the approach and key learning from its deployment in practice. Note: The legislative regime in England and Wales requires the identification and application of BAT. There is an equivalent regime in Scotland known as Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO) and Best Practicable Means (BPM). The requirements are comparable across the two legislative regimes and, for the purposes of simplicity, the term BAT will be utilised in this paper. The approach and outcomes of the national strategic optioneering process described are applicable across the UK. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2020

Dual Purpose Canister Reactivity and Groundwater Absorption Analyses

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Optimization of the Post-Operational Phase on Two Belgian Multi-Unit Nuclear Power Plants: the Case of the Non-Fissile Irradiated Core Items - 20156

The current legal framework in Belgium foresees the progressive phase out of nuclear power between October 2022 (Doel 3) and December 2025 (Doel 2). Upon its definitive shutdown, each unit of the Tihange and Doel sites will enter a Post-Operational Phase (POP) and be prepared for its Decontamination and Decommissioning (D and D). Prior to obtaining the D and D license, the Operator Electrabel is legally required to remove any non-fissile irradiated core items stored in the deactivation pools. The non-fissile irradiated core items consist essentially of control rods, poison rods and source thimbles as well as thimble plugs and foreign materials irradiated during operation: - Their significant content in highly radiant radionuclides (up to 6 TBq of Co-60 per kg of irradiated material) renders all existing operational waste management processes inadequate due to insufficient biological shielding; - Their high concentrations in long-lived radionuclides call for their disposal in a geological repository for which no final design nor waste acceptance criteria are expected prior to 2050. Uncertainties in the Belgian energy supply and security, however, require the Operator to be prepared for a partial nuclear phase out, where one or more units would benefit from lifetime extension while the remaining units would undergo decommissioning. The present paper aims at presenting how Electrabel, in partnership with Tractebel, addressed this challenge by maximizing the use of synergies within the respective sites as well as between both sites themselves, all the while accounting for site specificities. The most recent results and state of progress of the project will be detailed and the first lessons learned will be shared. The project has been split in multiple tasks and phased as follows: - An inventory phase aimed at mapping the contents, origin, composition and history of the non-fissile irradiated core items; - A pre-characterization phase based on neutron activation models; - A waste sorting phase aimed at separating waste forms for which an evacuation route exists from those for which such route does not exist; - A feasibility phase aimed at exploring all possible scenarios for the management of non-fissile irradiated core items and identifying the optimal feasible solution for each site; - A preparation phase (currently ongoing), developing further the optimal solution and ensuring that back-up solutions are available for any foreseeable change of context (licensing issue, modification in the nuclear phase-out program, etc.) and initiating early contacts with potential subcontractors for segmentation works and cask manufacturers, as well as the Belgian regulatory body and waste management agency. This phase also foresees the investigation of destructive and non-destructive radiological measurements to support the detailed characterization of the waste forms; - A realization phase (future work). (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Deep Borehole Disposal Research in the United States - 17427

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) manages a research and development (R and D) program for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in the United States. Deep boreholes are being evaluated for disposal of some smaller DOE-managed waste as an alternative to disposal in a mined geologic repository. The deep borehole disposal concept consists of drilling borehole(s) to a total depth of about 5,000 m (16,400 ft - or greater than three miles) into crystalline basement rock, placing waste packages in the lower emplacement zone portion of the borehole, and sealing and plugging the upper portion of the borehole. The required bottom-hole diameter of the borehole(s) depends on the waste package configuration for the reference concept, but ranges from 22 to 43 cm (8.5 to 17 inches). Additional research and development is desired in several important areas for further consideration of deep borehole disposal of radioactive waste. A Deep Borehole Field Test (DBFT) will be conducted by DOE to further assess the viability of deep borehole disposal as an alternative for the disposal of smaller DOE-managed waste forms. The DBFT will be used to evaluate three main areas: 1) evaluation of the capability for drilling and construction of deep, large-diameter boreholes; 2) downhole scientific analyses to assess hydrogeochemical conditions that control waste stability and containment; and 3) engineering activities to assess the viability and safety of waste package emplacement and retrieval in deep boreholes. The DBFT will include first drilling a characterization borehole, followed by an optional field test borehole, to a total depth of about 5,000 m (16,400 feet) into crystalline basement rock in a geologically stable continental location. The initial smaller diameter characterization borehole will be drilled and completed to facilitate downhole scientific testing and analysis. If site conditions are found to be suitable, DOE intends to drill a larger-diameter field test borehole to evaluate emplacement activities using surrogate waste packages. The surrogate waste packages will not contain any radioactive waste, nor will any radioactive waste be used in these tests. One of the advantages of deep borehole disposal is that it would give DOE the flexibility to consider options for disposal of smaller waste forms. Deep borehole disposal also potentially offers earlier disposal of some wastes than might be possible in a mined repository, and could reduce costs associated with projected treatments of some wastes. In order to accomplish the DBFT, DOE will require the support of multiple national laboratories, along with a site contractor to acquire a suitable test site and to manage the site and the required testing activities. DOE issued a competitive solicitation via a request for proposal (RFP) in July, 2015, which requested proposals to provide a test site and site management services. The contract was awarded in January, 2016, to a team led by Battelle Memorial Institute which included a proposed test site in Pierce County, North Dakota. After efforts to acquire both the initial test site in North Dakota and an alternative proposed site in Spink County, South Dakota were unsuccessful, activities were suspended. The experiences in Pierce County, ND and Spink County, SD highlighted the importance of public engagement and support for the DBFT, and that relevant levels of government and other public stakeholders should be involved from the beginning. Using the lessons learned in North and South Dakota, DOE issued a new RFP on August 22, 2016 which emphasized local, state, and tribal (if applicable) government engagement, as well as public and other stakeholder involvement ahead of proposal submittals and throughout the contract execution phases. The new RFP allowed for multiple initial awards and multiple phases of contract execution. In December, 2016, DOE announced the selection of four companies - AECOM, ENERCON, RE/SPEC, and TerranearPMC - to begin exploring the possibility of conducting a DBFT under the terms of the new RFP. Ultimately, only one site will be chosen for the field test. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗