Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “docking”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1970

Skylab Operations Handbook: Orbital Workshop (OWS), Airlock Module (AM), Multiple Docking Adapter (MDA): Systems Descriptions - Volume 1

The Skylab Program consists of three low-earth-orbit missions of the Orbital Assembly (OA) (figure 1.0-1), extending over.an a-month period. The OA consists of the CSM docked to the Saturn Workshop.(SWS). This handbook describes the systems for three of the four major components of the SWS (OWS, AM, and MDA), and also discusses significant interfaces with the Instrument Unit (IU), ATM, and CSM. The other major component of the SWS, the ATM, is treated separately in its own handbook. The OWS, AM, MDA, ATM Deployment Assembly (ATM-DA), Fixed Airlock Shroud (FAS), Payload Shroud (PS), and IU are addressed throughout this document as individual modules from a structural standpoint only. Although normally considered a part of the launch vehicle, the IU is treated in this document as part of the SWS because of its function in preparing the SWS for orbital operation. Section 1.0 describes vehicle and mission configurations of the Skylab program and provides general descriptions of the various systems. Section 2.0 provides detailed systems data covering system interfaces, functional description, subsystems and major components description, component operation, failure modes, performance and design data, operational limitations and restrictions, and instrumentation, and briefly outlines the experiments. Section 3.0 contains illustrations of all panels and identifies the controls and displays, panels, reference designators, nomenclature, functions, circuit breakers, and power sources. The Table of Contents lists in order of appearance all sections, subsections, major paragraphs, illustrations, and tables and provides their respective page locations. Appendix A defines the abbreviations and acronyms employed throughout this handbook, and Appendix B explains the symbols used. Appendix C is a locator index that references component controls contained in Section 3.0. Appendix D is an alphabetical index of paragraph headings, illustrations, and tables, according to the key word, with applicable page numbers. Additional items of significance to the user have been included in the index. The technical level to which this document is written assumes the reader to have general knowledge of engineering terms and principles.

West, W. D.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Satellite Servicing's Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking Testbed on the International Space Station

The Space Servicing Capabilities Project (SSCP) at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) has been tasked with developing systems for servicing space assets. Starting in 2009, the SSCP completed a study documenting potential customers and the business case for servicing, as well as defining several notional missions and required technologies. In 2010, SSCP moved to the implementation stage by completing several ground demonstrations and commencing development of two International Space Station (ISS) payloads-the Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM) and the Dextre Pointing Package (DPP)--to mitigate new technology risks for a robotic mission to service existing assets in geosynchronous orbit. This paper introduces the DPP, scheduled to fly in July of 2012 on the third operational SpaceX Dragon mission, and its Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking (AR&D) instruments. The combination of sensors and advanced avionics provide valuable on-orbit demonstrations of essential technologies for servicing existing vehicles, both cooperative and non-cooperative.

Naasz, Bo J.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Project Link!: Dynamics and Control of In-Flight Wing Tip Docking

Project Link! is a NASA-led effort to study the feasibility of multi-aircraft aerial docking systems. In these systems, a group of vehicles physically link to each other during flight to form a larger ensemble vehicle with increased aerodynamic performance and mission utility. This paper presents a dynamic model and control architecture for a system of fixed-wing vehicles with this capability. The dynamic model consists of the 6 degree-of-freedom fixed-wing aircraft equations of motion, a spring-damper-magnet system to represent the linkage force between constituent vehicles, and the NASA-Burnham-Hallock wingtip vortex model to represent the close-proximity aerodynamic interactions between constituents before the linking occurs. The control architecture consists of a guidance algorithm to autonomously drive the constituents towards their linking partners and an inner-loop angular rate controller. A simulation was constructed from the model, and the flight dynamic modes of the linked system were compared to the individual vehicles. Simulation results for both before and after linking are presented.

Cooper, John R.↗
NASA NTRS2020

GN&C Sequencing for Orion Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking

As part of the Artemis program to return humans to the lunar surface, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration is planning to use the Orion Multi- Purpose Crew Vehicle to transport crew to a small orbital platform called Gate- way in cislunar space. To facilitate this activity, Orion is required to perform Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking (RPOD) with both the Gate- way and the launch vehicle upper stage. The Orion spacecraft uses sequencing in the form of Phases, Segments, Activities, and Modes (PSAM) to configure Guidance, Navigation, & Control (GN&C) software during each portion of the mission. Significant updates to Orion PSAM definitions are required for RPOD. This paper describes the process of defining these new sequencing elements, implementing them in prototype flight software, and testing them in an integrated simulation environment. First, requirements are specified to determine the nominal and off-nominal sequencing behavior necessary to complete the mission. These requirements also specify which software functions should be fully autonomous and which functions require manual interactions from crew or ground operators. Next, the RPOD concept of operations is defined with detailed events listed in a mission timeline. Third, a state machine diagram is developed to show all PSAM states, including all possible transitions between them. After this, the PSAM states and transitions are entered into a sequencing software emulator and parameter values and modes are defined for GN&C software elements. Finally, the PSAM architecture is tested within an integrated simulation environment by connecting it with prototypes of relevant GN&C flight software elements and with detailed vehicle models. After the sequencing design has been finalized and tested, it is implemented in flight software.

Schulte, Peter Z.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Orion GN&C Sequencing for Off-Nominal Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking

This paper discusses the Concept of Operations of the nine contingency strategies available for off-nominal Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking of Orion with the Gateway in a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit around the Moon. Explanations are provided for each contingency strategy, how they are initiated, when they can be initiated, and how they are designed to protect the crew. Then an overview is provided of the sequencing of the Guidance, Navigation, and Control flight software used to achieve each contingency strategy, in the form of Phases, Segments, Activities, and Modes. These off-nominal scenarios re-quire the definition of new Segments and Activities.

Jordan S. Abell↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluating Delta-V Dispersions Using Linear Covariance Techniques with Applications to Rendezvous and Docking

One of the attractive advantages of using linear covariance analysis (LinCov) is that it can accurately produce both navigation errors and trajectory dispersions in a fraction of the time comparable to the standard Monte Carlo analysis approach that is traditionally adopted. It also has the capability of generating delta-v dispersions which is perhaps the most influential performance metric since many aspects of a mission design revolve around the anticipated propellant usage. Accurately capturing this key performance criteria using linear covariance techniques has several subtle caveats raising reasonable doubts and a cautious sense of skepticism. This paper outlines multiple approaches of modeling delta-v usage in LinCov, highlights their limitations and advantages, and ultimately compares their corresponding results to the actual Monte Carlo performance. The theory is also extended to reliably account for an arbitrary thruster configuration and the resultant propellant consumptions due to both translational burns and attitude maneuvers. This provides near instant insight into the impacts of thruster layout design and different vehicle mass properties. These derived techniques are applied and verified using an NRHO rendezvous and docking scenario consistent with upcoming NASA Artemis missions for Orion.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗
NASA NTRS2024

Evaluation of Cleaning Methods for Dust Mitigation of Lunar Docking and Hatch Seals

Low-leakage seals are an enabling technology for future lunar surface systems, and they must be kept clean to ensure that crews have sufficient breathable air for extended lunar surface missions. Previous testing on representative state-of-the-art seals showed that while seals can tolerate some level of lunar simulant dust contamination, dust can degrade seal performance to a point at which seal leak rates exceed maximum allowable values. The ability to clean simulant from seals had not been thoroughly studied, and the effectiveness and potential complications of using different cleaning methods for lunar seals were not well understood. To address this knowledge gap, researchers at the NASA Glenn Research Center executed a multiphase study to better understand and mitigate seal dust-exposure risks. The focus of this report is on the second phase of that study, in which tests were conducted to evaluate the viability of seal cleaning methods for use in the lunar environment. Multiple methods for cleaning seals contaminated with lunar simulant were assessed for cleaning effectiveness and viability for use in the lunar environment. Leak tests were performed on seals after they were cleaned to determine whether leak rates could be brought back to acceptable levels, and cleaned seals were examined to determine whether their surfaces had been damaged by the cleaning processes. This phase of the study also investigated changes in the seals’ adhesion forces as a result of contamination and cleaning.

Dust Mitigation↗
DOE OSTI2024

Diversifying hierarchical ionic assembly by docking cations to anions as salt bridges

Here, we expand the diversity of building blocks available for ionic assembly by introducing tertiary (3°) ammonium cations into anion complexes. We use proton transfer between 3° amines and organo-phosphoric acids to generate H-bonding cations (R 3 NH + ) and anions (RHPO 4 – ) that co-assemble with cyanostar macrocycles into assemblies with 2:2:2 stoichiometry. At the heart is a supramolecular dimer where phosphate anions form salt bridges by H-bonding with cations. Unlike conventional 4° ammonium cations, 3,000 commercial amines provide diversity for high-throughput screening of 72 combinations (9 nitrogen bases and 8 acids), producing 13 privileged partners for quantitative assembly. Yields depend on the solvent and sterics of salt bridge formation. Ten more nitrogen bases connect to fluorophores (pyrene), photocatalysts (quinoline), drugs (Cipralex, Zytiga), and ionic liquids (imidazole). The synthesis and examination of 82 new salts exemplify how acid-base chemistry can open a pipeline to a diversity of building blocks for exploring hierarchical ionic assembly.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
NASA NTRS1971

Preliminary design of a shuttle docking and cargo handling system

Work performed prior to concept selection, concept evaluation, and the preliminary design are summarized. The initial work included selection of the requirements and guidelines used to formulate concepts; analysis to determine detailed requirements for reach, velocity, torque, etc.; formulation of the alternative concepts; the evaluation and ranking of the concepts; and the selection of a concept. The man-in-the-loop simulation performed with a six degree of freedom moving base simulator and a three degree of freedom manipulator arm are described. The analysis and tradeoffs of those design parameters which are the key to the preliminary design are described. Estimates for a future development program are presented, including a schedule and manpower breakdown and cost estimate. The system design parameters, with a weight and power breakdown are summarized.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1972

Radiation environment for rendezvous and docking with nuclear rockets

Radiation environment data for the NERVA engine are provided which may be utilized in estimating radiation exposures associated with various space maneuvers. Spatial distributions of neutron and gamma tissue kerma rates produced during full thrust operation of the engine are presented. Final rendezvous with an orbiting space station would be achieved subsequent to full thrust operation during a period of 10 or more hours duration in which impulse is delivered by the propellant used for removal of decay heat. Consequently, post operation radiation levels are of prime importance in estimating space station exposures. Maps of gamma kerma rates around the engine are provided for decay times of 4 and 24 hours after a representative firing. Typical decay curves illustrating the dependence of post operation kerma rates on decay time and operating history are included. Examples of the kerma distributions around the engine which result from integration over specific exposure periods are shown.

Rogers, D. R.↗
NASA NTRS1972

A shuttle and space station manipulator system for assembly, docking, maintenance cargo handling and spacecraft retrieval (preliminary design). Volume 1: Management summary

A preliminary design is established for a general purpose manipulator system which can be used interchangeably on the shuttle and station and can be transferred back and forth between them. Control of the manipulator is accomplished by hard wiring from internal control stations in the shuttle or station. A variety of shuttle and station manipulator operations are considered including servicing the Large Space Telescope; however, emphasis is placed on unloading modules from the shuttle and assembling the space station. Simulation studies on foveal stereoscopic viewing and manipulator supervisory computer control have been accomplished to investigate the feasibility of their use in the manipulator system. The basic manipulator system consists of a single 18.3 m long, 7 degree of freedom (DOF), electrically acutated main boom with an auxiliary 3 DOF electrically actuated, extendible 18.3 m maximum length, lighting, and viewing boom. A 3 DOF orientor assembly is located at the tip of the viewing boom to provide camera pan, tilt, and roll.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1972

A shuttle and space station manipulator system for assembly, docking, maintenance, cargo handling and spacecraft retrieval (preliminary design). Volume 2: Concept development and selection

The overall program background, the various system concepts considered, and the rationale for the selected design are described. The concepts for each subsystem are also described and compared. Details are given for the requirements, boom configuration and dynamics, actuators, man/machine interface and control, visual system, control system, environmental control and life support, data processing, and materials.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1972

A shuttle and space station manipulator system for assembly, docking, maintenance, cargo handling and spacecraft retrieval (preliminary design). Volume 3: Concept analysis. Part 1: Technical

Information backing up the key features of the manipulator system concept and detailed technical information on the subsystems are presented. Space station assembly and shuttle cargo handling tasks are emphasized in the concept analysis because they involve shuttle berthing, transferring the manipulator boom between shuttle and station, station assembly, and cargo handling. Emphasis is also placed on maximizing commonality in the system areas of manipulator booms, general purpose end effectors, control and display, data processing, telemetry, dedicated computers, and control station design.

Source record↗