SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “extravehicular mobility units”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 361 records · Page 20

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Suit Portable Life Support System Oxygen Regulator History, Development, & Testing Results

An oxygen regulator has been in development for the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) Portable Life Support System (PLSS). The regulator provides the necessary oxygen pressure control for the crew member during prebreathe, Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA), post EVA airlock operations, and Decompression Sickness (DCS) treatment. It has been over four decades since a new spacesuit oxygen regulator has been designed. The regulator and EMU that is presently used on the International Space Station (ISS) was developed for the space shuttle program without any significant changes made throughout its service life. The xEMU spacesuit oxygen regulator is based on the previous EMU Secondary Oxygen Pack (SOP). The new design integrates numerous improvements and changes including an innovative approach to regulator architecture, a more robust first stage pressure sensing mechanism, digital actuation control, and electronic pressure sensing. These upgrades replace manual control linkages, physical gauges, and enable infinitely variable pressure set points. The new setpoints can decrease prebreathe time and make in suit DCS treatment possible. Throughout its four iterations design concerns have been addressed, safety features have been added, and the envelope of the regulator designed to fit inside the xEMU PLSS package. This paper will review the history, design, testing, and lessons learned during the development of the xEMU PLSS Oxygen Regulator.

Ryan Eric Ogilvie↗

NASA NTRS2023

U.S. Spacesuit Knowledge Capture – Expanding Our Future

NASA is going to the Moon. And it will don a new spacesuit when it reaches its destination. NASA is partnering with industry to build the spacesuit and supporting systems (i.e., surface mobility tools) that astronauts will use on the Moon, starting with Artemis III. The Johnson Space Center’s (JSC) Extravehicular Activity and Human Surface Mobility Program (EHP) is managing this effort, and the U.S. Spacesuit Knowledge Capture (SKC) Program is expanding its scope to help. For 15 years, the SKC Program has collected, archived, and disseminated decades of spacesuit-related knowledge, as appropriate, to help NASA scientists, technicians, and engineers support space exploration. The SKC Program captures its knowledge by hosting and recording subject-matter expert (SME) lectures, interviews, and workshops. It also collects retired SMEs’ reports, drawings, and schematics containing legacy spacesuit knowledge. To build a technically capable spacesuit essential for future lunar exploration, spacesuit professionals borrowed much of their knowledge from legacy Extravehicular Activity (EVA) spacesuits. Most of the SKC Program’s captured knowledge has focused on legacy and current spacesuits. To support EHP, the SKC Program is expanding its knowledge capture focus beyond the spacesuit and will seek to collect knowledge from other pertinent topics (e.g., Lunar Terrain Vehicle and EVA tools). In 2007, the SKC Program began as an independent source, without funding. As demand for capturing essential spacesuit knowledge increased, consequently, the SKC Program’s funding increased. Expansion of the SKC Program was evident in 2019, when it seized the opportunity to capture the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) buildup at JSC. In 2021, its collaboration with the xEMU Technical Community of Practice facilitated training and knowledge sharing with the xEMU team. In 2022, the SKC Program began supporting EHP. This paper describes the SKC Program’s expansive evolution, plans to support EHP, and more.

Cinda Chullen↗

NASA NTRS2023

xPLSS Structural Backplate Design, Manufacture, and Test Overview

NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) has been developing and building a new detailed design of the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) space suit to support future International Space Station (ISS) and Lunar Artemis missions. The Exploration Portable Life Support System (xPLSS) of the xEMU contains some clever new technologies to meet the requirements to provide Extra Vehicular Activity (EVA) capability on the ISS and the Moon. The suit must interface with and fit through ports and airlocks of at least three vehicles: ISS, Human Landing System (HLS), and Gateway. The first partial xPLSS experimental flight unit called SWME EXPRESS Rack Flight Experiment (SERFE) that was a rack-deployed thermal control system payload on the ISS for two years (2020-2022). The first complete assembly of the xEMU was built as a Design Verification Test (DVT) unit (2022); similar to but more extensive than an Engineering Development Unit (EDU). The xPLSS Backplate serves not only as the structural backbone of the xPLSS and SERFE systems but also contains innovative design features to reduce the: mass, complexity, parts count, number ofseals (and therefore leak potential), and outer dimensions of the entire assembly. This paper provides an overview of these new design features, manufacturing processes, system interfaces, and SERFE/DVT test results of the Backplate as part of the xPLSS/xEMU.

xPLSS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploration Helmet Permanent Anti-Fog Study

For the current Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) spacesuit, an astronaut applies an antifog solution to the interior of the helmet bubble before each EVA. However, the anti-fog solution has been reported to cause eye discomfort during at least seven EMU EVAs when the anti-fog solution contacted the crew member’s eyes. During STS-100, astronaut Chris Hadfield reported the eye irritation temporarily blinded him during his spacewalk. In addition, the wipe on anti-fog solution is a consumable that needs to be accounted for and a supply launched for missions. To solve this, NASA has tested different permanent anti-fog coatings. However, major issues have arisen with Human in the Loop (HITL) testing with the coatings. Cleaning and removing Valsalva devices which use pressure sensitive adhesives have been challenges to avoid damaging the permanent anti-fog coating. Due to these issues, further investigation is being completed evaluating two solvent based anti-fog solutions: Exxene’s HCF-100 and FSI’s Visgard 106-94. Each coating will be evaluated on polycarbonate samples for application consistency, steam cycles (mimicking breath cycles), cleaning durability, haze, and light transmission. This study will determine if either coating is a viable option to pursue as a permanent anti-fog for spacesuit helmet applications.

spacesuit↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Suit Portable Life Support System (PLSS) Oxygen Regulator History, Development, & Testing Results

Ryan Ogilvie↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Suit Portable Life Support System Thermal Control Valve Ball Design

A Thermal Control Valve (TCV) has been in development for the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit Portable Life Support System (xEMU PLSS). The xEMU PLSS TCV controls flow going to the liquid cooling and ventilation garment that the crew member wears during extra-vehicular activity to expel waste heat. A previous TCV version with a linear actuator and diverter valve has been tested to attempt to control the flow accurately. The previous valve has a non-linear flow response relative to valve position and has struggled to meet the setpoints desired for precise thermal control. While many diverter valve design variations have been attempted, all previous designs have had difficulty meeting set points. Additionally, high precision machining is required to create a metal-on-metal seal which has its own drawbacks and does not always meet requirements for internal leakage. This metal seal also requires stalling a linear actuator to load the seal in compression or tension which has caused sticking failures when stalled. A new approach and design for a TCV has been developed which uses a rotational ball to control flow and has demonstrated a much more precise and linear flow control. The design functions like a two-way ball valve with two Teflon seats that cradle and compress the ball for sealing. The ball outlet has a unique geometric design to create a set-able orifice like hole which is more predictable at controlling flow. Additionally, the Teflon seat performs much better for preventing internal leakage than the metal seal and prevents sticking by having a large range in which it is sealed without having to stall the actuator. This paper will review a new proposed xEMU PLSS TCV ball design and compare it with previous iterations of the design.

Ryan Ogilvie↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Testing the Exploration Conops (Excon) Mockup Suit in Lunar Analog Environments in 2022

Understanding how to effectively train for Extravehicular Activities (EVAs) for Artemis missions is critical. Developing high-fidelity simulation environments is important for Artemis mission preparation. Because the actual Lunar exploration environment cannot be fully replicated on Earth, it is paramount to determine where and how to properly train the Artemis team. The overall focus for this test series was developing the capability to perform Artemis simulated EVAs in high-fidelity, full-scale environments. This test series was broken into three distinct tests titled after the EVA & Human Surface Mobility (HSM) Program (EHP) integrated test team: Joint EVA & HSM Test Team (JETT). The test locations are planned to serve as Artemis training sites and were selected because of their relevance to the expected Artemis Lunar terrain. JETT1 was conducted near Kilbourne Hole by El Paso, Texas and focused on hardware development and checkout. JETT2 was conducted in the Icelandic Highlands and began the transition towards EVA concept of operations (con-ops), risks and technology. JETT3 was conducted near SP Crater by Flagstaff, Arizona and focused on simulating the Artemis III mission including a Houston based Flight Control Team (FCT) and a Science Mission Directorate (SMD) science team. All three JETT tests utilized the Exploration Concept of Operations (ExCon) mockup space suit. The ExCon mockup suit is a lightweight, unpressurized Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) simulator. While it cannot replicate the feel of working within a pressurized suit, it does introduce similar volume constraints and some of the mobility programing to simulate the user experience in the xEMU. Overall, the JETT testing was able to create a simulated Lunar EVA and have two subjects perform full scale operations in line with Artemis III mission expectations. Future work is planned to continue to improve the simulation quality of Lunar EVA simulations.

spacesuit↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Development of a Multi-Gas Microsensor Array for the Exploration Portable Life Support System

The Portable Life Support System (PLSS) of the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) requires sensors capable of measuring the major constituents of the gas stream. These major constituents include oxygen, carbon dioxide, and water vapor. The sensors must operate across a wide range of flow and pressure conditions and introduce very low pressure drop in the ventilation loop. The sensors must operate with low power and occupy a small volume. This paper reports the development of a compact, low power, multi-parameter astronaut life support sensor (M-PALSS). M-PALSS consists of an array of low-power chemical microsensors for oxygen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and pressure. M-PALSS includes custom electronics to control the sensors and is packaged in a custom housing that meets the volume and shape requirements for service in the PLSS.

James Makel↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Integrated Computational Fluid Dynamics and Thermal Desktop Thermal Modeling for Assessment of the EMU in Support of ISS EVA 80

Following the reports of water accumulation in the Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) helmet during the ISS US EVA-80, various efforts for mitigation and further understanding of this phenomenon have been undertaken with the goal of prevention and to ensure crew safety in future EVAs. In support of this goal, a combination of Thermal Desktop thermal modeling and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been performed in order to characterize the performance of the EMU components, specifically those within the ventilation/cooling water loops. This modeling effort evaluates the dry/wet gas pressure drop and flow distribution through gas and liquid flow paths using CFD, as well as a two-phase flow assessment of condensation production and water separation/removal performance using an integrated Thermal Desktop model of important EMU ventilation loop components. The models assess this overall thermal-fluid performance in comparison with previous existing models, design points, and historical EVA data using their inputs.

EVA 80↗

NASA NTRS2023

Lessons Learned from the EMU Fire

In April 1980, a Space Shuttle Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) was destroyed in a flash fire during a functional test in the Johnson Space Center's crew systems laboratory. During this lecture, retired Exploration Portable Life Support System (xPLSS) Operations Manager Joseph T. Nowetner Jr. discussed what happened to cause this failure, what safety message resulted from it, lessons learned from these mistakes, and how to leverage earned knowledge.

Joseph T Nowetner↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

EVA SPACESUIT INCIDENCE TRACKING

INTRODUCTION: Extravehicular Activity (EVA)suit-related injuries to crew during training and inflight operations are not uncommon. Systematic tracking of these issues has waxed and waned throughout NASA’s history. Given two new EVA suits in development and an increase in EVA training, the need for dutiful recording of this data is critical. The Suited User Incident Tracking System (SUITS) was developed in the last decade to track all suited exposures, recording exposure details and any related issues, pains, or injuries that arise. METHODS: SUITS data collected from 2017 to 2022 was analyzed for issue frequency and severity for each body location and plotted to visualize where issues were occurring. Clustering techniques using a k-modes approach were also applied to the data set to generate profiles of populations that experienced issues in the suit, and populations that did not. RESULTS:A key finding from SUITS is that discomfort and pain observed in the new planetary spacesuits are occurring in new body locations than those experienced in the microgravity space suit (Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU)).To date, the lower body and torso regions account for most pain reports in planetary spacesuits whereas most reports in EMU were shoulders and hands. DISCUSSION:SUITS will continue to be used to capture exposures for all suit types. As training suit availability improves and training cadence increases in preparation for planetary missions, it is critical to capture and assess all suit incidences. Further, a Suited Anomaly Assessment Team (SAAT) consisting of a broad range of EVA stakeholders was formed to share and act on SUITS data with the goal of developing robust solutions to issues/injuries as they arise. Understanding the types and locations of injuries that occur during suited operations will help inform future work related to EVA fitness training requirements, suit design, and modeling efforts to avoid injury. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1. Systematic tracking of suited exposures and issues is critical for understanding the complex interaction between the human and the EVA spacesuit. 2. As EVA suit issues/injuries arise it is important to share that data with a broad group to ensure robust strategies are developed.

N Newby↗

NASA NTRS2024

Effect of Varying HUT Sizing on Human-Spacesuit Contact Patterns

Fit, comfort, and mobility of the spacesuit rely on the location, magnitude, and type of contact between the suit and wearer. Typically, spacesuits include the Hard Upper Torso (HUT) comprising the upper torso of the spacesuit. Potential injuries from hard contact between the wearer’s shoulders and the HUT are a concern; therefore, to investigate spacesuit-wearer contact patterns, data from a retrospective study was analyzed. This study had eight subjects wearing the Shuttle Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU) spacesuit in two configurations, one with a nominally sized HUT and another with an oversized HUT. The subjects were sized per the NASA standard suit fit procedure. The suit’s arms and lower body were also resized to provide nominal arm and lower body fit, accounting for the larger HUT. Subjects held various shoulder postures (neutral posture, and various maximum shoulder rotations) with the suit pressurized to 4.3 PSI. For each posture, subjects reported the intensity of their perceived contact with the suit on a Borg CR10 scale, 0 indicating a non-existent contact intensity, and 10 representing a maximal contact intensity. Ratings were recorded for 11 regions covering the upper body and these ratings were used to determine the impact of body shape and size on suit contact. Our preliminary findings suggest that oversized HUTs had less contact regions than compared to the nominal HUT; and the region of contact, contact patterns, and contact intensities varied from person to person with the oversized HUT. This variance could be linked to subjects’ body shape and size. The next goal is to establish a causal factor between body shape and size, pose, contact region, and the HUT size. The outcome is expected to help understand the overall contact trends and insights into the influence of HUT sizing on suit fit.

Will Green↗

NASA NTRS2024

xEMU Thermal Vacuum Testing Overview

The Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) project was the culimation of over a decade of spacesuit development that was performed in-house at the NASA Johnson Space Center. This project reached a level where almost fully completed development fidelity spacesuits had been designed, assembled and tested in an integrated configuration. The xEMU Development-Verification-Test (DVT) hardware was assembled into two different xEMU test articles and underwent a series of thermal-vacuum tests at the Johnson Space Center’s Chamber B. These tests not only gathered data on thermal performance, but also exercised the life support system, communication system, suit information systems, and suit avionics. This complex test has and will continue to produce many meaningful reports ranging from component level test results (for example on spacesuit boots), test design of heater cages to simulate thermal environments for a spacesuit test article, and higher level thermal performance of subsystems (such as the Portable Life Support System) or the entire assembly. This paper provides an overview of the test configuration and also top level results from this highly successful integrated test of the xEMU.

PLSS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Short xEMU Pressure Garment Thermal Vacuum Test Results

NASA performed a thermal-vacuum test of the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) to demonstrate the performance of the government reference design in a relevant space-like environment. One of the spacesuit test articles was configurated as a Short-xEMU (SxEMU). This unmanned configuration provided an excellent test to evaluate the Exploration Portable Life Support System (xPLSS), however it posed some challenges with the Exploration Pressure Garment (xPGS) components involved due to the lack of a human wearing a Liquid Cooling and Ventilation Garment (LCVG), which significantly contributes to the thermal performance of the suit. This paper provides an overview of the pressure garment components that made up this portion of the test article, the test configuration, test results, and lessons learned from this very unique spacesuit test.

xemu↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

xEMU Suit Integrated Audio Communications System: Ambient and EVA Pressure Testing System Performance

Testing across several airlock and EVA thermal and pressure scenarios has demonstrated that the Integrated Audio System of NASA’s Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) spacesuits transmits and receives intelligible audio communications without the use of a commcap or similar worn device. The xEMU audio system consists of internal loudspeakers and digital microphones (Integrated Communications System –ICS) combined with an adaptive Acoustic Echo Canceller (AEC), outbound voice operated transmission (VOX), and automatic gain control (AGC). Transducers are mounted in an “exploded commcap” configuration with helmet-attached speakers near the ears and three microphones positioned at the collar. The AGC removes inbound audio signals (e.g.,suit, Mission Control, Lander, C&W tones) from the outbound comms stream, reducing echo and feedback (squeal) in low-noise suit environments. The reduction of worn communication equipment increases crewmember comfort, range of movement, and situational awareness. However, test results also highlight the need for proper fan, duct, pump, and gas flow integration with suit acoustics and audio. Ductwork may serve as waveguides for various component and structure-borne noise. Sharply angled ducts can generate turbulent-flow noise. Gas flow from inlets above the crewmember’s head can generate noise when cascading over the faceplate and collar (or commcap) microphones. Sufficient acoustic noise levels (1) require increased gain to boost inbound audio, and (2) may distort signals resulting in AEC disruption or artifacts. Suit-noise levels decline with reduced pressure (density), but then elevated speech and audio effort/power become necessary. Whether the Integrated Audio System, commcap, or other device is used, suit acoustic noise can mask speech in outbound comms. This reduces intelligibility and requires other AECs/devices to suppress comms noise. Yet, adjusting a few components may yield significant improvement. We discuss xEMU audio functionality, demonstrate how acoustical treatment combined with inbound signal conditioning improved clarity during tests, and discuss future modifications.

xEMU↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Durable Anti-Reflective and Anti-Fog Coatings Produced by Aerosol Impact Driven Assembly

The Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit’s (xEMU) helmet is a complex assembly designed to accomplish several tasks to protect and enable astronauts. In addition to maintaining a suitable environment for the wearer, it must also allow for appropriate mobility and provide a wide and undistorted view of the surroundings. A critical component of the helmet’s optical system is the anti-fog coating. While previous versions of the anti-fog coating have provided suitable anti-fog performance, they have been difficult to apply, lacked mechanical or chemical durability, or resulted in unanticipated failures (e.g., outgassing of eye-irritating materials during use). This work describes the use of a new coating technology, aerosol impact-driven assembly (AIDA), to develop a next-generation permanent anti-fog coating for the xEMU helmet. AIDA’s unique ability to tune both the refractive index and surface roughness of films was used to deposit a thin, transparent (>85% transmittance of visible light), and hydrophilic (contact angle <10°) anti-fog coating. The coating’s abrasion resistance and chemical resistance was evaluated and it was found that the coating maintained both its anti-fog and anti-reflective functionally. Finally, the scalability of the process was demonstrated by successfully coating the polycarbonate blanks used to form the helmet’s bubble.

Spacesuit↗

NASA NTRS2024

Advanced Pressure Garment Space Suit Sizing Considerations

Fitting a space suit to a person could be considered an art form. Establishing a repeatable fitcheck process to accommodate the full anthropometric range of test subjects for a single suit design is a critical process to be able to prove suit functionality. Suited test subjects can have different preferences on how they fit inside a suit, and different suited test environments can lead to differences in certain suit sizing accommodations. Throughout this paper, the process of achieving an acceptable suit fit for test subjects will be discussed, along with sizing considerations for changes in suit design and test environments. Lessons learned from the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) will be used to describe specific examples, along with key takeaways from additional NASA prototype mobility space suits. The suit fitcheck process starts with utilizing the anthropometric measurements of a test subject to evaluate their relation to the dimensions of space suit hardware in creating a predicted suit sizing configuration. From here, subjective comments and test team observations drive iterations to the suit sizing configuration to culminate in an acceptable suit fit for performance of further test evaluations. Understanding the relation of subjective comments to their impact on altering suit sizing is critical in establishing an acceptable suit fit.

spacesuit↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Extravehicular Activity Technology Roadmaps for Exploration

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed and matured many technologies over the decades to advance extravehicular activity (EVA) systems. Over the last 15 years, major steps were taken to advance the technology with the Exploration Extravehicular Mobility Unit (xEMU) government reference design at the Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, Texas. The xEMU builds on the lessons learned of the Apollo, Space Shuttle, and International Space Station (ISS) EMUs, evolving the technology to increase performance for extreme environments. As NASA sets its goals toward Earth’s Moon and Mars, a spacesuit design tolerable of gravity and dust will be needed for these adverse environments. NASA has used roadmaps as the means of documenting actionable plans for strategizing technology developments needed to meet NASA’s mission and goals. To help reach and create a sustained presence on the Moon, NASA procured EVA services from industry through the Exploration EVA Services (xEVAS) contract. These services include certified contractor-provided spacesuits, tools, equipment, vehicle interfaces, and support to training and real-time operations. NASA will now focus on a mission to Mars. NASA leadership has set goals and objectives related to the Agency’s vision and a Moon to Mars (M2M) strategy. This paper presents an organizational framework to provide insight into how NASA’s vision is realized. Additionally, this paper covers the maturation and development of the spacesuit technology and reveals the EVA technology roadmaps for the M2M Program. These EVA roadmaps visualize an actionable path to EVA capabilities needed for Mars exploration.

Cinda Chullen↗