Results for “Configuration” — Page 21

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CDC Bioreactor Configuration Method for Volume Level Control with Controlled Inlet and Outlet Flow

Environmental Control Life Support Systems and other microbiological biofilm studies often utilize small scale bioreactors. Among these options are the popular BioSurface CDC bioreactors, currently being utilized by Marshall Space Flight Center groups researching the impact of biofilms on life support systems. After a recent experimental regime, it was determined additional equipment could be added to augment the capabilities of the bioreactors. Previous research configurations such as ASTM E3161-21 relied on an outlet stream gravity draining from a side drain port located above sampling coupons. This limited applications to experimental conditions with a controlled inlet and uncontrolled outlet flow. With the introduction of a small single pole single throw (SPST) reed float switch and a peristaltic pump connected to the outlet drain and a chassis controller, the bioreactor is able to maintain a set level. The modification allows additional variables to be tested, including highly adjustable fill and flush cycles, bioreactor volume, draining and filling control. Once the configuration modifications were implemented through the installation of the new equipment, data was collected to ensure the stability of the level measurements. As the level control switch is a float switch, consideration was taken into account for effects of internal stirring speed, along with effects of inlet and outlet flow rate. Data presented in this study will illustrate the stability and effectiveness of the configuration changes in equipment made to the bioreactor. These configuration changes have demonstrated control method to conduct biofilm mitigation techniques for ECLSS hardware research. The controlled level capabilities allow for a constant drip feed flow rate into the bioreactors, a key aspect of the biofilm mitigation testing.

CDC Bioreactor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CDC Bioreactor Configuration Method for Volume Level Control with Controlled Inlet and Outlet Flow

Environmental Control Life Support Systems and other microbiological biofilm studies often utilize small scale bioreactors. Among these options are the popular BioSurface CDC bioreactors, currently being utilized by Marshall Space Flight Center groups researching the impact of biofilms on life support systems. After a recent experimental regime, it was determined additional equipment could be added to augment the capabilities of the bioreactors. Previous research configurations such as ASTM E3161-21 relied on an outlet stream gravity draining from a side drain port located above sampling coupons. This limited applications to experimental conditions with a controlled inlet and uncontrolled outlet flow. With the introduction of a small single pole single throw (SPST) reed float switch and a peristaltic pump connected to the outlet drain and a chassis controller, the bioreactor is able to maintain a set level. The modification allows additional variables to be tested, including highly adjustable fill and flush cycles, bioreactor volume, draining and filling control. Once the configuration modifications were implemented through the installation of the new equipment, data was collected to ensure the stability of the level measurements. As the level control switch is a float switch, consideration was taken into account for effects of internal stirring speed, along with effects of inlet and outlet flow rate. Data presented in this study will illustrate the stability and effectiveness of the configuration changes in equipment made to the bioreactor. These configuration changes have demonstrated control method to conduct biofilm mitigation techniques for ECLSS hardware research. The controlled level capabilities allow for a constant drip feed flow rate into the bioreactors, a key aspect of the biofilm mitigation testing.

CDC Bioreactor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

CDC Bioreactor Configuration Method for Volume Level Control with Controlled Inlet and Outlet Flow

Environmental Control Life Support Systems and other microbiological biofilm studies often utilize small scale bioreactors. Among these options are the popular BioSurface CDC bioreactors, currently being utilized by Marshall Space Flight Center groups researching the impact of biofilms on life support systems. After a recent experimental regime, it was determined additional equipment could be added to augment the capabilities of the bioreactors. Previous research configurations such as ASTM E3161-21 relied on an outlet stream gravity draining from a side drain port located above sampling coupons. This limited applications to experimental conditions with a controlled inlet and uncontrolled outlet flow. With the introduction of a small single pole single throw (SPST) reed float switch and a peristaltic pump connected to the outlet drain and a chassis controller, the bioreactor is able to maintain a set level. The modification allows additional variables to be tested, including highly adjustable fill and flush cycles, bioreactor volume, draining and filling control. Once the configuration modifications were implemented through the installation of the new equipment, data was collected to ensure the stability of the level measurements. As the level control switch is a float switch, consideration was taken into account for effects of internal stirring speed, along with effects of inlet and outlet flow rate. Data presented in this study will illustrate the stability and effectiveness of the configuration changes in equipment made to the bioreactor. These configuration changes have demonstrated control method to conduct biofilm mitigation techniques for ECLSS hardware research. The controlled level capabilities allow for a constant drip feed flow rate into the bioreactors, a key aspect of the biofilm mitigation testing.

CDC Bioreactor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Classical Flutter Analysis of X-57 Aircraft Mod II, III, and IV Configurations

To support airworthiness assessment of the X-57 electric propulsion demonstrator aircraft, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) completed classical flutter analysis of the Mod II, Mod III, and Mod IV aircraft configurations. Aeroelastic analysis was primarily performed using the ZAERO analysis code developed by Zona Technology. Supplemental computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flutter analysis for the Mod III and Mod IV configurations was performed using NASA’s FUN3D software to verify the aeroelastic behavior at deployed flaps conditions. The NASTRAN finite element models (FEMs) used for aeroelastic analysis were developed by NASA. The final Mod II FEM utilized shell elements for the wing and fuselage, and beam elements for the tail and wing control surfaces. For Mod III and Mod IV aircraft models, shell element wing FEMs developed throughout the Mod III/IV wing design cycle were utilized. The fuselage and empennage FEM components were shared between the Mod II, III, and IV aircraft models. ZAERO analyses predicted flutter boundaries were >60% beyond the X-57 flight-test envelope never exceed airspeed (V NE ) for all configurations. Aeroelastic Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) CFD simulations using FUN3D of the Mod III/IV configurations predicted flap mode instability did not occur until at least speeds of 60% higher than the Mod III/IV maximum flap deployment airspeed (V FE ).

Keerti K. Bhamidipati↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Introduction to the NATO AVT-298 Task Group and Development of the SWiFT Configuration

Reynolds number effects are a key development risk for blended wing body aircraft, particularly at high lift take-off and landing conditions. The full scale aerodynamics of these configurations are thought not to be well represented in industry standard low Reynolds number test facilities and the capability to predict Reynolds number effects using computational fluid dynamics or otherwise is not proven. The NATO AVT-298 research task group was established to investigate these issues and this paper sets out the background, motivations and the collaborative approach as well as the development of a new research configuration to serve as a focus for the research. The ‘SWiFT’ configuration, was developed to exhibit flow physics of interest to the AVT-298 research task group and to be suitable for an experimental campaign. The group collaboratively developed the research configuration to be relevant for related blended-wing-body aircraft programmes using computational fluid dynamics and wing design methods and considering the practicalities of testing. This research targets an improvement in our capability to design, optimise and mature future blended wing body aircraft.

SWiFT↗

NASA NTRS1958

Wind-Tunnel Investigation at a Mach Number of 2.01 of the Aerodynamic Characteristics in Combined Angles of Attack and Sideslip of Several Hypersonic Missile Configurations with Various Canard Controls

An investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of several hypersonic missile configurations with various canard controls for an angle-of-attack range from 0 deg to about 28 deg at sideslip angles of about 0 deg and 4 deg at a Mach number of 2.01 has been made in the Langley 4- by 4-foot supersonic pressure tunnel. The configurations tested we re a body alone which had a ratio of length to diameter of 10, the b ody with a 10 deg flare, the body with cruciform fins of 5 deg or 15 deg apex angle, and a flare-stabilized rocket model with a modified Von Karman nose. Various canard surfaces for pitch control only were te sted on the body with the 10 deg flare and on the body with both sets of fins. The results indicated that the addition of a flared afterbody or cruciform fins produced configurations which were longitudinally and directionally stable. The body with 5 deg fins should be capable of producing higher normal accelerations than the flared body. A l l of the canard surfaces were effective longitudinal controls which produced net positive increments of normal force and pitching moments which progressively decreased with increasing angle of attack.

AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS↗

NASA NTRS1993

Multiblock Navier-Stokes solutions about the F/A-18 wing-LEX-fuselage configuration

Three-dimensional thin-layer Navier-Stokes computations are presented for the F/A-18 configuration. The modeled configuration includes an accurate surface representation of the fuselage, leading-edge extension (LEX), and wing, both with and without leading-edge flap deflection. A multiblock structured grid strategy is employed to decompose the computational flowfield domain around the subject configuration. Steady-state solutions are obtained from an algorithm that solves the compressible Navier-Stokes equations with an upwind-biased, flux-difference splitting approach. The results presented are based on a fully turbulent flow assumption, simulating the high Reynolds number flow conditions that correspond to a recent FI A-18 flight experiment. Good agreements between the computations and the flight test results are obtained for both surface flow patterns as well as surface pressure distributions. Furthermore, a correlation between the computed LEX vortex-core and the flight test results, observed by way of smoke visualization, is also presented.

Aircraft configurations↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Multirotor Test Bed – A New NASA Test Capability for Advanced VTOL Rotorcraft Configurations

In November 2019, NASA completed the first wind tunnel test entry of the Multirotor Test Bed (MTB), a new test capability for advanced VTOL rotorcraft configurations. The MTB had been under development since 2017 when the need arose for an easily reconfigurable test stand for multirotor aircraft configurations. With the wide-ranging assortment of aircraft currently targeted at Urban Air Mobility and Unmanned Aircraft System applications, there is a need for validation data that will increase confidence in the computational modeling tools being used to develop these platforms. The MTB fills this need. This paper describes the key features of the MTB as well as its first wind tunnel test entry. A selection of results from the test is presented here, demonstrating the flexible configuration of the MTB and the types of data researchers can generate using this new test capability.

Multirotor Test Bed↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multirotor Configuration Trades Informed by Handling Qualities for Urban Air Mobility Application

Many contemporary Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), and more specifically, urban air mobility (UAM) vehicle designers are attracted to variable rotor speed-controlled designs with multiple rotors because of the great potential for mass savings compared to more traditional, variable blade pitch-controlled vehicles. These designs are based on the assumption that the stability and control of recreation or basic utility-sized drones can be scaled to larger passenger-sized vehicles. Previous work had shown the challenges in stabilizing passenger-sized quadcopters. In this study, power constraints were made less restrictive and varied, allowing more control power. Motor parameters such as efficiency, nominal voltage and current operating point, and rise time of the rotor speed controller step response were studied. By fixing the efficiency of the motor to 95% and assuming a motor voltage to current ratio of 2.0 (previously, assumed to be 1.0), the authors were able to stabilize the quadcopter in the roll axis because this allowed the vehicle to achieve adequate rise times between 0.4 and 0.8 s. This motor optimization was extended to a hexacopter and octocopter designed to the same payload size and mission as the quadcopter. The three vehicle configurations and their motor speed controllers were compared. It was found that while hexacopter and octocopter required more mass and overall power; all three configurations had similar margins required for control. However, the hexacopter and octocopter were able to use this power margin to achieve lower rise times (i.e. the vehicle responded more quickly to pilot inputs) than the quadcopter, with the octocopter having the lowest rotor response rise time of the three vehicle configurations studied.

Multirotor↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Predicting Airport Runway Configurations for Decision-Support Using Supervised Learning

One of the most challenging tasks for air traffic controllers is runway configuration management (RCM). It deals with the optimal selection of runways to operate on (for arrivals and departures) based on current and forecast of traffic, surface wind speed, wind direction, other environmental variables, noise constraints, and several other airport-specific factors. In this paper, a methodology using supervised learning is developed to build a predictive model for RCM decision-support from large volumes of historical data. Data from two full years (2018 and 2019) related to current and forecast weather, demand/capacity, etc. is collected, analyzed, and fused together. A variety of supervised learning algorithms are tested for predicting runway configuration and hyperparameter tuning is carried out to select the best performing model. The validation process involves two airports of low (Charlotte Douglas International Airport, CLT) and high (Denver International Airport, DEN) complexity of configuration decision-making. The results show significant promise for the two airports with test accuracy of 93% (CLT) and 73% (DEN). The methodology is scalable and generalizable to other airports across the U.S. National Airspace System.

air traffic management↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Predicting Airport Runway Configuration for Decision-Support Using Supervised Learning

One of the most challenging tasks for air traffic controllers is runway configuration management (RCM). It deals with the optimal selection of runways to operate on (for arrivals and departures) based on current and forecast of traffic, surface wind speed, wind direction, other environmental variables, noise constraints, and several other airport-specific factors. In this paper, a methodology using supervised learning is developed to build a predictive model for RCM decision-support from large volumes of historical data. Data from two full years (2018 and 2019) related to current and forecast weather, demand/capacity, etc. is collected, analyzed, and fused together. A variety of supervised learning algorithms are tested for predicting runway configuration and hyperparameter tuning is carried out to select the best performing model. The validation process involves two airports of low (Charlotte Douglas International Airport, CLT) and high (Denver International Airport, DEN) complexity of configuration decision-making. The results show significant promise for the two airports with test accuracy of 93% (CLT) and 73% (DEN). The methodology is scalable and generalizable to other airports across the U.S. National Airspace System.

air traffic management↗

NASA NTRS1966

Comparison of wind-tunnel and flight results on a four-propeller tilt-wing configuration

Over the years aerodynamicists have learned to rely heavily on wind-tunnel-model results in predicting the aerodynamic characteristics of conventional aircraft configurations. With the development of V/STOL configurations which have high slipstream deflection angles. such as the four-propeller tilt-wing XC-142A V/STOL aircraft, the reliability of small-scale wind-tunnel-model results in predicting full-scale airplane characteristics needs to be reexamined. Extensive tests have been made by NASA on several sizes of wind-tunnel models of the XC-142A V/STOL configuration and by Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., on the airplane. These results show that models predict the slow-speed level-flight characteristics very well but that small models underpredict the descent capability of the airplane. Larger scale wind-tunnel models of approximately half size show better agreement with the airplane descent characteristics. It was found from smoke flow studies that small models can also predict the region in which self-generated disturbances will be encountered by tilt-wing configurations in ground proximity.

WIND TUNNEL MODEL↗

NASA NTRS1970

Effects of Nose Bluntness on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Cruciform-Finned Missile Configuration at Mach 1.50 to 2.86

An investigation has been conducted in the Langley Unitary Plan wind tunnel to determine the effects of spherical nose bluntness on the aerodynamic characteristics of a typical cruciform-finned short-range missile configuration for roll angles of 0 deg and 45 deg and Mach numbers from 1.50 to 2.86. Also investigated was the effectiveness of a forward protruding nose spike in reducing the axial-force coefficient of a blunt-nose configuration. The results indicated that the effects of nose bluntness and nose spike on the longitudinal stability were small. For roll angles of both 0 deg and 45 deg, the greatest effects of nose bluntness on the aerodynamic-center location near zero angle of attack occurred at a Mach number of 2.86, where for each roll position, a rearward shift of approximately 3.5 percent of the body length occurred as bluntness was increased. Although large magnitudes of nose bluntness were accompanied by high axial-force coefficients, significant reductions in the axial-force coefficient of a blunt-nose configuration were achieved with the use of the nose spike. There were no noteworthy effects of nose bluntness on either the directional stability or side-force parameters. However, for high angles of attack at a Mach number of 1.50 increased nose bluntness generally resulted in decreased effective dihedral.

Jernell, L. S.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Space shuttle: Aerodynamic characteristics of the Titan T 3 (1207-4)/GAC H-33 launch configuration

Aerodynamic data obtained in a 14-inch trisonic wind tunnel test on static stability and drag of 0.003366-scale models of the Grumman H-33 drop tank orbiter and the Titan T 3 (1207-4) expendable booster are presented. The orbiter was mounted to the booster both piggyback and tandem. Data were obtained over a Mach number range of 0.6 to 5.0. Angle of attack data were obtained from -16 deg to +4 deg at both 0 deg and -6 deg sideslip for the piggyback configuration, but were limited to -10 deg to +10 deg at 0 deg sideslip for the tandem configuration. Primary configuration variations, other than piggyback and tandem mount, were the number and location of solid propellant strap-on boosters.

Sims, J. F.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Gravity gradient torque profiles over an orbit for arbitrary modular space station configurations in the Y-POP and inertial hold modes

For several proposed configurations of the modular space station, the gravity gradient torque distribution is examined for both Y-POP and inertial hold orbits. The necessary equations are derived to allow for solar panel gimbaling, and a procedure is established which will allow any desired space station configuration to be built up. Results indicated that solar panel gimbaling can be a significant factor in the torque distribution in Y-POP orbits. In addition, for the two configurations that were plotted, bias torque magnitudes varied widely in inertial hold modes.

Mcgill, D. J.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Aerodynamic stability and drag characteristics of a parallel burn/SRM ascent configuration at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 4.96

Experimental aerodynamic investigations were conducted in the NASA/MSFC 14-inch trisonic wind tunnel during March 1972 on a .003366 scale model of a solid rocket motor version of the space shuttle ascent configuration. The configuration consisted of a parallel burn solid rocket motor booster on an external H-O centerline tank orbiter. Six component aerodynamic force and moment date were recorded over an angle of attack range from -10 to 10 deg at zero degrees sideslip and over a sideslip range from -10 to 10 deg at 0, +6, and -6 deg angle of attack. Mach number ranged from 0.6 to 4.96. The performance and stability characteristics of the complete ascent configuration and build-up, and the effects of variations in tank diameter, orbiter incidence, fairings and positioning of the solid rocket motors and tank fins were determined.

Sims, J. F.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Aerodynamic stability and drag characteristics of a parallel burn/SRM ascent configuration (M equals 0.6 to 4.96)

Experimental aerodynamic investigations were conducted in the NASA/MSFC 14-inch trisonic wind tunnel during April 1972 on a 0.004-scale model of a solid rocket motor version of the space shuttle ascent configuration. The configuration consisted of a parallel burn solid rocket motor booster on an external HO centerline tank orbiter. Six component aerodynamic force and moment data were recorded over an angle of attack range from -10 deg to +10 deg at zero degrees sideslip and over a sideslip range from -10 deg to +10 deg at zero degrees angle of attack. Mach numbers ranged from 0.6 to 4.96. The purpose of the test was to determine the performance and stability characteristics of the complete ascent configuration and buildup, and to determine the effects of variations in HO tank and SRM nose shaping, orbiter incidence and position, and position of the solid rocket motors.

Sims, F.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Space shuttle: A comparison of wind tunnel facility data on the 040A space shuttle orbiter configuration

A series of comparisons made on the longitudinal and lateral directional stability and control characteristics of the baseline 040A space shuttle orbiter configuration is documented. The data used for the comparisons were obtained from five wind tunnel tests conducted in four different wind tunnel facilities. The media for comparison were the aerodynamic slope values plotted as a function of Mach number for the different facilities. The slopes were computed using the SADSAC system and have been reduced relative to a common reference system. Data used for the comparison were selected based on a common baseline configuration. Identical configurations were available in all cases except MSFC 551 where an off-baseline vertical tail was tested. Some of the factors considered in comparing the various data were balance operating ranges and sensitivities, Reynolds number differences, scaling effects and control deflection accuracies.

Gyorfi, R. A.↗