Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Li anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Using In Situ High-Energy X-ray Diffraction to Quantify Electrode Behavior of Li-Ion Batteries from Extreme Fast Charging

Extreme fast charging (XFC, =15 min charging time) of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) has been proposed as an immediate target to increase the commercial appeal of electric vehicles. However, XFC of LIBs is associated with the degradation of battery performance and safety concerns. Quantitative and simultaneous characterization of various components during cell degradation represents a major experimental challenge. In this work, we outline a methodology for the use of spatially resolved, high-energy X-ray diffraction as a quantitative, in situ method of mapping the degradation of LIBs. We use this approach to study the battery cell capacity loss, both locally (mm scale) and globally over the entire cell (cm scale). Specifically, our workflow allows us to quantify the total amount of plated Li on the anode, as well as its spatial correlation to the structural properties of the anode and cathode. The method complements existing optical methods to resolve the spatial heterogeneity of local degradation mechanisms such as Li plating and provides simultaneous insights into concomitant anode state-of-charge variability. We apply it to commercially relevant single-layer pouch cells with the graphite anode and the LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode. Our results show that Li plating occurs heterogeneously on the graphite anode and that it is spatially correlated to the extent of anode lithiation. In this work, we anticipate that the described workflow will allow for understanding multiscale degradation in energy-storage devices beyond LIBs, where quantitative analysis at a local and global length scale can be performed without the necessity to tear down the device, due to the applicability of high-energy X-rays to probe in situ degradation.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Evaluating Pressure‐dependent Discharge Behavior of Foil Versus In situ Plated Lithium Metal Anodes in Solid‐State Batteries

Abstract Anode‐free manufacturing of solid‐state batteries (SSBs) shows promise to maximize energy density by eliminating excess lithium (Li) and simplifying battery production. However, high reversibility during discharge (stripping of Li) is necessary for long‐lifetime SSBs with a limited Li reservoir. Further, the plastic flow of Li changes depending on the Li thickness, leading to possible differences in discharge performance under stack pressure. This work investigates the pressure‐dependent discharge performance of anode‐free manufactured SSBs with in situ plated Li and compares the performance to that of conventional thick Li foil cells. Distinct stripping behavior is observed at low pressures (0–1 MPa), where Li diffusivity and initial interfacial contact may control accessible capacity, compared to high pressures (3–10 MPa) where mechanical deformation of Li likely governs stripping behavior. Analysis of impedance spectra collected during stripping shows that additional stack pressure delays the formation of deep, as opposed to lateral, voids in the Li anode. These results provide insights to guide the transition from thick Li foil anodes to anode‐free manufactured SSBs.

Haslam, Catherine G.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Improving Cycling Performance of Anode-Free Lithium Batteries by Pressure and Voltage Control

The anode-free lithium (Li) batteries (AFLBs) have great potential to provide higher energy density than most other batteries. However, the performance of AFLBs is very sensitive to pressure and other operating parameters, especially for coin cells widely used in AFLB investigations. Therefore, optimizing cell assembly parameters and test protocol is critical to get reliable and comparable results in this field. In this work, the operating voltage range of AFLBs using a localized high concentration electrolyte has been optimized. The morphology of the deposited Li in AFLBs is much more indicting to the pressure than other type of batteries due to the absence of anode active material (i.e. Li) as a pressure cushion layer in the as prepared cells. With an optimized cycling protocol, a thin layer of uniform nucleation sites can be formed in the initial cycle which will facilitate smooth Li desposition/stripping in the subsequent cycles of AFLBs. The solid electrolyte interphase layer formed under optimized pressure and uniform pressure distribution exhibits a good mechanical stability even after long-term cycling. In conclusion, with an optimized cell configuration, the internal pressure in the coin cells has been optimized to improve the cycling performance of AFLBs (Cu||NMC811) with 72% of capacity retention in 100 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Analysis of an all-solid state nanobattery using molecular dynamics simulations under an external electric field

Present Li-ion battery (LIB) technology requires strong improvements in performance, energy capacity, charging-time, and cost to expand their application to e-mobility and grid storage. Li-metal is one of the most promising materials to replace commercial anodes such as graphite because of its 10 times higher specific capacity. However, Li-metal has high reactivity with commercial liquid electrolytes; thus, new solid materials are proposed to replace liquid electrolytes when Li-metal anodes are used. We present a theoretical analysis of the charging process in a full nanobattery, containing a LiCoO 2 cathode, a Li 7 P2S 8 I solid-state electrolyte (SSE), a Li-metal anode as well as Al and Cu collectors for the cathode and anode, respectively. In addition, we added a Li 3 P/Li 2 S film as a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer between the Li-anode and SSE. Thus, we focus this study on the SEI and SSE. We simulated the charging of the nanobattery with an external voltage by applying an electric field. We estimated temperature profiles within the nanobattery and analyzed Li-ion transport through the SSE and SEI. Here, we observed a slight temperature rise at the SEI due to reactions forming $PS_{3}^{–}$ and $P_{2}S_{7}^{4}$$^{–}$ fragments at the interfaces; however, this temperature profile changes due to the charging current under the presence of the external electric field ε = 0.75 V Å –1 . Without the external field, the calculated open-circuit voltage (OCV) was 3.86 V for the battery, which is within the range of values of commercial cobalt-based LIBs. This voltage implies a spontaneous fall of available Li-ions from the anode to the cathode (during discharge). The charge of this nanobattery requires overcoming the OCV plus an additional voltage that determines the charging current. Thus, we applied an external potential able to neutralize the OCV, plus an additional 1.6 V to induce the transport of Li + from the cathode up to the anode. Several interesting details about Li + transport paths through the SSE and SEI are discussed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Advanced Anode Manufacturing through Ultra-Thin Li Deposition

During the program's tenure, Applied Materials delivered high-quality (>99.9%) ultra-pure thin lithium metal in sheets and in roll to roll (R2R) formats to program partners for testing, cell builds and evaluation. The thickness range of the deposited Lithium can be controlled between 1-20 μm (<3% nonuniformity). A second R2R tool was commissioned for Li processing and inline CO 2 passivation module was validated. Additionally, S2S deposition tools were used to explore five different surface protection materials for Li-metal. One surface passivation chemistry was down selected for testing and showed improved performance. Key results are summarized in this final report.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Fast-Charging Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 Anode Driven by Light

Lithium-ion batteries with fast charging capabilities are crucial for widespread adoption of electric vehicles, as they will increase acceptance of the technology and reduce range anxiety for drivers. To achieve this, advanced fast charging technologies and alternative methods to enhance the slow electrochemical processes are desperately required. This study applied light-emitting diode (LED) photo-assisted fast charging to Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 (LTO), a large bandgap cubic spinel material, to enhance charging speed through electronic-structure coupling. UV LED-generated light irradiation on to the electrode interface boosted the ion diffusion and lithium cation addition by a factor of 1.3 during electrochemical lithiation, resulting in a 30% decrease in charging time under ambient conditions. Red LED light was not effective in accelerating the reaction as it does not provide sufficient energy. The first-principles calculations support the concept that UV illumination generates charges by overcoming the material’s bandgap and effectively reducing it through the introduction of additional titanium defect states.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS2012

Electrolytes with Improved Safety Developed for High Specific Energy Li-Ion Cells with Si-Based Anodes

A number of electrolyte formulations that have improved safety characteristics have been developed for use with high capacity silicon-based anodes. To improve the compatibility with Si-based anodes, a number of technical approaches have been employed, including: (1) the use of mono-fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) in conjunction with, or in lieu of, ethylene carbonate (EC), (2) the use of high proportions of fluorinated co-solvents, (3) the use of vinylene carbonate (VC) to stabilize the Si/C electrode, and (4) the use of lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB) to improve the compatibility of the electrolyte when Si/C electrodes are used in conjunction with high voltage cathodes. Candidate electrolytes were studied in Li/Si-C and Si-C/ Li(MnNiCo)O2 (NMC) coin cells, as well as in larger Si-C/NMC three-electrode cells equipped with lithium reference electrodes. In summary, many electrolytes that contain triphenyl phosphate (TPP), which is used as a flame retardant additive up to concentrations of 15 volume percent, and possess FEC as a co-solvent have been demonstrated to outperform the all-carbonate baseline electrolytes when evaluated in Si-C/ Li(MnNiCo)O2 cells.

Silicon-Based Anode↗
DOE OSTI2023

Stable Lithium Plating in “Lithium Metal-Free” Solid-State Batteries Enabled by Seeded Lithium Nucleation

In the “Li 0 -free” architecture, cells are manufactured with a bare anode current collector and the Li metal anode is plated in situ during the first charging step. While this architecture has many attractive qualities from manufacturing and energy density perspectives, stable Li plating in solid-state “Li 0 -free” cells can be challenging. It is generally accepted that the Li overpotential affects Li homogeneity in “Li 0 -free” cells. We demonstrate that the nucleation overpotential for Li plating in solid-state “Li 0 -free” cells using commercial current collectors can be eliminated by introducing metal clusters that guide Li nucleation. Au is used as model alloying metal cluster. Here, we demonstrate stable Li plating with thickness 16.5 μ m (3.3 mAh cm −2 ) in oxide solid-state electrolyte “Li 0 -free” cells enabled by Au metal clusters. It is shown that 97% of the in situ plated Li can be reversibly stripped at 60 °C and 2.5 MPa. Conversely, Au interlayers which are flat and continuous instead of clustered in morphology consistently showed short-circuiting during in situ Li plating, limiting Li electrodeposition to <0.1 mAh cm −2 . These results can help guide future studies of Li nucleation and growth at solid/solid interfaces, as well as offer alternative manufacturing pathways for “Li 0 -free” solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Advanced Microscopy and Spectroscopy for Probing and Optimizing Electrode-Electrolyte Interphases in High Energy Lithium Batteries (Final Scientific/Technical Report)

The earliest developed LiCoO 2 layered oxide cathode material sparked the development of other layered cathode materials, dominating the positive electrode materials for lithium ion batteries. Within the practical operating conditions of today, the current generation layered oxide materials do not meet the future energy storage demands of 350 Wh kg -1 at cell level. Li-rich layered oxide (LRLO) materials have the potential to meet the high energy demands. Unlike the classical layered oxides, LRLO materials exhibit capacities that go beyond conventional topotactic mechanistic theoretical values. Despite its high capacities, this material has several challenges (voltage fading, structural instability, sluggish kinetics, cathode electrolyte interphase instability, etc.) that must be overcome in order to reach commercialization. In the past five years, our research group has made great progress on developing advanced characterization techniques coupled with atomic scale modeling to properly characterize the dynamic phenomena that govern the performance limitations of LRLO materials. Furthermore, our efforts have guided the material synthesis and surface modification to improve capacity retention. By carefully controlling the oxygen activities through the creation of uniform oxygen vacancies, we were able to avoid structural decomposition in LRLO. Our materials deliver a discharge capacity as high as 306 mAh g -1 with an initial coulombic efficiency of 90.6%. Furthermore, they do not exhibit obvious capacity decay with a reversible capacity over 300 mAh g -1 after 100 cycles at 0.1 C-rate. Our approach demonstrates the critical needs for advanced diagnosis and characterization. It is through the in-depth understanding of these high voltage cathode materials at atomistic and molecular level and their dynamic changes during the operation of batteries; we can successfully formulate strategies to further optimize this class of cathode materials, especially for the voltage instabilities. The diagnostic tools developed here can also be leveraged to study anode materials such as Li metal anode. The challenge of probing Li metal is the low dose tolerance (high beam sensitivity) of Li metal. We will have to apply cryogenic method (low-temperature) and low-dose electron microscopy and specialized camera to enable the characterization of the lithium metal.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Precious metal oxygen-evolving anodes for electrolytic reduction of metal oxides in molten LiCl-Li 2 O electrolyte

Understanding the electrochemical stability of oxygen-evolving anode materials in molten salt electrolytes is essential to enable decarbonized electrolytic reduction of metal oxides (e.g., used nuclear oxide fuels). Here, this work investigated three precious metals (Ir, Ru, and Pt) as oxygen-evolving anodes in molten LiCl-Li 2 O (99.0-1.0 wt%) at 650 °C. For consistent measurements, this work employed a three-electrode cell comprised of a two-phase Li-Bi (65-35 at%) reference electrode and a NiO counter electrode. Anodic polarization behavior of each anode was investigated via cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry. The onset potential for oxygen evolution was observed at E > 2.9 V (vs. Li/Li + ) for the Ir and Ru anodes and anodic current density was as high as 1.0 A cm -2 at 3.23 V. The dimensional stability of each anode was evaluated from long-term electrolysis experiments (10.0-32.1 h) at 3.23 V. Rapid consumption of the Pt anode was observed after the application of 26,453 C cm -2 with a reduction in diameter of about 15.8% due to the formation of a non-protective Li 2 PtO 3 compound. The formation of this compound was also observed during CV measurements as additional anodic waves at potentials more negative than that of oxygen evolution. In contrast, both the Ir and Ru anodes exhibited excellent dimensional stability with a reduction in diameter or thickness of less than 1.5% even after applying greater charge density of ~41,100 C cm -2 , demonstrating superior stability during oxygen evolution in the LiCl-Li 2 O electrolyte.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Multi-phase characterization of pitch-carbon coated nano-silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries

Silicon (Si) is a leading next-generation Li-ion battery anode candidate that meets rigorous performance demands for portable power including enhanced power and energy density with robust cycling performance. However, a series of complex and interrelated reactions lead to reduced calendar life in Si-containing systems and therefore challenge practical adoption. In the present work, we probe the mechanisms underlying observed performance improvements by adding a pitch-carbon coating onto nano-Si material. We pair solid-phase (X-ray photoemission spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared), semi-volatile phase (solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry), and gas-phase (gas chromatography-flame-ionization detector) characterization signals to comprehensively evaluate the impact of pitch-carbon coating on the evolution of the Si solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) and the associated impacts on electrode/electrolyte reactivity. The pitch-carbon is found to serve as a physicochemical barrier, reducing the electro-active surface area for Si/electrolyte reactivity and preventing Si oxidation. Further, the pitch-carbon coating promotes the evolution of a more-favorable SEI by subsuming substantial functionality typically associated with the fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) electrolyte additive - such as alkoxide scavenging and suppression of transesterification pathways - and by shifting the competitive electrolyte degradation pathways' favorability. The multi-phase characterization approach enables holistic end-products evaluation from complex (electro)chemical interfacial reactions, which informs a robust interpretation of the carbon coating's role in electrochemical performance improvements. The present mechanistic evaluation aids the rational design for improved nano-Si materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
NASA NTRS2015

Development of Nanosized/Nanostructured Silicon as Advanced Anodes for Lithium-Ion Cells

NASA is developing high energy and high capacity Li-ion cell and battery designs for future exploration missions under the NASA Advanced Space Power System (ASPS) Program. The specific energy goal is 265 Wh/kg at 10 C. center dot Part of effort for NASA advanced Li-ion cells  Anode: Silicon (Si) as an advanced anode.  Electrolyte: advanced electrolyte with flame-retardant additives for enhanced performance and safety (NASA JPL).

silicon↗
DOE OSTI2023

Regulating Li Nucleation and Growth Heterogeneities via Near-Surface Lithium-Ion Irrigation for Stable Anode-Less Lithium Metal Batteries

The inhomogeneous nucleation and growth of Li dendrite combined with the spontaneous side reactions with the electrolytes dramatically challenge the stability and safety of Li metal anode (LMA). Despite tremendous endeavors, current success relies on the use of significant excess of Li to compensate the loss of active Li during cycling. Herein, a near-surface Li + irrigation strategy is developed to regulate the inhomogeneous Li deposition behavior and suppress the consequent side reactions under limited Li excess condition. The conformal polypyrrole (PPy) coating layer on Cu surface via oxidative chemical vapor deposition technique can induce the migration of Li + to the interregional space between PPy and Cu, creating a near-surface Li + -rich region to smooth diffusion of ion flux and uniform the deposition. Moreover, as evidenced by multiscale characterizations including synchrotron high-energy X-ray diffraction scanning, a robust N-rich solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) is formed on the PPy skeleton to effectively suppress the undesired SEI formation/dissolution process. Strikingly, stable Li metal cycling performance under a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm -2 at 2.0 mA cm -2 with merely 0.5 × Li excess is achieved. The findings not only resolve the long-standing poor LMA stability/safety issues, but also deepen the mechanism understanding of Li deposition process.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2026

Fluorinated Glyme Solvents to Extend Lithium-Sulfur Battery Life (Final Technical Report, Unlimited)

This project investigated a number of partially fluorinated glymes (PFGs) as electrolyte cosolvents to improve the performance of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries. A major issue in Li-S cells is the electrochemical reaction of sulfur in the cathode to form lithium polysulfides (LPS) that dissolve in the electrolyte. Those LPS are electrochemically and chemically reactive at the lithium anode, resulting in lithium sulfide deposition on the anode and also electrochemical reaction at both the anode and cathode, leading to a “polysulfide shuttle” and reduced coulombic efficiency (CE) and self-discharge of the cell. PFGs reduce the solubility of LPS while maintaining good solubility of lithium salts such as LiTFSI. By adjusting the amount of PFG as cosolvent in the electrolyte, we showed that the solubility of LPS in the electrolyte can be tuned. (It is not desirable to completely eliminate LPS in the electrolyte, as they facilitate electrochemical reaction of the electrically insulating S 8 and Li 2 S within the cathode by shuttling charge between them and the conductive carbon.) Another issue in Li-S cells is degradation of the Li anode over many cycles of stripping (discharge) and plating (charge). We showed that PFGs have a beneficial effect on the physical morphology of the Li anode, SEI formation, and the CE of a Li-Li cell. Among the many PFGs tested, we found the best performance from PFGs designated PFG2 and PFG5, and these two PFGs were thoroughly studied. A systematic coin-cell study of electrolyte solvents of 90:10, 80:20, or 70:30 DME:PFG (DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane) revealed some systematic trends: a higher percentage of PFG solvent led to substantially longer cycle life, but at the same time reduced specific capacity (mAh/g(S)) and cell capacity at higher rates. These studies used LiFSI as the electrolyte salt, as it was found to extend cycle life compared to LiTFSI. Finally, the addition of a small amount of 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) to the electrolyte was found to be beneficial. The overall optimal electrolyte solution was found to be 0.6 M LiFSI + 0.5 M LiNO 3 in 75:5:20 DME/DOL/PFG (either PFG2 or PFG5).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Balancing Interfacial Reactions to Achieve Long Cycle Life in High Energy Lithium Metal Batteries

Rechargeable lithium (Li) metal batteries have attracted wide attentions as the next generation energy storage technologies. However, simultaneously achieving high cell-level energy density and long cycle life in realistic batteries is still a great challenge. Here we investigate the cell degradation mechanisms of Li||LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2 pouch cells using different, but representative cell configurations to understand the fundamental linkage among Li thickness, electrolyte depletion and the structure evolution of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers. Different cell failure modes were discovered when tuning the anode to cathode capacity (N/P) ratio in compatible electrolyte. With a thick-Li anode (N/P ratio = 2.5), initial stable cycling is obtained because of the abundant Li supply from the anode together with an artificially inflated high Coulombic Efficiency, followed by a premature sudden cell death appears due to the enrichment of “ineffective SEI” which does not participate in the electrochemical reactions but keep increasing cell impedance. The anode-free cell (N/P 0:1) displays a steady capacity decay because cathode Li loss dominates from the beginning to the end of cell cycle life. An optimized thin-Li (N/P 1:1) well balances the Li consumption rate with the impedance buildup by minimizing the growth of ineffective SEI layer, thus decelerates cell polarization increasing and extends cycling. Contrary to conventional wisdoms, long cycle life is observed by using ultra thin-Li (20 µm) in balanced cells. A prototype 350 Wh kg-1 pouch cell (2.0 Ah) achieves over 600 long stable cycles with 76% capacity retention without sudden cell death.

Niu, Chaojiang↗
NASA NTRS2019

Development of Solid State Electrolytes for Li-Metal Based High Capacity Battery

NASA future missions demand safe, high specific energy (>400 Wh/kg) batteries. Current state-of-the-art (SOA) lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) can only provide ~150-200 Wh/kg in energy capacity, which is unable to meet NASA's future energy goals, and also pose safety issues due to the use of liquid flammable electrolyte. There are intense on-going development activities to increase battery energy density. The use of Li metal as an anode material has emerged as one highly attractive option for achieving high-energy, next generation batteries. This is because Li has many advantages. It is the lightest metal, but also has the highest theoretical capacity. It also has the lowest potential, which boosts whole cell voltage, and Li metal is 100% active material and requires no binder. Thus, Li metal is an ideal anode material for high energy battery chemistries. Lithium metal based advanced battery chemistries are envisioned to be mission enhancing and, in many cases, mission enabling for future space and aeronautic applications. However, the reliable use of this exceptionally high capacity anode in a commercial rechargeable battery has not been achieved due to safety and reliability concerns resulting from thermal runaway and short-circuit issues due to dendritic growth on the Li metal anode from lithium plating during charge-discharge cycles. A solid state electrolyte, such as garnet/ceramic or solid polymer nanocomposite electrolyte, is a promising approach to make Li metal safely cycling. The solid state electrolyte is non-flammable and eliminates leakage and fire hazard by replacing the liquid flammable electrolyte. However, the low-ionic conductivity and high interfacial impedance are the key issues to be overcome. In this presentation, the research activities on solid state electrolyte development funded by the NASA Advanced Energy Storage System program and by the NASA Center Innovative Fund will be presented, and the progress and results will be also discussed.

Wu, James J.↗