Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Solenoid”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

367 records · Page 21
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lunar South Pole Regenerative Fuel Cell System Efficiency Analysis

It is expected that future NASA mission energy storage needs can be adequately met by regenerative fuel cells (RFCs). Aerospace RFCs package proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrochemical conversion devices based on hydrogen, oxygen, and water. To optimize system designs and direct further development, the most useful system metric is round-trip efficiency (RTE). Improving RTE generally increases specific energy and reduces system mass. The following analysis models the impact of several factors on RTE for RFCs at the lunar south pole scaling from 0.1 kW to 50 kW. The analysis demonstrates that higher electrolyzer operational pressure most negatively impacts both RFC RTE and specific energy. Optimal electrolyzer membrane thickness is evaluated as a function of operational current density and pressure. Reactant storage heating and power management losses are significant for RFCs of any scale but are reduced in impact at the south pole compared to colder equator applications. Solenoid valve power remains a noticeable parasitic load for smaller RFCs. Larger electrolyzers enable higher peak theoretical efficiencies when recharging at higher rates, if the RFC can be coupled with a corresponding higher power source. RFC design is a compromise of many interrelated factors, but this analysis provides a starting point for difficult decisions that must be made when designing a lunar south pole RFC.

regenerative fuel cell↗
NASA NTRS2022

Actuator and Motor Control End-to-End V&V on the Mars 2020 Rover

The Mars 2020 Perseverance rover is the most advanced robotic exploration system ever sent to another planet. To support the complex scientific and mobility needs of the mission, the rover utilizes 33 actuators, three multi-degree-of-freedom force-torque sensors, fifteen single or dual-speed resolvers, two solenoid valves, and twelve contact switches. The control for these actuators and sensors is achieved by several levels of flight software, coordinated between two computers with varying bandwidth control loops. Furthermore, the actuators and sensors were integrated into multiple larger robotic mechanisms that were delivered by different organizations at various points in the Integration and Test (I&T) timeline. All of this created a very complex Verification and Validation (V&V) scenario involving multiple subsystems and teams, several hardware and software testbeds with varying levels of fidelity, and significant systems engineering to ensure the overall I&T schedule could be maintained while ensuring system hardware safety.This paper details the integrated V&V effort across multiple teams and venues to provide full coverage of all necessary functionality, performance, and fault protection. First, it provides an overview of how the V&V campaign was subdivided among teams and venues and provides descriptions of the various hardware configurations used to support the testing. The Mars 2020 implementation of the plan incorporates many of the lessons learned from Mars Science Laboratory’s test campaign, and these value-added modifications are discussed here. Also included in this section is the system-level environmental testing approach used for mechanisms. Second, the paper describes the phased approach used by the teams to support new hardware and software deliveries to testbed and Systems I&T. In this approach the test campaign was built upon higher-level mechanism needs for performance, functionality, and safety at specific times in the campaign. Finally, the paper discusses lessons learned from the V&V campaign that should be applied to future large-scale motion control testing efforts.

Borne, Davis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview and Assessment of the ESM Pressure Control Performance on Artemis I

The European Service Module propulsion system is a bipropellant hypergolic serial system used to provide translational thrust and attitude control for Orion. To control propellant tank pressure, a bang-bang pressure control system is employed. Each propellant commodity is regulated by a pressure control assembly consisting of two pressurization branches (a primary and redundant pressurization path) where each branch includes 3 valves in series. Regulation is accomplished via flight software control of two downstream solenoid valves triggered off propellant tank ullage pressure. This paper presents an overview of system level challenges which have been overcome to enable a successful Artemis I flight. Principle among the challenges was valve-to-valve pneumatic interactions which drove changes to the control scheme. During the Artemis I mission, the pressure control assembly was able to control tank pressure within allowable tolerances. Comparison between flight data and mathematical models are presented showing excellent agreement. Finally, during flight, a pressure surge was observed during the first regulation cycle when there was propellant in the upstream propellant tank. This was attributed to a gas hammer effect within the pressurization system and was not observable in a 1g environment. This paper also discusses the conclusion that this gas hammer effect is a nominal feature of the system during operations. Assessment of the in-flight performance of the electronic pressure regulation scheme on the European Service Module propulsion system shows the system behaved nominally during the Artemis I mission.

propulsion system↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview and Assessment of the ESM Pressure Control Performance on Artemis I

The European Service Module propulsion system is a bipropellant hypergolic serial system used to provide translational thrust and attitude control for Orion. To control propellant tank pressure, a bang-bang pressure control system is employed. Each propellant commodity is regulated by a pressure control assembly consisting of two pressurization branches (a primary and redundant pressurization path) where each branch includes 3 valves in series. Regulation is accomplished via flight software control of two downstream solenoid valves triggered off propellant tank ullage pressure. This paper presents an overview of system level challenges which have been overcome to enable a successful Artemis I flight. Principle among the challenges was valve-to-valve pneumatic interactions which drove changes to the control scheme. During the Artemis I mission, the pressure control assembly was able to control tank pressure within allowable tolerances. Comparison between flight data and mathematical models are presented showing excellent agreement. Finally, during flight, a pressure surge was observed during the first regulation cycle when there was propellant in the upstream propellant tank. This was attributed to a gas hammer effect within the pressurization system and was not observable in a 1g environment. This paper also discusses the conclusion that this gas hammer effect is a nominal feature of the system during operations. Assessment of the in-flight performance of the electronic pressure regulation scheme on the European Service Module propulsion system shows the system behaved nominally during the Artemis I mission.

propulsion system↗
NASA NTRS1993

Improved Linear Ion Trap

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Linear Ion Trap (LIT) ions microwave resonance reg↗