Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Space Launch System”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Launch System Base Aerodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The integrated test flight was composed of launch and ascent of SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2022. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf was powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, the base flow field had highly complex phenomena and regimes. SLS base aerodynamics covers vehicle base pressure and integrated axial force during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This was the first time in-depth base aerodynamics flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Launch System Base Aerothermodynamics Post-Flight Reconstruction for Artemis I

Artemis I was the first uncrewed integrated test flight of the NASA heavy-lift, human-rated, exploration-class launch vehicle, Space Launch System (SLS), and Orion spacecraft. Artemis I successfully launched from Pad39B at NASA Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2023. The integrated test flight is composed of launch and ascent of the SLS vehicle from lift-off to RS-25 main engine cut-off (MECO), interim cryogenic propulsion stage (ICPS) in-space flight and Orion’s trajectory around the moon and landing in the Pacific Ocean which occurred on December 11th, 2023. The SLS total thrust of 8,800,000 lbf is powered by four LOX/LH2 RS-25 engines and two 5-segment solid rocket boosters. As a result, base flow environments for this vehicle are highly complex and extreme. SLS base aerothermodynamics covers rocket plume-induced convection and radiation of the vehicle’s aft region during powered flight from lift-off to MECO. This work discusses the SLS base flow physics observed during Artemis I and comparisons of post-flight reconstruction with pre-flight models and Space Shuttle data. This is the first time in-depth base heating flight reconstruction has been investigated for an exploration-class launch vehicle since the Saturn V Program.

aerothermodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Experimental Identification of Bistable Flow States on the Space Launch System at Liftoff Conditions

Time-averaged global force and moment measurements in wind tunnel tests can obscure complex flow dynamics, including bistability phenomena. This paper presents a detailed analysis into the potential cause of previously unobserved discrepancies among repeat runs during the 202114- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel test of the Space Launch System. During the test, it was observed that liftoff configuration repeatability was not as strong as expected when compared to previous tests. These discrepancies occurred between wind angle azimuths of approximately 150◦ and 210◦, as well as between 330◦ and 30◦. After ruling out common confounding factors such as instrumentation hysteresis and temperature, it was hypothesized that the lack of repeatability was caused by the Coandă effect producing a bistable flow state at different locations between the cylindrical rocket centerbody and solid rocket boosters during the acquisition of data. Evidence to support this hypothesis is provided in this paper in the form of time-averaged force and moment coefficient data, time-dependent force and moment coefficient data, and still images from smoke flow and tuft flow visualization runs.

SLS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s Space Launch System: Artemis I Results and the Path Forward

On Nov. 16, 2022, NASA launched the Artemis I mission on the agency’s new SLS (Space Launch System) rocket. The debut launch of the integrated vehicle sent an uncrewed Orion spacecraft into a distant retrograde (DRO) orbit about the Moon to accomplish multiple mission objectives, including evaluating Orion’s heatshield at lunar return velocities and collecting critical data from the first flight of the new superheavy lift launch vehicle. Post-flight data analyses show that the rocket performed with a high degree of precision and accuracy. In addition to completing testing and launch of the Artemis I SLS in 2022, notable progress was made on hardware for future launch vehicles that will support Artemis missions II, III, IV, and V. The Artemis II core stage is mostly complete, and its RS-25 engines were integrated in the fall of 2023. The Artemis II solid rocket booster motor segments were shipped to the launch site in September 2023. Propellant tanks are being manufactured for additional missions, solid booster segments are being cast and prepared, software is being developed, and production of new RS-25 engines is underway. A more capable upper stage is in development, as well as a large adapter to encapsulate a 10-metric ton (t) co-manifested payload. This paper will provide details on the Artemis I flight as well as cover hardware progress for the future flights as available.

John Honeycutt↗
NASA NTRS2024

Uncertainty Quantification of Artemis I Space Launch System Integrated Aerodynamics Databases

Accurate prediction of integrated aerodynamic forces and moments is a necessary part of aerospace vehicle development. This accuracy can be quantified in the form of an uncertainty model, which makes the prediction more useful within an integrated vehicle design effort. Aerodynamic force and moment databases were constructed for the Artemis~I mission of the Space Launch System vehicle. These databases reconcile data from multiple sources to yield unified predictions of how NASA's most advanced launch vehicle interacts with Earth's atmosphere as it ascends into orbit. This paper outlines how the uncertainty quantification was performed for these databases to ensure comprehensive and tractable uncertainty source coverage.

Michael W Lee↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Space Launch System Cubesats: First Flight and Future Opportunities

On Artemis I, within the integrated SLS upper stage under the Orion spacecraft, there were 10 6U CubeSats. The spacecraft all had different mission objectives, ranging from studying the lunar surface for water and minerals, landing on the Moon, studying deep space radiation, studying the Sun, studying Earth-Moon LaGrange Point 2, and characterizing a near-Earth asteroid, to name a few. This paper discusses the conditions of the CubeSats’ flight on the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and their deployments. Statistics concerning the 10 CubeSats will be provided relating to radio contact and mission performance. For those still in operation at the time of the paper/presentation submittal, latest status will be provided. Opportunities for future missions will be introduced, including an overview of the upgraded SLS Block 1B vehicle configuration with its new secondary payload accommodations. The updated deployment system for SLS Block 1B will have the capability of handling 6U, 12U, and 27U CubeSats. For potential CubeSat developers, a basic timetable will be provided for planning purposes.

Russell Lane↗
NASA NTRS2019

Space Launch System Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel Test Results

Characterization of accurate launch vehicle unsteady aerodynamics is critical for component and secondary structure vibroacoustic design. For the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Space Launch System (SLS), aeroacoustic environments have been derived primarily through sub-scale wind tunnel testing. Both optical techniques and high frequency pressure measurements have been utilized across multiple testing facilities and numerous vehicle configurations to develop a range of preliminary and detailed environments. As the vehicle has matured and evolved, the data collected from each subsequent configuration has allowed for comparison studies which isolate the effects of certain outer mold line (OML) features on measured fluctuating pressure levels. This paper presents observations on some of those effects for features which include abort system protuberances, various fairings geometries, interstage flanges, and multibody interactions between a central core and fall away boosters. These features, and the flow conditions produced by them, are broadly applicable to many launch vehicle configurations.

Steva, Thomas B.↗
NASA NTRS2015

NASA's Space Launch System Program Update

Hardware and software for the world's most powerful launch vehicle for exploration is being welded, assembled, and tested today in high bays, clean rooms and test stands across the United States. NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) continued to make significant progress in 2014 with more planned for 2015, including firing tests of both main propulsion elements and the program Critical Design Review (CDR). Developed with the goals of safety, affordability, and sustainability, SLS will still deliver unmatched capability for human and robotic exploration. The initial Block 1 configuration will deliver more than 70 metric tons of payload to low Earth orbit (LEO). The evolved Block 2 design will deliver some 130 metric tons to LEO. Both designs offer enormous opportunity and flexibility for larger payloads, simplifying payload design as well as ground and on-orbit operations, shortening interplanetary transit times, and decreasing overall mission risk. Over the past year, every vehicle element has manufactured or tested hardware. An RS-25 liquid propellant engine was hotfire-tested at NASA's Stennis Space Center, Miss. for the first time since 2009 exercising and validating the new engine controller, the renovated A-1 test stand, and the test teams. Four RS-25s will power the SLS core stage. A qualification five-segment solid rocket motor incorporating several design, material, and process changes was scheduled to be test-fired in March at the prime contractor's facility in Utah. The booster also successfully completed its Critical Design Review (CDR) validating the planned design. All six major manufacturing tools for the core stage are in place at the Michoud Assembly Facility in Louisiana, and have been used to build numerous pieces of confidence, qualification, and even flight hardware, including barrel sections, domes and rings used to assemble the world's largest rocket stage. SLS Systems Engineering accomplished several key tasks including vehicle avionics software and hardware build and testing, scale model acoustic and base heating tests. Construction of the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) began. Advanced development provided a look into the future of SLS. Shell buckling knockdown factor testing refined decades-old design margins that added thousands of pounds to rocket payloads. Adaptive manufacturing and structured light scanning development promised to cut the cost and time associated with manufacturing and testing. This paper will provide an overview of the progress made over the past year and provide a glimpse of 2015 milestones and beyond on the way to the first launch in 2018.

May, Todd↗
NASA NTRS2015

NASA's Space Launch System Program Update

Hardware and software for the world's most powerful launch vehicle for exploration is being welded, assembled, and tested today in high bays, clean rooms and test stands across the United States. NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) continued to make significant progress in 2014 with more planned for 2015, including firing tests of both main propulsion elements and the program Critical Design Review (CDR). Developed with the goals of safety, affordability, and sustainability, SLS will still deliver unmatched capability for human and robotic exploration. The initial Block 1 configuration will deliver more than 70 metric tons of payload to low Earth orbit (LEO). The evolved Block 2 design will deliver some 130 metric tons to LEO. Both designs offer enormous opportunity and flexibility for larger payloads, simplifying payload design as well as ground and on-orbit operations, shortening interplanetary transit times, and decreasing overall mission risk. Over the past year, every vehicle element has manufactured or tested hardware. An RS-25 liquid propellant engine was hotfire-tested at NASA's Stennis Space Center, Miss. for the first time since 2009 exercising and validating the new engine controller, the renovated A-1 test stand, and the test teams. Four RS-25s will power the SLS core stage. A qualification five-segment solid rocket motor incorporating several design, material, and process changes was scheduled to be test-fired in March at the prime contractor's facility in Utah. The booster also successfully completed its Critical Design Review (CDR) validating the planned design. All six major manufacturing tools for the core stage are in place at the Michoud Assembly Facility in Louisiana, and have been used to build numerous pieces of confidence, qualification, and even flight hardware, including barrel sections, domes and rings used to assemble the world's largest rocket stage. SLS Systems Engineering accomplished several key tasks including vehicle avionics software and hardware build and testing, scale model acoustic and base heating tests. Construction of the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) began. Advanced development provided a look into the future of SLS. Shell buckling knockdown factor testing refined decades-old design margins that added thousands of pounds to rocket payloads. Adaptive manufacturing and structured light scanning development promised to cut the cost and time associated with manufacturing and testing. This paper will provide an overview of the progress made over the past year and provide a glimpse of 2015 milestones and beyond on the way to the first launch in 2018.

May, Todd↗
NASA NTRS2019

Effect of Sting Geometry on Axial Force Calculation for the Space Launch System

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which the size and shape of the wind tunnel sting affect the accuracy of the base pressure corrections applied to measured axial force. The study also includes an assessment of the overall accuracy of the corrections. To accomplish these goals, Computational Fluid Dynamics is used to simulate a simplified version of the geometry of the Space Launch System Block 1B Cargo configuration, paired with a range of wind tunnel sting sizes, over a variety of ascent flight conditions. The base pressure correction method used in the wind tunnel is emulated on the base pressures from the simulated flows and results are compared to direct integration of the base pressures. Differences in results between the two methods provides an assessment of the accuracy of the base force correction method and how that accuracy is affected by sting size.

Eggert, Christopher A.↗
NASA NTRS2019

Laser Light Sheet Flow Visualization of the Space Launch System Booster Separation Test

Planar flow visualizations were obtained in a wind tunnel test in the NASA Langley Research Center’s Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel using the laser-light-sheet method. This method uses a laser to illuminate fine particles generated in the wind tunnel to visualize flow structures. The test article was designed to simulate the separation of the two solid rocket boosters (SRBs) from the core stage of the NASA Space Launch System (SLS) at Mach 4 using a scale model. The test was run on of the SLS Block 1B Cargo (27005) configuration and the SLS Block 1B Crew (28005) configuration. Planar flow visualization was obtained only on the crew configuration. Air at pressures up to 1500 psi was used to simulate plumes from the booster separation motors (BSMs) located at the nose, and aft skirt of the two boosters. The facility free stream was seeded with water vapor, which condensed and froze into small ice crystals in the tunnel nozzle expansion. A continuous wave green (532 nm) laser sheet was used to illuminate the ice crystals, and the resulting Mie-scattered light was collected with a camera. The resulting images clearly identify shock waves and other flow features including BSM plume shapes. Measurements were acquired for different BSM pressures and booster separation locations.

Danehy, Paul M.↗
NASA NTRS2023

Damage Tolerance Comparison of IM7/8552 and T1100/3960 Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Sandwich Structure in Support of the Space Launch System Payload Adapter Fitting

As technology evolves and improves within the science of composite materials, new fiber/ resin systems are being developed for improved properties given certain loading and environmental scenarios. Improving the room temperature damage tolerance capabilities has long been one of the goals in the carbon fiber/polymer composite industry. Recently a new fiber/epoxy system has been introduced that is claimed to have superior damage tolerance capabilities. To examine if this new carbon fiber/epoxy composite material would be of benefit to a program to manufacture a Payload Adapter Fitting (PAF) for NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, the question was asked as to just how much damage tolerance could be realized if this new system were used. Compression after impact (CAI) strength of sandwich structure is one of the leading metrics being used to evaluate materials for the PAF program. As a result, a comparison of this new fiber/resin system with a very common (and planned baseline) fiber/resin system with respect to CAI was considered in this study. While it was already known that the older, baseline carbon fiber structure would not have as good damage tolerance characteristics as the newer carbon fiber system, the quantitative difference in damage tolerance was sought in this study since no other CAI data could be found in open literature on sandwich structures made with this new fiber/resin system.

A.T. Nettles↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Space Launch System Completes Key Hotfire Test And Begins Vehicle Integration

NASA and its commercial and international partners are on the way back to the Moon. As directed by the White House in 2019, the agency team is striving to return humans to the Moon and land the first woman and the first person of color on the lunar surface. NASA and its commercial partners made significant progress in the second half of 2020 and the first half of 2021 on the agency’s Space Launch System (SLS), one of the key parts of the Artemis program. The team is preparing for a 2021 launch of Artemis I, the first integrated launch of the Block 1 variant of SLS with the Orion crew capsule. Hardware for the Artemis II launch, which will be the first to launch crew on SLS and Orion, is progressing through assembly, and hardware for Artemis III has started manufacturing. Artemis IV manufacturing has also started, and engines for Artemis V are in development/manufacturing. This paper will discuss the progress made in the last year and the items currently in work on for future SLS flights and variants.

Bruce R Askins↗
NASA NTRS2015

NASA's Space Launch System Program Update

Hardware and software for the world's most powerful launch vehicle for exploration is being welded, assembled, and tested today in high bays, clean rooms and test stands across the United States. NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) continued to make significant progress in the past year, including firing tests of both main propulsion elements, manufacturing of flight hardware, and the program Critical Design Review (CDR). Developed with the goals of safety, affordability, and sustainability, SLS will deliver unmatched capability for human and robotic exploration. The initial Block 1 configuration will deliver more than 70 metric tons (t) (154,000 pounds) of payload to low Earth orbit (LEO). The evolved Block 2 design will deliver some 130 t (286,000 pounds) to LEO. Both designs offer enormous opportunity and flexibility for larger payloads, simplifying payload design as well as ground and on-orbit operations, shortening interplanetary transit times, and decreasing overall mission risk. Over the past year, every vehicle element has manufactured or tested hardware, including flight hardware for Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1). This paper will provide an overview of the progress made over the past year and provide a glimpse of upcoming milestones on the way to a 2018 launch readiness date.

May, Todd↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-C3 Applications for NASA's Space Launch System

For numerous high-interest science targets in the outer solar system and elsewhere, the limits of available launch vehicles have placed significant constraints on mission designs. Even for the current generation of heavy-lift launch vehicles, baseline capabilities still impose limitations, for example, the outer solar system in areas such as launch window availability, transit time, science payload mass, time at destination, etc. Initial studies show benefits for ultra-high C3 missions from configurations of NASA’s Space Launch System(SLS) adding third or fourth payload stages.

Robert W Stough↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Launch System Launch Window and Day of Launch Processes

Lunar missions benefit from varying the launch azimuth as a function of launch time to allow longer launch windows with minimum performance impacts. This variable azimuth approach allows the vehicle to track the Moon’s apparent motion due to Earth’s rotation . The Space Launch System (SLS) Block 1 vehicle design requires the mission to launch into an elliptical parking orbit to provide sufficient energy to insert Orion into a trans-lunar trajectory. The primary benefit of varying the launch azimuth, and as a result the parking orbit inclination, allows the SLS Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) to perform its Trans-Lunar Injection (TLI) burn closer to perigee and take advantage of performing a burn in a location where the burn will primarily raise apogee.

A. S. Craig↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Cross-Validation of Computational and Experimental Distributed Surface Pressures on the Space Launch System

This paper presents a new workflow for comparing experimental pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) data to computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations by way of mapping data from corresponding grids utilizing interpolation methods. In addition to generating quantitative and qualitative point-to-point comparisons between PSP and CFD data, this workflow extracts sectional loading data from both grids and generates lineload comparison charts for corresponding PSP and CFD runs. Experimental PSP data presented in this paper were taken from a 2016 NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel 11- by 11-Foot Transonic WindTunnel Facility test of the NASA Space Launch System. CFD simulation data for comparison purposes were generated using the FUN3D code. Overall, interpolation onto PSP grids versus CFD grids yields comparable surface pressure fields. However, lineload comparisons are easier to make on the CFD grid-mapped data due to the grid topology and the current capabilities of the lineload analysis tools at NASA Langley Research Center. This workflow is written using contemporary software (Python, Tecplot, PyTecplot), is compatible with existing tools at NASA Langley, and is developed to be adaptable depending on the situation.

SLS↗