SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Workshop”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 379 records · Page 21

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mixed-element USM3D Contributions to the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper discusses results of the mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME) simulations performed for the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The workshop was separated into six Technical Focus Groups to investigate the impact of geometry modeling, grid, and computational methods for predicting high lift flows. This work was performed under the Fixed Grid RANS Technical Focus Group. The primary geometry selected for the workshop was the High-Lift Common Research Model. The performed simulations included a flap deflection study and both a grid refinement study and pitch sweep for the nominal flap deflection configuration. The results show that USM3D-ME RANS solutions, generally, tends to underpredict the lift coefficient and to predict a less negative pitching moment relative to the experimental data. The predicted drag coefficient values agree better with experiment for smaller angles of attack but were observed to be larger than experiment for the largest angle of attack simulated. The results of the grid refinement study demonstrated a lack of grid convergence for the provided grid family. The results of the grid refinement study are consistent with the submissions to the Fixed Grid and Mesh Adaptation Technical Focus Groups. Grid convergence for the provided grid family remains elusive for the international community. A 2D Multielement Airfoil configuration was included to enable a turbulence model verification study, which illustrated favorable agreement between USM3D-ME and the solutions provided by other flow solvers.

CFD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mixed-Element USM3D Contributions to the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop

CFD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis and Ethics Workshop Lessons Learned

As NASA lays out its Artemis activities, it expects to set precedents in spaceflight for decades to come. Artemis is a far more ambitious program than even Apollo, aimed at developing a sustained human presence on and around the lunar surface, in preparation for Mars exploration. As a result, considering ethical and social concerns in the discussion and design of Artemis is vital to ensuring the future worlds we create are ones where humanity collectively wants to live. By understanding how to reflect on these issues as NASA makes decisions related to Artemis, NASA can avoid unintended consequences stemming from cultural perceptions of human exploration of the solar system that may harm society. We recognize that a diverse range of groups need to be part of this conversation. There are many different views about the work that should happen in space. We recognize that NASA does not hold sole responsibility for determining the ethical path forward in space, as decisions made by commercial, international, and intergovernmental partners play a major role. Inclusive conversations help inform that work. Others have already argued that social scientists and engineers need to work together with inputs from stakeholders to design the future. To begin to answer this need, NASA’s Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy (OTPS) hosted an Artemis and Ethics Workshop. This workshop was held in Washington, DC from April 12th-14th, 2023 and brought together invited experts in social science fields and NASA managers to discuss ethical, legal, and social aspects (ELSA) of Artemis and human exploration in general. The goal of the workshop was to discuss issues and build connections that NASA managers can consider across variety of ethical issues surrounding Artemis.

Katherine T McBrayer↗

NASA NTRS2024

X-Plane Knowledge Capture Workshop Summary Report

The history of experimental aircraft research and development at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) provides a large body of work for current and future team members to learn from and apply. NASA values the knowledge it gains from all the research it performs and desires to have that knowledge grow with each new project, incrementally adding to the collective knowledge base. To support this knowledge growth and sharing, in May 2019, NASA convened over 60 engineers; researchers; and other personnel (internal and external to NASA) for the X-plane1 Knowledge Capture Workshop to discuss their over 50-years’ worth of experiences in developing, operating, and managing experimental aircraft. Over the course of a two-day workshop, the group not only focused, primarily, on current X-plane development but also discussed a wide range of topics about experimental aircraft and flight research. In addition to the discussions, senior NASA aeronautics leaders shared their personal lessons learned with the workshop audience. Broadly, these discussions centered around the topics of organizational and cultural practices, the project lifecycle, flight, and risk and safety. Many of the observations offered by participants are applicable to other NASA team-based projects, demonstrating the value in sharing lessons learned and best practices across projects regardless of their research focus. To share the most valuable lessons learned as broadly as possible, a summary of these discussions has been compiled into the following report. These discussions are mostly included in their entirety, with some light editing for clarity and privacy. NASA is sharing this knowledge internally and making it available to the public in hopes that others can learn from the experimental aircraft challenges and successes at NASA. Note: this document represents the perspectives, experiences, and opinions of others but does not necessarily represent the official view of NASA.

Steven R Hirshorn↗

NASA NTRS2023

Artemis, Ethics and Society: Synthesis from a Workshop

NASA’s planning and implementation of the Artemis missions and Moon to Mars efforts may set precedents in exploration for decades to come. In April 2023, NASA convened a workshop on how to assess the ethical and societal implications of Artemis. This workshop was NASA’s first structured foray into studying the ethical and societal implications of exploration since the Apollo program in the 1960s. This report documents the discussion and ideas feedback and suggestions from the 55 participants invited to the Artemis and Ethics workshop and focuses on the following key study questions: 1) How should NASA consider the ethical, legal, and societal implications (ELSI) of the Artemis and Moon to Mars efforts?; and 2) What are the key ethical and societal implications that need consideration? This initial exploratory study does not make formal recommendations but instead maps out options available for NASA and other actors to consider as humanity goes to the Moon, Mars and beyond.

Artemis↗

NASA NTRS2023

NASA Earth Science Technology Office (ESTO) Advanced Information Systems Technology (AIST) Program: Earth Systems Digital Twins (ESDT) Standards for Interoperable Digital Twins Workshop Presentations

On September 18, 2023, NASA Earth Science Technology Office (ESTO) Advanced Information Systems Technology (AIST) Program conducted a mini-workshop that brought together seven experts to survey and discuss "Standards for Interoperable Digital Twins". Since three years, the AIST Program has been developing technologies and prototypes for Earth System Digital Twins (ESDT). During those developments and after the ESDT Workshop held in October 2022, it became clear that standard for ESDT interoperability were needed and should be defined as soon as possible. To address this challenge, the AIST program will survey ongoing development for Digital Twins standards in various domains and the September 18, 2023 Workshop represented the first step towards this understanding. Speakers during this event included: Michael Grieves (Digital Twin Institute), Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa (IEEE GRSS Standards), Trent Tinker (OGC), Ryan Berkheimer (NOAA), John Stone (NVIDIA), Thomas Geenen (ECMWF-DestinE) and Arne Berre (SINTEF-Iliad DTO and EDITO). This presentation regroups all the speakers' presentations.

Earth Science Remote Sensing; Information Systems↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Summary of the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop Nozzle Test Case: Heated Supersonic Axisymmetric Jets

This paper summarizes findings from the sixth AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW) nozzle test case. The focus of the workshop participants was turbulent supersonic round jets with variation in jet Mach number and jet heating. Three nozzles were utilized with on-design jet Mach numbers of 1.36, 1.63, and 2.00. A heated jet for each of these three nozzles at on-design conditions, a temperature matched on-design condition at Mach 1.63, and an off-design heated condition for the Mach 1.63 nozzle were the five cases examined. Workshop participants utilized Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) based techniques. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions were compared with non-intrusive measurements of velocities and temperatures, including both mean values and turbulence statistics. In general, the RANS approaches were unable to capture the trend of reduced mixing as the jet Mach number increased. Incorporation of compressibility corrections improved the agreement with experimental measurements in terms of trends with varying jet Mach number, but also increased the jet potential core lengths to be in worse agreement with data. RANS methods were able to reasonably capture trends of jet heating. The LES-based approaches as a whole were able to capture the effects of compressibility more accurately. Effects of jet heating were captured well by LES. None of the LES approaches introduced disturbances from the wall boundary layers of the nozzle into the jet mixing layer, which would affect the jet flow physics modeling in the initial part of the jet shear layer, but would be very computationally demanding.

supersonic jet↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Lessons Learned from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s Product Development Lead Training Schedule and Cost Development Workshop: Continuous Improvement

This presentation provides a status of the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) effort to increase foundational knowledge of Product Development Leads (PDLs) in schedule and cost management including earned value management (EVM). In 2012, GSFC’s Engineering and Technology Directorate (ETD) implemented an in-house training program to prepare PDLs for managing the technical, cost, schedule, and risk aspects of spaceflight systems to meet their subsystem commitments. Developed in-house, the PDL training program provides an integrated approach to requirements development, risk, schedule and cost management, EVM, performance tracking, and other areas. The program has been held twice yearly since its inception with 531 participating and 451 completing the curriculum. In 2017, the program won the Robert H. Goddard award for Quality and Process Improvement. Program development and evolution were presented in the 2018 NASA Schedule and Cost Symposium. The presentation was so well received that this year we focus on one workshop within the program: Schedule and Cost Development, including EVM. We examine the on-going logic modeling process and how participant and stakeholder data influence workshop content and design, and how the disciplines of schedule and cost contribute to mission success. In this presentation we refresh you on how the approach integrates lecture, small group discussion, estimating, case study exercises, and problem solving. We update you on the data collected from participants and stakeholders, and we discuss how we use these data to measure training effectiveness. Specific topics include: • How the logic model is used as the backbone for continuous program improvement, • How feedback influences implementation and curriculum updates, • How data collection and analysis inform workshop content and development, including participant discoveries of EVM data, • How including the resource analyst and planner in the product development team supports project success.

Lessons Learned↗

NASA NTRS2024

Proceedings of the Quantum Sensing Workshop, September 2022

To understand the NASA needs for quantum-sensing technologies and the capabilities developed internal and external to NASA, a workshop was held on September 27 through 29, 2022, in Newport News, VA. This workshop brought together senior leadership within NASA, technical experts within the quantum sensing community, NASA scientists and potential end-users of quantum-sensing technologies, and external stakeholders. This document contains the papers and presentations given at the Workshop.

Quantum Sensing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024 Summary: Spalart-Allmaras QCR2000-R Turbulence Model

This paper summarizes solutions submitted for the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) test suite of the High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop. The goal of the workshop is to establish standards for verification of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approaches to simulations of steady and unsteady turbulent flows. The RANS verification studies focus on a one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model with quadratic constitutive relation and rotation correction, SA-neg-QCR2000-R. The verification test cases are a two-dimensional subsonic flow around a Joukowski airfoil, a three-dimensional subsonic flow around an extruded NACA 0012 wing in a tunnel, and a subsonic flow around a wing-body configuration developed for verification of solvers participating in the 5 𝑡 ℎ High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The turbulencemodel formulation, geometry, flow conditions, grids, and reference solutions are described in detail. Solutions for the test cases are computed by seven established CFD solvers on adaptedand fixed-grid families using different discretization approaches. While some noticeable differences between solutions remain, the results achieved by contributing solvers show that different solutions computed for the same RANS model on different grid families can converge to a common limit with grid refinement. The apparent requirements for grid convergence are a well designed family of grids that provide sufficient resolution in important areas and a strong solver capable of deep iterative convergence on each grid. For each test case in the study, the variation between aerodynamic forces computed by different solvers on the finest grids of different families is less than 2%.

Boris Diskin↗

NASA NTRS2024

2024 Software for NASA Science Mission Directorate Workshop Report

The 2024 Software for the NASA Science Mission Directorate Workshop was the first workshop of its kind in over 10 years. The numerous attendees and high level of interaction in this hybrid workshop portrayed the untapped interest and energy in the NASA SMD community about software. Over 100 takeaways were collected from the hosted discussions in four key areas - Communication, Communities, Funding and Clarity - as summarized in this report. One takeaway was representative of all four categories: “Software is not hardware; it is organic and needs a different model. You often don't know which components will be Open-Source reusable until later in the development cycle.” For the communication category, this takeaway motivates the reduction of silos by shifting towards a model that better supports community collaboration on common challenges and a more streamlined and improved software release process. For the communities category, the same statement points to forming communities of practice with varying scopes and a new approach to recognition and incentives for open-source software contributions. Concerning funding, this statement motivates a more sustained and flexible funding model that better supports the software foundation needed for NASA’s long-term success, including the collaboration and infrastructure a good foundation requires. The new approach to clarity motivated by this statement calls for significant changes to the software release process and related policies to streamline compliance, align those policies with the open-source science culture NASA is promoting and with each other, and simplify use of the cloud. It is time to recognize software as a foundational component of NASA with an organic nature not properly supported by current approaches. Different models are needed in all four areas to shift the NASA SMD software community and governance structures into a more efficient, open, and collaborative ecosystem - one that enables ground-breaking science and daring exploration into the coming decades

science↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Contributions to the 5th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations conducted by the NASA flow solver, mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME), for the 5th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. As part of the Fixed-Grid RANS Technology Focus Group (TFG), these simulations were performed to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the USM3D-ME solutions in predicting high-lift flows. The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) served as the primary geometry. Several CRM-HL configurations were used for three case studies: a verification study (Case 1), a configuration buildup study (Case 2), and a Reynolds-number variation study (Case 3). Overall, USM3D-ME RANS results aligned with the solutions selected by the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG and available wind tunnel data. Simulations for Case 1 and Configuration 2.1 achieved machine-zero residual convergence, with aerodynamic coefficients converging to steady-state values. However, Configurations 2.2-2.4 and Case 3 encountered iterative- and grid-convergence challenges, particularly at high angles of attack. Compared with the experimental data available for Configurations 2.2-2.4, close agreement was demonstrated at low angles of attack. However, for angles of attack approaching the maximum lift conditions, the predicted lift coefficient and pitching moment deviated from experimental values. The drag-coefficient predictions were in relatively good agreement, however, slight overpredictions were observed at the highest angle of attack corresponding to the maximum-lift condition. Although iterative convergence for Configurations 2.2-2.4 at high angles of attack remains a persistent challenge, averaging aerodynamic coefficients over the last 5000 iterations yielded satisfactory agreement with the available wind tunnel experimental data. During the workshop, the lack of iterative convergence was attributed to the vortex structures emanating from the slat brackets. To investigate this issue further, post-workshop simulations were conducted on Configuration 2.2. In one study, RANS simulations were performed on a simplified geometry with the slat brackets removed. The second study focused on performing unsteady RANS (URANS) simulations on the original Configuration 2.2 geometry. Preliminary results from both studies are presented and compared with wind tunnel data for Configuration 2.2. Consistent with the findings of other participants in the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG, this study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration and advancement in RANS technology for predicting high-lift flows.

Aerodynamics↗

NASA NTRS2008

Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes in the Gulf of Mexico, St. Petersburg, FL

Despite their relatively small surface area, ocean margins may have a significant impact on global biogeochemical cycles and, potentially, the global air-sea fluxes of carbon dioxide. Margins are characterized by intense geochemical and biological processing of carbon and other elements and exchange large amounts of matter and energy with the open ocean. The area-specific rates of productivity, biogeochemical cycling, and organic/inorganic matter sequestration are high in coastal margins, with as much as half of the global integrated new production occurring over the continental shelves and slopes (Walsh, 1991; Doney and Hood, 2002; Jahnke, in press). However, the current lack of knowledge and understanding of biogeochemical processes occurring at the ocean margins has left them largely ignored in most of the previous global assessments of the oceanic carbon cycle (Doney and Hood, 2002). A major source of North American and global uncertainty is the Gulf of Mexico, a large semi-enclosed subtropical basin bordered by the United States, Mexico, and Cuba. Like many of the marginal oceans worldwide, the Gulf of Mexico remains largely unsampled and poorly characterized in terms of its air-sea exchange of carbon dioxide and other carbon fluxes. The goal of the workshop was to bring together researchers from multiple disciplines studying terrestrial, aquatic, and marine ecosystems to discuss the state of knowledge in carbon fluxes in the Gulf of Mexico, data gaps, and overarching questions in the Gulf of Mexico system. The discussions at the workshop were intended to stimulate integrated studies of marine and terrestrial biogeochemical cycles and associated ecosystems that will help to establish the role of the Gulf of Mexico in the carbon cycle and how it might evolve in the face of environmental change.

Air sea exchanges↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Nearfield Anisotropic Mesh Adaptation for the Third AIAA Sonic Boom Workshop

Sonic boom prediction is critical for the development of low-boom supersonic aircraft and encouraging a replacement of the overland commercial supersonic ban with a certification standard. The Third AIAA Sonic Boom Workshop nearfield test cases provide a unique opportunity to review anisotropic adaptive-mesh strategies for complex geometries with important propulsion interaction effects. Anisotropic metrics formulated to control estimated Mach interpolation and integrated nearfield pressure signature (goal-oriented) errors are compared with the results obtained on workshop-provided meshes. Detailed flow solutions and mesh renderings are combined with computational schlieren images to reveal the complex interactions present in a shock-plume interaction wind tunnel model and a prototype of the Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator. A favorable comparison of independent implementations of the entire simulation process provides evidence that each process is implemented correctly and sets a solid foundation for confidence in the nearfield prediction of each method.

sonic boom↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

FUN3D Mesh Adaptation Simulations of 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop Case 1a

Special sessions of the High Lift Prediction/Geometry & Mesh Generation Workshop. Will be written and presented at AIAA Aviation 2022. Describes in detail FUN3D Mesh adaptation simulation results for the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. RANS (Stabilized Finite Element SA-neg) results for Case 1a are presented.

4th High-Lift Prediction Workshop Case 1a↗

NASA NTRS2024

A Summary of the 2023 Joint High-Speed Boundary Layer Transition Workshop

A joint workshop between the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Office of Naval Research, and the NASA Hypersonic Technology Project was held in June 2023 on the topic of high-speed boundary-layer transition. The purpose of this workshop was to gather subject matter experts in the areas of supersonic and hypersonic boundary-layer transition in the areas of geometries of interest, computational methods, facilities and diagnostics, flight experiments, flow control, and new approaches and to discuss the current state of the art in the field. As gaps and accomplishments were identified, roadmaps were also created to guide future investments in these areas. The top recommendations are (1) to define relevant common geometries of interest that can be worked by multiple research groups; (2) improve modeling of high-enthalpy flows involving chemistry and ablation, studies of receptivity of freestream disturbances and atmospheric particulates into the boundary layer, surface feature characterization and modeling of changes to geometry; (3) design and determine viable flow control methods; and (4) move towards incorporating boundary layer transition prediction into a standard practice for design of high-speed vehicles. To execute this last recommendation successfully, investments beyond fundamental (basic and early applied) research are needed.

boundary layer transition↗

NASA NTRS1969

Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Voltage Breakdown in Electronic Equipment at Low Air Pressure

The Second Workshop on Voltage Breakdown in Electronic Equipment at Low Air Pressure was sponsored by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California. It has been three and one-half years since the convening of the first workshop on voltage breakdown. In this interval, gains are evidenced in the progress and sophistication in solving voltage breakdown problems affecting electronic equipment operating at high altitudes or other low air pressure environments. Although space applications predominate the area of concern, other projects such as the SST are becoming increasingly involved with voltage breakdown. High-voltage breakdown in spacecraft continues; however, the incidences of occurrence appear to have decreased in spite of an increase in the number of missions flown. This, it is felt, is due to many project managers now requiring all equipment with voltage in excess of 270-V peak to be designed to operate in the critical pressure region without damage, even though its normal functional environment is sea level pressure and the hard vacuum of space. In addition, designers are becoming more aware of the principle of good high-voltage design by selecting void-free components, proper spacing of conductors, isolating high-voltage circuitry from lower voltage areas, etc. The consensus seems to be that the slight increase in cost to achieve a provable corona-free design is more than offset by the increase in confidence that the equipment will survive accidental loss of vacuum during high-vacuum tests, inadvertent turn on while passing through the critical air-pressure region of earth after launch or outgassing in flight pressurizing the enclosure into the critical pressure region.

E. R. Bunker, Jr.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Experimental evaluation of the Skylab orbital workshop ventilation system concept

Extensive testing was conducted to evaluate the Orbital Workshop ventilation concept. Component tests were utilized to determine the relationship between operating characteristics at 1 and 0.34 atm. System tests were conducted at 1 atm within the Orbital Workshop full-scale mockup to assess delivered volumetric flow rate and compartment air velocities. Component tests with the Anemostat circular diffusers (plenum- and duct-mounted) demonstrated that the diffuser produced essentially equivalent airflow patterns and velocities in 1- and 0.34-atm environments. The tests also showed that the pressure drop across the diffuser could be scaled from 1 to 0.34 atm using the atmosphere pressure ratio. Fan tests indicated that the performance of a multiple, parallel-mounted fan cluster could be predicted by summing the single-fan flow rates at a given delta P.

Allums, S. L.↗