SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “draft”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification
Under the guidance of NASA’s Space Communication and Navigation (SCaN) program, this document, along with its companion documents, LunaNet Services Requirements Document (TBD) and the LunaNet Concept of Operations and Architecture (TBD), provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet) for services to the human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft platform, or node. The expectation is that the needs of NASA, its partners and other users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the combined, cooperative lunar network.
Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification Recording
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
2020 IEEE Paper on Psyche margin management, Draft
In January 2017, the mission concept Psyche: Journey to a Metal World was one of two concepts selected by NASA for implementation as part of the 14th Discovery mission competition. Over the course of the past year, the Psyche team has actively worked to refine and mature the technical design, culminating in a successful completion of the Project Preliminary Design review and approval to proceed to Phase C in mid-2019. Psyche is a deep space mission utilizing solar electric propulsion (SEP), consisting of SPT-140 Hall thrusters which have been successfully employed on multiple commercial spacecraft. When launched, Psyche will carry over 1000 kg of Xenon, and will represent the farthest usage of electric propulsion usage from the Sun – a distance of over 3.3 AU. The use of solar electric propulsion in deep space has resulted in challenges unique to other missions. Spacecraft designs typically balance margins across two main elements – mass and power – that are independent of one another. Utilizing a low thrust trajectory through the application of electric propulsion introduces more elements - namely flight time, missed thrust percentage and thruster duty cycle. Moreover, these elements become connected, presenting additional relationships that must be considered. This paper will present an overview of the margin management process for Psyche, and how it has evolved from the early proposal stage to its current state. It will discuss the elements that are margined, their relationship with one another, and key uncertainties that must be addressed. It discusses challenges and mitigations obtained during the refinement of the Psyche project, culminating in a new margin strategy that enables optimization across many of the system elements, and will serve as a template for future deep space SEP missions.
Draft Genome Sequences of Actinobacterial and Betaproteobacterial Strains Isolated from the Stratosphere
Here, we report the genome sequences of three bacterial isolates that werecultured from aerosol samples collected at altitudes of 18 to 29 km above sea level. The isolates tolerate desiccation and shortwave UV radiation and are members of the actino-bacterial genera Curtobacterium and Modestobacter and the betaproteobacterial genus Noviherbaspirillum.
Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification
This document, along with its companion documents, provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet). LunaNet will include Earth ground stations and orbiting spacecraft and will provide services to human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft, or node. The expectation is that the needs of users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the cooperative lunar network. This document was written and reviewed by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).
Draft LunaNet Interoperability Specification
This document, along with its companion documents, provides the basis for a comprehensive set of requirements for operation of a lunar communications and navigation network capable of interoperating with other networks compliant with the Lunar Network (LunaNet). LunaNet will include Earth ground stations and orbiting spacecraft and will provide services to human exploration, lunar science, and space technology missions. LunaNet will start with a simple architecture of a few nodes to meet the needs of the early missions and evolve to meet the growing needs of a sustained lunar presence. All relay network services are not expected to be met by a single spacecraft, or node. The expectation is that the needs of users will be met through a combination of interoperable systems provided by NASA, international partners, and commercial providers. Interoperability across this network-of-networks can be achieved through negotiation of mutually-agreed-upon standards that will be reflected in this document and in the specifications defined by other participants in the cooperative lunar network. This document was written and reviewed by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).
Probabilistic Performance Assessment for Deep Borehole Disposal of Cs/Sr Capsules - DRAFT.
Abstract not provided.
Finding the Magnetic Center of a Quadrupole to High Resolution - A Draft Proposal
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Final Focus Test Beam Alignment, A Draft Proposal
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Draft-Radiographic Testing Handbook NDT Handbook 4th edition: Volume 3 Radiographic Testing Chapter 6. Principles of Digital Imaging.
Abstract not provided.
High Temperature Reactor Research and Development Roadmap, Draft for Public Comment
Nuclear power provides clean, reliable energy, contributing about 20 percent of the electricity generated in the United States. It supplies approximately 60 percent of our non-greenhouse-gas emitting power, making it our nation’s single largest contributor of carbon-free electricity. This vital component of the U.S. energy portfolio avoids hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year and supports hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs, and yet is facing unprecedented challenges. Complex market factors, falling alternative generation costs and lower electricity demand forecasts have made operating nuclear power plants uneconomical in some parts of the country. The industry is confronting premature shut downs, a lack of new plants in the pipeline, profound market challenges and intense financing requirements. However, none of these challenges reflect a reduced need for this reliable and clean source of baseload power. Our nation’s nuclear sector urgently needs to adjust to these challenges to ensure continued availability of this vital national energy resource. The Department of Energy and its national laboratories are aggressively working to revive, revitalize, and expand U.S. nuclear energy capacity. We are advancing nuclear energy technologies through targeted early-stage investments to ensure a strong domestic industry now and into the future. By leveraging public-private partnerships and the national laboratory system, we are developing an advanced nuclear infrastructure, encouraging a resilient supply chain, and promoting a strong nuclear pipeline. A key element of this effort is to support the recent and rapid expansion in innovative advanced reactor development already being led by the U.S. nuclear industry. Advanced reactors, particularly non-light water reactor concepts, offer the potential for significant improvements to safety, economics and environmental performance, to help sustain and expand the availability of nuclear power as a clean, reliable and secure power source for our nation. As part of this strategy, the Department of Energy commissioned the development of technology roadmaps for advanced non-light-water reactor concepts. The starting point for the roadmaps is the technical readiness assessment performed as part of an advanced test and demonstration reactor study released in 2016 [ ]. The roadmaps show the Research and Development (R&D) needed to support demonstration of advanced reactor concepts, for either engineering demonstration or commercial demonstration depending on concept maturity, by 2035. The starting point for the roadmaps is the technical readiness assessment performed as part of an advanced test and demonstration reactor study released in 2016. The roadmaps were developed based on a review of technical reports and vendor literature summarizing the technical maturity of each concept and the outstanding R&D needs. Tasks for specific systems were highlighted on the basis of time and resources needed to complete the tasks and the importance of the system to the performance of the reactor concept. The roadmaps are intended to be generic (i.e., not specific to a particular vendor’s design); however, features of the General Atomics Energy Multiplier Module were included to provide specific examples for illuminating needed R&D tasks to be conducted in support of demonstration in the near future.
Microalgae Commodities from Coal-Fired Power Plant Flue Gas CO 2 (Draft Final Report, October 1, 2015 to June 30, 2018)
The Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) operates an approximately 900-MWe coal fired-power plant at Stanton Energy Center (SEC), which was the site for this project to develop an integrated process for microalgae utilization of flue gas CO 2 for the production of biofuels and animal feeds. Microalgae have both potentially high yields (tons biomass/acre-year) and can be used for biofuels or high value animal feeds. The high biomass yields of microalgae cultures allows efficient use of land and water resources. They can also use wastewaters, recycle fertilizers, and have lower overall greenhouse gas emissions than conventional biofuels or animal feeds. However, many technical issues and technology gaps related to large-scale algae biomass production still must be resolved before such a process can be scaled-up. In this project, techno-economic analyses (TEAs) and life cycle assessments (LCAs) were carried out, projecting the costs and impacts of large-scale algae biomass cultivation for production of biofuels and animal feeds using OUC-SEC flue gas CO 2 . In addition, 3.5-m 2 (~ 40-ft 2 ) experimental raceway ponds were used for the cultivation of microalgae at OUC-SEC and also at the University of Florida. A large-scale algae farm was designed for a 1,300-acre site (~500-ha) located near the OUC-SEC plant, consisting of 400 hectares (1,000 acres) of paddle wheel mixed raceway ponds (each 4 ha), receiving flue gas piped approximately 3 km (2 miles) from the SEC plant. In the first year of this project (Budget Period 1, BP1), the TEA and LCA studies focused on the production of biogas produced from algae biomass and its use to replace coal at the power plant. However, due to the resulting very high cost of CO 2 mitigation, the process was modified to produce compressed natural gas (‘renewable natural gas’, RNG) for transportation fuel from the biogas, in conjunction with wastewater treatment by the algae cultures. During Budget Period 2 (BP2), the TEA and LCA studies focused on the production of animal feeds by the algae farm, using fresh water and agricultural fertilizers. In this case, CO 2 mitigation costs would be entirely covered if the algal biomass could be sold at between a two to three-fold premium above soybean feed, based on a higher nutritional value for the algal biomass. In support of the above analyses, microalgae cultivation experiments were carried out for over two years during this project in small 3.5-m 2 ponds at both SEC and the University of Florida. The most important results were the demonstration at SEC of the cultivation, on flue gas CO 2 , of filamentous algae biomass, which can be harvested at much lower cost than processes required for the colloidal algae species, as currently used by almost all algal mass culture biofuels and animal feeds projects. The yield of biogas production from the algal biomass was investigated by the University of Florida, and the value of the algal biomass as animal feed was projected based on biochemical analysis of the SEC ad UF biomasses. The conclusion from TEA/LCA carried out for the biogas case in BP1 was that a 400-ha algae system producing biomethane for co-firing at OUC-SEC could generate 27,500 MWh/yr of renewable power, offsetting 28,400 Mg CO 2eq /yr, which amounted to less than 1% of the CO 2 emitted by the SEC plant. (Mg = metric ton = 1.10 short tons). The overall cost was projected at $820/Mg of CO 2eq reduction, making this process unfeasible under any possible scenario. More favorable economics were projected when the biogas was converted to higher value transportation fuel, RNG, which also would benefit from renewable fuel (RINs) and possibly other credits. However, only by combining RNG production with municipal wastewater treatment in the algal ponds would CO 2 utilization result in no net cost or even be economically beneficial (i.e., generate income to the power plant). However, in that case the amount of CO 2 utilization would be even lower than that in the biogas case, because a large fraction of the carbon required would be supplied from the wastewater and CO 2 recovered during biogas upgrading to RNG. In brief, use of power plant CO 2 emissions for algal biofuels production was not favorable, even with optimistic assumptions about biomass productivity and biogas yields. For the animal feed case, developed during BP2, algal biomass would replace soybean feeds. The same scale 400-ha algal production plant was projected to produce 26,280 Mg per year of animal feed with a utilization of 45,300 Mg flue gas CO 2 taken up by the algal biomass. However, the process would result in a projected reduction of 112,500 Mg CO 2eq emissions per year, or roughly 1.9% of OUC-SEC emissions, mainly due to the large CO 2eq emissions from conventional soybean production. A major factor in this analysis were greenhouse gas emissions from land use changes. The cost of CO 2 utilization was projected at $116/Mg if the biomass sold for the same price as soybean meal, but if sold as a premium feed (e.g., based on high omega-3 fatty acid and carotenoid content), the power plant could actually charge for the CO 2 utilized. These economic projections are sensitive to assumptions underlying the TEA and LCA models, including biomass composition and the financial models used to project CAPEX and OPEX. Further development of an algal animal feed production using coal-fired power plant flue gas CO 2 is recommended based on the TEA and LCA, as well as experimental results. The required research and development is detailed in a technology gap analysis (Section 11), which focuses on the demonstrations of the cultivation of higher value filamentous algal biomass at OUC-SEC.
The life story of a helium bubble in a metal tritide: a rough draft.
Abstract not provided.