Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “POLYURETHANES”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Identification and characterization of an oleaginous microalgal base strain for use in bio-based poly-urethane production

In collaboration with Checkerspot, Inc, researchers at ABPDU have successfully demonstrated production of algal lipids at high rate, titer, and yield in fed-batch fermentation. This technology enables high-intensity fermentation of sugars to algal oil, helping to reduce the cost of algal oils as a highly customizable feedstock for development of new bio-based polyurethanes.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Conceptual Basis and Techno-Economic Modeling for Integrated Algal Biorefinery Conversion of Microalgae to Fuels and Products (2019 NREL TEA Update: Highlighting Paths to Future Cost Goals via a New Pathway for Combined Algal Processing)

The report documents the conceptual basis for a new potential Combined Algal Processing design strategy which may allow more flexibility in accommodating different algal biomass feedstock compositions, by enabling upgrading of both protein and carbohydrates in a single step, without a strict requirement for either component to be in soluble or monomeric form, while maintaining effective wet lipid extraction techniques to enable high lipid recoveries. In light of previously-established constraints around algal biomass costs (which are significantly higher than lignocellulosic terrestrial biomass), the present CAP processing strategy reflects an integrated biorefinery concept producing both fuels and value-added chemical coproducts as a means to improve profitability and generate coproduct revenues to help drive down the minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) towards economically viable levels. Namely, this report highlights an integrated CAP biorefinery process and associated technical targets that would be required to achieve U.S. Department of Energy target MFSP goals of $2.5/gallon gasoline equivalent by 2030. This is accomplished by a process involving low-cost seasonal storage of algal biomass during high-growth seasons, rapid flash hydrolysis pretreatment of the biomass, solvent extraction of pretreated biomass, cleanup and fractionation of lipids into triglyceride and free fatty acid fractions, and a series of thermochemical conversion steps to upgrade carbohydrates and protein to hydrocarbon fuels. These steps include mild oxidative treatment (MOT), a process originally investigated at NREL for upgrading lignin, followed by catalytic ketonization and hydrotreating of MOT products to fuels. Isolated triglycerides are sent to a coproduct train, with the base case focused on upgrading to polyurethane foams as a high-value, high-market-volume coproduct.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Monitoring of Unvented Roofs with Fibrous Insulation, Diffusion Vents, and Interior Vapor Control in a Cold Climate

Unvented roof assemblies have been accepted in North American building codes since 2007; code-compliant construction calls for a minimum thickness of “air-impermeable insulation” (based on climate zone) to avoid cold-weather condensation and moisture risks. This is typically implemented with polyurethane spray foam insulation; however, negatives of this material include high first cost and possible adverse environmental impacts. Implementing unvented roofs in a moisture-safe manner with air-permeable fibrous fill insulations (e.g., fiberglass or cellulose) could potentially reduce the first cost of unvented roof designs, allowing for more widespread use. Building unvented roofs in a cost-effective, airtight, and moisture-safe manner opens up options for high-performance house designers and builders.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2026

First ARM Mobile Facility (AMF1) Aerosol Observing System (AOS01) Instrument Handbook

The U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility Mobile Aerosol Observing System – Aerosols (MAOS-A), designated AOS01, entered service in March of 2012 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory for the Pajarito Aerosol Coupling to Ecosystems (PACE) field campaign. The Aerosol Observing System is meant to be a standalone, completely autonomous, aerosol sampling system. It requires only power, 208VAC 1φ or 440 VAC 1φ, and an internet connection to be operational. The physical structure is a standard-sized shipping container, 20 feet long by 8 feet wide. Inside, the walls, ceiling, and floor are insulated using >3.5” of spray polyurethane foam with an R-value of 6.2/inch of insulation. The interior walls, floor and ceiling are lined with ¾” plywood for durability and have integrated unistrut for mounting equipment.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Second ARM Mobile Facility (AMF2) Aerosol Observing System (AOS) Instrument Handbook

The U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility’s second mobile facility (AMF2) Aerosol Observing System, designated AOS02, entered service in October of 2010 at Steamboat Springs, Colorado for the Storm Peak Laboratory Cloud Property Validation Experiment (StormVEx). The Aerosol Observing S ystem is meant to be a standalone, autonomous, aerosol sampling system. It requires only power, 208 or 440 VAC 1φ, and an internet connection to be operational. The physical structure is a standard-sized shipping container, 20 feet long by 8 feet wide. Inside, the walls, ceiling, and floors are insulated using >3.5” of spray polyurethane foam with an R-value of 6.2/inch of insulation. The interior walls, floor, and ceiling are lined with ¾” plywood for durability and have integrated unistrut for mounting equipment.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Third ARM Mobile Facility (AMF3) Aerosol Observing System (AOS) Instrument Handbook

The U.S. Department of Energy ARM user facility’s AMF3 AOS, designated AOS03, entered service in August of 2016 at the ARM Mobile Facility at Oliktok Point, Alaska. The Aerosol Observing System is meant to be a standalone, completely autonomous, aerosol sampling system. It requires only power, 208VAC, and an internet connection to be operational. The physical structure is a standard-sized shipping container, 20 feet long by 8 feet wide. Inside, the walls, ceiling, and floors are insulated using >3.5” of spray polyurethane foam with an R-value of 6.2/inch of insulation. The interior walls, floor, and ceiling are lined with ¾” plywood for durability and have integrated unistrut for mounting equipment.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2020

Eastern North Atlantic (ENA) Aerosol Observing System (AOS) Instrument Handbook

The U.S. Department of Energy ARM user facility’s ENA AOS, designated AOS06, entered service in October of 2013 at the ARM Facility on Graciosa Island, Azores. The Aerosol Observing System is meant to be a standalone, completely autonomous, aerosol sampling system. It requires only power, 208VAC 1φ or 440 VAC 1φ, and an internet connection to be operational. The physical structure is a standard-sized shipping container, 20 feet long by 8 feet wide. Inside, the walls, ceiling, and floors are insulated using >3.5” of spray polyurethane foam with an R-value of 6.2/inch of insulation. The interior walls, floor, and ceiling are lined with ¾” plywood for durability and have integrated unistrut for mounting equipment.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2021

Algal Biomass Conversion to Fuels via Combined Algae Processing (CAP): 2020 State of Technology and Future Research

The annual State of Technology (SOT) assessment is an essential activity for platform research conducted under the Bioenergy Technologies Office. It allows for the impact of research progress to be quantified in terms of economic improvements in the overall biofuel production process for a particular biomass processing pathway, whether based on terrestrial or algal biomass feedstocks. As such, initial benchmarks can be established for currently demonstrated performance, and progress can be tracked towards out-year goals to ultimately demonstrate economically viable biofuel technologies. NREL's algae state of technology benchmarking efforts focus both on front-end algal biomass production and separately on back-end conversion to fuels through NREL's "combined algae processing" (CAP) pathway. The production model is based on outdoor long-term cultivation data, enabled by comprehensive algal biomass production trials conducted under the Development of Integrated Screening, Cultivar Optimization, and Verification Research consortium (DISCOVR) efforts, driven by data furnished by Arizona State University (ASU) at the Arizona Center for Algae Technology and Innovation (AzCATI) testbed site. The CAP model is based on experimental efforts conducted under NREL research and development projects. This report focuses on back-end conversion of algal biomass through the CAP pathway, highlighting the 2020 updates to minimum fuel selling price (MFSP). Notably, this analysis marks the first time that polyurethane (PU) is included as a value-added coproduct in the SOT case. Relative to prior 2019 benchmarks, the 2020 CAP SOT achieved further MFSP reductions of over $4/gallon gasoline equivalent, reflective of (a) the inclusion of PU co-production, (b) reduced SOT biomass production costs, and (c) higher pretreatment sugar yield data.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Sustainable Functional Epoxies through Boric Acid Templating

Thermoset polymers (e.g. epoxies, vulcanizable rubbers, polyurethanes, etc.) are crosslinked materials with excellent thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability; these properties make thermoset materials attractive for use in harsh applications and environments. Unfortunately, material robustness means that these materials persist in the environment with very slow degradation over long periods of time. Balancing the benefits of material performance with sustainability is a challenge in need of novel solutions. Here, we aimed to address this challenge by incorporating boronic acid-amine complexes into epoxy thermoset chemistries, facilitating degradation of the material under pH neutral to alkaline conditions; in this scenario, water acts as an initiator to remove boron species, creating a porous structure with an enhanced surface area that makes the material more amenable to environmental degradation. Furthermore, the expulsion of the boron leaves the residual pores rich in amines which can be exploited for CO 2 absorption or other functionalization. We demonstrated the formation of novel boron species from neat mixing of amine compounds with boric acid, including one complex that appears highly stable under nitrogen atmosphere up to 600 °C. While degradation of the materials under static, alkaline conditions (our “trigger”) was inconclusive at the time of this writing, dynamic conditions appeared more promising. Additionally, we showed that increasing boronic acid content created materials more resistant to thermal degradation, thus improving performance under typical high temperature use conditions.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Algal Biomass Conversion to Fuels via Combined Algae Processing (CAP) (2021 State of Technology and Future Research)

The annual State of Technology (SOT) assessment is an essential activity for platform research conducted under the Bioenergy Technologies Office. It allows for the impact of research progress to be quantified in terms of economic improvements in the overall biofuel production process for a particular biomass processing pathway, whether based on terrestrial or algal biomass feedstocks. As such, initial benchmarks can be established for currently demonstrated performance, and progress can be tracked towards out-year goals to ultimately demonstrate economically viable biofuel technologies. NREL's algae state of technology benchmarking efforts focus both on front-end algal biomass production and separately on back-end conversion to fuels through NREL's "combined algae processing" (CAP) pathway. The production model is based on outdoor long-term cultivation data, enabled by comprehensive algal biomass production trials conducted under the Development of Integrated Screening, Cultivar Optimization, and Verification Research consortium (DISCOVR) efforts, driven by data furnished by Arizona State University (ASU) at the Arizona Center for Algae Technology and Innovation (AzCATI) testbed site. The CAP model is based on experimental efforts conducted under NREL research and development projects. This report focuses on back-end conversion of algal biomass through the CAP pathway, highlighting the 2021 updates to minimum fuel selling price (MFSP). This update maintains an important recent inclusion of polyurethane (PU) previously incorporated in the 2020 SOT as a value-added coproduct. Relative to the 2020 SOT case, this indicates a minimal increase of $0.10-$0.14/GGE (roughly 2%) for both the acids and BDO pathways, attributed to minimal increases in upstream algal biomass costs from slightly lower demonstrated cultivation productivities in the 2021 SOT.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2022

LLNL FY2022 Aging and Lifetimes Exit Criteria: Milestone 8118, GC#3

Adhesives and adhesive-bond joints play a critical role in many applications across the national security enterprise. They are ubiquitous and their aging performance can impact the physical and chemical behavior of complex systems. Previously, we have explored the chemical aging behavior of polyurethane adhesives (Halthane 73-18, Halthane 88-3, and Wilethane 44) exposed to varying levels of radiation and identified the primary chemical degradation products. In this work, we expand upon our analysis to understand how the mechanical properties of adhesives-bonded joints behave after radiation exposure.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2022

Biopolymer Concrete

Cement production for concrete has been responsible for ~7–8% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and nearly equally contribution for steel production processes (EPA, 2020). In order to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, a novel solution has to be investigated. This project aims to develop fundamental mechanistic understanding and experimental characterization to create a 3D printable biopolymer concrete using plant-based polyurethane as an innovative and sustainable alternative for Portland cement concrete, with significantly low carbon footprint. Future construction will utilize the advances in digital additive manufacturing (3D printing) to produce optimal geometries with a minimum waste of materials. Understanding the polymerization process, factors impacting the composite rheology, and the structural behavior of this biopolymer concrete will enable us to engineer the next generation of concrete structures with low carbon footprint. This project aims to improve the nation’s ability to control Greenhouse Gas emission neutrality for the set goal of 2050 via introducing a structurally viable bio-based polymer concrete.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Carbon Electrodes from Powder River Basin Coal Development of Competitive Supercapacitor Electrodes of Diverse Compositions from Coal Extract

Recent demand for coal as a thermal energy source has decreased significantly and will likely continue to decrease as renewable sources of energy become more available and environmental concern and cost from burning coal makes it more costly than renewables. Given that Powder River Basin (PRB) coal in Wyoming has relatively low thermal energy, it is critical for Wyoming to employ coal in other capacities at the current energy transition period in history. Among many potential non-thermal applications, PRB coal can be utilized for membrane and electrode applications through the formation of carbon fibers. Coal-derived membranes can become low-cost, conductive membranes for use in electrodialysis separation processes. Carbon fiber derived electrodes have been shown be a cost-effective alternative to typical electrode materials that can meet or exceed the performance of current carbon electrode materials. In this talk, we demonstrate the manufacture of supercapacitor electrodes from Powder River Basin (PRB) coal-derived precursors. Specifically, PRB coal was treated in cheap solvents, partitioned into liquid extract and solid residue. An electropinning process has been developed that can convert either the liquid extract or the solid residue into carbon fiber mats. The electrospinning process is versatile with many tunable process parameters to achieve desirable physiochemical properties. For example, the coal residue can be manipulated by additional heat treatment, or by adding binders, salts, or surfactants to create a solution that can be electrospun into advanced carbon electrodes with desirable structural and surface properties. Similarly, some of the liquid extract (tar fraction) can be subsequently reacted with toluene diisocyanate to create resinous coal-derived polyurethane (PUs) as a spinnable ink. Carbon nanofiber mats made from our proprietary electrospinning process were further carbonized at temperature ranging from 700°C to 900°C before they are used as electrodes in supercapacitors. Galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) results show that the best performing PU fiber mats can deliver a specific capacitance of 604 F g -1 at the current density of 1 A g -1 . A carbon fiber mat from a different solvent extraction residue also delivered the specific capacitance of 508 F g -1 . These specific capacitance values are comparable to or better than commercial activated carbons, demonstrating the viability of manufacturing carbon nanofiber electrodes from coal without the use of a commercial polymer as binder in the spinning ink.

Cincotta, Robert↗
DOE OSTI2023

Radiation Hardened Foam Cold Test Plan - Phase II: Foam Characterization Testing and Environmental Chamber Testing of FoamBag Fixative Foam

This document outlines the Phase II test objectives and implementation plan for a down-select foam fixative technology intended to facilitate activities in support of the Savannah River Site (SRS) F/H labs deactivation and decommissioning (D&D) efforts. It is a collaborative effort between Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), Florida International University (FIU), and the SRS F/H labs team intended to test and evaluate the potential of a polyurethane resin foam in mitigating the release of contamination during dismantling operations on radioactively contaminated piping in legacy facilities. The cold test plan addresses specific requirements highlighted by site and safety personnel and will be executed at FIU and SRNL test and lab facilities. Results from the cold tests will inform the hot test at F/H labs, which will use the foam fixative to confine and/or isolate residual contamination within a 3-dimensional void space of Hastelloy C-22 piping designated for removal from the area and transported to a designated disposal facility. Phase I testing was previously conducted using Hilti CP620 fixative foam. Results from Phase I testing indicate Hilti CP-620 fixative foam is incompatible with SRS site hot taps as an effective foam delivery method into Hastelloy C-22 piping. Phase II testing will be conducted using FoamBag TM fixative foam as an alternative fixative foam option. Phase II testing will address eight test objectives: (1) evaluation of the adhesion and bonding properties of FoamBag TM in Hastelloy C-22 piping, (2) evaluation of the adhesion of FoamBag TM in piping under various moisture conditions, (3) determination of the heat profile of FoamBag TM during curing, (4) determination of the internal pipe pressure after FoamBag TM deployment and curing, (5) conduct a leak test to determine if FoamBag TM is effective at creating a full seal within piping, (6) headspace testing of FoamBag TM to determine if there are any associated off-gas hazards during FoamBag TM curing, (7) conduct environmental chamber testing of FoamBag TM to understand how environmental parameters impacts FoamBag TM curing, and (8) conduct fire testing to evaluate FoamBag TM fire retardant characteristics.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Foam Degradation Model during Thermal Hypothetical Accident Conditions

Current practice in Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP) thermal analysis for hypothetical accident conditions (HAC) of packages is to not explicitly model the consequence to the foam impact limiting material, but instead to make conservative estimates of those consequences and begin calculations from that point. This approach is typically used for the foam regression distance, which is the thickness of the degraded foam layer after the 30-minute fire event. Estimates for regression distance can come directly from package burn test results or from correlations based on one-dimensional testing by the foam manufacturer. In either case, this is a subjective process, and although it can be used to produce a conservative result, it is a significant approximation in the analysis. This paper describes testing and refinement of a simplified foam regression model. Comparisons are made against available data from laboratory experiments. Model refinements were tested until satisfactory agreement was achieved. The final modeling approach was then compared with post-test inspection results from HAC burn test data. A new model with an effective thermal conductivity based on foam to char density variation was shown successful in representing laboratory-scale foam thermal degradation experiments and full-scale burn tests of a current package. This model offers a technically defensible and predictive approach for modeling thermal degradation of rigid polyurethane insulation in transport packages.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

Algal Biomass Conversion to Fuels via Combined Algae Processing (CAP): 2022 State of Technology and Future Research

The annual State of Technology (SOT) assessment is an essential activity for platform research conducted under the Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO). It allows for the impact of research progress (both directly achieved in-house at NREL and furnished by partner organizations) to be quantified in terms of economic improvements in the overall biofuel production process for a particular biomass processing pathway, whether based on terrestrial or algal biomass feedstocks. As such, initial benchmarks can be established for currently demonstrated performance, and progress can be tracked toward out-year goals to ultimately demonstrate economically viable biofuel technologies. NREL's algae SOT benchmarking efforts focus both on front-end algal biomass production and separately on back-end conversion to fuels through NREL's "combined algae processing" (CAP) pathway. The production model is based on outdoor long-term cultivation data, enabled by comprehensive algal biomass production trials conducted under Development of Integrated Screening, Cultivar Optimization, and Verification Research (DISCOVR) consortium efforts and driven by data furnished by Arizona State University's (ASU's) Arizona Center for Algae Technology and Innovation (AzCATI) test bed site. The CAP model is primarily based on experimental efforts conducted under NREL research and development projects, with some process parameters provided by partner organizations. Assumptions regarding the wet storage of algae use data provided by Idaho National Laboratory (INL), while parts of the polyurethane production process leverage BETO-funded research from collaborators at Algenesis and the University of California, San Diego (UCSD). This report focuses on back-end conversion of algal biomass through the CAP pathway, highlighting the 2022 updates to minimum fuel selling price (MFSP). This update incorporates improvements to fermentation performance for two biological pathways through carboxylic acid and 2,3-butanediol (BDO) intermediates, as demonstrated through parallel research on the biochemical conversion of corn stover. Improvements are applied to the glucose fraction of the biomass only, while parameters regarding the conversion of the mannose fraction (not a significant component in corn stover) are maintained consistently with prior CAP SOTs. Additional parameters are also updated to reflect the most current understanding of each pathway, including an increase in the catalyst loading requirement in the ketonization step of the acids pathway and a decrease in the fermentation productivity in the BDO pathway. Additionally, the biomass feedstock costs (minimum biomass selling price [MBSP]), yields, and seasonal variability from the upstream cultivation SOT model were also incorporated into downstream Aspen Plus CAP models.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗
DOE OSTI2023

CRADA Number NFE-20-08283 with Actinic LLC (CRADA Final Report)

Significant advances have been made in the additive manufacturing (AM) of thermoplastics and optically cured thermosets; however, AM of thermally cured thermosets has lagged. Materials belonging to this class of thermosets, such as silicone rubbers and polyurethanes, are not well represented in the AM space despite their widespread use in medical, defense, and other fields. Ideally, a solution would enable AM of current commercially viable thermally cured thermosets with a speed that is comparable to those already realized for thermoplastics and optically cured thermosets. Realizing this goal will provide several benefits, including: 1. Make thermally cured thermoset designs impossible via casting. 2. Iteration of part designs without investment in new molds. 3. Devices and personal protection equipment, custom-fit to the end-user. 4. Ability to print multifunctional composite materials. 5. Rapid production ability for DoD personnel deployed at forward locations. 6. Simplify supply chains and replace multiple parts with a single raw material. These benefits motivate the development of a commercially viable 3D printer for thermally cured thermosets, based on the technique of photothermal curing. This project further developed a printer capable of printing composites containing commercially available thermally cured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), directly yielding cured parts such as boxes, walls, and free-standing overhangs.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Climate Impact of Primary Plastic Production

Plastics show the strongest production growth of all bulk materials over the last decade. The industry’s current growth trajectory is exponential and plastic production is expected to double or triple by 2050. The rapidly increasing production of plastics and the continued reliance on fossil fuels for production, have contributed to numerous environmental problems and health harms. As a result, plastic pollution has become an increasing threat to natural ecosystems, human health and climate. However, there is a lack of granularity on the contribution of the primary plastics specifically to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their impact on the remaining global carbon budget needed to stay below a 1.5°C or 2°C global average temperature rise. In this report, we explore the contribution of primary plastic production to climate change disaggregated by polymer and technology. To this end, we have developed comprehensive bottom-up modeling of GHG emissions from global primary plastic production, with a special focus on polymer value chains. We have analyzed the results under various growth scenarios in the context of carbon budgets compatible with a 1.5°C global trajectory. Modeling includes the material flows of all production stages, processes and technologies used in primary plastic production value chains, including from the extraction of fossil fuels required for production to shaping the final product. We specifically focus on nine major types of fossil fuelbased plastic polymers that are produced and consumed in large quantities: three types of polyethylene (PE) – low-density (LDPE), linear low-density (LLDPE), and high-density (HDPE) – as well as polypropylene (PP); polyethylene terephthalate (PET); polyvinyl chloride (PVC); polystyrene (PS) and other key styrene-based plastics such as styrene acrylonitrile (SAN) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and polyurethane (PU). Together these account for about 80% of plastics production.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗