SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Aerodynamic characteristics of aircraft configuration for low level supersonic attack tested in transonic wind tunnel
Transonic wind tunnel study of aerodynamic characteristics of blunt reentry vehicles at varying angles of attack
Transient and steady state aerodynamic flow of turbulent boundary layers are investigated for generalized cylindrical projections and several specific configurations used on the Saturn 5 launch vehicle. A transonic wind tunnel gave generalized information.
Transonic wind tunnel studies on airfoil to determine effects of Reynolds number and boundary layer transition location on shock induced separated flow
Transonic wind tunnel tests of aerodynamic drag and lift forces on circular cylinder in two dimensional flow at high Reynolds number
Data reduction of transonic wind tunnel static pressure variation tests for correcting Saturn 5 data
Transonic wind tunnel background noise measurement for analysis of Saturn 5 model protuberance test data
Transonic wind tunnel tests of vertical fin loads and rudder hinge moments on M2-F3 lifting body scale model at Mach 0.50 to 1.30
Transonic wind tunnel investigation of flow characteristics and pressure fluctuation of space shuttle launch and reentry configurations
Transonic wind tunnel tests to determine static aerodynamic characteristics of space shuttle models
A 0.015 scale model of a modified version of the MDAC space shuttle booster was tested in the Naval Ship Research and Development Center 7 x 10 foot transonic wind tunnel, to obtain force, static stability, and control effectiveness data. Data were obtained for a cruise Mach Number of 0.38, altitude of 10,000 ft, and Reynolds Number per foot of approximately 2 x one million. The model was tested through an angle of attack range of -4 deg to 15 deg at zero degree angle of sideslip, and at an angle of sideslip range of -6 deg to 6 deg at fixed angles of attack of 0 deg, 6 deg, and 15 deg. Other test variables were elevon deflections, canard deflections, aileron deflections, rudder deflections, wing dihedral angle, canard incidence angle, wing incidence angle, canard position, wing position, wing and canard control flap size and dorsal fin size.
Data are presented, in plotted form, of tests for determining the interference effects of space shuttle booster cruise engine location for power-on and power-off conditions. The tests were conducted in a 7 x 10 foot transonic wind tunnel; the model was a 0.015-scale space shuttle booster specially equipped for propulsion effects testing. Data were obtained over a Mach number range of 0.4 to 1.13 at angles of attack from -4 deg to 20 deg at zero degrees sideslip and at angles of sideslip from -6 deg to +6 deg at constant angles of attack of 0 deg, 6 deg, 15 deg, and in some cases 10 deg. Additional parameters investigated were: elevon deflection, canard deflection, aileron deflection, rudder deflection, canard position, and mass flow rate.
The changes in thrust minus drag performance as well as longitudinal and directional stability and control characteristics of a single-engine jet aircraft attributable to an in-flight thrust reverser of the blocker-deflector door type were investigated in a 16-foot transonic wind tunnel. The longitudinal and directional stability data are presented. Test conditions simulated landing approach conditions as well as high speed maneuvering such as may be required for combat or steep descent from high altitude.
Overall fluctuating pressure levels of seven space shuttle launch configurations are presented. The model was a 4-percent-scale space shuttle vehicle, tested in both a 11- by 11-foot transonic wind tunnel and a 9- by 7-foot supersonic wind tunnel. Mach numbers varied from 0.8 to 2.2, and the angle of attack range was from -8 deg to 8 deg at angles of sideslip of -5 deg, and 5 deg. The model configurations included both series-burn and parallel-burn configurations, two canopy configurations, two positions of the orbiter nose relative to the HO tank nose and two HO tank nose-cone angles (15 deg and 20 deg). The fluctuating pressure levels are presented in three forms.
An experimental investigation was conducted in an 11- by 11-foot transonic wind tunnel to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of three oblique high aspect ratio wings in combination with a high fineness-ratio Sears-Haack body. The three wings had the same elliptical planform and base line curvature but had different airfoil sections. One wing had an airfoil section designed to have a lift coefficient of 1.0 at a Mach number of 0.7, another to have shock-free supersonic flow over the upper surface, and the other to have a lift coefficient of 1.3 at a Mach number of 0.6. Longitudinal and lateral-directional stability data were obtained at wing yaw angles of 0 deg, 45 deg, 50 deg, and 60 deg over a test Mach number range from 0.6 to 1.4 for angles of attack between minus 7 deg and 9 deg. Reynolds numbers for the study were 4 and 6 million per foot. Flow-visualization studies were made to examine the nature of the flow on the wing surfaces. Notable differences were found in the aerodynamic characteristics of the three wing-body combinations, particularly in the lateral-directional characteristics.
The effects of test model element misalignments on test results were investigated. Transonic wind tunnel-573 was designed to study these misalignment effects in detail by purposely misaligning model elements a known amount. Misalignments in TWT-573 were achieved by use of special off-set spacers and mounting hardware to change, yaw, pitch and roll on various elements of a 0.004-Scale PRR Baseline space shuttle configuration model. By comparing the misalignment runs to the nominal configuration with no misalignment, relative effects of the misalignment could be seen. This data was obtained over a Mach range of .9 to 1.46 using an angle of attack sweep of minus 10 deg to plus 10 deg in 2 deg increments.
Nonsteady features of a Whitcomb-type supercritical airfoil flowfield were studied in a series of transonic wind tunnel experiments. Data consisted of mean and fluctuating pressures on the airfoil and in the free stream, velocity fluctuations in the wake region, and airfoil vibrations. Fluctuation data were analyzed statistically for intensity, frequency content, and spatial coherence; variations in these parameters were correlated with changes in the mean airfoil flowfield. Surface pressure fluctuation intensity was influenced primarily by the location and motion of the upper-surface shock, the existence of separation, and (downstream of the shock) the development and upstream propagation of 'shocklets'. Power spectra of pressure fluctuations showed characteristics differences up- and downstream of the shock. Chordwise and spanwise coherences were considerably reduced in the presence of separation. Downwash fluctuations at the edge of the wake were noticeably affected only by the development of trailing-edge flow separation.
Shadowgraphs of five space shuttle launch configurations are presented. The model was a 4 percent-scale space shuttle vehicle, tested in the 11- by 11-foot Transonic Wind Tunnel at Ames Research Center. The Mach number was varied from 0.8 to 1.4 with three angles of sideslip (0 deg, 5 deg and -5 deg) that were used in conjunction with three angles of attack (4 deg, -4 deg, and 0 deg). The model configurations included both series-burn and parallel-burn configurations, two canopy configurations, two positions of the orbiter nose relative to the HO tank nose, and two HO tank nose-cones angles (15 deg and 20 deg). The data consist entirely of shadowgraph photographs.